Account of the administration (extract) by which the Provedor das Capelas condemns Simão da Cunha, administrator of Gomes Martins' entail, to pay 6 000 réis, since he had contracted that debt by not fulfiling the pious obligations established in the institutor's will.

Account of the administration (extract) by which the Provedor das Capelas condemns the administrator of Afonso Eanes Carregueiro and Clara Garcia's entail to pay 494 000 réis, since he had contracted that debt by not fulfiling the pious obligations established in the institutors' will. The Provedor das Capelas also orders the arrest of the entail's patrimony, since the administrator failed to annex the third part of his assets to the entail, as it was previously requested.

Account of the administration (extract) declaring that the administrator of Margarida Dias' chapel fulfilled its pious obligations until 1599.

Account of the administration (extract) by which the Provedor das Capelas condemns Fernando Lopes de Serpa, administrator of Catarina Eanes' entail, to pay 72 000 réis, which he owed for not funding the pious obligations established in the institutor's will.

Acórdão em relação accepting the accusation presented by the Procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against the defendants D. Francisca de Sande and her husband D. Martinho de Vargas. D. Francisca de Sande descends from Isabel Fernandes who has signed the agreement deed in 1481 and therefore she has a half of the chapel. Orders the defendants to fulfill the pious obligations and they must force the administrator of the other chapel in Évora to maintain the chaplain in Estremoz. It must be issued the sequestration of the assets from the chapel in Évora to accomplish this obligation. The defendant must sign an agreement with the padres of São Francisco in Estremoz to celebrate the masses; and also must do the tombo.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Ana de Lemos and Vasco Martins de Melo, her husband, defendants, on the chapels instituted by Clara Vicente and Maria Eanes Louseira, in the monastery of São Francisco of Évora and in the church of Santa Maria do Castelo de Estremoz.
The sentence recognizes as legitimate the administration of the defendants, who, however, did not fulfill the charges. Thus, he condemns the defendants to leave the administration of the chapel, due to maladministration, declaring it vacant for the Crown. The Crown should appoint an administrator.

Acórdão nullifying the court sentence issued by the Provedor das Capelas that ended the legal action opposing the Promotor das Capelas to António de Saldanha, administrator of Pedro de Moura and Mécia de Abreu's entail. The court declared that D. Mécia de Abreu acted against the law by entailing houses in Rua das Arcas, which were not included in the third part of her assets, to the chapel established in S. João da Praça. By doing so, she altered clauses of the entail foundation deed. The defendant was subsequently absolved.

Acórdão of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the civil process between procurador da Coroa, author, against Manuel Barbosa and D. Margarida Godinha, his wife, defendants, due to the sequestration ordered by the procurador da Coroa about the assets of the chapel of Santa Clara, instituted by João Miguéis in the church of Santa Maria de Sintra. The sentence shows the chapel was not of the Crown and that the administrators were appointed by their predecessors. The defendants are acquitted of non-compliance with the charges, as the chapel was reduced in income, ordering that, in the future, they seek to comply with them, as well as recover the lost assets and carry out a new tombo. They were also required to make a statement on the institutor's grave, stating that, due to the reduction in income, it was necessary to reduce charges. Only after this declaration should the sequestration of assets be lifted.
Sentence handed down by Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, Juiz das Capelas da Coroa e tombos da Coroa, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.

Acórdão of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the civil process between procurador da Coroa, author, against Manuel Barbosa and D. Margarida Godinha, his wife, defendants. As a result of the acórdão of 1628-02-18, whose compliance is ordered, the charges are reduced.
Sentence handed down by Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, Juiz das Capelas da Coroa e tombos da Coroa, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Luís Alvares Temudo, defendant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Joana Ferreira in São Silvestre de Unhos.
The sentence orders the registration in Capelas da Coroa and the placing of a tombstone that reads “Joana Ferreira deixou capela com capelania perpétua que se reduziu, por Bula, a quatro missas cada semana. É da Coroa e se fez tombo e esta lembrança em mil seiscentos e trinta e três”. It reiterates the need to comply with the charges and orders the registration of the tombo at Torre do Tombo and Provedoria.

Acórdão em relação ordering a sequestration to the entailed assets of the chapel founded by Vasco Lourenço since the administrator doesn't fullfils the pious obligations. Manuel Ribeiro will administrate this chapel to fullfil everything that is concerned with this chapel, including the new tombo.

Acórdão em Relação confirming the court sentence issued by the Provedor das Capelas and condemning the appellant to pay the court fees.

Acórdão em relação considering Pedro de Mesquita as a bad administrator, because he didn't accomplished the pious obligations inherent to his office. The chapel is vacant to the crown and António Barbosa will be the depositary of the administration. In 1623-02 was made the sequestration of the assets and it was ordered to him to make the tombo of the chapel; he also received a new letter but still didn't accomplished what it was asked to him.

Acórdão em relação ordering to acccomplish the acórdão of 1625-07-29; they don't accept the motion presented by Pedro de Mesquita.

Acórdão em relação acquiting the defendant D. António de Almeida and ordering the end of the sequestration that was asked by Procurador da Coroa. The defendant is descendant of the institutor and fulfills the pious obligations; he must make the tombo of the chapel and put an inscription in the church.

Acórdão em relação accepting the accusation moved by the author the Procurador da Coroa against the tenants of the leases that belongs to the chapel of Vasco Esteves de Gatuz. The leases must be entailed and the crown must take possession of it.

Acórdão em relação ordering the execution of the sentence and condemning the appellant to pay the court fees.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Ana de Lemos and Vasco Martins de Melo, her husband, defendants, on the chapels instituted by Clara Vicente and Maria Eanes Louseira, in the monastery of São Francisco of Évora and in the church of Santa Maria do Castelo de Estremoz.
The sentence recognizes as legitimate the administration of the defendants, who, however, did not fulfill the charges. Thus, he condemns the defendants to leave the administration of the chapel, due to maladministration, declaring it vacant for the Crown. The Crown should appoint an administrator.

Acórdão em relação ordering that the chapel belongs to the crown. The ancestors of the defendant Diogo Lopes de Carvalho belong to the institutor's family, but he only have appointed Maria Afonso to the chapel's administration and no other person and Maria isn't related to the institutor nor to the defendant. Therefore, the defendant and his successors can administrate the chapel if they fulfill the pious obligations and take care of the entail assets. This sentence must be registered in the book of Capelas da Coroa in the Torre do Tombo and in the books of Provedoria. The sequestration can't be lifted until the tombo is finished.

Acórdão em relação, judging an application presented by the procurador da Coroa, administrator of the chapel, on the regularization of the fulfillment of the charges.

Acórdão em relação ordering the execution of the court sentence and condemning the appellant to pay the court fees.

Acórdão em relação by which it is confirmed that Leonor Pires had established a chapel, appointing her mother as its first administrator. Her mother had then appointed, in her will, her son, João Pires, as the next administrator. João Pires is ordered to render account of the obligations paid after his mother's death.

Acórdão em relação acquiting the defendant D. António de Melo of the accusation presented by the plaintiff the Procurador da Coroa. The administration letter that D. António de Melo has, is valid; he will fulfill the pious obligations; the leases must be entailed in the chapel; and must put an inscritpion the church. The administrator must have a book with this sentence and tombo to show to the provedor and one copy of it will be sended to the Torre do Tombo, to the Provedoria and registered in the book of Capelas da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação confirming the condemnation given by the Provedor das Capelas to the appellant and ordering him to pay the court fees.

Acórdão em relação ordering the defendant Henrique da Silveira, administrator of the chapel, to maintain a chaplain in the church of Santa Cruz as it is ordered in the institutors' will and also in the administration letter given to his grandfather.

Acordão em relção judging the libel of accusation presented by the Procurador da Coroa against the defendant Francisco de Brito. As the defendant doesn't accomplishes the pious obligations nor has tombo since four years, he is dismissed and the chapel belongs to the crown, with the incomes obtained since the sequestration was imposed. The crown must put an inscription in the chapel.

Acordão em relação allowing the masses established in the will of Domingos João to be prayed in the convent of S. Francisco of Lisboa, instead of the church of S. Nicolau.

Acórdão em relação noting that the chapel instituted by Pedro Fernandes was vacant for the Crown, being provisionally administered by João Fernandes Aires, while the Crown did not provide it with an administrator. The reitor and beneficiados of the church of São Salvador of Alcáçovas had lost their chaplaincy for bringing the divided assets, not fulfilling the charges and do not keep the chapel conserved.

Acórdão em relação judging the accusation presented by the plaintiff Procurador da Coroa against the defendant Leonor Malheira, administrator of the chapel. Since that this chapel doesn't have grave nor altar, orders to add more information to the inscription that already exists about the pious obligations. The chapel belongs to the crown and has tombo, which must be registered in the church. The administrators must fulfill the pious obligations under the surveillance of the provedor.

Acórdão em relação considering that the pious obligations aren't fulfilled and that the assets of the chapel are splitted, orders the issue of a commission to the Provedor of Guimarães or in his absence to the Juiz de Fora to get access to the foundation deed of the chapel and its tombo. They have to remake the tombo according to the institution to determine if the administrator fullfills the pious obligations, and they must issued a declaration deed about the results of this inquiry. If they conclude that there are differences in the payment of the pious obligations they must impose a sequestration to the entailed assets.

Acórdão em relação accepting the accusation presented by the Procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against the defendants D. Francisca de Sande and her husband D. Martinho de Vargas. D. Francisca de Sande descends from Isabel Fernandes who has signed the agreement deed in 1481 and therefore she has a half of the chapel. Orders the defendants to fulfill the pious obligations and they must force the administrator of the other chapel in Évora to maintain the chaplain in Estremoz. It must be issued the sequestration of the assets from the chapel in Évora to accomplish this obligation. The defendant must sign an agreement with the padres of São Francisco in Estremoz to celebrate the masses; and also must do the tombo.

Acórdão em relação, as an appeal of the previous sentence, ordering the defendant, António da Silveira, to celebrate the masses that are missing.

Acórdão em relação declaring that the motion presented by the defendant is not accepted and therefore the previous acórdão must be fulfilled.

Acórdão em relação acquiting the defendant Francisco de Sousa, administrator of the chapel, against the accusation presented by the Procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, because he fulfills the pious obligations. They order him to remake the tombo and to bring to the chapel the leases that are lost; if the income increase he must order more masses according to the instititors' will, and put an inscription in the chapel. He must make three copies of the tombo with the will: one for the administrator, one for the Provedoria and another one to the Torre do Tombo.

Acórdão em relação by which the friars of S. Francisco of Lisboa are ordered to pray the two annual masses entailed to the chapel of Diogo Pinto, for two cruzados, and to compensate the years during which they received this money without praying one of the masses, not charging any more money for them. The sentence related to this acórdão is only mentioned.

Acórdão em Relação confirming the sentence of the juiz and ouvidor and condemning the appealer to pay the proceedings expenses, with a statement that buying the 30 alqueires of wheat in free estate, the available portion estate is free from charge.

Apostolic sentence (extract) reducing the amount of masses of the chapel of Ana Galvão de Abreu, since the properties entailed to it didn't provide enough revenue to fulfill the obligation established by the institutor.
Refers to a papal bull it contained, dated 1587-11-24, not transcribed.

Composition deed between the monastery of São Francisco do Porto and João de Vitarães, as administrator of the chapel of Lopo Fernandes and Catarina Eanes. It was negotiated after a conflict between the two parties: the monastery complained that the administrator hadn't paid the mass fees for 13 years, while the administrator complained that the monks were allowing "strangers" into the chapel. The agreement between the administrator and the monastery determined the rules of the chapel. Next to the altar of the chapel, the administrators were to paint an image of St. George and place an image and a crucifix to the memory of the Passion of Jesus. They were also allowed to place the coat of arms of their lineage in the tombs.

Court sentence handed down by doutor Brás Cardoso, provedor dos resíduos in comarca of Estremadura, in a process between the prior and beneficiados of the church of Santiago of Coimbra, plaintiffs, against António de Alpoim, defendant, administrator of the chapel of Afonso Domingues de Aveiro, located in that church. The sentence condemns the defendant, determining that the masses said should be paid at 20 réis each and those sung at 30 réis each.

Court sentence handed down by doutor Brás Cardoso, provedor dos resíduos in comarca of Estremadura, in a process between António de Alpoim, plaintiff, administrator of the chapel of Afonso Domingues de Aveiro, against the prior and beneficiados of the church of Santiago of Coimbra, defendants. The sentence acquits the defendants, determining which administrator was required to fulfill all the duties provided for in the institution, and not just sung masses on Saturday, as intended.

Court sentence issued by Doutor Vicente Serrão, Provedor of the Comarca of Beja, checking that Manuel Lampreia de Vargas had fulfilled the charges of the chapel instituted by Ana de Oliveira, celebrated in the church of Santa Maria de Serpa, relating to the year 1683.

Court sentence issued by the licenciado Diogo de Almeida, protonotário apostólico and vigário-geral of the diocese of Coimbra, judging a civil process between Ana da Cruz, appellant, against the licenciado João Henriques, appellee, concerning the charges of the chapel instituted by João Fernandes Bolho. The sentence determines that the appellant was not obliged to pay the charges, as she had previously contracted with priest João Fernandes Girão and Manuel Girão, her brothers, in this regard.
It contains an extract of the motion presented (fl.232-233); a petition (fl. 233v-234); a certificate of a probate inventory of the Doutor Manuel Fernandes Bolho, issued by the escrivão dos órfãos of Tentúgal (fl.234-235); a dispatch (fl.235v); an extract of the opposition to the motion presented (fl.235v-236).

Court sentence ordering the defendant, António de Saldanha, administrator of the entail established by Pedro de Moura and his wife, to fulfil the pious obligations in the church of S. João da Praça, which were established by D. Mécia de Abreu in her will, and to present the chapel's account of administration.

Court sentence refusing a motion by Rui Lourenço de Távora, administrator of the chapel established by Garcia Rodrigues de Távora, and ordering that the masses of the institutor's chapel start to be prayed in a convenient place, while the monastery he founded in his will is being built, since, even though the place for the construction had already been acquired, there was still need of obtaining authorization from the king. After the construction is finished, the masses shall be prayed in the new convent. An order is also given to write a tombo of the properties belonging to the institutor.
Followed by an acordão em relação confirming the sentence.

Court sentence condemning Bernardo Peres, husband of Isabel de Espinosa, to pay the obligation of the chapel established by Ângela Rodrigues de Brito and Belchior de Espinosa, since he and his wife possessed the houses entailed to it and had received them with that obligation.
Preceded by answer of the promotores about this subject.

Court sentence ordering D. Simoa Godinho to pay 37 000 reais for the masses of the chapel of her cousin Ambrósio Fernandes Godinho and 3 000 reais for its construction.

Court sentence by which the Provedor das Capelas condemns the administrator of Diogo Gonçalves do Prado's chapel to pay 11 000 réis to the convent of S. Domingos of Lisboa. Thus, he would settle the debt contracted by not paying for the entail's pious obligations.

Court sentence condemning António de Brito da Silva, administrator of Diogo Gonçalves do Prado's chapel, to pay 28 350 réis, which he owed for not paying the annual masses celebrated for the institutor's soul.

Court sentence handed down by Fernando de Sá, provedor dos órfãos, capelas, contador das terças and juiz dos resíduos in comarca of Estremadura, ordering the execution of the contractual charges in the contract signed on 1514-02-17, between the prior and beneficiados of the church of Santiago of Coimbra and Pedro de Alpoim, administrator of the chapel of Afonso Domingues de Aveiro.

Court sentence issued by António Velho, vigário-geral of the bishopric of Coimbra, on a process that took place in the ecclesiastical court, between the prior and beneficiados of the church of Santiago of Coimbra, plaintiffs, against Francisco de Alpoim, defendant. The sentence condemns the defendant, determined that he had to satisfy the alms of the masses (around 14 000 réis a year) for the years in which they had been celebrated.

Court sentence issued by Lucas Rodrigues, cónego of the cathedral of Coimbra and vigário-geral of the diocese, in favor of the prior and beneficiados of the church of Santiago of Coimbra, plaintiffs, against João Vaz, defendant, for non-compliance with the charges for the chapel of Inês Barbancha, located in that church.

Court sentence issued by Doutor João Batista Peixoto, Provedor das Capelas, Hospitais, Confrarias, Albergarias e Órfãos de Lisboa, deliberating on the case opposing the Procurador das Capelas to Cristóvão Vaz Pinto, regarding the fulfilment of the pious obligations left by his wife, Violante Henriques, institutor of a chapel in the convent of Nossa Senhora da Anunciada. The defendant, Cristóvão Vaz Pinto, was condemned to entail a public debt instrument of 15 000 réis to the chapel to support the celebration of 3 weekly masses and 2 annual masses for his wife's soul. Contains copies of an acórdão, a motion and a court sentence.

Court sentence condemning the appellant to pay the debt declared in the account of the administration of Afonso Eanes Carregueiro and Clara Garcia's entail and the court fees.

Court sentence condemning the defendant, João de Braga, Escudeiro, administrator of Pedro Esteves Barbas' entail, to deliver each year half of its revenues to the prior of the convent of S. Domingos of Lisboa, who is responsible for celebrating masses for the soul of the institutor.

Court sentence approving the account of the administration of the chapel of Diogo de Palma and Elvira de Salazar, his wife.
In accordance with the apostolic bulls and royal provisions, the value of unfulfilled legacies was given to the works and the sick at the Hospital de Todos os Santos.

Court sentence of appeal issued by doutor José de Abreu Bacelar, vigário-geral and provisor of the bishopric of Coimbra, in an appeal between António de Escobar, appellant, administrator of the chapel of Inês de Matos, against the prior and beneficiados of the church of Santiago, appellees. The sentence reiterates the previous one, dated 1641-04-15, condemning the appellant.

Court sentence issued by Doutor José de Abreu Bacelar, vigário-geral and provisor of the bishopric of Coimbra, in a process between António de Escobar, appellant, administrator of the chapel of Inês de Matos, against the prior and beneficiaries of the church of Santiago, appellees. The sentence condemns the appellant, determining that the administrator must meet the expenses of the chapel until the day of São João at the rate of two cents for each mass celebrated and 200 réis for each sung mass, making a total of 8.520 réis.

Court sentence confirming the reduction of the pious obligations associated to João Esteves de Rica Solteira and Constança Eanes' chapel, which was administrated at that time by D. Diogo da Silveira, Guarda-mor do Rei. Contains copies of two undated court sentences and a papal bull issued on 1561-11-26.

Court sentence accepting a motion by Domingos de Azevedo in which he had defended that there was no impediment to the entailment of the masses for his wife's soul to the houses he had bought, in spite of them already having an obligation of masses attached.

Court sentence condemning the nephew of Jorge Fernandes de Elvas, administrator, since 1648, of the chapel of Santo António, established by António Fernandes de Elvas and his wife, to pay the 30 years of obligations of redeeming a captive annually, which he and his uncle hadn't fulfilled. António Fernandes de Elvas is said to have died in 1589-12-19.
Contains extract of the codicil VINC007834 AFEMF EA/004.

Court sentence handed down by Doutor João Lucena Homem, desembargador and vigário-geral in Lisbon, on behalf of Francisco de Aguiar, containing the exemplification of a papal bull for reduction of charges celebrated at the Hospital dos Pobres, in Unhos, in the outskirts of Lisboa, issued by Pope Clement VIII. The sentence confirms the information that had been sent to Rome to issue the bull, thus confirming the reduction in the charges of the chapel instituted by Joana Ferreira.

Court sentence issued by Jorge Rodrigues, licenciado em Cânones, protonotário apostólico, desembargador e vigário-geral do arcebispado de Lisboa, finishing a conflict between the beneficiados of the church of Santa Cruz do Castelo de Lisboa, authors, and António da Silveira, defendant, fidalgo da Casa do Rei and administrator of the chapel of Constança Domingues. The authors claimed the defendant refused to pay the obligations of the chapel. The defendant claimed that he had paid all the obligations of the chapel, as had his great-grandfather, Nuno Martins da Silveira, who had received it from king D. João I, his grandfather, Diogo da Silveira, and his father, Henrique da Silveira, and that the authors didn't allow him to appoint the new chaplain. The defendant is acquited of the charges against him.
Contains copies of the sentence VINC001620 JFCD EA/003c and of the acordão em relação VINC001620 JFCD EA/003d.

Court sentenced by Doutor João Carvalho de Almeida, ordering that Pedro de Vilas Boas, Pedro de Fragoso's son and heir, should deliver to his cousin Isabel Dias the estates left by his father to institute a chapel, on which he appointed Isabel Dias as administrator. According to the sentence, Pedro de Vilas Bolas retained the estates and the pious deeds were never performed.

Court sentence ordering that the estates entailed to the chapel instituted by Afonso Luís and Ana Afonso should be delivered to their daughter and administrator Apolónia. According to the sentence, some estates were in possession of Manuel Afonso, another of the couple's children, and for that reason the pious obligations were not fulfiled.

Court sentence approving the agreement deed between Frei Vicente do Rosário, procurador das capelas de São Domingos, and Doutor Manuel Álvares de Carvalho, administrator of João Eanes Palhavã and Sancha Pires' chapel.

Court sentence considering that the will of Simoa Fernandes has been fulfilled. Contains a list of the assets and the charges that were ordered by the institutor.

Court sentence refusing new motions by Bernardo Peres and ordering him to pay the obligations of the chapel established by Ângela Rodrigues de Brito and Belchior de Espinosa. The obligations had been previously fulfilled by Manuel de Espinosa, son of the deceased.
Followed by petitions and motions by Bernardo Peres, still refusing to pay.

Court sentence authorizing Henrique de Melo, administrator of the chapel established by D. Catarina de Paiva, his stepmother, to move the masses she had ordered in her will to the chapel of Nossa Senhora da Piedade of the convent of Nossa Senhora do Carmo of Lisboa, since they couldn't be prayed in the hermitage she had built in her leased lands.
Preceded by petition and dispatch.

Court sentence (extract) condemning the administrator of Teresa Nogueira's chapel to settle the debt which he contracted by not paying the right amount of money to the convent of S. Domingos of Lisboa for the fulfiment of the entail's pious obligations. The administrator was also asked to order the making of a tombo of the entail's properties.

Court sentence issued by the Ouvidor-Geral de Pernambuco absolving, Estêvão Pais Barreto, administrator and defendant, from the charges made by the plaintiff, João Pais de Melo, regarding the right of the defendant to remain on the administration of the entail founded by João Pais Barreto and Inês Guardes, once his deceased father and last administrator, João Pais de Castro, did not fulfilled the masses obligations disposed by the institutors nor annexed his own available portions to the entail. The Ouvidor-Geral absolved the defendant based on the very high expenses made by his father on the reconstruction of the chapel and of the entailed sugar-mills who died so poor that he had no sum on his available portion capable of being annexed to the entail, as he proved through a sentença de justificação.

Court sentence judging a donation deed made by Marta Machado, institutor, to Padre António Lopes Correia, defendant and chaplain of her chapel, as void. Marta Machado made that donation deed after her fist will, ordering that the chaplain should celebrate a half of the masses "anal" during her lifetime and the other half after her and her daughter's, plaintiff, death, but she revoked this deed. She still made a second will, in which she revoked the first one. The defendant argues that the donation deed is valid.

Court sentence that revokes a previous sentence from Juiz Geral das Ordens, judging the donation deed made by Marta Machado, institutor, to Padre António Lopes Correia, defendant and chaplain of her chapel, as valid.

Court sentence judging that the properties owned by the defendant, Luís Freire de Andrade, are bounded and mortgaged to the masses obligations of the chapel of Isabel Freire, in the church of Santiago. The defendant is forced to pay the properties income to the prior and bursars of the church of Santiago, since the unauthorised occupation until the return.

Petition by which the prior of the convent of S. Domingos of Lisboa asks for Álvaro de Quadros, administrator of Pedro Esteves Barbas' entail, to be cited, in order to obligate him to donate half of its revenues to support the celebration of annual masses for the institutor's soul. The prior declares that Frei Martinho, executor of Pedro Esteves Barbas' will, had appointed him to fulfil those pious obligations.

Petition by which the Procurador das Capelas declared that the chapel's obligations have not been fulfil and determined that the administrator Manuel de Sousa de Faria was obligated to deliver the account of the administration.

Royal sentence finishing a court process between the priests of the convent of S. Domingos de Benfica, Lisboa, and Luís de Brito do Rio, fidalgo da Casa do Rei, husband of Joana de Lima Henriques and administrator of the entail and chapel established by Lopo Mendes do Rio and Leonor Dias. Luís de Brito do Rio had inherited the entail after the death, in 1619, of D. Guiomar da Silva, wife of Luís de Mendonça, who was the last successor of the institutors in direct line. As heir from a transversal line, Luís de Brito do Rio only had the right to administer half the possessions of the entail. The other half should, according to the will of the institutors, be divided in two parts: half to the convent of S. Domingos de Benfica and half for pious obligations, namely redemption of captives. There was a long process to establish which properties and what revenue was owed to each part.
Contains several documents regarding these proceedings, including royal sentences dated 1627-08-17, 1627-11-18, 1630-08-13, 1631-07-24, 1631-07-28 and 1631-07-30; sentences issued by the provedor das Capelas dated 1627-02-18, 1630-05-24, 1631-03-06 and 1631-07-24, and sentences of liquidation dated 1630-10-08, 1630-10-12 and 1630-11-16. Mentions dispatches and several embargos set upon the revenue by both parts.

Royal sentence by which Manuel Côrte-Real and D. Beatriz de Mendonça, his wife, administrators of the chapel established by Vasco Eanes Côrte-Real and D. Joana da Silva in the convent of S. Francisco of Lisboa, are ordered to pay the obligations they owe to the chapel with the revenue of the casal de Grajal, in Belas, entailed to it, even though the administrator, in his will, says he will forgive the administrators if they don't order the masses.
Contains undated sentences and dispatches explaining that the payments had ceased from 1544 onwards, because there wasn't enough revenue, due to the sterility of the land entailed to the chapel. Because of this, Manuel Côrte-Real was ordered to show proof of the revenue, so that the debt corresponding to those years should be discounted, and that he should make payments with the current revenue.

Royal sentece concerning the charges of the chapel founded by Lourenço Martins do Avelar, following a petition presented by Pedro Lourenço de Almeida, who claimed lack of assets to fulfil all the charges. It lists the chapel's properties.

Royal sentence condemning António de Macedo, Desembargador and Juiz dos Feitos da Casa da Suplicação, and his wife, D. Cecília de Andrade, administrators of Leonor Eanes' chapel, to pay for the celebration of annual masses in the convent of S. Domingos of Lisboa as it was established by the institutor in her will. That payment should be done in money and wheat. Contains a declaration made by António de Macedo in 1545-02-03.

Royal sentence absolving João Homem da Silva Gago of the three years of obligations his deceased father owed to the chapel established by Rui Gago de Andrade, of which he was the current administrator.
Contains extract of document VINC000785 RGACB EA/003; sentence dated 1619-10-05; extract of an undated habilitation; acórdãos em relação dated 1626-02-07, 1626-03-21,1627-01-23 and 1628-05-02.

Sentence by which it is proven that Luís de Melo da Silva and his wife, D. Antónia da Silva, administrators of the chapel established by Luís de Melo da Silva, owe several years of masses to the friars of the convent of S. Francisco de Xabregas, Lisboa. It is explained that although the institutor established his chapel in the convent of Madre de Deus de Xabregas, the nuns of that convent hadn't accepted it, and thus the chapel had been transferred to S. Francisco de Xabregas.

Sentence against Manuel Álvares, administrator of the chapel established by Vicência Ribeiro, by which the embargos he set upon her properties are considered unproven, and he is ordered to pay the obligations he owes to the chapel, which was entailed to houses he inherited from his wife.

Sentence entailing the properties previously measured to the chapel established by Bartolomeu Velho e Sousa, which is administered by Antónia Pedroso, and adding to it an obligation of another weekly mass for her own soul, in compensation for the improvements she made in these properties after the institutor's death.

Sentence acquiting the defendant, António da Silveira, of the accusation presented by the beneficiados of the church of Santa Cruz do Castelo de Lisboa, and ordering him to celebrate the daily mass of the chapel founded by Constança Domingues and her husband.

Sentence by which an embargo set upon the chapel of Francisco Rodrigues Preto by its administrator is judged without effect, and it is established that from the 19 500 reis entailed to the chapel, 15 600 reis would be spent in masses.

Sentence judging the obligations of the chapel established by padre Diogo Pestana fulfilled, until the year 1647, and ordering the issuance of certificates to be given to the convent of Santo António do Varatojo and to the administrator, Manuel Pestana.

Sentence by which it is ordered that the payments of the obligations of the chapel established by Isabel Luís in the convent of S. Francisco of Lisboa be made from the public debt instrument entailed to it, which had been left by Cristóvão Leitão, its previous administrator, deceased.
Preceded by a summary mentioning a certificate dated 1632-09-06, by which it was proven that Cristóvão Leitão was fulfilling the obligations, and explaining that in 1641 the administrator was D. Beatriz de Abreu, and that the payment hadn't been made for 6 years.

Sentence in favour of André de Almeida, declaring that the friars of S. Francisco of Lisboa shall receive 800 reis each year to pray two masses, one for Diogo Pinto's soul and another for Filipe Pinto's soul, according to their wills.

Sentence refusing the motion by Bartolomeu Correia, and ordering the payment of the obligations to the chapel he administered.

Sentence refusing the embargos set by an unidentified defendant upon the quinta de Almoster, head of the entail established by Simão da Veiga Cabral, and ordering him to pay its obligations.

Sentence absolving Baltasar Rodrigues de Matos of a previous condemnation, since it was proven that he had been fulfilling the obligations of the chapel established by Pedro Gomes and Joana Rodrigues since the death of Joana Rodrigues, in 1630. He is ordered to buy assets to entail in the next ten days.

Sentence refusing a motion, since it was proven the masses established by D. Ângela de Melo were being fulfilled in the convent of S. Francisco de Xabregas, but not in the convent of Santo António do Varatojo.

Subrogation deed by which Baltazar Fernandes and his wife Florença Fernandes obligated themselves to use their property composed of land and an olive grove, in Varatojo farm, in Lisboa, in order to pay the chapel obligations .

Warrant declaring that the administrator Inês Botelho de Macedo must fulfil the chapel's obligations.