Acórdão em relação ordering Isabel Eanes, Pedro da Costa's widow and administrator of Bartolomeu Cristóvão's chapel, to fulfil its pious obligations and demanding the delimitation of the entail's assets. Followed by the measurement of its properties. It is mentioned that, at the time of the issuance of this document, was unknown what had become of the entail established by Bartolomeu Cristóvão to be administrated by João Martins.
Acordão em relação nullifying a previous sentence by considering valid the sale of the houses which had belonged to Vicente Soares de Vilas Boas. They had been entailed to the chapel established by their father, Manuel Soares de Vilas Boas e Vilhegas, which was administered by Jerónimo Soares de Vilhegas.
Acórdão em relação (extract) which opposed the Procurador da Coroa and the defendant Henrique Pestana, administrator of the chapel founded by Aldonça Afonso. There is no foundation deed of the chapel, but its content is reported in an administration letter of the king D. Manuel from 1501.
Acórdão em Relação judging Josefa Fragoso Boto, opponent, as the rightful successor of the chapels of Diogo Boto, in the farmstead (herdade) of Zambujeiro, in the parish of Nossa Senhora do Escourão, in the outskirts of Montemor-o-Novo, Henrique Mendes Casco and Maria Mouzinho, in the church of S. Domingos of Évora, Teresa da Silveira, in the chapter of the monastery of S. Francisco of Évora, in the monastery of S. Domingos of Évora, and in the farmstead (herdade) of Silveira, in the outskirts of Redondo, and Miguel Pegas, in the monastery of S. Francisco of Évora, all denounced as vacant to the Crown by the late José da Costa Castelo Branco, the original plaintiff, because she is the daughter of a natural daughter of António Fragoso and niece of Álvaro de Ataíde, the last and legitimate administrators, and because there is not legitimate relatives of the institutors. It condemns the children of António Correia Pereira and D. Filipa de Melo, defendants, to relinquish the chapels to the opponent, with their income generated since the opposition, and judges the chapels as absolutas and not vacant to the Crown. It is mentioned that Diogo Boto had founded his chapel in a will made in 1530-08-20 and had bequeathed it to his brother, André Boto, and afterwards to his cousin, João Boto, father of D. Teresa da Silveira. Henrique Mendes Casco and Maria Mouzinho had founded their chapel in a dowry deed to their niece, D. Teresa da Silveira, daughter of João Boto da Silveira and Margarida Vaz Pegas, dated 1584-07-17. D. Teresa da Silveira had founded three chapels in her will, made in 1621-12-12, the first one for her nephew António Fragoso de Ataíde, the second one for her niece D. Constança Lobo and the third one for her nephew Rui Lopes da Silveira. Miguel Pegas had founded his chapel in a will made in 1530-04-08 and had bequeathed it to his uncle, cónego João Rodrigues, and after his death to his cousin, Lucas Rodrigues, and to his descendants.
Acórdão em Relação confirming a previous sentence from Desembargadores dos Agravos and ordering its fulfilment. It condemns the suitor (suplicante) to pay the proceedings' expenses and to lose the deposited guarantee.
Acórdão em Relação judging the opponent, D. António da Silveira and his qualified son, D. Álvaro da Silveira, as the rightful successor of the entail of D. Fernando Coutinho, marechal do reino, located in Valverde dos Cavaleiros, Quinta da Pega and in the outskirts of Pinhel, because he is descendant of D. Beatriz Coutinho, daughter of the institutor, by her male son line, while Marquês de Távora, plaintiff, descends from her daughter. It condemns the Procurador da Fazenda and the defendant, excluded from the succession because she and her father are natural sons, altought she is the granddaughter of the last administrator, to relinquish the entailed assets to the opponent.
Acórdão em Relação that orders the fulfilment of the sentence from Corregedor do Cível da Corte, declaring that the defendants only should pay the income generated since the contested lawsuit.
Acórdão em Relação condemning Maria Madalena, defendant, to relinquish the entail of Padre Francisco Dias, vigário of the parish of Esgueira, to Maria de Resende, plaintiff and the rightful successor, with the income generated since the contested lawsuit. It refers that the assets of Padre Francisco Dias were not divided by his heirs, that Pedro Godinho Barbosa, second administrator, founded a chapel in the church of Esgueira, and that the entail of Padre Francisco Dias was founded by collateral relatives.
Acórdão em Relação condemning the Procurador da Fazenda to relinquish to Matias Varregoso, plaintiff, 16 alqueires of cereal entailed to the chapel of João Afonso, founded in the farmstead of Pimpolho, which were alienated and belong to Inácio da Costa, absent in Castile.
Acórdão em Relação judging António de Miranda, opponent, as the rightful successor of the entail of Manuel de Miranda, because he is descendant from Guiomar de Miranda, the institutor's sister, and from Maria de Miranda, her daughter, and condemning Francisco de Sousa Cid and his wife, D. Maria de Sousa, defendants, to relinquish the entail to him, with the income generated since the contested lawsuit. It excludes Pedro de Melo, plaintiff, who received the entail's administration, allegedly vacant to the Crown, from the king, and D. Maria de Sousa, defendant, because her consanguinity was forged and she is the daughter of her mother's second husband, Licenciado Manuel da Costa, and not of Simão de Miranda, the first administrator.
Acórdão em Relação revoking a previous sentence from a judge determining D. Ana de Sequeira, plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the entail of Margarida Lobo, because she is the only daughter of Diogo Pires Reimão, nephew of the institutor. Since Marcos Raposo Figueira and his wife, defendants, are not related to the institutor, they are condemned to relinquish the entailed assets to the plaintiff, with their income since the contested lawsuit.
Acórdão em Relação judging Luís Gonçalves de Sousa de Macedo, plaintiff, as the rightful owner of the entailed assets of D. Maria Manuel, institutor, and four parts of the reserved portions of her four children who stayed in Castille, after the partition of the assets of D. Jorge Manuel, the institutor's father, who bequethed them to her and to her sister, D. Briolanja de Aragão. João de Ilhoa de Vasconcelos and his wife, D. Marcelina Manuel de Aragão, defendants, are condemned to pay the proceedings' expenses.
Acórdão em relação (transcription) judging D. Maria de Lencastre as the rightful successor of the entail of João Gomes da Silva, since she was the daughter of the penultimate administrator, João Gomes da Silva, the sister of Luís da Silva, the last administrator, and the entail was not of agnatic succession, as Fernando Teles de Meneses, plaintiff and D. Maria's uncle, argued. It is mentioned that João Gomes da Silva founded an entail through his will and left it to his only son, Luís da Silva, declaring that its succession should respect the clauses determined by Rui Teles, his grandfather, when he instituted the entail which was eventually inherited by João's father, Brás Teles. Luís da Silva inherited that entail and the patronage of the monastery of Chagas of Lamego.
Acórdão em Relação that revokes a previous sentence from Desembargadores dos Agravos, judging António de Saldanha, qualified opponent, who presented a supplication, as the rightful successor of the entails of Oliveira, founded by D. Martinho Pires de Oliveira, archbishop of Braga, and Vale de Sobrados, founded by D. Rodrigo, bishop of Lamego and son of D. Martinho, because it is proven that those who were not born when the last administrator died can succeed.
Acórdão em Relação from Desembargo revoking a previous sentence from Corregedor, absolving the defendants from the requested by the plaintiff, because this one does not prove that he is from the institutor's bloodline and in the foundation deed it is not included the illegitimate exclusion.
Acórdão em Relação revoking the sentence of Desembargadores dos Agravos da Casa da Suplicação and ordering the fulfilment of the sentence of Corregedor da Corte. It condemns the appellee to pay the proceedings expenses and the income.
Acórdão em Relação condemning the defendants, the widow of Manuel Correia de Mancelos and Procurador da Fazenda, to pay to the plaintiff, daughter of Manuel Correia de Mancelos and administrator, the amount corresponding to the available portion of Francisco Correia da Costa, who ordered it in his entail foundation deed. This amount comes from the seized assets of Manuel Correia de Mancelos, the institutor's son and first administrator. The amount will be relinquish to the plaintiff with its income generated since the death of her father.
Acórdão em Relação absolving Manuel Correia Calvos, defendant, from the request of Joana Ferreira Pinto, plaintiff, declaring him as the rightful administrator of the entail of Francisco Ferreira, with the obligation of masses in his Chapel of Nossa Senhora do Loreto, located in Torgueda, because he was appointed by his uncle and last administrator, Jacinto Ferreira. Although the plaintiff is daughter of the institutor, she was not appointed by him if the first administrator had not descendants.
Acórdão em Relação judging Josefa Fragoso Boto, opponent, as the rightful successor of the chapels of Diogo Boto, in the farmstead (herdade) of Zambujeiro, in the parish of Nossa Senhora do Escourão, in the outskirts of Montemor-o-Novo, Henrique Mendes Casco and Maria Mouzinho, in the church of S. Domingos of Évora, Teresa da Silveira, in the chapter of the monastery of S. Francisco of Évora, in the monastery of S. Domingos of Évora, and in the farmstead (herdade) of Silveira, in the outskirts of Redondo, and Miguel Pegas, in the monastery of S. Francisco of Évora, all denounced as vacant to the Crown by the late José da Costa Castelo Branco, the original plaintiff, because she is the daughter of a natural daughter of António Fragoso and niece of Álvaro de Ataíde, the last and legitimate administrators, and because there is not legitimate relatives of the institutors. It condemns the children of António Correia Pereira and D. Filipa de Melo, defendants, to relinquish the chapels to the opponent, with their income generated since the opposition, and judges the chapels as absolutas and not vacant to the Crown. It is mentioned that Diogo Boto had founded his chapel in a will made in 1530-08-20 and had bequeathed it to his brother, André Boto, and afterwards to his cousin, João Boto, father of D. Teresa da Silveira. Henrique Mendes Casco and Maria Mouzinho had founded their chapel in a dowry deed to their niece, D. Teresa da Silveira, daughter of João Boto da Silveira and Margarida Vaz Pegas, dated 1584-07-17. D. Teresa da Silveira had founded three chapels in her will, made in 1621-12-12, the first one for her nephew António Fragoso de Ataíde, the second one for her niece D. Constança Lobo and the third one for her nephew Rui Lopes da Silveira. Miguel Pegas had founded his chapel in a will made in 1530-04-08 and had bequeathed it to his uncle, cónego João Rodrigues, and after his death to his cousin, Lucas Rodrigues, and to his descendants.
Acórdão em Relação judging Josefa Fragoso Boto, opponent, as the rightful successor of the chapels of Diogo Boto, in the farmstead (herdade) of Zambujeiro, in the parish of Nossa Senhora do Escourão, in the outskirts of Montemor-o-Novo, Henrique Mendes Casco and Maria Mouzinho, in the church of S. Domingos of Évora, Teresa da Silveira, in the chapter of the monastery of S. Francisco of Évora, in the monastery of S. Domingos of Évora, and in the farmstead (herdade) of Silveira, in the outskirts of Redondo, and Miguel Pegas, in the monastery of S. Francisco of Évora, all denounced as vacant to the Crown by the late José da Costa Castelo Branco, the original plaintiff, because she is the daughter of a natural daughter of António Fragoso and niece of Álvaro de Ataíde, the last and legitimate administrators, and because there is not legitimate relatives of the institutors. It condemns the children of António Correia Pereira and D. Filipa de Melo, defendants, to relinquish the chapels to the opponent, with their income generated since the opposition, and judges the chapels as absolutas and not vacant to the Crown. It is mentioned that Diogo Boto had founded his chapel in a will made in 1530-08-20 and had bequeathed it to his brother, André Boto, and afterwards to his cousin, João Boto, father of D. Teresa da Silveira. Henrique Mendes Casco and Maria Mouzinho had founded their chapel in a dowry deed to their niece, D. Teresa da Silveira, daughter of João Boto da Silveira and Margarida Vaz Pegas, dated 1584-07-17. D. Teresa da Silveira had founded three chapels in her will, made in 1621-12-12, the first one for her nephew António Fragoso de Ataíde, the second one for her niece D. Constança Lobo and the third one for her nephew Rui Lopes da Silveira. Miguel Pegas had founded his chapel in a will made in 1530-04-08 and had bequeathed it to his uncle, cónego João Rodrigues, and after his death to his cousin, Lucas Rodrigues, and to his descendants.
Acórdão em Relação judging Beatriz Rodrigues, plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the chapel of Maria Luís, founded in a property in Bera, in the outskirts of Coimbra, because she is aunt and the closest relative of the last administrator, Padre Manuel Teixeira, and females are not excluded by the foundation deed. It condemns João das Neves, plaintiff, to relinquish the entailed assets, with their income generated since the death of Padre Manuel Teixeira.
Acórdão em Relação declaring that the succession of the chapel of doutor Lourenço Coelho Leitão and D. Ana Cardosa, his wife, belongs to the plaintiff, not named, because he his descendant of doutor Jerónimo Gomes Leitão, nephew of doutor Lourenço Coelho Leitão and the first successor appointed by him. It condemns the plaintiff, not named, to relinquish to the plaintiff the chapel's assets, with their income generated since the undue occupation, when the defendant's father took possession of them, until their return. The plaintiff or her child will live in Viseu or in its outskirts, as imposed by the institutor.
Acórdão em Relação judging the end of a reprisal imposed against the entails of Lopo Rodrigues de Évora e Veiga, Nicolau da Veiga and Bernardo da Veiga, his sons, and their income when their administrator, D. Lopo de Meneses, o Roxo, was absent in Castile and D. João IV was acclaimed as king of Portugal. It also orders the return to D. Lopo Rodrigues de Évora e Veiga, plaintiff (suplicante) and administrator of the three entails, of the entailed assets and public debt instruments, with their income generated since the peace publication.
Acórdão em Relação which revokes a previous sentence from Desembargadores dos Agravos, given in favour of Padre Diogo de Oliveira. Now that it is proven that he professed in Companhia de Jesus, the judges determined the loss of his administration of the chapel of Diogo de Oliveira and recognised the right of Diogo do Casal to claim that administration, if he abandons his religious condition.
Acórdão em Relação condemning capitão António Arrais de Mendonça and his wife, defendants, to pay to Ângela de Almeida, plaintiff and administrator, 20 medidas of bread as annual rent of Campo da Eira, with its houses, and Campo da Bica, belonging to the chapel of Diogo Dias and Madalena Francisca, his wife. The defendants argue that the properties were improperly sold by the grandfather of capitão António Arrais de Mendonça's wife, administrator of the entail of Quinta da Costa, founded by Afonso Pinheiro, to Diogo Dias, but it is proven that the properties were sold as free and not entailed estate.
Acórdão em Relação partially confirming and partially revoking the previous sentences from Juiz dos Órfãos. It distinguishes the entailed assets from those belonging to the available portion of the late Simão Mateus.
Acórdão em relação (transcription) condemning the defendant, not named, to relinquish to Pedro, minor, administrator of the entail of Beatriz Ribeiro and son of the plaintiff, not named, an entailed public debt instrument, which was seized to pay a debt, and, before the auction, was incorporated in the king's assets and donated by the king to the defendant as a reward for his services. This public debt instrument had been left by Beatriz Ribeiro to her brother, Baltasar Ribeiro, after his death it had passed to D. Maria de Gouveia, who had passed it to her daughter, Antónia Josefa de Sousa, mother of D. Maria Teresa de Ayala, Pedro's mother.
Acórdão em Relação that revokes a previous sentence from Desembargadores dos Agravos, judging António de Saldanha, qualified opponent, who presented a supplication, as the rightful successor of the entails of Oliveira, founded by D. Martinho Pires de Oliveira, archbishop of Braga, and Vale de Sobrados, founded by D. Rodrigo, bishop of Lamego and son of D. Martinho, because it is proven that those who were not born when the last administrator died can succeed.
Acórdão em Relação proving that Pedro Mexia de Magalhães provisioned his assets in his will as intended and that his will is written in an exemplification. It also orders the granting of a sentence to Diogo Mexia de Magalhães, his nephew, cofirming his appointment as heir and successor of Pedro Mexia de Magalhães in the chapel founded by his brother, Simão Mexia de Magalhães, in Pedrógão Grande, to which he annexes his assets.
Ácórdão em Relação from Desembargo that revokes the sentence of Corregedor da Corte do Cível, judging the village of Sanguinheda and other annexed properties as free estate and not entailed and the sale of these properties to defendants as good. It is proved that Simão da Cunha, institutor, disposed of his properties by inheritance and only imposed to the successors the fulfilment of a daily mass, which is not sufficient to consider the existence of an entail or chapel.
Ácórdão em Relação from Desembargo partially confirming and partially revoking the previous sentence. It states that the will of António Madeira (nephew) is false and Miguel Madeira is his closest relative and his estate heir, condemning Manuel Viegas to relinquish the properties and their income, from the contested lawsuit until their return.
Acórdão em Relação from Desembargo that confirms the previous sentence from Provedor das Capelas, declaring that Manuel Cardoso, defendant, only should pay the income of the seized houses since the contested lawsuit.
Acórdão em Relação that confirms the previous sentence of Ouvidor, but condemning Manuel Monteiro da Paz, defendant, to pay to relinquish the olive grove's income since the contested lawsuit.
Acórdão em Relação absolving Manuel Ribeiro and his wife, Maria Silveira, defendants, from the requested by António Luís da Silva and his minor daughter, not named, plaintiffs, to pay their half of the assets of Manuel de Sousa Cardoso to entail to his chapel. After these assets' partitions, both parties must bought assets, in Aveiro, to entail to the chapel, but the plaintiffs accused the defendants of of not fulfiling their obligation.
Acórdão em Relação from Desembargo partially confirming and partially revoking the previous sentence from Juiz de Fora. It judges that the assets of Pedro Barbosa de Figueiredo, defendant, annexed to the entail are free and that he only should pay their income since the contested lawsuit.
Acórdão em Relação that orders the registration of the appealed sentence in the chancery, declaring that the defendant only should pay the revenues generated since the contested lawsuit.
Acórdão em Relação judging the chapel of S. Brás, founded by Fernando Vaz, in Aveiro, next to the church of S. Miguel, as absoluta, because it is not vacant, whether it is of regular succession or appointment. The chapel was denounced as vacant to the Crown by Tomás da Costa Corte-Real, plaintiff, since the institutor's lineage is extincted. It orders that D. Tomás Jordão de Noronha, qualified part in the proceedings, must remain in the chapel's administration and if D. Catarina da Veiga, his sister and defendant, wants to demand him she must do it in the competent court. While D. Catarina da Veiga and her husband, João de Nápoles, defendants, argue that the chapel is of appointment, D. Tomás Jordão de Noronha, qualified part, argues that it is of regular succession.
Acórdão em Relação from Desembargo partially confirming the previous sentence and partially revoking it. It judges that the estate from the litigation belong to the entail founded by D. Filipa de Sequeira in her will, in which she appointed doutor Luís Mendes Barreto, father of D. Isabel Barreto, as her successor, so the plaintiffs, strange to the founder and first administrator, are not the properties' rightful owners.
Acórdão em Relação ordering that the acórdão of 1678-08-27 pass through the chancellery, be handed over to the parties and that the author pay the expenses.
Acórdão em Relação ordering that the acórdão of 1678-08-27 pass through the chancellery, be handed over to the parties and that the author pay the expenses.
Acórdão em Relação judging D. Filipa de Noronha, plaintiff, as administrator of the entails established by D. Henrique de Noronha, D. António Matos de Noronha and D. Filipa Cardoso, confiscated after the conviction of Rui de Matos de Noronha, conde of Armamar, brother of D. Filipa de Noronha and the previous administrator, of the crime of lese-majesty. D. Filipa de Noronha succeeds to her brother as determined in D. Henrique de Noronha's entail foundation deed in case of royal treason. It is declared that D. António Matos de Noronha, Bispo de Elvas, attached an estate ("casal da Lagem"), properties (azenhas) in Castelo de Vide and houses on Rua da Cutelaria and Beco do Pato to his entail.
Acórdão em Relação judging João, plaintiff with his grandfather, Manuel Fernandes, as the rightful successor of the chapels of Padre Gaspar Carvalho Pais and Susana Dias, and excluding the defendant, not named, because she is an illegitimate daughter of Nuno Pais, the last administrator of the first chapel. It condemns the defendants to relinquish to the plaintiff the assets of the chapel of Padre Gaspar Carvalho Pais, with their income generated since the undue occupation until their return, and it annuls the donation of the chapel of Susana Dias made by Isabel da Assunção, nun in Convento de Ferreira and last administrator, to the defendants.
Acórdão em Relação judging Josefa Fragoso Boto, opponent, as the rightful successor of the chapels of Diogo Boto, in the farmstead (herdade) of Zambujeiro, in the parish of Nossa Senhora do Escourão, in the outskirts of Montemor-o-Novo, Henrique Mendes Casco and Maria Mouzinho, in the church of S. Domingos of Évora, Teresa da Silveira, in the chapter of the monastery of S. Francisco of Évora, in the monastery of S. Domingos of Évora, and in the farmstead (herdade) of Silveira, in the outskirts of Redondo, and Miguel Pegas, in the monastery of S. Francisco of Évora, all denounced as vacant to the Crown by the late José da Costa Castelo Branco, the original plaintiff, because she is the daughter of a natural daughter of António Fragoso and niece of Álvaro de Ataíde, the last and legitimate administrators, and because there is not legitimate relatives of the institutors. It condemns the children of António Correia Pereira and D. Filipa de Melo, defendants, to relinquish the chapels to the opponent, with their income generated since the opposition, and judges the chapels as absolutas and not vacant to the Crown. It is mentioned that Diogo Boto had founded his chapel in a will made in 1530-08-20 and had bequeathed it to his brother, André Boto, and afterwards to his cousin, João Boto, father of D. Teresa da Silveira. Henrique Mendes Casco and Maria Mouzinho had founded their chapel in a dowry deed to their niece, D. Teresa da Silveira, daughter of João Boto da Silveira and Margarida Vaz Pegas, dated 1584-07-17. D. Teresa da Silveira had founded three chapels in her will, made in 1621-12-12, the first one for her nephew António Fragoso de Ataíde, the second one for her niece D. Constança Lobo and the third one for her nephew Rui Lopes da Silveira. Miguel Pegas had founded his chapel in a will made in 1530-04-08 and had bequeathed it to his uncle, cónego João Rodrigues, and after his death to his cousin, Lucas Rodrigues, and to his descendants.
Acórdão em relação (transcription) revoking the sentence by the desembargadores dos Agravos da Casa da Suplicação in favour of António Perestrelo, defendant, because his legitimation wasn't valid. He is ordered to return the properties of the entails of Brásia Nunes and D. Beatriz de Óbidos to Nuno Gonçalves Perestrelo, plaintiff, who was the rightful successor.
Acórdão em Relação judging the end of a reprisal imposed against the entails of Lopo Rodrigues de Évora e Veiga, Nicolau da Veiga and Bernardo da Veiga, his sons, and their income when their administrator, D. Lopo de Meneses, o Roxo, was absent in Castile and D. João IV was acclaimed as king of Portugal. It also orders the return to D. Lopo Rodrigues de Évora e Veiga, plaintiff (suplicante) and administrator of the three entails, of the entailed assets and public debt instruments, with their income generated since the peace publication.
Acórdão em Relação condemning capitão Manuel Duarte Sobreiro, defendant, to relinquish the farmhouse (casal) of Securio, with his income, to Domingos Soares Barbosa, plaintiff and administrator of the entail founded by doutor Pedro Barbosa, doutor Gaspar Barbosa, his brother, and D. Leonor Soares, his wife. The farmhouse was entailed by D. Leonor Soares.
Acórdão em relação (transcription) partially confirming and partially revoking the previous sentence from the Corregedor do Cível da Corte. It changes the decision regarding the annexation of the third part of the available portion of D. Luísa de Eça e Mendonça to the entail of Côrtes-Reais, ordering the annexation of the available portion to both entails.
Acórdão em Relação judging the second will of Luís de Mendonça Furtado as valid and both his brother, Nuno de Mendonça Furtado, plaintiff, and sister, D. Maria Josefa de Mendonça, defendant, as his successors, since their other brother, Jerónimo de Mendonça Furtado, committed the crime of lèse-majesté and was excluded from the succession. It defines how to divide the estate of Luís de Mendonça Furtado, seting apart the half of his available portion to annex to the entail of S. Simão de Azeitão and other bequests and then dividing the remaining assets between Nuno de Mendonça Furtado and D. Maria Josefa de Mendonça. It also defines the payment of some debts that Luís de Mendonça Furtado owed to his brother Jerónimo de Mendonça Furtado.
Acórdão em relação (transcription) revoking the sentence by the desembargadores dos Agravos da Casa da Suplicação in favour of António Perestrelo, defendant, because his legitimation wasn't valid. He is ordered to return the properties of the entails of Brásia Nunes and D. Beatriz de Óbidos to Nuno Gonçalves Perestrelo, plaintiff, who was the rightful successor.
Acórdão em Relação revoking a previous sentence from Desembargadores dos agravos, which revoked a previous sentence from Juiz do Cível. It judges that the chapel of António Correia da Costa belongs to the suitor (suplicante), André de Almeida Félix, son of Manuel Félix de Almeida, brother of D. Luísa de Almeida, endowed by Ana Correia da Costa with the chapel's administration. It also condemns the accused (suplicado) to relinquish the chapel's assets to the suitor. This acórdão describes the appointment process of the chapel's administration.
Acórdão em Relação from Desembargo that revokes a previous sentence, condemning the provedor and irmãos of Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Santarém, defendants, to relinquish to the author, Manuel Cardoso, a half of the farmstead of Gouveia, in the outskirts of Évora, belonging to the entail of André Dias and seized to pay a debt. It refers that the entailed properties can not be executed to pay the entails' owners and administrators debts.
Acórdão em Relação ordering that only D. Beatriz de Oliveira Franco will be compelled to fulfil the pious obligations, judging her hindrances as proven and condemning André Correia to pay the proceedings expenses. Once D. Beatriz de Oliveira Franco has not descendants, the institutor's first will takes precedence in the chapel's succession. However, the first will disappeared, so André Correia, only mentioned in the second, can't succeed after the death of D. Beatriz de Oliveira Franco.
Acórdão em Relação ordering that the embargoed sentence should go through the chancery and must be delivered separately, with a statement that the sentence does not harm the institutor's relatives if D. Beatriz de Oliveira Franco appoints a stranger as successor, before her death.
Acórdão em Relação judging the embargoes as proven, the chapel established by Afonso Munhós as absolute and ordering the lifting of the sequestration of his assets.
Acórdão em Relação judging Isabel Pereira, plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the chapel of Inácio de Bettencourt, in the monastery of Basto, because she is the legitimate and only daughter of the last administrator, Simão Barroso, also judged in a sentence as the rightful successor. It condemns João Rebelo Leite, defendant, who argues that he is the closest relative of the institutor, to relinquish the chapel's administration, with its income since the contested lawsuit.
Acórdão em Relação judging Francisco de Almeida, plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the entail of Fernando Luz de Almeida and Isabel Brandoa, his wife, and absolving him from the counterclaim of the defendant, D. João Telo, because he is from the lineage of Almeida, by which the succession must be regulated.
Acórdão em Relação judging João, plaintiff with his grandfather, Manuel Fernandes, as the rightful successor of the chapels of Padre Gaspar Carvalho Pais and Susana Dias, and excluding the defendant, not named, because she is an illegitimate daughter of Nuno Pais, the last administrator of the first chapel. It condemns the defendants to relinquish to the plaintiff the assets of the chapel of Padre Gaspar Carvalho Pais, with their income generated since the undue occupation until their return, and it annuls the donation of the chapel of Susana Dias made by Isabel da Assunção, nun in Convento de Ferreira and last administrator, to the defendants.
Acórdão em Relação judging Manuel Ferreira de Eça, plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the entail of Fajozes, founded by Estêvão Ferreira, o Velho, excluding the defendant, D. Francisca da Silva, wife of D. João Manuel de Meneses, because he is male and it is an agnation entail. He also excludes João Machado de Eça, opponent, once he represents his father, Gregório Ferreira de Eça, the opponent's older brother. It condemns the defendants to relinquish to the plaintiff the entail, with its income generated since the contested lawsuit.
Acórdão em Relação judging the end of a reprisal imposed against the entails of Lopo Rodrigues de Évora e Veiga, Nicolau da Veiga and Bernardo da Veiga, his sons, and their income when their administrator, D. Lopo de Meneses, o Roxo, was absent in Castile and D. João IV was acclaimed as king of Portugal. It also orders the return to D. Lopo Rodrigues de Évora e Veiga, plaintiff (suplicante) and administrator of the three entails, of the entailed assets and public debt instruments, with their income generated since the peace publication.
Acórdão em Relação confirming the sentence of the juiz and ouvidor and condemning the appealer to pay the proceedings expenses, with a statement that buying the 30 alqueires of wheat in free estate, the available portion estate is free from charge.
Acórdão em Relação judging D. Filipa de Noronha, plaintiff, as administrator of the entails of D. Henrique de Noronha, D. António Matos de Noronha and D. Filipa Cardosa, confiscated after the conviction of Rui de Matos de Noronha, conde of Armamar, brother of D. Filipa de Noronha and the previous administrator, of the crime of lese-majesty. D. Filipa de Noronha succeeds to her brother as determined in D. Henrique de Noronha's entail foundation deed in case of royal treason.
Acórdão em Relação judging Josefa Fragoso Boto, opponent, as the rightful successor of the chapels of Diogo Boto, in the farmstead (herdade) of Zambujeiro, in the parish of Nossa Senhora do Escourão, in the outskirts of Montemor-o-Novo, Henrique Mendes Casco and Maria Mouzinho, in the church of S. Domingos of Évora, Teresa da Silveira, in the chapter of the monastery of S. Francisco of Évora, in the monastery of S. Domingos of Évora, and in the farmstead (herdade) of Silveira, in the outskirts of Redondo, and Miguel Pegas, in the monastery of S. Francisco of Évora, all denounced as vacant to the Crown by the late José da Costa Castelo Branco, the original plaintiff, because she is the daughter of a natural daughter of António Fragoso and niece of Álvaro de Ataíde, the last and legitimate administrators, and because there is not legitimate relatives of the institutors. It condemns the children of António Correia Pereira and D. Filipa de Melo, defendants, to relinquish the chapels to the opponent, with their income generated since the opposition, and judges the chapels as absolutas and not vacant to the Crown. It is mentioned that Diogo Boto had founded his chapel in a will made in 1530-08-20 and had bequeathed it to his brother, André Boto, and afterwards to his cousin, João Boto, father of D. Teresa da Silveira. Henrique Mendes Casco and Maria Mouzinho had founded their chapel in a dowry deed to their niece, D. Teresa da Silveira, daughter of João Boto da Silveira and Margarida Vaz Pegas, dated 1584-07-17. D. Teresa da Silveira had founded three chapels in her will, made in 1621-12-12, the first one for her nephew António Fragoso de Ataíde, the second one for her niece D. Constança Lobo and the third one for her nephew Rui Lopes da Silveira. Miguel Pegas had founded his chapel in a will made in 1530-04-08 and had bequeathed it to his uncle, cónego João Rodrigues, and after his death to his cousin, Lucas Rodrigues, and to his descendants.
Acórdão em Relação judging D. Filipa de Noronha, plaintiff, as administrator of the entails of D. Henrique de Noronha, D. António Matos de Noronha and D. Filipa Cardoso, confiscated after the conviction of Rui de Matos de Noronha, conde of Armamar, brother of D. Filipa de Noronha and the previous administrator, of the crime of lese-majesty. D. Filipa de Noronha succeeds to her brother as determined in D. Henrique de Noronha's entail foundation deed in case of royal treason.
Acórdão em Relação judging Josefa Fragoso Boto, opponent, as the rightful successor of the chapels of Diogo Boto, in the farmstead (herdade) of Zambujeiro, in the parish of Nossa Senhora do Escourão, in the outskirts of Montemor-o-Novo, Henrique Mendes Casco and Maria Mouzinho, in the church of S. Domingos of Évora, Teresa da Silveira, in the chapter of the monastery of S. Francisco of Évora, in the monastery of S. Domingos of Évora, and in the farmstead (herdade) of Silveira, in the outskirts of Redondo, and Miguel Pegas, in the monastery of S. Francisco of Évora, all denounced as vacant to the Crown by the late José da Costa Castelo Branco, the original plaintiff, because she is the daughter of a natural daughter of António Fragoso and niece of Álvaro de Ataíde, the last and legitimate administrators, and because there is not legitimate relatives of the institutors. It condemns the children of António Correia Pereira and D. Filipa de Melo, defendants, to relinquish the chapels to the opponent, with their income generated since the opposition, and judges the chapels as absolutas and not vacant to the Crown. It is mentioned that Diogo Boto had founded his chapel in a will made in 1530-08-20 and had bequeathed it to his brother, André Boto, and afterwards to his cousin, João Boto, father of D. Teresa da Silveira. Henrique Mendes Casco and Maria Mouzinho had founded their chapel in a dowry deed to their niece, D. Teresa da Silveira, daughter of João Boto da Silveira and Margarida Vaz Pegas, dated 1584-07-17. D. Teresa da Silveira had founded three chapels in her will, made in 1621-12-12, the first one for her nephew António Fragoso de Ataíde, the second one for her niece D. Constança Lobo and the third one for her nephew Rui Lopes da Silveira. Miguel Pegas had founded his chapel in a will made in 1530-04-08 and had bequeathed it to his uncle, cónego João Rodrigues, and after his death to his cousin, Lucas Rodrigues, and to his descendants.
Acórdão em Relação confirming a previous sentence from Desembargadores dos Agravos and ordering its fulfilment. It condemns the suitor (suplicante) to pay the proceedings' expenses and to lose the deposited guarantee.
Acórdão em Relação (transcription) judging the chapel of D. Leonor da Costa, in the convent of S. Francisco of Lisboa and composed of a farmstead in Caparica, as not vacant to the Crown and absolving D. Isabel de Gamboa, defendant, from the requested by Manuel Guedes Pereira, plaintiff, who denounced the chapel as vacant and received a royal grace warrant of administration. It declares D. Isabel de Gamboa as the chapel's rightful successor, because she is cousin of the last administrators, D. Isabel da Costa and D. Francisca da Costa, sisters and successors of Frei Manuel Pacheco, and she is from the institutors bloodline. Although the chapel is from agnation, the women are only excluded if there is a male to succeed, which is not the case.
Acórdão from Desembargo ordering the defendants to fully annex the third part of the available portion of Fernando Teles de Meneses to the entail of Rui Teles de Meneses, once they are the heirs of Luís da Silva Teles, head of the family in the partition of the estate of Fernando Teles de Meneses.
Acórdão do Desembargo that confirms the previous sentence from Ouvidor, declaring that the improvements made by the appelant and his ancestors should be paid to him.
Acórdão confirming the previous sentence from Provedor da Comarca de Évora and declaring that if the appellant wants to sell some of his free properties to entail to the chapel, he can do it under the institutor's conditions.
Acórdão do Desembargo revoking a previous sentence of Juiz das Auções Novas da Relação e Casa do Porto, who judged António de Freitas do Amaral, opponent, as the rightful successor of the entail of Casa Nova do Basto, founded by Martinho Lourenço, and Padre Jerónimo de Amaral, plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the entail of Quinta de Sezim, founded by Afonso Vasques Peixoto. It judges Fernando de Freitas de Mesquita, appellant, as the rightful successor of both entails, because he is simultaneously a legitimate descendant and the closest relative of the last administrator, while the opponent is a collateral relative and the plaintiff is a natural son.
Acórdão do Desembargo ordering the fulfilment of the previous sentence from Juiz do Cível of Lisbon and declaring that the single storey houses mentioned in the institutor's (?) will do not belong to the chapel of Mécia Gomes.
Acórdão judging Domingos Soares Barbosa, plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the entail of Doutor Pedro Barbosa, Doutor Gaspar, his brother, and D. Leonor Soares, his wife, because he is the natural son of Manuel Soares Barbosa, the first administrator, and the natural and illegitimate children are not excluded from the succession. Jerónimo de Scacia de Castro, defendant, is condemned to relinquish to the plaintiff the entailed properties, with their income, which he received from Miguel de Vasconcelos, who took possession of the entail after the death of Manuel Soares Barbosa.
Acórdão partially confirming and partially revoking a previous sentence from the judge and Ouvidor. It condemns Diogo Fernandes Branco, defendant, to relinquish to Roque Acciaiuoli de Vasconcelos, plaintiff and administrator of the entail of Simão de Acciaiuoli, some houses and a mill, because it is proven that they were entailed. The plaintiff should pay to the defendant the improvements.
Acórdão do Desembargo that revokes a previous sentence from Provedor of Évora, judging the partition of the income of the chapel of António de Oliveira between the administrator, the pious obligations and a poor and close relative. It orders the payment of one moio of wheat or 30 cruzados to the administrator, the fulfilment of the pious obligations and the payment of the remaining income to Catarina de Oliveira, appellee, who is poor and a close relative. The institutor imposed this condition to the administrators who are collateral relatives, including D. Ana Maria de Oliveira, appellant and current administrator.
Acórdão that revokes a previous sentence from Corregedor de Portalegre, judging the appellant's wife and defendant as the rightful successor of the chapel of Ana de Miranda, since she is the daughter of Manuel Vellez, collateral relative of the institutor. Since the defendant's father and the plaintiff are in the same degree of relationship it should succeed the male and his descendants.
Acórdão confirming the sentence of Provedor dos Resíduos, in the part where he declares the clause of the institutor's will as lawful, because it supports the dowry donated to D. Beatriz de Oliveira Franco, who is condemned to pay the proceedings expenses.
Acórdão do Desembargo partially confirming and partially revoking the previous sentence. Besides the assets belonging to the available portion of António Gomes Angel, it judges the assets belonging to the reserved portions of his daughters, D. Maria Angel and D. Graça Angel, and the assets entailed by his wife, Joana Jerónima, also as an entailed dowry to their daughter, D. Maria Angel, because the parents can impose conditions on their children's reserved portions, when they bequeath them other equivalent assets and they approve it. D. Maria Angel, defendant, can not dispose of the entailed assets as free and, after her death, she will be succeeded by a relative of the institutors.
Acórdão do Desembargo judging Maria Marques, opponent as the rightful succession of the entail of Padre António Marques, abbot of the church of Fiães, with masses in the chapel of Santo António, because she is the legitimate daughter of Miguel Sardinha, illegitimate son of the institutor, and, therefore, descendant by straight line from the institutor and not by collateral line like the other opponents. It condemns João de Sá de Miranda to relinquish to Maria Marques the entailed assets, with their income generated since the contested lawsuit until their return.
Acórdão do Desembargo partilly confirming and partially revoking a previous sentence from Juiz de Fora of Santarém. It judges the assets belonging to the available portion of Diogo Fonseca de Almeida as entailed and the third appellant as their rightful owner, because he is the closest relative of the last administrator. Those assets were improperly sold by the last administrator, so the judges reserve to the third appellant the right to claim them.
Acórdão that partially revokes the previous sentence from Desembargador Conservador dos Moedeiros, declaring that if after the exectution of D. Custódia da Rocha's estate there is some payment to the chapel of Beatriz de Freitas, the defendant will be forced to pay the amount requested in the libel or to relinquish the farmhouse.
Acórdão do Desembargo that revokes a previous sentence from Juiz and Ouvidor, absolving Francisco Martins, defendant, from the request of Catarina Martins, plaintiff, and declaring him as the rightful successor of the chapel and entail of Domingos Vaz Amarelo, because he is the closest relative of the institutor and last administrator and the representation benefit does not apply in this case.
Acórdão do Desembargo revoking the previous sentence from Ouvidor da Comarca of Beja and the sentence of Juiz de Fora of Beja, which the first one confirmed. It absolves the defendant, not named, from relinquishing the assets of the entail of Manuel Correia Margalho to the plaintiff, not named, because he is the grandson of Manuel Dias Correia, collateral relative of the institutor and last administrator, so he is the entail's successor.
Acórdão do Desembargo that revokes a previous sentence from Corregedor da Corte, declaring that the assets of the entail founded by Cid António Salvago, in the farmstead (quinta) of Santo António de Pera Manca, near Évora, and amended by Baltasar Mendes dos Reis in his will belong to Luís Fernandes Lobo, plaintiff, son of Antónia Simões Correia and nephew of Baltasar Mendes dos Reis, because the defendant, José Botelho, is not relative to Francisco de Melo, last administrator, by his father's, Baltasar Mendes dos Reis, bloodline. It condemns the defendant to relinquish to the plaintiff the entailed assets, with their income generated since the contested lawsuit.
Acórdão from the Desembargo revoking the previous sentences of the judge and ouvidor, which ruled Francisco da Costa de Mesquita as rightful successor of the entail of Francisco da Costa de Mesquita and ordered the defendant, Domingos da Costa de Mesquita, to relinquish the entailed properties. Although Domingos da Costa de Mesquita is a natural and legitimated son of the last administrator, Jorge da Costa de Mesquita, is excluded from the succession because there is a legitimate descendant of the institutor, his cousin and plaintiff, Francisco da Costa de Mesquita.
Acórdão from the Desembargo partially confirming the previous sentence and partially revoking it. It judges that the defendants should pay the income of the reserved portion of Gaspar Lopes since the properties’ misappropriation and the income of the reserved portion of Isabel Dantas since the impugnment.
Acórdão do Desembargo ordering the fulfilment of the sentence delivered by Corregedor do Cível and condemning Manuel Correia de Lacerda, defendant, to pay the two parts in both instances and Jácome Carneiro de Barros, plaintiff, to pay the third part. It refers that the defendant was absolved from relinquish the assets of the requested leases (prazos) and chapels of Maria Baltasar and Marquesa Antónia.
Acórdão do Desembargo that revokes a previous sentence from Corregedor do Cível da Corte, condemning the defendant to relinquish to the Diogo Soares da Veiga do Avelar e Taveira, plaintiff and administrator of the entail of Isabel de Avelar, the lease of a farmstead (quinta), with its income generated since the contested lawsuit. The lease was included in the entail by the institutor, who appointed the administrators to succeed in the lease.
Taveira, Diogo Soares da Veiga do Avelar e (flor.1683-1684)
Acórdão from Desembargo that partially revokes the previous sentence, condemning the defendant, António de Sousa Meneses, to relinquish the properties income only from the contested lawsuit until their return, because, before that, he did not owned the assets with ill will.
Acórdão from Desembargo absolving the defendant, Miguel Soares de Vasconcelos, from the legal action took by the plaintiff, Pedro Soares, and declaring him the rightful successor of the entail of deão D. Luís de Melo. The judges quoted the family name and coat of arms clauses to justify the exclusion of the plaintiff, because there are still relatives of the institutor and the outsiders only can succeed after those relatives extinction.
Acórdão from Desembargo revoking a previous sentence from Provedor. It absolves the defendant, Gaspar Gonçalves, from relinquish the properties to the plaintiff and administrator of the chapel of Padre João Esteves Gil, Cristóvão Velho de Faria, because it is not proven that they belong to the chapel, while the defendant proved his ownership presenting the titles and letters of acquisition.
Acórdão from Desembargo that confirms the previou sentence of Juiz de Fora of Pinhel, declaring that D. Maria Monteiro, defendant, sould return the income of the available portion of João Gomes Leitão, o Velho, since his death until the time when the plaintiffs took possession of the chapel.
Acórdão from Desembargo that orders the fulfilment of the previou acórdão, amending it and declaring that D. Maria Monteiro, defendant, only should return the income of the available portion and entail of João Gomes Leitão, o Velho, since the time when she and her granddaughter took possession of it, after the death of Doutor Lourenço Coelho Leitão, until the time when the plaintiffs took possession.
Acórdão do Desembargo partially revoking the previous sentence from Juiz do Cível. It declares that it is not proven that the appellee and the appellants are from the institutor's bloodline, so none of the contenders has action to claim the chapel. Altought, it absolves the appelle (?) from the requested in the action and counterclaim and orders that he should keep the administration.
Acórdão do Desembargo partially confirming the previous sentence from Juiz de Fora of Castelo de Vide and absolving the defendants from the other request included in the plaintiffs' libel, regarding the ownership of some properties.
Acórdão from Desembargo partially confirming and partially revoking the previous sentence. It condemns António Varela, defendant, to pay the revenues since he owns the estate and absolves the Manuel Cardoso, plaintiff, from the sale's price, revenues and improvements.
