Termo of Álvaro Pires de Andrade and D. Guiomar Henriques, his wife, annexing the evaluated properties to the entail founded by Fernando Álvares de Andrade and D. Isabel de Paiva, and other properties, inherited from D. Isabel de Paiva, to add up to the amount they owed to the entail.

Sentence in favour of Gaspar de Faria Severim, administrator of the entail established by his grandfather, Gaspar Gil Severim, considering him free of the debt owed by his father, Francisco de Faria Severim, who hadn't annexed his third part to the entail, as required.

Sentence judging the embargos set by cónego Manuel de Saldanha, executor of D. Mariana de Noronha's will. It is proven that he isn't forced to present the titles of the quinta da Portela because, although D. Mariana de Noronha, in a previous will, had bequeathed it to him with an obligation of a daily mass, she had changed her mind and given it to the condessa da Ericeira, in her codicil. She had given to Manuel Saldanha, instead, the houses entailed to the chapel of D. Cristóvão de Sousa, adding to them the obligation of a daily mass. The houses are considered entailed, Manuel de Saldanha is appointed as administrator, and the will of D. Mariana de Noronha is considered fulfilled.

Sale, quittance, subrogation and obligation deed by which Manuel Correia and his wife Maria Zuzarte, daughter of the institutor Beatriz Gomes, sold their houses located in Alverca that were obligated to the celebration of masses in the Church of Nossa Senhora da Purificação de Bucelas. They incorporated land and an olive grove instead, also located in Alverca, in order to fulfil the chapel's obligations. This document was preceded by a procuration deed dated 1648-08-17, and followed by an Alvará dated 1652-12-05 confirming the subrogation.

Dispatch of Doutor Rui Gago judging the houses of Lisbon, inherited by Álvaro Pires de Andrade from his mother, as applied in the entail of Fernando Álvares de Andrade and D. Isabel de Paiva.

Desembargo issued by Doutor Rui Gago, juiz do cível in Lisbon, judging the evaluation of the properties belonging to Álvaro Pires de Andrade as good and those properties as annexed to the entail founded by his parents, Fernando Álvares de Andrade and D. Isabel de Paiva. The judge also orders to Sebastião Álvares, notary, to write a declaration.

Court sentence condemning the defendants, Antónia de Miranda and her sons, Baltasar da Silva and Luís da Silva, to relinquish to the plaintiff, Fernando Teles de Meneses, son of the original plaintiff, D. Catarina da Silva Teles, the third part of the available portion of Fernando Teles de Meneses, his grandfather and father of D. Catarina da Silva Teles, in free estate. It also condemns the plaintiff to divide with the defendants, heirs of Luís da Silva Teles, brother of D. Catarina da Silva Teles, the properties acquired by Fernando Teles de Meneses, their father, to the reserved portion of his son, Luís da Silva Teles. At the origin of the litigation was the estate partition of Fernando Teles de Meneses and his wife, D. Maria de Brito, and the annexation of his available portion to the entail of Rui Teles de Meneses.

Court sentence that orders Doutor Manuel Carvalho Viegas, defendant and executor of Padre Frei Pedro Dias Manso, the chapel's institutor, to buy free properties to entail to the chapel, within 4 months, to fulfil the institutor's will, under penalty of losing his function. Baltasar da Cunha, administrator, sould also give a certain amount of money to the executor, under penalty of losing the chapel's administration.

Court sentence judging that the houses of Marechal, in the parish of S. Jorge, belong to the entail of D. Fernando Coutinho, marechal do reino, annexed to it by D. Álvaro Coutinho, son of D. Fernando Coutinho, and absolving D. Álvaro da Silveira de Albuquerque, defendant, from the request of D. José Coutinho de Lencastre, plaintiff, who argued that they are free assets.

Court sentence absolving Doutor Gregório Mascarenhas Homem and his wife, defendants, from the request, made by the plaintiffs, Sebastião da Cunha da Fonseca and D. Beatriz da Câmara, his wife, of the entail and chapel of D. Filipa de Sequeira, its estate and the available portions of Doutor Luís Mendes Barreto, first administrator, and the late D. Sebastiana da Câmara, his niece, who used to be married to the defendant. The plaintiffs failed to prove their family relationship with the institutor, while the defendants quoted the annexation and the entail succession clause stated by the institutor.

Court sentence issued by the Ouvidor-Geral de Pernambuco absolving, Estêvão Pais Barreto, administrator and defendant, from the charges made by the plaintiff, João Pais de Melo, regarding the right of the defendant to remain on the administration of the entail founded by João Pais Barreto and Inês Guardes, once his deceased father and last administrator, João Pais de Castro, did not fulfilled the masses obligations disposed by the institutors nor annexed his own available portions to the entail. The Ouvidor-Geral absolved the defendant based on the very high expenses made by his father on the reconstruction of the chapel and of the entailed sugar-mills who died so poor that he had no sum on his available portion capable of being annexed to the entail, as he proved through a sentença de justificação.

Court sentence condemning the condessa of Alegrete, defendant, to deposit, in Misericórdia de Lisboa, the income of the assets belonging to the entail of Matias de Albuquerque, vice-rei of Índia, generated during the first two years of the administration of her husband, Matias de Albuquerque, conde of Alegrete, who did not fulfil the clause imposed to all the entail administrators by the executors of the institutor's will. The condessa of Alegrete is the universal heir of her husband and her condemnation was requested by the plaintiff, successor of conde of Alegrete, her uncle, in the entail's administration.

Court sentence judging a litigation between Marcos de Castelo Branco, the embargoing party, and Fernando Dias Franco and Francisca Manuel, son and wife of Luís Dias Franco, executor of the will of Pascoal de Lisboa, the chapel and entail's institutor, the embargoed party, about the execution of the institutor's will, made in 1640. According to Marcos de Castelo Branco, Luís Dias Franco did not use the will's money to buy properties to the entail. The Provedor dos Resíduos transferred the proceedings to Juízo Eclesiástico, which has the jurisdiction to execute the will and to order the employment of the money.

Court sentence judging the properties mentioned in the lawsuit, both those from the foundation deed and those from the dowry deed, as entailed and Padre Frei Bento Lamberto, professed religious in the monastery of Maceira Dão, as the rightful successor of the entail of Licenciado António Marques, abbot of S. Miguel of Fiães, because he is the closest relative of António Vaz Perestrelo, last administrator, and belongs to the institutor's bloodline. It condemns the defendant to relinquish the entailed assets, withe their income generated since the contested lawsuit until their return, to the monastery of Maceira Dão, plaintiff, their rightful owner during Padre Frei Bento Lamberto lifetime.

Court sentence (transcription) condemning Cristóvão de Almada, defendant, to separate the third part of the available portion of the assets of his wife, D. Luísa de Eça e Mendonça, to annex it to the entail of Pedro de Eça, because she had not annexed her available portion while she was administering it. The entail was currently administrated by the plaintiffs, D. Joana Francisca de Montebelo and the marquês de Montebelo, her husband. It also condemns him to pay the income generated since the undue occupation until its return, and absolves him from annexing the third part of the available portion of his son, Rodrigo Luís de Almada, because he died too early and did not administer the entail. Regarding the entail of Cortes Reais, it reserves to Pedro Mendonça Côrte-Real, opponent, the right to request his part in the annexation of the third part of the available portion to the entail of Pedro de Eça.

Court sentence absolving the defendants, not named, from the requested by the plaintiffs, not named, and declaring them as the rightful owners of the litigation houses, because they are the heirs of Beatriz Mendes, wife of António Vaz, the entail institutor. The houses were bequeathed by Maria Vaz to her brother, António Vaz, and, after him, to his son and wife and are not entailed.

Court sentence absolving D. Maria Monteiro, defendant, from relinquish the half of the available portion of her late granddaughter, D. Mariana, previous administrator of the chapel of João Gomes Leitão, o Velho, to the plaintiffs, including Gomes Freire de Andrade.

Court sentence judging Máximo de Melo, defendant, as the rightful successor of the entail of doutor Diogo Borges, medical doctor in Lisbon, and its houses, located in the neighbourhood of Santa Ana, in Lisbon, and absolving him from relinquish and divide them. The plaintiffs accused Diogo Broges, first administrator and son of the institutor, of not accepting the condition imposed by his father of annex his reserved portion, so the houses were free and should take part in the inheritance partition. It is not proven that Diogo Borges did not approved and fulfiled the institutor's condition.

Court sentence absolving Gonçalo Pereira do Lago, defendant, from annexing to the entail of Gil Lourenço and Joana Gonçalves, his wife, the properties that the late Filipe Pereira do Lago, the last administrator administrator, donated to him, as requested by João Pereira de Miranda, plaintiff and current administrator. It is proven that the donation was made to pay a debt and there is no evidence that the previous administrators fulfiled the condition to annex to the entail the inherited properties, imposed by the institutor to all administrators.

Court sentence condemning D. Antónia de Sousa e Meneses, defendant, to make an inventory of the assets of Diogo de Sousa, her brother and last administrator, and to separate his available portion to annex to the entail of Álvaro de Sousa, o Velho, and Francisca de Távora, his wife, as requested by the plaintiff, Manuel de Melo, as father and administrator of his minor son's, Álvaro de Sousa, assets.

Court sentence by which the third part of Gaspar de Abreu, deceased, is entailed to the chapel established by his parents, Sebastião de Abreu and D. Antónia de Vasconcelos, which was administered by D. Helena de Vasconcelos, his sister and heir.

Court sentence issued by Doutor Rui Gago, juiz do cível in Lisbon, declaring that the evaluated properties belonging to Álvaro Pires de Andrade were annexed to the entail founded by his parents, Fernando Álvares de Andrade and D. Isabel de Paiva, fulfiling his obligation.

Court sentence ordering António Gomes do Alemo to buy from António de Torres, his cousin, the quarter of the engine which they had received from their grandfather, Diogo Rodrigues de Lisboa, and to annex it to his entail, according to their grandfather's will. António de Torres shall employ the money from the sale to buy properties for his own entail, and will be called to give notice of the fulfillment of the obligations ordered by their grandfather.

Court sentence by which the third part of D. Helena de Vasconcelos, sister and heir of Gaspar de Abreu, is entailed to the chapel established by their parents, Sebastião de Abreu and D. Antónia de Vasconcelos.

Court sentence ordering António Gomes do Alemo to buy from António de Torres, his cousin, the quarter of the engine which they had received from their grandfather, Diogo Rodrigues de Lisboa, and to annex it to his entail, according to their grandfather's will. António de Torres shall employ the money from the sale to buy properties for his own entail, and will be called to give notice of the fulfillment of the obligations ordered by their grandfather.

Court sentence accepting a motion by Manuel de Abreu, regarding the properties of the third part of D. Antónia de Vasconcelos, which ought to be annexed to the entail she and her husband had established, and which was administered by D. Helena de Vasconcelos.

Acórdão from Desembargo ordering the defendants to fully annex the third part of the available portion of Fernando Teles de Meneses to the entail of Rui Teles de Meneses, once they are the heirs of Luís da Silva Teles, head of the family in the partition of the estate of Fernando Teles de Meneses.

Acórdão confirming the previous sentence from Provedor da Comarca de Évora and declaring that if the appellant wants to sell some of his free properties to entail to the chapel, he can do it under the institutor's conditions.

Acórdão from Desembargo that confirms the previou sentence of Juiz de Fora of Pinhel, declaring that D. Maria Monteiro, defendant, sould return the income of the available portion of João Gomes Leitão, o Velho, since his death until the time when the plaintiffs took possession of the chapel.

Acórdão from Desembargo that orders the fulfilment of the previou acórdão, amending it and declaring that D. Maria Monteiro, defendant, only should return the income of the available portion and entail of João Gomes Leitão, o Velho, since the time when she and her granddaughter took possession of it, after the death of Doutor Lourenço Coelho Leitão, until the time when the plaintiffs took possession.

Acórdão from Desembargo confirming the sentence of Provedor dos Resíduos, which transferred the proceedings to Juízo Eclesiástico, and declaring all the sentences procecuted in his Juízo as cancelled, because he is unqualified to judge the will's execution.

Acórdão do Desembargo confirming the previous sentence and declaring that the other assets included in the fourth part of the institutor are entailed. The plaintiffs, as the rightful successors of the entail of António Vaz, can demand them.

Acórdão from Desembargo that partially revokes the previous sentence from Juiz do Cível, ordering the defendants to annex the third part of the available portion of Fernando Teles de Meneses to the entail of Rui Teles de Meneses, as defined in the foundation deed.

Acórdão em Relação condemning the defendants, the widow of Manuel Correia de Mancelos and Procurador da Fazenda, to pay to the plaintiff, daughter of Manuel Correia de Mancelos and administrator, the amount corresponding to the available portion of Francisco Correia da Costa, who ordered it in his entail foundation deed. This amount comes from the seized assets of Manuel Correia de Mancelos, the institutor's son and first administrator. The amount will be relinquish to the plaintiff with its income generated since the death of her father.

Acórdão em relação (transcription) partially confirming and partially revoking the previous sentence from the Corregedor do Cível da Corte. It changes the decision regarding the annexation of the third part of the available portion of D. Luísa de Eça e Mendonça to the entail of Côrtes-Reais, ordering the annexation of the available portion to both entails.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Jerónimo Fernando de Melo, defendant, due to the administration of the chapel established by Bartolomeu Gil and Brígida Dias, in Viana do Alvito.
The sentence condemns the defendant to leave the administration of the chapel because it is not attached to the chapel of Pomar da Sertã, but was a different chapel. It declares the chapel vacant for the Crown and orders the Crown to take possession of it and then appoint an administrator, who should make the tombo.