Acórdão em relação (transcription) partially confirming and partially revoking the previous sentence from the Corregedor do Cível da Corte. It changes the decision regarding the annexation of the third part of the available portion of D. Luísa de Eça e Mendonça to the entail of Côrtes-Reais, ordering the annexation of the available portion to both entails.

Carta testemunhável containing an exemplification of the will of D. Pedro de Eça, also called D. Pedro de Sá, issued at the request of his son, D. Diogo de Eça, also called D. Diogo de Sá.
Contains other copy of the documents VINC002292 PE EA/001a and VINC002292 PE EA/001aa.

Court proceedings (partial) regarding the annexation of the third parts of the administrators of the entails of Pedro de Eça and Cortes Reais.

Court proceedings (partial) opposing Marquês de Montebelo to Pedro de Mendonça Côrte-Real, concerning the destiny of a property ("herdade da Latada de baixo") attached to Pedro de Eça and Maria da Silva's entail.

Court proceedings (partial) opposing the monastery of Santa Clara of Lisboa to Manuel de Sousa da Silva Côrte-Real, regarding the succession of the entail instituted by Pedro de Eça and Maria da Silva.

Court sentence determining that Manuel de Sousa da Silva Côrte-Real was the rightful successor of the entail instituted by Pedro de Eça and Maria da Silva, despite the claim made by the convent of Santa Clara of Lisboa. The convent argued that the entail had to be administrated by one of its nuns, D. Antónia de Eça Côrte-Real e Mendonça, who was the sister of its last administrator, D. Luísa de Eça. However, since one of the clauses of the institution forced the administrators to attach the third part of their assets to the entail, and neither the convent or D. Antónia could fulfil those obligations, it had to be delivered to Manuel Côrte-Real. He was a descendant of D. Garcia de Eça, grandfather of the institutor, and the closest male relative to the entail's last administrators, D. Diogo de Eça and D. Luísa de Eça.

Court sentence condemning the defendant, Pedro de Mendonça Côrte-Real, to return a property ("herdade da Latada de Baixo") which was attached to Pedro de Eça and Maria da Silva's entail to the plaintiff, Marquês de Montebelo, who administrated it. The legal dispute started after Pedro de Mendonça Côrte-Real refused to give back that property, alleging that it belonged to the entail he administrated ("morgado dos Mendonças").

Court sentence (transcription) condemning Cristóvão de Almada, defendant, to separate the third part of the available portion of the assets of his wife, D. Luísa de Eça e Mendonça, to annex it to the entail of Pedro de Eça, because she had not annexed her available portion while she was administering it. The entail was currently administrated by the plaintiffs, D. Joana Francisca de Montebelo and the marquês de Montebelo, her husband. It also condemns him to pay the income generated since the undue occupation until its return, and absolves him from annexing the third part of the available portion of his son, Rodrigo Luís de Almada, because he died too early and did not administer the entail. Regarding the entail of Cortes Reais, it reserves to Pedro Mendonça Côrte-Real, opponent, the right to request his part in the annexation of the third part of the available portion to the entail of Pedro de Eça.

Exemplification of royal letter containing the exemplification of the will of Pedro de Eça, written by Jorge de Penalva, notary.

Documents produced by the entail.

Royal letter to D. Diogo de Eça Côrte-Real copying the will of his father, D. Pedro de Eça, confering to this exemplification faith and authority.
Contains: approval deed, dated from 1548-01-30.

Will of D. Pedro de Eça founding an entail with masses in the chapel he intends to build in the convent of S. Francisco of Xabregas, Lisboa, and appointing D. Diogo, his son, as his successor. He entails to it his third part, consisting of properties in Ribeira de Lavra, Ribeira de Canha and Póvoa, and the third part of his wife, D. Maria da Silva, with an obligation of two daily masses for their souls.
Will approved in 1548-01-30.