Sentence refusing the claims of the abbess and nuns of the convent of Santa Marta, to which D. Mariana, daughter of Filipa de Sousa and heir of D. Luísa de Góis, had bequeathed the properties entailed to her mother's chapel. They claimed these properties weren't entailed and that the obligations weren't perpetual, and as such the properties could be alienated, and the provedor das Capelas couldn't make a tombo of them.
Followed by a sentence dated 1612-03-06.

Sentence nullifying the sale of certain houses belonging to Vicente Soares de Vilas Boas which had been entailed to the chapel established by his father, Manuel Soares de Vilas Boas e Vilhegas, and administered by his brother, Jerónimo Soares de Vilhegas.

Sale, quittance, subrogation and obligation deed by which Manuel Correia and his wife Maria Zuzarte, daughter of the institutor Beatriz Gomes, sold their houses located in Alverca that were obligated to the celebration of masses in the Church of Nossa Senhora da Purificação de Bucelas. They incorporated land and an olive grove instead, also located in Alverca, in order to fulfil the chapel's obligations. This document was preceded by a procuration deed dated 1648-08-17, and followed by an Alvará dated 1652-12-05 confirming the subrogation.

Royal sentence judging the "brejo" and pine forest as part of the farmstead (quinta) of Marinha das Vacas, which belong to the Crown and was perpetually leased to conde de Portalegre, in 1499, altought they can not be considered as entailed, and condemning Francisco Rodrigues, o Merca Tudo, to relinquish them to D. Guiomar da Silveira.

Royal sentence regarding a legal action moved by João Alves, Luís Álvares, Pedro Alves, Margarida Gomes and Catarina Álvares against Fernando Gonçalves, lavrador, and his wife, Maria Alves. The appellants, which were Maria Alves' brothers and sisters, argued that, after their parents' death, Álvaro Eanes and Catarina Eanes, the defendants had unlawfully seized a vineyard in Panasqueira, Lisboa, which should had been partitioned among them. In turn, Fernando Gonçalves and his wife declared that the vineyard had been bequeathed by Inês Eanes Forjaz to Maria Eanes "a Calva", Maria Alves' grandmother, with the obligation of celebrating one annual mass for her soul in the church of the convent of S. Domingos of Benfica. Subsequently, the entail's first administrator donated it to her son, Álvaro Eanes, who, before his own death, appointed his daughter, Maria Alves, to administer it.
In view of the facts presented, the judges absolved the defendants and condemned the appellants to pay the court fees.

Royal sentence against D. Inês de Meneses, widow of Bernardo de Carvalho and tutor of her minor son, Rui de Carvalho de Albuquerque, administrator of the entail established by his grandfather, Rui de Carvalho. D. Inês de Meneses had started a conflict against D. Joana de Távora, declaring that her husband had improperly sold her a rent in an estate in Grândola which belonged to the entail of her son. It was proven, however, that this rent wasn't part of the entail, as it hadn't been included in the partitions made after the institutor's death, nor in the legitime of his son, Bernardo de Carvalho. Thus, the sale had been valid and D. Inês de Meneses was ordered to pay the charges.
Followed by deed of sale by which Bernardo de Carvalho sold the rent to D. Joana de Távora, declaring it free of any obligations or entail.

Royal sentence declaring that Luís de Andrade, António de Andrade and Antónia Serrão's son, Moço da Câmara do Rei, is the rightful administrator of Pedro Vasques de Pedra Alçada's chapel. It revoked the sale of the entailed lands (casal) in Peroleite, Sintra, made by António de Andrade to Violante de Basto. Contains a copy of an extract of a sentence concerning the court proceedings which opposed Manuel Barbosa, Promotor das Capelas, and João Lourenço, Solicitador das Capelas, to Violante de Basto and her heirs regarding the same subject.

Court sentence condemning Marcos Cacero and his wife, defendants, to relinquish to the plaintiffs, João Dias Coelho and his wife, not named, administrator, the farmstead (herdade) of Granja, located in the parish of Santa Clara of Louredo, belonging to the chapel and entail of Padre Rodrigo Eanes, with its income generated since the contested lawsuit. The property was improperly alienated by previous entail's administrators and later sold by Duarte Lopes Rosa to the plaintiffs.

Court sentence judging the sale of a portion of a vineyard, oil press and orchard as void and condemning the Provedor da Misercórdia de Portalegre, defendant, to relinquish the property to Diogo Fernandes de Almeida, plaintiff and administrator of the chapel of Frei Fernando, vigário of the church of Santa Maria do Castelo of Portalegre.

Court sentence judging the chapel of Margarida Nogueira, in the church of Salvador of Beja, as an appointment chapel and the barley field (ferragial), next Rio Verdeiro, as entailed to it. The judge orders Diogo de Brito, defendant, to relinquish the barley field, with the income since the contested lawsuit, to António Rodrigues Certão, plaintiff and husband of Helena da Cruz, the chapel's administrator.

Court sentence condemning Isabel Tinoco de Mesquita and her sons, defendants, to relinquish to licenciado Vicente Vaz, plaintiff and administrator, the land called Gasca, belonging to the entail of Vicente Vaz Alemão, with its income generated since the contested lawsuit. The property was improperly alienated by Ana Bocarro, the institutor's wife and last administrator.

Court sentence judging the village of Sanguinheda and other properties of Simão da Cunha, institutor, as entail and annuling the sale of this estate to the father/father-in-law of the defendants. The defendants are condemned to relinquish the village, other properties, their income and titles to the plaintiff, D. Pedro de Castelo Branco, represented by his mother and tutor, not named.

Court sentence absolving Diogo Fernandes Branco, defendant, from relinquish to Roque Acciaiuoli de Vasconcelos, plaintiff and administrator of the entail of Simão de Acciaiuoli, some houses and a mill sold by a previous administrator. It declares that if the plaintiff wants to annul the sale deed and pay the sale and improvements' price, the defendant is forced to annul it and to relinquish him the properties.

Court sentence condemning the defendants, not named, to relinquish a property of the chapel or entail of Margarida Antunes de Magalhães to the plaintiff, not named, administrator, whith it income generated since the contested lawsuit. The property was improperly sold because there was no subrogation, as demanded.

Court sentence absolving the defendant from relinquish the farmhouse (quinta) of Banda de Além, in Rossio da Mora, to D. Joana Coutinho, plaintiff and administrator of the chapel of Beatriz de Freitas. It is proven that the farmhouse, subrogated for some houses, is free from the mortgage of 408.000 réis and belongs to the defendant.

Court sentence condemning the defendant to relinquish to the plaintiffs the income of 20 alqueires of wheat, imposed in the farmstead (herdade) of Parreira, in Perna Seca, in the outskirts of Estremoz, entailed to the chapel of Catarina de Fontes, with its revenue generated since the contested lawsuit. The income was improperly sold by Maria de Fontes, last administrator, to Domingos Fernandes, from whom the defendant inherited it. The plaintiff's wife is the rightful successor of the chapel, because she is cousin and the closest relative of Maria de Fontes.

Court sentence condemning the defendants, not named, to pay to the plaintiff, not named, administrator of the entail of Vasco de Brito Freire, 3 contos 117.543 réis imposed in the sugar mill of S. Lourenço, in Rio de Pernamarim, in the outskirts of Baía, and corresponding to the available portion of the institutor, which D. Graça de Araújo, his wife, did not annexed to the entail, selling the sugar mil to the defendants. They also have to pay the equivalent income generated since the contested lawsuit.

Court sentence condemning Beatriz Álvares to relinquish to Álvaro Pires de Távora, plaintiff, some lands of the entail of Lourenço Pires de Távora and D. Catarina de Távora, with the income since the contested lawsuit. The lands were leased, according to the plaintiff's argument, or exchanged, according to the defendant's argument, by D. Catarina de Távora, institutor, to the defendant's mother, after the death of Lourenço Pires de Távora. Besides forbiding the estate's lease, the foundation deed forbids D. Catarina de Távora of exchange properties without Lourenço Pires de Távora's permission. It is also forbidden to exchange entailed properties without the king's licence.

Court sentence condemning the defendants to relinquish to the plaintiffs, D. Joana de Abreu, administrator, and António de Magalhães Barreto, her husband, some properties, located in Vilar de Escarigo, belonging to the chapel of João Gomes Caldas and improperly sold to the defendant by a previous administrator. The defendats must pay the income generated since the contested lawsuit, deducting the improvements made by them in the properties, which will be paid by the plaintiff.

Court sentence partially confirming and partially revoking the previous sentence from Juiz Vereador of Vila Viçosa. It states that the rescission of the income (foro) should not be included in the improvements to be paid by the plaintiffs, Pedro da Costa Tavares and D. Mariana Josefa da Silva. It also condemns Manuel Monteiro da Paz and his wife, defendants, to relinquish the olive grove's income since the death of the two sellers.

Court sentence ordering António Gomes, defendant, to return to Manuel Simões Perdigão, plaintiff, the properties belonging to the entail of Diogo Dias Perdigão that he improperly owns. He is condemned to relinquish the income of all assets generated since the undue occupation until its return, except the income generated by a vineyard he bought to the plaintiff's father, which he should only pay since the contested lawsuit.

Court sentence condemning the defendant to pay to the plaintiffs a portion of some houses allegadly belonging to the chapel of Francisca Calis and claimed by the plaintiffs, who argued that they are the closest relatives of the institutor. It absolves the defendants from the remaining request.

Court sentence condemning the defendant, an unnamed woman, to relinquish to her brother, Francisco Ferreira, plaintiff and administrator, a farmhouse (casal) belonging to the chapel of Baltasar Pires Maio and improperly given to her as a dowry by their parents. It also condemns the plaintiff to pay the defendant 26.663 réis, as requested by her in the counterclaim, to fulfil her dowry.

Court sentence absolving Manuel Gomes, defendant, from relinquish an olive grove, located in Fonte da Barroca, belonging to the chapel of Catarina Morata and improperly sold to him, to Maria Camelo, plaintiff and administrator, because she contributed to the sale and did not stop it. It reserves to the next successors of the chapel the right to recover the olive grove.

Court sentence condemning D. Benta de Sousa and João Gomes de Castro, her husband, defendants, to relinquish to D. Antónia Pereira de Castro, plaintiff and administrator of the entail of Rosal and Sago, founded by Doutor Gaspar Pereira, a vineyard, with a house and wine press, and a tilled plain (veiga), in Sago, in the outskirts of Monção, improperly sold by João Gomes de Castro, abade of Sopo and uncle of the plaintiff, to Reverendo Manuel Soares, ancestor of the defendants, after he donated them to the entail.

Court sentence condemning Damião Botelho da Silveira, defendant, to pay to Valentim da Costa Gentil, plaintiff, administrator of the chapel of Doutor Francisco Gentil, absent in India, and represented by his mother and attorney-in-fact, D. Inês Gentil, a deposit of 12.000 réis per year, corresponding to the income of some entailed houses, since the last acquittance until the present. The amount of 12.000 réis corresponds to a deposit offered by Estêvão Rodrigues to the plaintiff in a subrogation contract and only paid until he finds other free houses to subrogate. The defendant is in possession of the chapel's houses, but owes the income from 1641. Since the deposit does not change the entailed nature of the houses, they still belong to the chapel and the defendant has to pay the value in debt.

Court sentence condemning Isabel Rodrigues, defendant, to relinquish to André Pires and his wife, Isabel Fernandes, plaintiffs, an olive grove, belonging to the entail of Manuel Rodrigues Viegas and improperly sold, with the income from the contested lawsuit onwards.

Court sentence condemning the defendant, not named, to relinquish to the plaintiffs, not named, an annual income of 30 alqueires of wheat and barley, with its revenues generated since the undue occupation until its return, which she claims as belonging to the chapel of Marcos Pires. The income was donated by Marcos Pires to his freed slave, Filipa, who bequeath it to her granddaughter, who, in turn, sold it to the plaintiffs. The income was entailed only if Filipa did not have children.

Court sentence judging a litigation between Manuel Cardoso, plaintiff, and António Varela, defendant, about the ownership of the estate of the chapel of Maria Correia sold by Francisca Pires, mother of Manuel Cardoso, to Francisco Fernandes Encrespadeiro, who sold it to the defendant. It orders the defendant to return the estate to the plaintiff and the plaintiff to pay him the sale's price, the revenues and improvements.

Court sentence condemning the defendants to relinquish to the plaintiffs, including Maria Teles, wife of the plaintiff and administrator of the entail of Maria Dias, the half of the vineyard of Vale do Freire, with the income since the contested lawsuit, which was improperly seized to execute a debt of Manuel Teles, husband of the institutor and first administrator. The plaintiff should return to the defendants 31.750 réis, corresponding to the price of the acquisition at auction and to the income from the lease of the farmstead of Casa Branca, also improperly settled.

Court sentence condemning the defendants, including João Sardinha, to relinquish to Padre Álvaro Figueira, plaintiff and administrator of the chapel of Padre Manuel Fernando de Sande, an olive grove, located in Terra Branca, in the outskirts of Elvas, with its income since the contested lawsuit until de return, which was improperly sold to Pedro Coelho, father-in-law of the defendants, by Inês de Morais, niece of the institutor. Inês Morais received the olive grove by dowry from her aunt, sister of the institutor, who had not the right to alienate the entailed property.

Court sentence condemning Manuel Monteiro da Paz and his wife, defendants, to relinquish to Pedro da Costa Tavares and D. Mariana Josefa da Silva, his wife and administrator of the chapel of João de Araújo Negreiros, plaintiffs, an olive grove, with its income since the contested lawsuit, which was improperly sold to Amador Monteiro, father of the defendant. The plaintiffs are forced to pay to the defendents the improvements already made in the olive grove.

Court sentence freeing the quinta da Bouça in Cascais, which belonged to doutor António de Sousa de Macedo and was leased "in fatiota" to the entail and chapel of António Durães, in the cathedral of Lisboa, which was administered by D. Miguel Luís de Meneses. António de Sousa de Macedo was given full possession of the farmstead and had only to pay 6 000 réis of "censo" to that chapel.

Court sentence delivered from Padre João Alves Nordelo condemning the defendant to relinquish to the plaintiff the litigated properties with their income generated since the contested lawsuit until their return, because it is proven that they belong to the entail and, according to its institution, they can not be alienated.

Court sentence issued by António da Mota Perestrelo, corregedor do rei, condemning Francisco Rodrigues, o Merca Tudo, to relinquish the "brejo" and pine forest, belonging to the farmstead (quinta) of Marinha das Vacas, to D. Guiomar da Silveira with their income generated since the unduly occupation until their return. Altought these assets can not be considered as entailed, since the farmstead of which they are a part belongs to the Crown, they were perpetually leased to conde de Portalegre, in 1499, so they can not be separeted from each other.

Court sentence freeing the quinta da Bouça in Cascais, which belonged do doutor António de Sousa de Macedo and was leased "in fatiota" to the entail and chapel of António Durães, in the cathedral of Lisboa, which was administered by D. Miguel Luís de Meneses. António de Sousa de Macedo was given full possession of the farmstead and had only to pay 6 000 réis of "censo" to that chapel.

Court sentence issued by the Ouvidor and Provedor das Capelas e Resíduos da Paraíba absolving Salvador Duarte Gomes da Silveira, son of the defendant António Barbalho Bezerra, administrator of the entail founded by his grandfather Duarte Gomes da Silveira, of the charges made against them by Maria Barbalho Bezerra, their aunt and sister respectively, and her husband Baltazar Bezerra, plaintiffs, regarding his right to succeed on the administration of the entail. The magistrate did not absolved the defendant of the accusations made by the plaintiffs that stated that he was connivent with the dispersion of the entailed assets made by his predecessor, Duarte Gomes da Silveira, when he gave up of several charges made against Duarte through a composition deed, but recognized the right of Salvador Duarte Gomes da Silveira to inherit the administration as a true born male heir over the claims of his aunt. He also absolved the defendant and his son of the accusation made by the plaintiffs against Salvador's mother of having of jewish ancestry, allowing him to take on the administration of the entail.

Court sentence condemning the defendant, Duarte de Melo Pereira, to relinquish the houses he owned in Lisboa, since they belonged to the chapel instituted by Isabel Coelho. It is referred that Frei Nicolau Coelho, the chapel's first administrator, bought houses in Lisboa to Nicolau Ferreira and incorporated them in the entail. After his death, he was succeeded by Frei António Coelho, the institutor's brother. The latter appointed Maria da Silva, Lourenço Figueira de Azevedo's mother, to be the entail's next administrator.

Court sentence issued by the Provedor of the Comarca of Portalegre, following a petition presented by Nuno Martins de Gomide, authorizing the subrogation of some houses, located in Portalegre, entailed in entail by Doutor António Dias de Aguiar, by other houses, located in the same location, and for income taken on the Abrantes' estate (herdade), on the outskirts of Arronches, in accordance with the respective subrogation warrant.

Court sentence issued by Doutor Manuel Henriques Sacotto, do Desembargo do Rei and provedor das Capelas, Hospitais, Confrarias, Albergarias, Órfãos e Ausentes com Alçada em Lisboa, ordering the fulfilment of his court sentence, in which he validated the subrogation of properties entailed to the chapel founded by Maria de Rebelo in the church of Nossa Senhora da Conceição, Lisboa.
The process of subrogation was started by D. Mariana de Morais, widow of Filipe Borges Rebelo and mother of the current administrator, Inácio Borges Rebelo. She had requested authorization to sell the entailed houses in Lisboa, and to use the money to buy other properties in Quintela, Bragança, but hadn't had the time to finish the transaction before her death.
Contains an exemplification of a sale, quittance, and obligation deed; dispatches; an evaluation deed; a termo; a certificate; a subrogation deed and a court sentence.

Court sentence issued by Doutor Francisco da Costa Alcoforado, provedor das capelas, hospitais, confrarias, albergarias, órfãos e absentes of Lisbon, in favor of Baltasar Pereira do Lago, administrator of the chapel established by Duarte de Almeida Pacheco, in the convent of São Domingos of Lisbon, authorizing the sale of the floor of some houses, located next to the Hospital dos Palmeiros, property of that chapel.
Contains an insert (dated 1692-04-30), a letterof attorney from the Monteiro-mor do Reino (dated 1692-05-06), two bids records (dated 1692-05-06 and 1692-05 -30), some motions launched by D. Francisca da Cunha and other documents related to the auctioning of the houses.
Several acórdãos follow, confirming the sentence, and numerous other legal documents relating to the process, which drags on beyond the end of the century.

Court sentence concerning the restitution of entailed lands in Peroleite, Sintra, to Luís de Andrade, administrator of Pedro Vasques de Pedra Alçada's chapel. Contains a copy of an acórdão em relação issued on 1564-11-18.

Court sentence dismissing the motion presented by D. Maria de Lemos and condemning the defendant to present the account of administration of Catarina Feio's chapel. She had unlawfully sold properties in Angra, Ilha Terceira, which belonged to that entail.

Court sentence issued by Doutor Francisco Nunes de Aguiar, juiz de fora in Portalegre, approving the sale of some houses, located in Cerro de São Francisco, in Portalegre, made by Nuno Vaz de Sousa and his wife D. Mécia to Jorge Centeno de Chaves and his wife Leonor Gomes.

Court sentence nullifying the motion and declaring that the assets sold by D. Maria de Lemos were still linked to the chapel established by Catarina Feio. The judge ordered the defendant to fulfil the chapel's pious obligations.

Certificate of payment of the sisa in which Jorge Centeno de Chaves declares that he bought some houses, located in Cerro de São Francisco, in Portalegre, from Nuno Vaz de Sousa and his wife D. Mécia.

Acórdão do Desembargo that confirms the previous sentence from Ouvidor, declaring that the improvements made by the appelant and his ancestors should be paid to him.

Acórdão partially confirming and partially revoking a previous sentence from the judge and Ouvidor. It condemns Diogo Fernandes Branco, defendant, to relinquish to Roque Acciaiuoli de Vasconcelos, plaintiff and administrator of the entail of Simão de Acciaiuoli, some houses and a mill, because it is proven that they were entailed. The plaintiff should pay to the defendant the improvements.

Acórdão do Desembargo partilly confirming and partially revoking a previous sentence from Juiz de Fora of Santarém. It judges the assets belonging to the available portion of Diogo Fonseca de Almeida as entailed and the third appellant as their rightful owner, because he is the closest relative of the last administrator. Those assets were improperly sold by the last administrator, so the judges reserve to the third appellant the right to claim them.

Acórdão that partially revokes the previous sentence from Desembargador Conservador dos Moedeiros, declaring that if after the exectution of D. Custódia da Rocha's estate there is some payment to the chapel of Beatriz de Freitas, the defendant will be forced to pay the amount requested in the libel or to relinquish the farmhouse.

Acórdão from Desembargo revoking a previous sentence from Provedor. It absolves the defendant, Gaspar Gonçalves, from relinquish the properties to the plaintiff and administrator of the chapel of Padre João Esteves Gil, Cristóvão Velho de Faria, because it is not proven that they belong to the chapel, while the defendant proved his ownership presenting the titles and letters of acquisition.

Acórdão from Desembargo partially confirming and partially revoking the previous sentence. It condemns António Varela, defendant, to pay the revenues since he owns the estate and absolves the Manuel Cardoso, plaintiff, from the sale's price, revenues and improvements.

Acórdão do Desembargo ordering the fulfilment of the appealed sentence an revoking a previous sentence, regarding the return of the price of the sold houses.

Acórdão do Desembargo partially revoking a previous sentence from Desembargadores da Relação of Baía, which confirmed a previous one from Ouvidor Geral. It absolves the defendant from paying the income or unlawful interests (usuras) of the mortgage imposed in the sugar mill of S. Lourenço, in Rio de Pernamarim, in the outskirts of Baía.

Acórdão absolving the defendant from the payment of the past pensions.

Acórdão do Desembargo declaring that they receive the last motion's article and not the others.

Acórdão do Desembargo ordering the fulfilment of the appealed sentence and its exclusion from the lawsuit.

Acórdão do Desembargo partially confirming and partially revoking the previous sentence. It absolves António Gomes, defendant, from relinquish the income since the undue occupation until its return and condemns him to only relinquish to Manuel Simões Perdigão, plaintiff, the income generated at the time he is the entail's administrator, after his father's death.

Acórdão do Desembargo that revokes a previous sentence from Corregedor do Cível da Corte, absolving the appellant, not named, from the requested by the appellee, not named, administrator of the entail of Mendonças, founded by João Arrais de Mendonça, because it is not proven that the farmstead (herdade) of Delgados belongs to this entail and that this is the farmstead claimed by the appellee as alienated from the entail.

Acórdão do Desembargo partially confirming and partially revoking the previous sentence from Juiz Ouvidor of Barcelos. It absolves António de Macedo, plaintiff, qualified to replace his father, Francisco Ferreira, the original plaintiff, from paying 23.663 (or 23.673) to the defendant, as requested in the counterclaim, because it is not proven that his father was his parents' heir and the defendant and her husband did not want to be her parents' heirs.

Acórdão do Desembargo condemning the prioress and religious of Santa Mónica of Lisbon, defendants, to relinquish to Luís de Sousa de Meneses, plaintiff, some houses belonging to the entail of doutor João Monteiro, which are improperly alienated, according to an express clause of prohibition of alienation.

Acórdão em Relação condemning the Procurador da Fazenda to relinquish to Matias Varregoso, plaintiff, 16 alqueires of cereal entailed to the chapel of João Afonso, founded in the farmstead of Pimpolho, which were alienated and belong to Inácio da Costa, absent in Castile.

Acórdão em Relação revoking the sentence of Desembargadores dos Agravos da Casa da Suplicação and ordering the fulfilment of the sentence of Corregedor da Corte. It condemns the appellee to pay the proceedings expenses and the income.

Ácórdão em Relação from Desembargo that revokes the sentence of Corregedor da Corte do Cível, judging the village of Sanguinheda and other annexed properties as free estate and not entailed and the sale of these properties to defendants as good. It is proved that Simão da Cunha, institutor, disposed of his properties by inheritance and only imposed to the successors the fulfilment of a daily mass, which is not sufficient to consider the existence of an entail or chapel.

Acórdão em Relação that confirms the previous sentence of Ouvidor, but condemning Manuel Monteiro da Paz, defendant, to pay to relinquish the olive grove's income since the contested lawsuit.

Acórdão em Relação that orders the registration of the appealed sentence in the chancery, declaring that the defendant only should pay the revenues generated since the contested lawsuit.

Acórdão em relação not accepting the first part of the motion presented by Jerónimo Rodrigues in which he accuses João Martins da Costa of subreptition. Though, he can present the last four articles of the motion and also the libel of accusation.

Acórdão em relação judging João Martins da Costa, plaintiff, who as denounced the chapel's vacancy, as the rightful successor of the chapel founded by Francisco Pires and his wife Bárbara Fernandes, against the Procurador dos Cativos who tried to take possession of it because Violante, former administrator, applied several assets to the rescue of captives. Therefore the chapel belongs to the crown, and must be made the tombo. After that it must be issued a letter of administration and possession on behalf of the above João Martins da Costa, and put an inscription in the church.

Acórdão em relação considering the motion presented by Jerónimo Rodrigues not proven and ordering the fulfillment of the first sentence by which João Martins da Costa was considered the administrator of the chapel.

Acórdão em relação, removing Lopo Homem of the administration of the chapel instituted by Sancha Cortês, in the church of São Vicente da Ribeira de Abrantes, for non-compliance with the charges and alienation of assets.
The sentence orders that the administration be handed over to Vicente Ribeiro until the Crown provides for a new administrator.

Acórdão em relação, ordering the possession of the chapel of Sancha Cortês to João de Sequeira. The sentence reiterates the need to fulfill the charges, orders the preparation of the tombo (with three copies) and the placement of a tombstone, saying “Sancha Cortês deixou antigamente encargo de missa cada semana nesta igreja sobre bens de que há tombo. Vagou para a Coroa de que se fez esta lembrança. Ano 1624”. If Lopo Homem, previous administrator, did not return the olive grove of the chapel that had alienated, another property of his, worth 40.000 réis, had to be attached to the chapel.

Acórdão em relação noting that the chapel instituted by Pedro Fernandes was vacant for the Crown, being provisionally administered by João Fernandes Aires, while the Crown did not provide it with an administrator. The reitor and beneficiados of the church of São Salvador of Alcáçovas had lost their chaplaincy for bringing the divided assets, not fulfilling the charges and do not keep the chapel conserved.

Acordão em relação nullifying a previous sentence by considering valid the sale of the houses which had belonged to Vicente Soares de Vilas Boas. They had been entailed to the chapel established by their father, Manuel Soares de Vilas Boas e Vilhegas, which was administered by Jerónimo Soares de Vilhegas.

Acórdão judging a civil deed between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Maria Brás and António Pires, her husband, administrators of the chapel of Pedro Brás and Inês de Castro.
The sentence absolves the defendants, alleging that the sale of the chapel's properties, in order to comply with the legacy of the institutor's will and the settlement of their debts, were not sufficient reasons to remove them from the chapel administration, as long as they reinstated those that they had unduly alienated.
The administrators are ordered to make a drop of the chapel's goods, with the present sentence, and register it in the Torre do Tombo and in the Provedoria.
Judgment given by desembargador Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, juiz dos tombos, averiguação e manifestações das Capelas da Coroa, in the name of Filipe III, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.
There are also two dispatchs of doutor Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, ordering the inventory of the chapel's assets to be carried out (dated 1623-09-17) and ordering the administrator to make a bond.

Acórdão judging a civil process between Francisco de Oliveira, plaintiff, and António Barreiros Favacho, defendant.
The sentence condemns the defendant for dissipating the chapel's assets and orders their delivery to the plaintiff.
The judgment given by doutor Diogo Marchão Temudo, desembargador dos agravos and juiz dos feitos da Coroa e fazenda, in the name of D. João IV.