Court sentence judging the appeal presented by the plaintiff Martinho Afonso de Brito and the opponent João Afonso de Beja
against the defendants António de Beja and his wife Antónia de Brito. It orders that estate of Atouguia belongs to the chapel founded by Francisco Domingues de Beja in the church of Santa Clara in Beja; therefore the defendants must deliver the estate. The opponent is excluded from the succession of this property.

Acórdão em Relação condemning Maria Madalena, defendant, to relinquish the entail of Padre Francisco Dias, vigário of the parish of Esgueira, to Maria de Resende, plaintiff and the rightful successor, with the income generated since the contested lawsuit. It refers that the assets of Padre Francisco Dias were not divided by his heirs, that Pedro Godinho Barbosa, second administrator, founded a chapel in the church of Esgueira, and that the entail of Padre Francisco Dias was founded by collateral relatives.

Acórdão em Relação judging Luís Gonçalves de Sousa de Macedo, plaintiff, as the rightful owner of the entailed assets of D. Maria Manuel, institutor, and four parts of the reserved portions of her four children who stayed in Castille, after the partition of the assets of D. Jorge Manuel, the institutor's father, who bequethed them to her and to her sister, D. Briolanja de Aragão. João de Ilhoa de Vasconcelos and his wife, D. Marcelina Manuel de Aragão, defendants, are condemned to pay the proceedings' expenses.

Acórdão em Relação ordering the return of the proceedings (autos) to court, so the judge can grant correctly the counterclaim.

Acórdão em Relação partially confirming and partially revoking the previous sentences from Juiz dos Órfãos. It distinguishes the entailed assets from those belonging to the available portion of the late Simão Mateus.

Acórdão em Relação absolving Manuel Ribeiro and his wife, Maria Silveira, defendants, from the requested by António Luís da Silva and his minor daughter, not named, plaintiffs, to pay their half of the assets of Manuel de Sousa Cardoso to entail to his chapel. After these assets' partitions, both parties must bought assets, in Aveiro, to entail to the chapel, but the plaintiffs accused the defendants of of not fulfiling their obligation.

Acórdão em Relação judging the second will of Luís de Mendonça Furtado as valid and both his brother, Nuno de Mendonça Furtado, plaintiff, and sister, D. Maria Josefa de Mendonça, defendant, as his successors, since their other brother, Jerónimo de Mendonça Furtado, committed the crime of lèse-majesté and was excluded from the succession. It defines how to divide the estate of Luís de Mendonça Furtado, seting apart the half of his available portion to annex to the entail of S. Simão de Azeitão and other bequests and then dividing the remaining assets between Nuno de Mendonça Furtado and D. Maria Josefa de Mendonça. It also defines the payment of some debts that Luís de Mendonça Furtado owed to his brother Jerónimo de Mendonça Furtado.

Acórdão em Relação ordering the return of the proceedings (autos) to court, so the judge can grant correctly the counterclaim.

Acórdão em Relação ordering the return of the proceedings (autos) to court, so the judge can grant correctly the counterclaim.

Acórdão do Desembargo partially confirming and partially revoking the previous sentence. Besides the assets belonging to the available portion of António Gomes Angel, it judges the assets belonging to the reserved portions of his daughters, D. Maria Angel and D. Graça Angel, and the assets entailed by his wife, Joana Jerónima, also as an entailed dowry to their daughter, D. Maria Angel, because the parents can impose conditions on their children's reserved portions, when they bequeath them other equivalent assets and they approve it. D. Maria Angel, defendant, can not dispose of the entailed assets as free and, after her death, she will be succeeded by a relative of the institutors.

Acórdão do Desembargo that revokes a previous sentence from Juiz Ordinário of Colares, judjing the award of a land, in Ferrolho, belonging to the entail of Mateus de Torres and António Dias and three chestnut groves in Boca da Mata, belonging to the entail of António Dias, both administrated by Francisco de Torres, appelant, to Maria Simões, widow, as void. It also orders to amend the asset's partitions of Maria Simões.

Acórdão do Desembargo partially confirming and partially revoking the previous sentence. Besides the assets belonging to the available portion of António Gomes Angel, it judges the assets belonging to the reserved portions of his daughters, D. Maria Angel and D. Graça Angel, and the assets entailed by his wife, Joana Jerónima, as a dowry to their daughter, D. Maria Angel, as entailed, because the parentes can impose conditions on their children's reserved portions, when they bequeath them other equivalent assets and they approve. D. Maria Angel, defendant, can not dispose of the entailed assets as free and, after her death, she will be succeeded by a relative of the institutors.

Acórdão do Desembargo partially confirming and partially revoking the previous sentence. Besides the assets belonging to the available portion of António Gomes Angel, it judges the assets belonging to the reserved portions of his daughters, D. Maria Angel and D. Graça Angel, and the assets entailed by his wife, Joana Jerónima, as a dowry to their daughter, D. Maria Angel, as entailed, because the parentes can impose conditions on their children's reserved portions, when they bequeath them other equivalent assets and they approve. D. Maria Angel, defendant, can not dispose of the entailed assets as free and, after her death, she will be succeeded by a relative of the institutors.

Acórdão do Desembargo condemning Manuel Ribeiro and his wife, Maria Silveira, defendants, to pay the income of the entailed assets to António Luís da Silva and his minor daughter, not named, plaintiffs, and, for them, 25.000 réis per year, since the time when the plaintiff's wife assumed the administration.

Acórdão do Desembargo revoking a previous sentence from Provedor dos Resíduos, because he do not have the jurisdiction to impugn or order the execution of the partitions of the assets of Desembargador Manuel Gameiro de Barros, who founded an entail with his available portion, as firstly ordered in those partitions, which were amended in the meantime. It orders the Provedor dos Resíduos to accept the motions presented by the appelant, which should be submited to approval.

Acórdão do Desembargo that revokes a previous sentence from Juiz Ordinário of Colares, judjing the award of a land, in Ferrolho, belonging to the entail of Mateus de Torres and António Dias and three chestnut groves, belonging to the entail of António Dias, both administrated by Francisco de Torres, appelant, to Maria Simões, widow, as void. It also orders to amend the asset's partitions of Maria Simões.

Court sentence judging the libel of accusation presented by the plaintiff Martinho Afonso de Brito against the defendants António de Beja and his wife Antónia de Brito and the opponent João Afonso de Beja, about the estate of Atouguia which is claimed by the plaintiff as an entailed property. The defendants were acquited.

Court sentence delivered by Doutor Manuel Marques da Costa, Juiz de Fora com alçada in Abrantes, judging a lawsuit between Capitão João Manuel Grândio, widower of Catarina Lopes Preta, and Padre João Alves Pinto, her nephew and heir, regarding the estate partition of Catarina Lopes Preta, namely this assigned to the chapel she founded in her will. Doutor Manuel Marques da Costa judged the partitions as finished and condemned both sides in the proceedings expenses. He also judges that the declared assets will belong to Padre João Alves Pinto, after the death of João Manuel Grândio. This sentence was requested by Padre João Alves Pinto.
Contains: approval deed, dated from 1693-11-13, and opening deed of a will, dated from 1694-10-26.

Court sentence issued by Doutor Jerónimo de Mesquita Homem, provedor dos Resíduos e Cativos of Lisbon, concerning the fulfillment of the will of Doutor Belchior Dias Preto, in charge of Lourenço Dias Preto, his son and executor, defendant. It orders that, in order to comply with the institution, two books are made, containing the institution, the assets of the entail, and the exemplification of this sentence, one remaining in Torre do Tombo and the other in the possession of the defendant.

Court sentence, issued by licensee Manuel Pinto da Fonseca, juiz da Coroa in Viana da Foz do Lima, on the partition deed of assets left by Pedro Gonçalves Rebelo, carried out between Maria Vicente, widow and executor of Pedro Gonçalves Rebelo, and the chapel he instituted.
Contains the inventory of assets.

Court sentence issued by the judges on the division of assets left by Fernando de Álvares da Cunha approving the divisions made with regard to the additions made by Joana Vaz to the assets left to the entail that her husband had instituted.

Court sentence annexing to the entail of Vigidal a lease of 70 alqueires in Montemor-o-Novo, and ordering the sale of the houses in Lisboa which had belonged to its former administrator, Nicolau de Castro, so the revenue of the sale could be employed in their place.

Court sentence from the judges of Mesa da Consciência revoking a previous sentence from Juiz Geral das Ordens, which condemned the defendants, comendadeira de Avis and religious of the church of Encarnação of Lisboa, to subrogate estate of the same value than the litigation houses and return the income of these houses, since they are entailed, and absolving them from the plaintiff's, conde de São Lourenço, request, in his libel. It is proven that the houses sold to the defendants were free estate and belonged to D. Luísa de Meneses, grandmother of the plaintiff, since the partition of the estate of her grandmother and the intitutor's second wife, D. Luísa de Noronha.

Court sentence judging only the assets of the available portion of António Gomes Angel as entailed, since the institutor could not impose any condition and entail on the reserved portion of his daughters, D. Maria Angel, plaintiff, and D. Graça Angel. All the other assets, included those entailed by Joana Jerónima, wife of António Gomes Angel, as a dowry to D. Maria Angel, her daughter, are judged as free.

Court sentence absolving the defendant, João do Canto de Castro, from the request of the plaintiff, António do Canto de Castro, and opponent, Pedro do Canto de Castro, his brothers, with regard to the estate partitions of D. Francisca da Silva, wife of Rui Dias Sampaio, intitutor, and their grandmother, and giving him the right to enjoy the litigation property. It states that in Rui Dias Sampaio's partitions his available portion will be given to António do Canto de Castro to enjoy it as an entail, since he is the younger son of D. Antónia da Silva, daughter of Rui Dias de Sampaio.

Court sentence judging Máximo de Melo, defendant, as the rightful successor of the entail of doutor Diogo Borges, medical doctor in Lisbon, and its houses, located in the neighbourhood of Santa Ana, in Lisbon, and absolving him from relinquish and divide them. The plaintiffs accused Diogo Broges, first administrator and son of the institutor, of not accepting the condition imposed by his father of annex his reserved portion, so the houses were free and should take part in the inheritance partition. It is not proven that Diogo Borges did not approved and fulfiled the institutor's condition.

Court sentence determining the partition of the assets of the late Simão Mateus, administrator of the chapel of Catarina Dias, his great-grandmother, with properties in Penha Longa and masses in the monastery of S. Jerónimo, and distinguishing the chapel's assets. It mentions that D. Micaela, son of Simão Mateus and sister of João Mateus, the last administrator, is the rightful successor of the chapel of Catarina Dias and another chapel in S. João de Coruche.

Court sentence absolving Álvaro de Magalhães, defendant and husband of Maria Simão, from the requested by Manuel Ferreira, plaintiff and administrator of the entail of Maria Simoa, because the requested properties were given to the defendant in her wife's partitions.

Court sentence judging only the assets of the available portion of António Gomes Angel as entailed, since the institutor could not impose any condition and entail on the reserved portion of his daughters, D. Maria Angel, plaintiff, and D. Graça Angel. All the other assets, included those entailed by Joana Jerónima, wife of António Gomes Angel, as a dowry to D. Maria Angel, her daughter, are judged as free.

Court sentence judging only the assets of the available portion of António Gomes Angel as entailed, since the institutor could not impose any condition and entail on the reserved portion of his daughters, D. Maria Angel, plaintiff, and D. Graça Angel. All the other assets, included those entailed by Joana Jerónima, wife of António Gomes Angel, as a dowry to D. Maria Angel, her daughter, are judged as free.

Partition deed by which Francisco Serrão de Almeida and his wife Ana de Lencastre divided their estate between them, incorporating in the institutor's part the farm in Telheiras and the houses in Lisboa in order to fulfil of the chapel's obligations.

Petition presented by Lourenço Dias Preto requesting a certificate to join the two books of the assets of the entail instituted by Doutor Belchior Dias Preto, his father, of which he was administrator, as ordered by the institution.
Several dispatchs follow.

Royal sentence concerning the conflict between Marta Pedroso, her husband Jerónimo de Abreu, and João Prego, regarding the portions entailed in Álvaro do Porto Pedroso and Margarida Eanes' chapel. The royal court declares the institution as valid.

Contains exemplifications of petitions and letters of attorneys.

Royal sentence, judging a civil process on the division of assets of Fernando Álvares da Cunha, between Joana Vaz, plaintiff, against Lourenço Vasques da Cunha and Ana da Cunha, his wife, defendants, administrators of the entail.
The sentence reiterates compliance with the decisions issued by the judges regarding the division of the deceased's assets, namely in relation to the settlement of Joana Vaz's debts to the entail.

Sentence finishing a partition process made after the death of Francisco de Faria Severim, son of Gaspar Gil Severim and husband of D. Joana da Fonseca, by which Manuel Severim de Faria, uncle of Gaspar de Faria Severim, his minor son, took possession of the properties belonging to his nephew, as his tutor.

Sentence accepting a motion by an unspecified plaintiff and ordering the separation from the entail of João Jorge and Joana Gonçalves of a part of the properties in Chelas, which had been wrongfully listed in the tombo as belonging to the entail.

Sentence judging the farmstead previously entailed by Manuel Correia Barba freed from the entail, since the partitions through which it had been inherited hadn't been considered valid. The obligations for his soul shall be paid from the remaining properties entailed.

Sentence validating the partition of the houses in Lisboa, which had belonged to Isabel da Cunha and her husband, entaling the part which belonged to Isabel da Cunha to her chapel, and ordering the making of a tombo.
Preceded by partitions and evaluation of the houses.

Sentence against Jerónimo Soares de Vilhegas judging the validity of the partitions made in his father's will, written in 1622-08-20, in comparison with the partitions established in his entail and chapel foundation deed, issued in 1628-02-26. It regards properties inherited by Jerónimo Soares de Vilhegas and his brother, Vicente Soares de Vilhegas, from the legitime of their mother, D. Guiomar Nunes Angel.