Identity area
Reference code
Title
Date(s)
- 1685-12-06 (Creation)
Level of description
Item
Archival reference
PEGAS-1739-4-336-338
Context area
Creator/ accumulator
Entail/ Vínculo
Archival history
Immediate source of acquisition or transfer
Content and structure area
Scope and content
Court sentence judging the plaintiff, not named, as the rightful successor of the entail and chapel of Martinho Bolo and Catarina Álvares, his sister, because he is the son of the late Catarina Rodrigues, oldest daughter of Diogo Martins, brother of the institutors and appointed in second place to succeed in the administration. The defendant's wife is also daughter of Diogo Martins, but younger, so she can not succeed while there is descendants from her older sister.
Appraisal, destruction and scheduling
Accruals
System of arrangement
Conditions of access and use area
Conditions governing access
Conditions governing reproduction
Language of material
- Portuguese
Script of material
Language and script notes
Physical characteristics and technical requirements
Finding aids
Allied materials area
Existence and location of originals
Existence and location of copies
Related units of description
Notes area
Alternative identifier(s)
Access points
Subject access points
Place access points
Name access points
Genre access points
Description control area
Digital identifier
Institution identifier
Rules and/or conventions used
INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES – ISAD(G): General International Standard Archival Description: adopted by the Committee on Descriptive Standards, Stockolm, Sweden, 19-22 September 1999. 2nd ed. Ottawa: CIA/CDS, 2000. ISBN 0-9696035-5-X
DIREÇÃO GERAL DE ARQUIVOS; PROGRAMA DE NORMALIZAÇÃO DA DESCRIÇÃO EM ARQUIVO; GRUPO DE TRABALHO DE NORMALIZAÇÃO DA DESCRIÇÃO EM ARQUIVO – Orientações para a descrição arquivística. 2.ª v. Lisboa: DGARQ, 2007, 325 p.
Status
Draft
Level of detail
Partial
Dates of creation revision deletion
2021.04.23
Language(s)
Script(s)
Sources
Nota ao elemento "Date(s)" - Na edição, o documento está datado de 1585, o que nos parece tratar-se de um erro, atendendo a outras referências relativas a este processo e à cronologia de todas as restantes sentenças publicadas nesta obra.
Archivist's note
ARR