Acórdão do Desembargo confirming a previous sentence from Juiz de Fora with regard to the chapel of Manuel de Valadares and revoking it with regard to the entail of Doutor João de Valadares and Beatriz Lopes de Carvalho, his wife. It absolves the defendant, not named, and declares him as the rightful successor, since the plaintiff's mother was already deceased when Manuel de Valadares, the last administrator, died, and the defendant mother, the late Mariana de Valadares, was his closest relative and was from the institutors bloodline.

Acórdão do Desembargo ordering the fulfilment of a previous sentence of Desembargadores da Casa do Porto and declaring that the appellant should pay the income generated since the contested lawsuit.

Acórdão do Desembargo that revokes a previous sentence from Corregedor do Cível, absolving Diogo Gomes de Lemos, defendant, from the requested by Maria Correia Ferreira, plaintiff, and Joana Ferreira de Vilhena, religious in the monastery of Santa Ana of Viana, opponent, and judging him as the rightful successor of the entails of João Martins Ferreira and Pantaleão Ferreira, his son, because he descends from Inês Correia, daughter of João Martins Ferreira and sister of Pantaleão Ferreira. The plaintiff is excluded from the succession because it is not proven that Violante Correia, her ancestor, is daughter of João Martins Ferreira and sister of Pantaleão Ferreira. The opponent is excluded because she is a religious.

Acórdão do Desembargo ordering the fulfilment of the appealed sentence an revoking a previous sentence, regarding the return of the price of the sold houses.

Acórdão do Desembargo confirming a previous sentence from Juiz de Fora with regard to the chapel of Manuel de Valadares and revoking it with regard to the entail of Doutor João de Valadares and Beatriz Lopes de Carvalho, his wife. It absolves the defendant, not named, and declares him as the rightful successor, since the plaintiff's mother was already deceased when Manuel de Valadares, the last administrator, died, and the defendant mother, the late Mariana de Valadares, was his closest relative and was from the institutors bloodline.

Acórdão do Desembargo do Rei judging D. António de Carvalho, plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the entail of Casa de Basto, founded by D. Diogo de Castro and D. Leonor de Ataíde, his wife, and the entails of D. Beatriz de Vilhena, D. Madalena de Sousa and D. Maria de Vilhena, in representation of his late father, D. Fernando de Castro, first-born son of D. Diogo de Castro, conde de Basto, and not excluded for the reasons presented by D. Maria Madalena de Castro, defendant, such as his marriage without his parent's permission and his marriage with a descendant of a cristão-novo, which are not proven. It condemns the defendant to relinquish to the plaintiff the entails, with their income generated since the contested lawsuit.

Acórdão do Desembargo partially confirming and partially revoking the previous sentence from Corregedor do Cível da Corte. It judges Cristóvão de Almada, plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the entails of Oliveira, founded by D. Martinho Pires de Oliveira, archbishop of Braga, and Vale de Sobrados, founded by D. Rodrigo, bishop of Lamego and son of D. Martinho, because he was the only candidate already born when his uncle, Luís Francisco de Oliveira, died. It condemns the defendants to relinquish to him the entailed assets, with their income generated since the contested lawsuit until their return. It is proven that the entail of Vale de Sobrados is not separated from the entail of Oliveira and both are administrated by the same person.

Acórdão (transcription) by the Desembargo confirming that the properties referred to in the previous sentence were indeed an entail and absolving the defendant, António Perestrelo, who is judged the rightful successor of Brásia Nunes' entail, since she hadn't expressly excluded natural children from the succession. The clause referring the illegitimate exclusion only concerns the ancestors and descendants and not the collateral relatives.

Acórdão do Desembargo partially confirming and partially revoking the previous sentence. It condemns Vicente Coelho, defendant, to only pay the income generated since the contested lawsuit, because he owned it in good faith.

Acórdão from Desembargo confirming the sentence of Provedor dos Resíduos, which transferred the proceedings to Juízo Eclesiástico, and declaring all the sentences procecuted in his Juízo as cancelled, because he is unqualified to judge the will's execution.

Acórdão do Desembargo ordering the fulfilment of the previous sentence from Corregedor do Cível da Corte and declaring that the defendant will pay the 150.000 réis with no alternative.

Acórdão from Desembargo that confirms the previous sentence, declararing that it is proven that Manuel Mendes Mexia, defendant, did not act with ill will. It condemns the defendant to only pay the income from the contested lawsuit until their return and to pay the ninth part of the proceedings' expenses.

Acórdão that revokes a previous sentence from Corregedor, judging Jerónimo Teles Barreto de Albuquerque, appellant, as the rightful successor of the entail of Afonso de Albuquerque and D. Maria de Noronha, his wife, because he is the grandson of Pedro Barreto, great-grandson of Gonçalo de Albuquerque, first administrator, and his descendant by straight line, so he is closer to him than D. Francisco Luís de Albuquerque.

Acórdão (transcription) by the Desembargo ordering the fulfilment of the previous sentence of Corregedor do Cível da Corte and declaring that the defendant is also forced to return to the plaintiff assets worth 2 000 réis of annual income, because João de Morais and his wife, Eugénia da Veiga, the defendant's mother, did not do it while they were administrators.

Acórdão from Desembargo ordering the fulfilment of the sentence of Desembargadores dos agravos da Relação do Porto and declaring the reserved right of Isabel Fernandes, plaintiff, aggravated.

Acórdão do Desembargo partially revoking a previous sentence from Desembargadores da Relação of Baía, which confirmed a previous one from Ouvidor Geral. It absolves the defendant from paying the income or unlawful interests (usuras) of the mortgage imposed in the sugar mill of S. Lourenço, in Rio de Pernamarim, in the outskirts of Baía.

Acórdão that partially revokes the previous sentence, condemning the defendant, Gregório Mascarenhas Homem, as heir of his wife, D. Sebastiana da Câmara, to return to the plaintiff all movables of Afonso Garcia Tinoco or their price to buy properties to the entail of Afonso Garcia Tinoco. He is absolved from paying the money of the rescission of a wheat moio census paid by Domingos Cardoso and the value of the portions of Luís Mendes Barreto and Luís Gonçalves in the estate of Borras.

Acórdão ruling the first and second articles as proven and the fulfilment of the hindered sentence, regarding the estate and money returning by the defendants to the plaintiff.

Acórdão from Desembargo that confirms the previous sentence from Desembargador Juiz Comissário, clarifying how the income that the defendants should pay and the improvements that the plaintiff should pay to them will be estimated.

Acórdão do Desembargo ordering the fulfilment of the appealed sentence and its record in the chancery.

Acórdão absolving the defendant from the payment of the past pensions.

Acórdão from Desembargo which revoke a previous sentence, judging the appellant, Francisco de Melo, as the rightful successor of the entail founded by Luís Melo Freire, in 1590, in Quinta de Nespereira, for his father's vested right. It also condemns the appellee, Francisco Soares de Melo, to relinquish the entail's properties to the appellant. The decision was made based on the description of the Freire family branch in question to distinguish it from other branches of the same name.

Acórdão do Desembargo declaring that they receive the last motion's article and not the others.

Acórdão do Desembargo ordering the fulfilment of the appealed sentence and its exclusion from the lawsuit.

Acórdão do Desembargo ordering that the appealed sentence goes to chancery and reserving to the appellant the right to demand the maintenance.

Acórdão from Desembargo which revoke the previous sentence, condemning the defendant, D. Maria Josefa da Cunha, to return the income of the properties of the entail of D. Pedro de Lima since the death of her husband onwards and absolving her from the return of the two properties of Casa Branca and Ervedal, once she received them, by donation, from her old husband, as a reward for her youth.

Acórdão from Desembargo revoking a previous sentence from Juiz and Ouvidor, because it rejected the motion of the appellant.

Acórdão from Desembargo ordering the fulfilment of a previous motioned sentence, given the evidences presented by the appellee on how he is from the institutor's bloodline.

Acórdão do Desembargo that revokes a previous sentence delivered from Juiz de Fora de Évora, condemning the defendant, not named, to relinquish the entail and chapel of Gonçalo Boto, with its income generated since the contested lawsuit, to Martinho Pais de Melo, plaintiff and relative to the institutor, judged as its rightful successor. It also absolves the plaintiff from relinquish the entail and chapel of Catarina Boto to the defendant, as requested in the counterclaim. It is proven that the defendant is the daughter of Isabel Fragosa, natural daughter of António Fragoso, and that the natural sons and their descendants are excluded from the succession.

Acórdão do Desembargo do Rei judging D. António de Castro, plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the entail of Casa de Basto, founded by D. Diogo de Castro and D. Leonor de Ataíde, his wife, and the entails of D. Beatriz de Vilhena, D. Madalena de Sousa and D. Maria de Vilhena, in representation of his late father, D. Fernando de Castro, first-born son of D. Diogo de Castro, conde de Basto, and not excluded for the reasons presented by D. Maria Madalena de Castro, defendant, such as his marriage without his parent's permission and his marriage with a descendant of a New Christian, which are not proven. It condemns the defendant to relinquish to the plaintiff the entails, with their income generated since the contested lawsuit.

Acórdão do Desembargo that revokes a previous sentence from Juiz Ordinário of Colares, judjing the award of a land, in Ferrolho, belonging to the entail of Mateus de Torres and António Dias and three chestnut groves in Boca da Mata, belonging to the entail of António Dias, both administrated by Francisco de Torres, appelant, to Maria Simões, widow, as void. It also orders to amend the asset's partitions of Maria Simões.

Acórdão from Desembargo partially confirming and partially revoking the previous sentence. It absolves the plaintiff, Manuel Viegas, from relinquish the estate of António Madeira (nephew) to the defendant, declaring his will as valid, but condemns him to relinquish the public debt instrument of 12.000 réis (in the meantime reduced to 9600 réis, by a king's order) to the defendant, Miguel Madeira, the entail's administrator. It refers that António Madeira (nephew) entailed his estate to a chapel, founded in his will.

Acórdão do Desembargo that revokes a previous sentence from Desembargores da Relação do Porto, judging Baltasar Gomes, plaintiff, as successor of the entail of licenciado Baltasar Gomes, because he is male and nephew of the last administrator, Manuel Gomes, son of his brother, male and older than their sister, Maria Filipa, defendant. It excludes the defendant from the succession and condemns her to return the entail to the plaintiff, with the income generated since the contested lawsuit.

Acórdão do Desembargo confirming the previous sentence from Ouvidor, who had revoked the judge sentence.

Acórdão do Desembargo that partially revokes the previous sentence from Corregedor do Cível da Corte, condemning the defendant to relinquish to the opponent the income generated since the contested lawsuit until its return, because he owned it with ill will after the contested lawsuit.

Acórdão (transcription) by the Desembargo confirming that the properties referred to in the previous sentence were indeed an entail and absolving the defendant, António Perestrelo, who is judged the rightful successor of Brásia Nunes' entail, since she hadn't expressly excluded natural children from the succession. The clause referring the illegitimate exclusion only concerns the ancestors and descendants and not the collateral relatives.