Acórdão em Relação judging the end of a reprisal imposed against the entails of Lopo Rodrigues de Évora e Veiga, Nicolau da Veiga and Bernardo da Veiga, his sons, and their income when their administrator, D. Lopo de Meneses, o Roxo, was absent in Castile and D. João IV was acclaimed as king of Portugal. It also orders the return to D. Lopo Rodrigues de Évora e Veiga, plaintiff (suplicante) and administrator of the three entails, of the entailed assets and public debt instruments, with their income generated since the peace publication.

Acórdão em Relação judging D. Filipa de Noronha, plaintiff, as administrator of the entails established by D. Henrique de Noronha, D. António Matos de Noronha and D. Filipa Cardoso, confiscated after the conviction of Rui de Matos de Noronha, conde of Armamar, brother of D. Filipa de Noronha and the previous administrator, of the crime of lese-majesty. D. Filipa de Noronha succeeds to her brother as determined in D. Henrique de Noronha's entail foundation deed in case of royal treason. It is declared that D. António Matos de Noronha, Bispo de Elvas, attached an estate ("casal da Lagem"), properties (azenhas) in Castelo de Vide and houses on Rua da Cutelaria and Beco do Pato to his entail.

Acórdão em Relação judging the end of a reprisal imposed against the entails of Lopo Rodrigues de Évora e Veiga, Nicolau da Veiga and Bernardo da Veiga, his sons, and their income when their administrator, D. Lopo de Meneses, o Roxo, was absent in Castile and D. João IV was acclaimed as king of Portugal. It also orders the return to D. Lopo Rodrigues de Évora e Veiga, plaintiff (suplicante) and administrator of the three entails, of the entailed assets and public debt instruments, with their income generated since the peace publication.

Acórdão em Relação judging the second will of Luís de Mendonça Furtado as valid and both his brother, Nuno de Mendonça Furtado, plaintiff, and sister, D. Maria Josefa de Mendonça, defendant, as his successors, since their other brother, Jerónimo de Mendonça Furtado, committed the crime of lèse-majesté and was excluded from the succession. It defines how to divide the estate of Luís de Mendonça Furtado, seting apart the half of his available portion to annex to the entail of S. Simão de Azeitão and other bequests and then dividing the remaining assets between Nuno de Mendonça Furtado and D. Maria Josefa de Mendonça. It also defines the payment of some debts that Luís de Mendonça Furtado owed to his brother Jerónimo de Mendonça Furtado.

Acórdão em Relação judging the end of a reprisal imposed against the entails of Lopo Rodrigues de Évora e Veiga, Nicolau da Veiga and Bernardo da Veiga, his sons, and their income when their administrator, D. Lopo de Meneses, o Roxo, was absent in Castile and D. João IV was acclaimed as king of Portugal. It also orders the return to D. Lopo Rodrigues de Évora e Veiga, plaintiff (suplicante) and administrator of the three entails, of the entailed assets and public debt instruments, with their income generated since the peace publication.

Acórdão em Relação judging D. Filipa de Noronha, plaintiff, as administrator of the entails of D. Henrique de Noronha, D. António Matos de Noronha and D. Filipa Cardosa, confiscated after the conviction of Rui de Matos de Noronha, conde of Armamar, brother of D. Filipa de Noronha and the previous administrator, of the crime of lese-majesty. D. Filipa de Noronha succeeds to her brother as determined in D. Henrique de Noronha's entail foundation deed in case of royal treason.

Acórdão em Relação judging D. Filipa de Noronha, plaintiff, as administrator of the entails of D. Henrique de Noronha, D. António Matos de Noronha and D. Filipa Cardoso, confiscated after the conviction of Rui de Matos de Noronha, conde of Armamar, brother of D. Filipa de Noronha and the previous administrator, of the crime of lese-majesty. D. Filipa de Noronha succeeds to her brother as determined in D. Henrique de Noronha's entail foundation deed in case of royal treason.

Acórdão do Desembargo judging of a reprisal imposed against the assets of the entail of Aires de Meira, in the outskirts of Portalegre, because its administrators, Afonso Taborda and D. Maria de Meira, his wife, were absent in Castile when D. João IV was acclaimed as king of Portugal. It also concludes that D. José de Meira, plaintiff (suplicante), is the rightful successor of this entail because he is the administrator of an other entail, founded by João de Meira, nephew of Aires de Meira, and annexed to his unle's entail and he is the grandson of Afonso Taborda and D. Maria de Meira.

Court sentence judging that D. Maior de Mendonça, plaintiff, can not succeed in the entail of Vilar de Frades, later named Rego da Água, founded by D. Jorge Telo and D. Isabel Mascarenhas, his wife, because she is the natural daughter of Francisco de Mendonça Furtado, last administrator, and there is legitimate descandants from the first administrator, D. João Telo, despite being collateral relatives of Francisco de Mendonça Furtado. It also judges the defendant D. António Luís de Sousa, marquês das Minas and great-grandson of D. João Telo, as the rightful successor of the entail. The sentence refers that Francisco de Mendonça Furtado was convicted of the crime lese-majesty and the defendant argues that the plaintiif can not succeed because of that.