Acórdão of Juizo das Capelas da Coroa in favor of D. Filipa de Carvalho, plaintiff, against the convent of Nossa Senhora da Graça de Évora, defendants, being the opponent priest António Soares de Albergaria, judging the administration of the chapel instituted by Sancha Eanes in the monastery of S. Francisco de Évora. The sentence orders the registration of the chapel as absolute and reiterates the power of its administrator to appoint the successor.
Sentence handed down by Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, Juíz das Capelas da Coroa e tombos da Coroa, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação, approving a resignation and donation deed (dated 1597-03-08) by which Joana da Costa renounces the administration of the chapel instituted by Gil Vicente, in favor of Manuel de Morais, her husband's nephew.

Acórdão em relação, demonstrating that the chapel had vacated for the Crown, since the first administrator had not appointed a successor. Vicente Pereira, the supplicant, had denounced the chapel as a vacancy for the Crown, having received the corresponding denunciation warrant of administration. Once the acknowledgment record has been completed, the sentence orders that the administration be handed over to the supplicant, in days of his life, and must fulfill the charges, make the inventory of the assets and register it in the Books of the Capelas da Coroa and in the Torre do Tombo.

Acórdão em relação, judging an appeal presented by Filipe Ribeiro de Carvalho, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Gonçalo Eanes de Carvalho, in the church of Santa Maria dos Agougues de Montemor-o-Novo.
The sentence recognizes that the institution did not include the need for the existence of two administrators, and as such, it bids the reduction to only one.
The sentence orders the placing of a tombstone that reads “Gonçalo Eanes Carvalho instituiu capela nesta igreja de anal de missas ditas pelos raçoeiros dela, que vagou para a Coroa. É de nomeação perpétua por doação de que é administrador Filipe Ribeiro de Carvalho neste ano de seiscentos e vinte e quatro em que se fez lembrança”, the realization of a tombo and its registration in the Provedoria and Torre do Tombo.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of appeal, between Manuel Borges, appellee, and Diogo da Silva, plaintiff, and the Desembargadores do Paço, appellants, about the administration of the entail instituted by João de Louredo, in the church of São Martinho of Lisbon.
After a previous sentence had declared the entail vacant for the Crown, and had condemned the appellee to leave the administration, the present one revokes the previous one, proving that the entail was of nomination and not of blood, and that Manuel Borges was his legitimate administrator, having been appointed by Luís Borges, his father, previous administrator.

Acórdão delivered by the king and his Desembargo revoking the previous sentence delivered by Juiz de Fora of Estremoz and absolving Luís de Abreu de Melo, defendant, from the requested by Pedro de Abreu da Silva, plaintiff, because the entail is from appointment and he was appointed by their father, Duarte de Abreu de Noronha.

Acórdão of the Desembargo do Paço revoking the sentence of the corregedor that acquitted the defendant (unidentified), since it was proved that the entail was always administered by appointment, legitimately belonging to Afonso de Almeida, author.
The sentence condemns the defendant to hand over the administration of the morgado to the plaintiff.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process moved by the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against an unnamed defendant, administrator of the chapel instituted by Fernando Gonçalves do Sobrado.
The sentence condemns the defendant to leave the administration, for not presenting any document legitimizing it. It declares that the chapel is vacant for the Crown.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Fernando Boto, defendant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by João Lourenço.
The sentence acquits the defendant, as the legitimate administrator of the chapel, ordering its registration in the Book of Capelas da Coroa of Torre do Tombo. It reiterates compliance with the charges and orders the placement of a tombstone saying: “João Lourenço deixou encargo de três missas nesta igreja sobre bens de que há tombo. É donatário da Coroa Fernando Boto e seus herdeiros”.

Acórdão em Relação declaring that the resignation of D. Maria Berarda de Lima in her brother Jacinto Gomes de Lima is valid as a court sentence. She had previously obtained a resignation warrant for this purpose.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Manuel de Paiva Botelho, defendant, on the administration of the chapel established by D. Antónia Henriques, in the monastery of Santíssima Trindade, in Lisboa.
The sentence condemns the defendant, since the mercy of the administration made to António Frazão was only in his life, and he could not leave it to his descendants. The chapel is declared vacant for the Crown, ordering the tombo of the assets.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against João Frazão, defendant, on the administration of the chapel established by D. Antónia Henriques, in the monastery of Santíssima Trindade, in Lisboa.
The defendant was acquitted by a sentence, recognizing as valid the appointment made by António Frazão to João Frazão, his son, and also his administration.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process on the administration of the chapel established by Isabel Lobato, in the monastery of São Francisco of Santarém.
The sentence recognizes that the administration was, legitimately, owned by Damião Dias de Meneses.

Acórdão em Relação judging the chapel of S. Brás, founded by Fernando Vaz, in Aveiro, next to the church of S. Miguel, as absoluta, because it is not vacant, whether it is of regular succession or appointment. The chapel was denounced as vacant to the Crown by Tomás da Costa Corte-Real, plaintiff, since the institutor's lineage is extincted. It orders that D. Tomás Jordão de Noronha, qualified part in the proceedings, must remain in the chapel's administration and if D. Catarina da Veiga, his sister and defendant, wants to demand him she must do it in the competent court. While D. Catarina da Veiga and her husband, João de Nápoles, defendants, argue that the chapel is of appointment, D. Tomás Jordão de Noronha, qualified part, argues that it is of regular succession.

Acórdão em Relação revoking a previous sentence from Desembargadores dos agravos, which revoked a previous sentence from Juiz do Cível. It judges that the chapel of António Correia da Costa belongs to the suitor (suplicante), André de Almeida Félix, son of Manuel Félix de Almeida, brother of D. Luísa de Almeida, endowed by Ana Correia da Costa with the chapel's administration. It also condemns the accused (suplicado) to relinquish the chapel's assets to the suitor. This acórdão describes the appointment process of the chapel's administration.

Court sentence issued by Doutor Belchior Martins de Carvalho, provedor das Capelas, Hospitais, Confrarias e Albergarias of Lisbon, approving the handover of the administration of the chapel of Bárbara de Torres, by António Nunes to Amaro Gonçalves, his son-in-law, and to Maria Luís, his wife.

Court sentence judging Miguel Leitão Machado as the sole heir of João Machado de Pontes, after the resignation made by António Machado Leitão, Paula de Pontes Machado, Maria de Pontes Machado and Ângela Machado, their brothers.

Court sentence judging the casal in Calhariz de Benfica entailed to the chapel established by priest Baltasar Soares Magro, of which Sebastião Pereira Magro was the first administrator.

Court sentence judging Miguel Leitão Machado as the sole heir of João Machado de Pontes, after the resignation made by António Machado Leitão, Paula de Pontes Machado, Maria de Pontes Machado and Ângela Machado, their brothers.

Court sentence judging D. Tomás, minor, and D. Paula Maria Josefa de Mendonça, his mother and tutor, plaintiffs, as administrators of the Hospital of S. Brás, founded by Fernando Vaz de Agonide, in Aveiro, succeeding to D. Tomás de Nápoles, father of D. Tomás, according to the succession clauses changed in a papal brief dated from 1582, which stated that the hospital should have a regular succession as an entail. Until then, the successors are appointed by the current administrators. Both opponent, D. Joana de Sousa e Alcáçova, and defendants, João de Nápoles and D. Catarina, his wife, invoked this argument. It condemns the defendant to relinquish the hospital's properties, with the income generated since the undue occupation until their return.

Royal sentence judging a lawsuit between Pedro de Abreu e Silva, original plaintiff, and Luís de Abreu de Melo, his brother and defendant. The plaintiff accused his brother of taking possession of the entail of Gonçalo Rodrigues da Azambuja and its properties, pleading that he is the righful successor, as the eldest son of Duarte de Abreu de Noronha, last administrator. However, the king judges Luís de Abreu de Melo as the rightful successor because he was appointed by their father and the entail is from appointment and not succession.
Contains: dispatch regarding the qualification of Pedro Mascarenhas as plaintiff, undated.