Acórdão em Relação that revokes a previous sentence from Desembargadores dos Agravos, judging António de Saldanha, qualified opponent, who presented a supplication, as the rightful successor of the entails of Oliveira, founded by D. Martinho Pires de Oliveira, archbishop of Braga, and Vale de Sobrados, founded by D. Rodrigo, bishop of Lamego and son of D. Martinho, because it is proven that those who were not born when the last administrator died can succeed.

Acórdão do Desembargo partially confirming and partially revoking the previous sentence from Corregedor do Cível da Corte. It judges Cristóvão de Almada, plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the entails of Oliveira, founded by D. Martinho Pires de Oliveira, archbishop of Braga, and Vale de Sobrados, founded by D. Rodrigo, bishop of Lamego and son of D. Martinho, because he was the only candidate already born when his uncle, Luís Francisco de Oliveira, died. It condemns the defendants to relinquish to him the entailed assets, with their income generated since the contested lawsuit until their return. It is proven that the entail of Vale de Sobrados is not separated from the entail of Oliveira and both are administrated by the same person.

Court proceedings regarding the succession of the entails of Oliveira, founded by D. Martinho Pires de Oliveira, archbishop of Braga, and Vale de Sobrados, founded by D. Rodrigo, bishop of Lamego and son of D. Martinho, both administrated by the same person.

Court sentence judging Fernando de Saldanha, represented and administrated by his father, João de Saldanha, opponent, as the rightful successor of the entail of Oliveira, founded by D. Martinho Pires de Oliveira, archbishop of Braga, because he is the closest male relative of the last administrator, and condemning Cristóvão de Almada, plaintiff, and D. Maria de Oliveira and her husband, D. Diogo de Meneses, defendants, to relinquish to him the entailed assets, with their income generated since the death of D. Pedro, the defendants son, until their return. It is proven that the entail is only of male succession and not of agnation. It also judges that the property of Vale de Sobrados, claimed as belonging to the entail founded by D. Rodrigo, bishop of Lamego and son of D. Martinho, and the properties of the entail of Oliveira belong all to a same entail.

Documents produced by the entail.