Acórdão, approving António da Maia Dinis's resignation deed, ordering it to be complied with. It orders the chapel to register in the books of Capelas da Coroa and Torre do Tombo. The plaintiff, with the sentence, had to request the respective administration letter at the Desembargo do Paço.
Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Francisco Coutinho do Sem, defendant, on the administration of the chapel established by Branca Eanes, Gil do Sem and Martinho do Sem, in Santarém. The sentence declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, ordering its registration in the Livro das Capelas da Coroa. However, having received an royal provision to administer it during his lifetime, it requires the defendant to request an administration letter and make a tombo of the chapel's assets.
Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against João Lopes de Pina, defendant, about the administration of the chapels established by Vasco Esteves Bousão and Maria Martins Bousão, his wife. The sentence proves that Vasco Esteves Bousão's chapel belonged to the Crown and that Maria Martins Bousão's was absoluta. Consequently, it determines that the defendant should leave the administration of the first, as ordered in the previous sentence, but can legitimately administer the second. It mandates Barnabé Maldonado, escrivão, by order of the provedor or the juiz de fora, to take possession of the chapel of Vasco Esteves Bousão, and that António Barbosa acts as provisional administrator.
Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion, filed by Luís da Silva de Sousa, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Maria Martins Bousão, in Estremoz. The sentence judges the motions as proven, ordering the lifting of the sequestration of the assets of Maria Martins Bousão's chapel. It orders, however, that it be maintained until, by a certificate from the Torre do Tombo, they can be distinguished from those in the chapel of Vasco Esteves Bousão.
Acórdão, judging a civil deed between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Gonçalo Fernandes Picheiro, defendant, who was administrator of the chapel of Diogo Rodrigues Trombeta and Margarida Fernandes, Manuel Mendes Batalhos being opponent. The sentence judged the possession of the chapel in favor of the opponent, because he proves the defendant had inherited the administration of the chapel because it was sold by Gaspar Mealheiro to Álvaro Rodrigues, so he was not a descendant of the institutors, and therefore could not administer the chapel. It also proves that, on the contrary, the opponent was a descendant of the first administrator of the chapel. Condemns the defendant to leave the administration of the chapel, giving possession to Manuel Mendes Batalhos. It orders the fulfillment of the charges, the realization of the tombo of the chapel's assets, which should be registered in the Provedoria and in the Torre do Tombo, as well as the placing of a headstone in the grave of the institutors. Sentence given by desembargador Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, juiz dos tombos, averiguação e manifestações das Capelas da Coroa, in the name of Filipe III, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.
Acórdão acquiting the defendant Domingos da Fonseca against the legal action presented by the plaintiff Procurador da Coroa. This chapel is "absoluta" and this acórdão must be registered in the chapel's tombo, in the books of the Provedoria, of the church and of Torre do Tombo. The seizure is ended. Signed by Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, Juíz do Tombo da Capela da Coroa, and undersigned by Pedro Almirante, Escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.
Acórdão overruling a court sentence, determining that the plaintiffs, Lourenço de Sousa and D. Luísa de Meneses e Noronha, were the rightful administrators of the chapel established by Afonso de Albuquerque. D. Luísa's grandmother, D. Luísa de Noronha, was the closest living relative of the institutor at the time of his death. The defendants were obligated to renounce the entail's administration. Followed by two acórdãos.
Acórdão of Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the petition presented by Salvador Pinheiro, supplicant, due to the sequestration ordered by the procurador da Coroa about the assets of the chapel of Gonçalo Esteves Borralho. The sentence shows the chapel was not of the Crown because the institution predicted that if the lineage of the institutor was extinguished, the chapel would be administered by the brotherhood of Santa Maria de Sintra. It determines the chapel to be registered as absoluta and the sequestration of assets be lifted.
Acórdão em relação, approving a resignation and donation deed (dated 1597-03-08) by which Joana da Costa renounces the administration of the chapel instituted by Gil Vicente, in favor of Manuel de Morais, her husband's nephew.
Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Isabel de Novais, wife of Diogo de Faria de Araújo, defendant, administrator of the chapel established by Martinho Dias de Ceira, in the church of São Bartolomeu of Coimbra. The sentence absolves the defendant, for being a descendant of the institutor and, as such, legitimate administrator of the chapel. Even so, the sentence could not be registed, nor the sequestration of the assets lifted, until the defendant presented the tombo of the chapel's assets and the proof of fulfillment of the charges.
Court sentence judging the appeal presented by the plaintiff Martinho Afonso de Brito and the opponent João Afonso de Beja against the defendants António de Beja and his wife Antónia de Brito. It orders that estate of Atouguia belongs to the chapel founded by Francisco Domingues de Beja in the church of Santa Clara in Beja; therefore the defendants must deliver the estate. The opponent is excluded from the succession of this property.
Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Pedro Barreto, António Colaço, Gaspar Gonçalves and Maria Barreto, defendants, administrators of the chapels of Duarte Barreto, Diogo Barreto, Beatriz Gomes, Maior Gomes Raposa and Maria Gonçalves Raposa, located in Serpa. The sentence absolves the defendants, because they are legitimate descendants of the founders and fulfill the charges. It is ordered that the chapels should be crossed out from the list of the Capelas da Coroa and that the sentence be registered at Torre do Tombo and at the Provedoria. Judgment given by desembargador Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, juiz dos tombos, averiguação e manifestações das Capelas da Coroa, in the name of Filipe III, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.
Acórdão of Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the petition presented by Brás Veloso de Sequeira, supplicant, due to the sequestration ordered by the procurador da Coroa about the assets of the chapel of João Gonçalves Folga na Palha. The sentence proves the chapel did not belong to the Crown and that the supplicant legitimately administered it, determining the sequestration should be lifted and the chapel inscribed as absoluta.
Acórdão validating a court sentence which had exempted the defendants, Benedita de Melo and José Botelho, her son-in-law, from giving back to the plaintiffs, Capitão António de Miranda Catela and his wife, the properties attached to Baltasar Mendes dos Reis' entail. The latter were only collateral relatives of the institutor, and did not have the right to administrate the entail, which had to be given to the Misericórdia de Évora according to the institution. The acórdão also overruled part of that sentence, recognizing that the entail founded by Cid António Salvago belonged to Capitão António de Miranda Catela, since he was the closest relative of Francisco de Melo, the last administrator and son of Baltasar Mendes dos Reis.
Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Pedro Barreto, António Colaço, Gaspar Gonçalves and Maria Barreto, defendants, administrators of the chapels of Duarte Barreto, Diogo Barreto, Beatriz Gomes, Maior Gomes Raposa and Maria Gonçalves Raposa, located in Serpa. The sentence absolves the defendants, because they are legitimate descendants of the founders and fulfill the charges. It is ordered that the chapels should be crossed out from the list of the Capelas da Coroa and that the sentence be registered at Torre do Tombo and at the Provedoria. Judgment given by desembargador Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, juiz dos tombos, averiguação e manifestações das Capelas da Coroa, in the name of Filipe III, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa
Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between António de Azevedo de Mendonça, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against José Pereira Sodré, Duarte Sodré Pereira, his son, Francisco Nobre de Almeida and his wife, defendants, about the administration of the chapel of the priest Frei Fernando Marques. The defendants did not present any opposition to the libel of accusation. The sentence judges the chapel vacant for the Crown, condemning the defendants to leave the administration to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, who should ask for the respective administration letter. It orders that the chapel be registered in the Torre do Tombo, in the books of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa and in Provedoria of Tomar.
Acórdão em relação which opposed the plaintiff Procurador da Coroa against the defendant Martinho Afonso de Beja, administrator of the entail, about several entailed assets that were lost and motivated the sequestration of the entail's income. Orders the defendant to make a new tombo, to fulfill the pious obligations and to put and inscription on the church.
Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between António Borges de Azevedo, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Brás de Oliveira Pais, defendant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Pedro Lobo and Leonor Cardosa, his wife, in the convent of São Francisco of Alenquer. The sentence judges the chapel vacant for the Crown, as there are no descendants of the founders. It orders that the administration be given to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, and with the sentence, he must request the respective administration letter at the Desembargo do Paço. It also had to make the tombo of the assets, within two months. Orders the chapel to be registered at the Torre do Tombo and at the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa.
Acórdão em relação, judging the motions presented by José Barreto Valdevinos de Vasconcelos as unproven, ordering the fulfillment of the previous sentence.
Vasconcelos, José Barreto Valdevinos de (flor.1691-1697)
Acórdão em relação, ordering the tombo of assets, its registration in the Book of Capelas da Coroa and the placing of a tombstone in the church of Santa Maria da Feira, in Beja.
Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Domingos de Morais, defendant, administrators of the chapel of Santo Estêvão, instituted by Estêvão Vaz and Florença Eanes, his wife, in the church of Nossa Senhora da Oliveira of Guimarães. The sentence absolves the defendant, as he is a legitimate descendant of the founders, ordering the chapel to be crossed out from the list of Capelas da Coroa. It is also proved that, due to the reduction in the chapel's income, the charges had previously been reduced, so the defendant did not meet the institution's, but only had to meet those of the reduction. In this sense, it is ordered that the provedor verify the chapel's income, as well as if the lease of the properties (carried out with reduced incomes) were made in accordance with the Ordenações. Taking into account the high number of properties, it is also ordered to verify their number, with those existing in the institution and in the tombo. Judgment given by desembargador Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, juiz dos tombos, averiguação e manifestações das Capelas da Coroa, in the name of Filipe III, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.
Acórdão of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the civil suit about the chapel instituted by Lourenço Martins and Constança Rodrigues, in Bornes and Bragança, between the procurador da Coroa, author, and D. Mariana de Morais, defendant, represented by Lázaro de Figueiredo Jorge de Madureira, her tutor. The sentence absolves the defendant, giving as proven she is of the lineage of the institutors. The end of the sequestration of the chapel's assets is ordered and registered as absoluta.
Acórdão judging the civil deed between Francisco de Oliveira, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Diogo da Fonseca and Diogo de Azambuja, defendants, due to the denunciation of the chapel instituted by Bárbara Teixeira de Valadares. The sentence recognizes the institutor had determined that the chapel should be administered by a clergyman, but it was against the principle of ordination, so declaring it vacant for the Crown and ordering its surrender to the author, who should carry out the tombo and register it in the Capelas da Coroa books. It also contains a dispatch favorable to the denunciation (dated 1648-02-11) and the approval of the tombo (dated 1649-03-24).
Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Filipe Ribeiro de Carvalho, defendant, on the administration of the chapel established by Gonçalo Eanes de Carvalho, in the church of Santa Maria dos Açogues de Montemor-o-Novo. The sentence determines that Nuno de Carvalho, who had received a letter of administration of the king, would only belong to half of the chapel, as the institution stated that there must be two administrators, he tends to omit this information. In this sense, it acquits the defendant of half of the chapel and declares the other as vacant for the Crown. It orders it registration and that the Crown provide it as an administrator.
Acórdão of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the civil suit between José Dias de Barros, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, and Manuel Carrilho, defendant, about the denunciation of the chapel instituted by Ramy Álvares Ramires. The sentence recognizes the chapel was vacant for the Crown, due to the extinction of the institutor's lineage, that the defendant was only his temporary administrator (appointed by the Provedor das Capelas), and that its legitimate administration was the responsibility of the author, who had presented a denunciation warrant of administration. He orders the Crown to take possession of the chapel and its inscription in the Capelas da Coroa and Torre do Tombo books. The author should, with the sentence, ask for the respective administration letter at Desembargo do Paço and make a tombo.
Acórdão of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the petition of the supplicant [Manuel Rebelo], following the sequestration of the chapel's assets, moved by the procurador da Coroa. The sentence orders the enforcement of the 1622-04-15 sentence, which proves the chapel does not belong to the Crown and that it was registered as absolute.
Acórdão of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the civil suit between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and the priest Manuel Nunes, defendant, about the chapel established by Martinho Pires and Domingos Pires, brothers and clerics, at the altar of Nossa Senhora, in the church of Izeda. The process follows another one, by the ecclesiastical court, since the chapel was established by cleric. The sentence absolves the defendant, because he is a descendant of the institutors. Sentence handed down by Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, juiz das Capelas da Coroa e tombos da Coroa, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.
Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between José de Oliveira, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against the religious of the convent of Divina Providência, defendants, on the administration of the entails instituted by António Sanches, reduced to one. The sentence condemns the defendants, as D. Violante cannot appoint administrators for the entailed assets, who were not descendants of the institutor. It declares the entail vacant for the Crown, handing over the administration to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, in the form of the warrant he had. Orders the entail to register at the Torre do Tombo and at the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa.
Acórdão em relação, judging a process of motion between Juliana Maria de Santo António, appellant, against José de Oliveira, appellee, about the possession of some houses in Lisbon, located in front of the church of São Nicolau, property of the chapel instituted by António Sanches, in convent of Nossa Senhora da Graça of Lisbon. The sentence judges part of the motions as proven, demonstrating that not all the houses in the dispute were entailed to the chapel of António Sanches. Orders that the previous sentence be fulfilled, but only on the entailed houses.
Acórdão declaring that Inês Nunes, defendant, is not obligated to celebrate annual masses for her husband's soul, during her lifetime. Nevertheless, she should guarantee that after her death someone she chooses will fulfil the pious obligations instituted by the couple. The defendant is obligated to give a copy of an extract of the will she and her husband had made to the convent of S. Domingos of Lisboa, where he is buried.
Acórdão ordering the execution of the court sentence issued against the defendant which unlawfully possessed lands entailed to Rui Grego and Valentina de Almeida's entail.
Acórdão of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the civil suit between priest Pedro Gonçalves Fraga, author, represented by Cristóvão Teixeira, his attorney, and the procurador da Coroa. The sentence recognizes the sentence of 1673-02-07 had not been carried out (the Crown did not take possession of the chapel) and that now it was proved that the author was of the lineage of the institutor. It is ordered that the sequestration of assets be lifted and the chapel be registered as absoluta.
Acórdão em relação judging a civil process of motion about the chapel instituted by Leonor Cacela. The sentence confirms the previous one, legitimately acknowledging the administration of [Manuel Vaz da Corda] and condemning the appellant, unidentified, of the motion.
Acórdão judging a civil deed between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Maria Brás and António Pires, her husband, administrators of the chapel of Pedro Brás and Inês de Castro. The sentence absolves the defendants, alleging that the sale of the chapel's properties, in order to comply with the legacy of the institutor's will and the settlement of their debts, were not sufficient reasons to remove them from the chapel administration, as long as they reinstated those that they had unduly alienated. The administrators are ordered to make a drop of the chapel's goods, with the present sentence, and register it in the Torre do Tombo and in the Provedoria. Judgment given by desembargador Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, juiz dos tombos, averiguação e manifestações das Capelas da Coroa, in the name of Filipe III, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa. There are also two dispatchs of doutor Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, ordering the inventory of the chapel's assets to be carried out (dated 1623-09-17) and ordering the administrator to make a bond.
Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Luís Lopes Lobo, defendant, on the administration of the chapels instituted by Domingos Esteves Bem-lhe-Quero and Maior Domingues, in Estremoz. The sentence acquits the defendant, as the legitimate administrator of the chapels, for being a descendant of D. Iria, previous administrator. Orders the chapels to be removed from the list of Capelas da Coroa. Orders that the tombo of the chapels be registered in the Torre do Tombo and in the Provedoria.
Acórdão ordering the lifting of the sequestration of the assets of the chapels instituted by Domingos Esteves Bem-lhe-Quero and Maior Domingues, as they do not belong to the Crown. On the contrary, it orders the confiscation of the assets of the chapel instituted by Teresa Martins to be maintained, since it has not been proven that it is not belonging to the Crown.
Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Domingos da Fonseca, defendant, administrator of the chapel established by Pedro Afonso, in the church of São Miguel of Freixo, on the outskirts of Fonte Arcada. The sentence orders the tombo, registered at Torre do Tombo and at the Provedoria, and that the administrators comply with the charges. Judgment given by desembargador Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, juiz dos tombos, averiguação e manifestações das Capelas da Coroa, in the name of Filipe III, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.
Acórdão declaring that this chapel is administrated by the defendants' family for the last 120 years, which is the family of the institutor, and therefore doesn't belong to the Crown. This court sentence must be registered in the books of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa and in books of the Torre do Tombo. Signed by Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, Juiz do Tombo da Capela da Coroa, and undersigned by Pedro Almirante, Escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.
Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against João Lopes de Pina, defendant, about the administration of the chapels established by Vasco Esteves Bousão and Maria Martins Bousão, his wife. The sentence proves that Vasco Esteves Bousão's chapel belonged to the Crown and that Maria Martins Bousão's was absoluta. Consequently, it determines that the defendant should leave the administration of the first, as ordered in the previous sentence, but can legitimately administer the second. It mandates Barnabé Maldonado, escrivão, by order of the provedor or the juiz de fora, to take possession of the chapel of Vasco Esteves Bousão, and that António Barbosa acts as provisional administrator.
Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against João Lopes de Pina, defendant, about the administration of the chapels established by Vasco Esteves Bousão and Maria Martins Bousão, his wife. The sentence orders a tombo to be made and recorded at the Torre do Tombo, as an epitaph to be placed in the chapels. Only then could can be abolished the sequestration of assets of Maria Martins Bousão's chapel and handed over the administration to the defendant.
Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Gomes Ravasco, defendant, administrator of the chapels instituted by João Fernandes and Catarina Rodrigues Pimenta. The sentence absolves the defendant, as the legitimate administrator of the chapels. He orders the chapel to be removed from the list of the Capelas da Coroa, the administrator to make a tombo and register it in the Provedoria and in the church. He should also place a tombstone in the chapels saying "João Fernandes e Catarina Rodrigues Pimenta ordenaram esta capela com missa quotidiana e fábrica na forma da instituição de que é administrador de sua geração Gomes Ravasco”.
Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion filed by the Conde de Sarzedas, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, on the administration of the chapel and entail instituted by Branca Eanes and Martinho do Sem, in the convent of São Domingos of Santarém. The judgment judges the motions as proven, demonstrating that the appellant was a descendant of the institutors and that the succession in the entail had been regulated by the institutors' dispositions, there being no reason for it to belong to the Crown. It orders the appellee to leave the administration, which he hands over to the appellant.
Acórdão judging a civil deed between Francisco de Oliveira, plaintiff, and Bartolomeu Dias Favacho, defendant. The sentence judges the chapel to be vacant for the Crown, because it is administered by clerics, against the Ordinations. The administration is given to the author, as long as he fulfills the charges, makes the tombo and registers it in the book of the Capelas da Coroa.
Acórdão judging a civil process between Francisco de Oliveira, plaintiff, and António Barreiros Favacho, defendant. The sentence condemns the defendant for dissipating the chapel's assets and orders their delivery to the plaintiff. The judgment given by doutor Diogo Marchão Temudo, desembargador dos agravos and juiz dos feitos da Coroa e fazenda, in the name of D. João IV.
Acórdão issued by the Relação da Baía confirming the sentence issued by the Ouvidor and Provedor das Capelas e Resíduos da Paraíba in which he absolved Salvador Duarte Gomes da Silveira, son of António Barbalho Bezerra, of the charges made against them by Maria Barbalho Bezerra, their aunt and sister respectively, and her husband Baltazar Bezerra, appellants, regarding his right to succeed on the administration of the entail. The magistrate condemned the appellants to pay for the process fees.
Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between António Antunes, plaintiff, tutor of João Rodrigues, against the procurador da Coroa and António de Aguiar da Silva, defendants, on the administration of the chapel of Fernando Daires, in Lisbon. The sentence declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, since the death of João Vieira, last administrator, left none of the founder's relatives. It orders that the chapel be registered in the “Livros das Capelas da Coroa” and in the Torre do Tombo and hands over the administration to the defendant [António de Aguiar da Silva], only during his lifetime, who should request the respective administration letter.
Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Pedro Barreto, António Colaço, Gaspar Gonçalves and Maria Barreto, defendants, administrators of the chapels of Duarte Barreto, Diogo Barreto, Beatriz Gomes, Maior Gomes Raposa and Maria Gonçalves Raposa, located in Serpa. The sentence absolves the defendants, because they are legitimate descendants of the founders and fulfill the charges. It is ordered that the chapels should be crossed out from the list of the Capelas da Coroa and that the sentence be registered at Torre do Tombo and at the Provedoria. Judgment given by desembargador Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, juiz dos tombos, averiguação e manifestações das Capelas da Coroa, in the name of Filipe III, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.
Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between José Barreto Valdevinos de Vasconcelos, plaintiff, against the provedor and brothers of the Santa Casa da Misericórdia of Évora, defendants, on the administration of the chapels instituted by Belchior Barreto, Fernando Barreto, Diogo Pires and Gaspar Barreto Cabral. The sentence judges the four chapels as vacant for the Crown, and the plaintiff cannot prove to be a descendant of any of the institutors. It acquits the defendants and orders the chapels to be registered at the Torre do Tombo and the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa.
Vasconcelos, José Barreto Valdevinos de (flor.1691-1697)
Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion filed by Luís Correia, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Filipa Rodrigues, in Évora. The sentence judges the motions as proven, recognizing the appellant as a legitimate administrator of the chapel, since he was the son of Manuel Correia, previously judged as a legitimate administrator of the chapel. It orders that the sequestration of the chapel's assets be lifted and that it be recorded, where necessary, that the chapel did not belong to the Crown.
Acórdão handed down by Luís Afonso, chantre of the Cathedral of Braga, judging a civil process made by Vasco Eanes de Camões, vigário-geral of D. João Galvão, bishop of Coimbra, between Bishop D. Galvão and the church of Coimbra, plaintiffs, against Gil and Lopo, sons of Diogo Gil and tutored by Lopo Gil, and Isabel Dias, their sister, defendants, concerning the administration of the chapel instituted by Domingos Domingues, which had been administered by Diogo Gil. The bishop of Coimbra claimed that he had the right to appoint an administrator for the chapel, while the sentence of first instance, handed down by the vigário-geral of the diocese, proved that the compromise of the chapel stated that its administrator should be the eldest son or daughter of the previous administrator, without making a difference between men and women. Isabel Dias, defendant, is recognised as the legitimate administrator of the chapel. The second instance sentence handed down in the arcebispado of Braga confirms the previous one. It contains insert a petition presented by D. João Galvão, an interlocutory by Vasco Eanes de Camões, vigário-geral of the diocese of Coimbra, a sentence by the same vigário, and an acórdão of the arcebispado of Braga, validating the previous sentence by the vigário-geral of Coimbra.
Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion filed by José Correia de Andrade, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, about the chapel instituted by Pedro Cabaços. The sentence judges the motions as proven, as the chapel is not of the Crown and the appellant is a descendant of Beatriz Calva, previously judged as the legitimate administrator of the chapel. It orders the sequestration of the chapel's assets to be lifted.
Acórdão judging a civil process between Pedro Dias and Antónia de Morais, authors, against Diogo Lopes de Mesquita and D. Joana, his wife, defendants, because of the administration of the chapel established by Florence Eanes, in the church of Santa Maria de Guimarães. The sentence condemns the defendant to leave the chapel administration and hand it over to the plaintiff. Sentence handed down by Doutor Manuel da Fonseca and signed by Pedro Lamirante.
Acórdão em relação, demonstrating that the chapel had vacated for the Crown, since the first administrator had not appointed a successor. Vicente Pereira, the supplicant, had denounced the chapel as a vacancy for the Crown, having received the corresponding denunciation warrant of administration. Once the acknowledgment record has been completed, the sentence orders that the administration be handed over to the supplicant, in days of his life, and must fulfill the charges, make the inventory of the assets and register it in the Books of the Capelas da Coroa and in the Torre do Tombo.
Acordão proving that Gonçalo Rodrigues and Leonor Afonso's entail belonged to the crown, and therefore João Camelo's wife did not have the right to succeed him as administrator.
Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between João de Sampaio Lobo, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against D. Antónia de Amorim and her husband, defendants, about the administration of the chapel of São João, instituted by Constança Esteves, in the church of Santa Maria de Estremoz. The sentence acquits the defendants, as legitimate administrators of the chapel, which, in this way, was not found vacant for the Crown.
Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Manuel de Macedo de Siqueira, defendant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Moninho Pais and D. Clara, his wife, in the church of Santa Maria da Orada, in Avis. The sentence judges the chapel as a vacancy for the Crown, as it was instituted by lay people and, therefore, cannot be administered by ecclesiastics, nor can they appoint administrators to it. Furthermore, the administrator had no tombo, no institution, no document that would legitimize the administration. He orders that the chapel be registered in the Torre do Tombo and in the books of the Capelas da Coroa and make his assets' tombo.
Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion, filed by Francisco de Macedo de Siqueira, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Moninho Pais and D. Clara, his wife, in the church of Santa Maria da Orada, in Avis. The sentence judges the motions as proven, ordering the lifting of the sequestration of the chapel's assets, which, previously, had already been judged as not belonging to the Crown. It also orders the necessary records to be made in the books of the Capelas da Coroa.
Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion, filed by Luís da Silva de Sousa, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Maria Martins Bousão, in Estremoz. The sentence judges the motions as proven, ordering the lifting of the sequestration of the assets of Maria Martins Bousão's chapel. It orders, however, that it be maintained until, by a certificate from the Torre do Tombo, they can be distinguished from those in the chapel of Vasco Esteves Bousão.
Acórdão of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the civil process between procurador da Coroa, author, against Manuel Barbosa and D. Margarida Godinha, his wife, defendants, due to the sequestration ordered by the procurador da Coroa about the assets of the chapel of Santa Clara, instituted by João Miguéis in the church of Santa Maria de Sintra. The sentence shows the chapel was not of the Crown and that the administrators were appointed by their predecessors. The defendants are acquitted of non-compliance with the charges, as the chapel was reduced in income, ordering that, in the future, they seek to comply with them, as well as recover the lost assets and carry out a new tombo. They were also required to make a statement on the institutor's grave, stating that, due to the reduction in income, it was necessary to reduce charges. Only after this declaration should the sequestration of assets be lifted. Sentence handed down by Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, Juiz das Capelas da Coroa e tombos da Coroa, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.
Acórdão of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the civil process between procurador da Coroa, author, against Manuel Barbosa and D. Margarida Godinha, his wife, defendants. As a result of the acórdão of 1628-02-18, whose compliance is ordered, the charges are reduced. Sentence handed down by Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, Juiz das Capelas da Coroa e tombos da Coroa, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.
Acórdão of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the embargoes presented by priest João da Costa Cameiro as proven, since, in a acórdão of 1628-11-20, it was proved that priest Manuel Nunes was a descendant of the institutors. The sentence recognizes, for the same reasons, the priest João da Costa Cameiro as the legitime administrator of the chapel, which does not belong to the Crown, ordering, for this reason, its removal of the list and book of the Capelas da Coroa and also the end of the sequestration of its assets.
Acórdão ordering the lifting of the sequestration of the assets of the chapels instituted by Domingos Esteves Bem-lhe-Quero and Maior Domingues, as they do not belong to the Crown. On the contrary, it orders the confiscation of the assets of the chapel instituted by Teresa Martins to be maintained, since it has not been proven that it is not belonging to the Crown.
Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between Francisco do Vale Soutomaior, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador, against the licenciado Brás de Oliveira Pais, appointed curador for the chapel, about the administration of the chapel of Gregório Lourenço and Maria Borges, his wife, located on the island of Santiago, Cabo Verde. The sentence declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, ordering it to be registered in the “Livro das Capelas da Coroa” and in the Torre do Tombo, and delivered to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, in the form of the denunciation warrant of administration to him presented.
Acórdão em relação judging a civil process of motion between André de Castro de Cal, appellant, and Francisco do Vale Soutomaior, appellee, about the administration of the chapel of Gregório Lourenço and Maria Borges, his wife. The sentence confirms the previous one, judging the motions as unproven.
Acórdão of Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the petition presented by Manuel Gomes, supplicant, due to the sequestration ordered by the procurador da Coroa about the assets of the chapel instituted by Vicente Pires and Sancha Fernandes. The sentence determines that the chapel be removed from the Book of Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, as it does not belong to it, and inscribed in the Book of Absolutas.
Acórdão ordering the removal of this chapel from the list of Capelas da Coroa. The judges saw the entail foundation deed and have appointed an administrator with a salary. In 1587 it was made the tombo and there was a layman administrator as it was ordered by the institutors.
Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between D. António Henriques de Almeida, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Gonçalo Fernandes, defendant, on the administration of the chapel of Guiomar Romacha. The sentence judges the chapel as a vacancy for the Crown, since the administrator was not a descendant of the institutor. Condemns the defendant to leave the chapel to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, in accordance with the denunciation warrant of administration he had. It orders the chapel to be registered in the “Livro das Capelas vagas” and in the Torre do Tombo.
Acórdão em relação, ordering the end of the sequestration of the assets of the chapel instituted by João Domingues, abbot of Sabadim, since Francisco de Sousa Lobato, supplicant, was its legitimate administrator, having received a warrant of administration, and made the tombo of the chapel's assets.
Acórdão, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Luís de Góis de Mendonça, defendant, on the administration of the Minguelhos' chapel, instituted by Lourenço Martins Minguelhos and Vasco Martins Minguelhos, in the church of Santa Maria da Lagoa de Monsaraz . The sentence declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, and it must be registered in the book of Capelas da Coroa and the properties of the demand in the respective tombo. A tombstone should be placed that said: “Nesta igreja se dizem sessenta missas pela capela que deixaram Lourenço Martins e Vasco Martins Minguelhos que vagou para a Coroa pelos bens declarados no tombo e esta memória se fez no ano de mil seiscentos e vinte e dois”. It orders the Provedor to take possession of the chapel and that the future administrator make tombo of the assets and fulfill the charges.
Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between José Barreto Valdevinos de Vasconcelos, plaintiff, against the provedor and brothers of the Santa Casa da Misericórdia of Évora, defendants, on the administration of the chapels instituted by Belchior Barreto, Fernando Barreto, Diogo Pires and Gaspar Barreto Cabral. The sentence judges the four chapels as vacant for the Crown, and the plaintiff cannot prove to be a descendant of any of the institutors. It acquits the defendants and orders the chapels to be registered at the Torre do Tombo and the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa.
Vasconcelos, José Barreto Valdevinos de (flor.1686-1697)
Acórdão em relação, judging the motions presented by José Barreto Valdevinos de Vasconcelos as unproven, ordering the fulfillment of the previous sentence.
Vasconcelos, José Barreto Valdevinos de (flor.1686-1697)
Acórdão em relação, judging a process between José de Oliveira e Silva, appellant, against Joana Siaviliger, appellee, about the possession of an income (renda), in the amount of 30.000 réis, belonging to the chapel instituted by António Sanches. The sentence declares the motions presented as unproven, confirming the previous sentence.
Acórdão em relação, judging a process of motion between José de Oliveira e Silva, appellant, against José da Costa Pinheiro and his wife, appellee, about the possession of a farmstead (casal) allegedly belonging to the chapel instituted by António Sanches. The sentence condemns the defendants, ordering the delivery of the farmstead to the appellant, as it was demonstrated that Arcela's farmstead had been bought and entailed by the institutor.
Acórdão em Relação opposing the Procurador da Coroa, as plaintiff, against the defendant Manuel Botelho da Silveira. The defendant doesn't prove that he is descendant of the institutor, nor has the entail foundation deed nor accomplish the pious obligations. The hospital doesn't have beds nor wraps. Therefore the hospital founded by Martinho Eanes, that belongs to the defendant, must be separated from the Hospital of Cordovelos, and the last one will be integrated in the list of the Capelas da Coroa and made its tombo.
Acórdão of the king with his Desembargadores confirming the court sentence issued by the judge of the tombo and condemning the religious of the monastery of Nossa Senhora do Monte do Carmo of Lisbon, appellants, in the proceedings expenses.
Acórdão of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the civil process between Lucas de Castro Delgado, author, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against priest Leonardo Martins, defendant, about Julião Pires' chapel, in Abreiro. The sentence condemns the defendant for not being a descendant of the institutor and proves the chapel was vacant for the Crown, legitimately belonging to the plaintiff, who had received a denunciation warrant of administration. It is ordered that the Crown take possession of the chapel and that be registered in the books of the Capelas da Coroa and Torre do Tombo. The defendant should deliver the assets to the plaintiff.
Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between [Manuel Vaz da Corda], plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against the administrator of the chapel instituted by Leonor Cacela, unidentified. The sentence declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, since the defendant could not prove to be a descendant of the institutor. It orders that the chapel be registered in the “Livro das Capelas da Coroa” and in the Torre do Tombo and delivers its administration to the plaintiff, only during his lifetime, and for that, he must request the respective administration letter at the Desembargo do Paço.
Acórdão ordering the survey of the sequestration of the chapel's assets established by Martinho Eanes and Francisco Eanes, since Domingos Luís Rasquinho, defendant, had proved to be the grandson of Gabriel Luís Rasquinho and legitimate administrator of the chapel.
Acórdão of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the civil process between Estevão Arez Pessanha, on behalf of Manuel de Abreu Pessanha, his son, author, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Nicolau Fraião and Maria Velha, his wife, defendants, about the denunciation of the chapel instituted by Aires Vasques and Maria Eanes, in Alcácer do Sal. The sentence absolves the defendants and orders the chapel to be registered as a chapel absoluta.
Acórdão, issued by the Desembargo, in an appeal filed by D. Luísa Mesquita Pimentel, plaintiff, against Jorge de Melo Coutinho, and his wife, and D. João Casco de Melo, and his wife, defendants, relating to the administration of the entail instituted by Gil Rodrigues de Vasconcelos, following a court sentence by the conservador of the Universidade of Évora. The sentence proves the appeals of the plaintiff, judges her to be the closest relative of the last owner of the entail, which belongs to the institutor's lineage and condemns the defendants to delivery her the entailed properties.
Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between the prioress and nuns of the convent of Santa Mónica of Évora, on behalf of D. Francisca da Noronha, plaintiffs, against the procurador da fazenda real, defendant, on the administration of the Cascos' entail. The sentence condemns the defendant to return to the plaintiffs the possession of the property of the entail. There follows a related acórdão, dated 1664-03-24, receiving the motions presented by the procurador da fazenda real, and another, dated 1646-03-17, confirming the first.
Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Roque de Macedo Pereira, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against António de Macedo Pereira, defendant, about the chapel instituted by Francisca de Sampaio Borges, in Estremoz. The sentence judges the chapel as a vacancy for the Crown, condemning the defendant and ordering the delivery of administration to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, in the form of the denunciation warrant of administration he had. It orders the chapel to register at the Torre do Tombo and at the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, and the plaintiff must request the respective administration letter.
Acórdão of the Desembargo do Paço, issued by doutores Francisco Nogueira, juiz dos Feitos da Coroa e Fazenda, and Luís Lopes de Carvalho, judging a civil process between doutor Gaspar Barbosa and D. Leonor Soares, his wife, plaintiffs, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against João Lopes de Pina and Mécia Antónia, his mother and tutor, defendants, on the administration of the chapels established by Vasco Esteves Bousão and Maria Martins Bousão, his wife. It comes from an exemplification (dated 1623-02-18). The sentence condemns the defendants to leave the plaintiffs to the administration of the chapel established by Vasco Esteves Bousão, since they had not presented any document that would legalize this administration. On the contrary, it has not been proved that the assets of Maria Martins Bousão's chapel were attached to those of the chapel established by her husband, recognizing the administration of the defendants as legitimate.
Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against João Lopes de Pina, defendant, about the administration of the chapels established by Vasco Esteves Bousão and Maria Martins Bousão, his wife. The sentence orders a tombo to be made and recorded at the Torre do Tombo, as an epitaph to be placed in the chapels. Only then could can be abolished the sequestration of assets of Maria Martins Bousão's chapel and handed over the administration to the defendant.
Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion, filed by Gaspar Limpo Homem, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, on the administration of the chapel instituted by João Fernandes and Catarina Rodrigues Pimenta, in Moura. The sentence judges the motions as proven, recognizing the appellant as a legitimate administrator and ordering the lifting of the sequestration of the chapel's assets. It should also be registered, where necessary, that the chapel did not belong to the Crown.
Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion filed by Sancho de Melo da Silva, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, about the Torrosa's farm (herdade), on the outskirts of Avis. The sentence judges the motions as proven, revoking the previous sentence. It is proven that the chapel of Afonso Pires Rodrigues does not belong to the Crown and that the Torrosa's farm, located on the outskirts of Avis, did not belong to this one, but to the entail instituted by Constança de Castelo Branco, which the appellant is administor legitimate. Orders the Sequestration of the farm to be lifted.
Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between José Coelho Varela, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against José Teixeira da Fonseca and his wife, defendants, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Paulo Arrais de Mendonça, in the church of Misericórdia of Almada. The opponents were Estêvão Cordeiro Soares and D. Francisca Machone, his wife. The defendants did not present any opposition to the libel of accusation, acknowledging that they were illegitimate administrators of the chapel. The sentence gives the opponents' allegations as unproven, as it was not possible to prove that D. Francisca Machone was a family member of the last administrator of the chapel. It judges the chapel as a vacant for the Crown, and must be registered in the Coroa and Torre do Tombo books. It orders that the administration be delivered to the plaintiff, in the form of the warrant he had, and, with the sentence, within two months, he must request the administration letter at the Desembargo do Paço.
Acórdão condemning the Procurador da Fazenda to restitute the assets incorporated in Martinho Ferreira's entail to Henrique Pestana Travassos, its administrator, which had been seized after António Travassos, the entail's former administrator and the latter's uncle, use them as guarantee.
Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between Pedro Semedo Estaço, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Luís de Oliveira Pantoja and Teresa Maria de Sousa, his wife, defendants, about the administration of Catarina Fernandes' chapel, in the convent of Nossa Senhora da Graça of Lisbon. The judgment declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, ordering the defendants to leave its administration. It also orders that the chapel be registered in the “Livros das Capelas da Coroa” and in the Torre do Tombo and delivers the administration to the plaintiff, who, with the present judgment, should request the respective administration letter at the Desembargo do Paço.
Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Luís Lopes Lobo, defendant, on the administration of the chapels instituted by Domingos Esteves Bem-lhe-Quero and Maior Domingues, in Estremoz. The sentence acquits the defendant, as the legitimate administrator of the chapels, for being a descendant of D. Iria, previous administrator. Orders the chapels to be removed from the list of Capelas da Coroa. Orders that the tombo of the chapels be registered in the Torre do Tombo and in the Provedoria.
Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Bartolomeu de Sousa Mexia, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Maria da Silva, defendant, about the chapel instituted by Isabel Correia. The sentence judges the chapel as a vacancy for the Crown, as there are no descendants of the institutor. It condemns the defendant and delivers the administration to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, in the form of the denunciation warrant of administration he had. Orders the chapel to be registered at the Torre do Tombo and at the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa. The plaintiff, with the sentence, had to request the respective administration letter at the Desembargo do Paço.
Acórdão em relação, judging the motions presented by José Barreto Valdevinos de Vasconcelos as unproven, ordering the fulfillment of the previous sentence.
Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between unidentified parties, of the denunciation of the chapel instituted by Leonor Pires, in Barcarena. The sentence declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, since there are no descendants of the institutor and it has been proven that the chapel was effectively established and that the Carnaxide's farmstead (casal) were entailed. The defendant is ordered to leave the property and the administration is handed over to the plaintiff. Orders the chapel to be registered in the Crown's books and in the Torre do Tombo. The plaintiff, with the sentence, should request the respective administration letter.
