Court sentence condemning marquesa of Alenquer, defendant, to relinquish to condessa do Vimioso, plaintiff and administrator, the farmstead (quinta) of Junqueiro, in Carcavelos, which was bought by the plaintiff's father, Duarte de Albuquerque, during the absence of his brother, Matias de Albuquerque, first administrator, and annexed to the entail of Matias de Albuquerque.

Court sentence absolving D. Isabel Henriques, defendant, from the request of D. Lopo Rodrigues de Évora e Veiga, plaintiff and administrator of the entail of Nicolau Veiga, to return him some houses, in Lisbon, which he claims that belong to the entail. It was proven that the houses were bought by Padre Nicolau da Veiga Ximenes, executor of Nicolau Veiga, with his own money and not with the institutor’s money.

Court sentence judging that the estate and public debt instrument of 12.000 réis of António Madeira, nephew of António Madeira, the entail's institutor, belong to Miguel Madeira, defendant, as the entail's administrator. The plaintiff, Manuel Viegas, took possession of the estate of António Madeira (nephew), presenting his and his wife's fake will. Miguel Madeira is the rightful heir of António Madeira (nephew) and his wife, Isabel Botelha, who didn't have children, so their public debt instrument of 12.000 réis belongs to the entail, according to a donation from António Madeira (uncle).

Court sentence proving the foundation of the chapel of Francisco Faleiro and declaring D. Luísa de Meneses, plaintiff with her husband, Manuel de Almeida, as its rightful successor, because she is a natural and legitimated daughter of Jorge da Fonseca de Meneses, last administrator. It judges that the income of one moio of wheat imposed in the farmstead (herdade) of Aldeia das Três, in the outskirts of Beja, belongs to the chapel and condemns João de Aboim Pessanha, defendant, to relinquish it to the plaintiff, with its income since the death of Jorge da Fonseca de Meneses.

Court sentence absolving the defendants, not named, from relinquishing some properties requested by the plaintiffs, not named, and claimed as belonging to the chapel and entail of João Martins, abbot of Perre, located in the farmstead (quinta) of Olheire, in Perre, because they are free and not entailed. Besides, the plaintiffs can not bring an action against the defendants because the current administrator is his father and father-in-law, Manuel Antunes, absent and presumably alive.

Court sentence condemning D. Maria Josefa da Cunha, defendant, to waive the properties of the entail of Nisa, in the outskirts of Grândola, founded by D. Pedro de Lima, to the plaintiffs, D. João de Lima and D. Martinho Ribeiro, on behalf of his wife, D. Mariana de Lima, cousin of D. João de Lima, because they are descendants of the instituitor. The defendant took possession of the properties for being married to Estêvão Brandão de Lima, last administrator, of whom she was heir, since they didn't have children. Altought, it was proved that D. Maria Josefa da Cunha only received, by donation, his husband's free properties.

Grace warrant of administration on behalf of João de Sousa Falcão appointing him to the administration of the chapel founded by Pedro de Sousa Falcão and his wife D. Catarina in the church of Santa Maria in the village of Alter do Chão, succeeding to his late father Cristóvão Falcão de Sousa.

Royal sentence confirming that Pedro da Silva de Meneses and D. Isabel, his wife, plaintiffs, are not aggravated by the corregedor sentence and condemning them in the proceedings expenses. The corregedor absolved Pedro de Abreu and D. Beatriz, his wife, defendants, from the requested by the plaintiffs, because the entailed farmstead (herdade) of Serra always belonged to the male ascendants of Pedro de Abreu and his grandfather, Pedro de Abreu, was older than D. Maior, his sister and mother of the plaintiff, against who he win a sentece in 1505.

Royal sentence finishing a court process between the priests of the convent of S. Domingos de Benfica, Lisboa, and Luís de Brito do Rio, fidalgo da Casa do Rei, husband of Joana de Lima Henriques and administrator of the entail and chapel established by Lopo Mendes do Rio and Leonor Dias. Luís de Brito do Rio had inherited the entail after the death, in 1619, of D. Guiomar da Silva, wife of Luís de Mendonça, who was the last successor of the institutors in direct line. As heir from a transversal line, Luís de Brito do Rio only had the right to administer half the possessions of the entail. The other half should, according to the will of the institutors, be divided in two parts: half to the convent of S. Domingos de Benfica and half for pious obligations, namely redemption of captives. There was a long process to establish which properties and what revenue was owed to each part.
Contains several documents regarding these proceedings, including royal sentences dated 1627-08-17, 1627-11-18, 1630-08-13, 1631-07-24, 1631-07-28 and 1631-07-30; sentences issued by the provedor das Capelas dated 1627-02-18, 1630-05-24, 1631-03-06 and 1631-07-24, and sentences of liquidation dated 1630-10-08, 1630-10-12 and 1630-11-16. Mentions dispatches and several embargos set upon the revenue by both parts.

Royal sentence concerning the conflict between Marta Pedroso, her husband Jerónimo de Abreu, and João Prego, regarding the portions entailed in Álvaro do Porto Pedroso and Margarida Eanes' chapel. The royal court declares the institution as valid.

Contains exemplifications of petitions and letters of attorneys.

Royal sentence issued by Casa da Suplicação, declining the appeal made on behalf of the minor Martinho Afonso de Melo, defendant and appellant, against a sentence issued by the Juiz dos Órfãos de Lisboa, Francisco Ferreira Encerrabodes on the cause that opposed him, defendand and D. Maria da Silva de Almeida, plaintiff, regarding the succession on the administration of the entail and chapel of Espírito Santo, in the church of the Misericórdia de Lisboa, founded by Luís de Almeida e Vasconcelos. The Casa de Suplicação condemned the minor Martinho Afonso de Melo and his tutors to pay for the costs of the process and deliver the administration of the entail and of the entailed properties with all of it's derived income to D. Maria da Silva.

[includes several documents, including sentences, statement of oath, termo de curador, extracts of the will and a termo de atempação].

Royal sentence judging the salt pans as belonging to the farmstead (quinta) of Amora and entail of D. Guiomar da Silveira and condemning the religious of the monastery of Nossa Senhora do Monte do Carmo of Lisbon to pay the autos expenses.

Royal sentence issued by D. Pedro II, judging a civil process between Manuel Martins Pereira and his wife, plaintiffs, against António Lopes Moutoso and Maria Álvares Veladas, his wife, defendants, over the administration of the chapel established by Diogo Barradas de Bem.
The sentence judges the plaintiffs as the legitimate administrators of the chapel and condemns the defendants to leave the administration and the possession of the entailed properties.
Contains inserted parts of the libel of accusation and of the contrariedade.

Royal sentence deliberating on a lawsuit opposing Cristóvão Mendes de Eça and D. Filipa de Lacerda, his wife, to Filipe Bandeira Pessoa and D. Maria de Castelo Branco, his wife, regarding the unlawful possession of entailed properties to the chapel of Santa Catarina de Vila de Rei. The court confirmed the decision of the Juiz de Fora.

Royal sentence giving to the plaintiff Lopo Godinho the administration of the chapel founded by João Afonso Barreiros and the right to appoint the successors. João Álvares, administrator appointed by the institutor in his will, didn't accepted the nomination, so the judge gave the administration of the chapel to Gil Fernandes and his descendants. The defendant Luís Vaz is now revoked from the administration.

Royal sentence (extract) issued by the king D. Manuel about the libel of accusation presented by the plaintiff doutor Diogo Lopes de Carvalho against the defendant Diogo Eanes. It condemns the defendant, that is administrating the chapel without a valid letter, to deliver the chapel to the plaintiff, who is grandson of Afonso Lourenço, brother of the institutor Vasco Lourenço.

Sentence by which the provedor das Capelas orders Luís de Brito do Rio to give an account of the properties which he inherited as successor to the entail and chapel established by Lopo Mendes do Rio and Leonor Dias, to calculate the amount he should own, since, as a successor from a transversal line, he could only own half of the properties. Luís de Brito do Rio set embargos upon this sentence, claiming some of the properties had been taken without authorization, and as such he shouldn't be charged for them.
Followed by a royal sentence dated 1630-08-13, judging this sentence fair, sentences of liquidation, dated 1630-10-08, 1630-10-12, and 1630-11-16, and other procedural documentation.