Warrant appointing Luziana da Veiga de Sequeira and her descendants to the administration of the houses located in Arco do Rossio, which belongs to the chapel founded by Gonçalo Gil and which chapel's administration belongs to the crown. She must pay the rent to fulfill the pious obligations.

Tenure contract by which António Lourenço and his wife Ana Dinis confirmed the fulfilment of João Velho's chapel obligations in Church of Nossa Senhora da Purificação de Bucelas.

Sentence in favour of D. Miguel Luís de Meneses, owner of quinta da Bouça, in Cascais, against Gonçalo de Sousa Moniz, administrator of the entail established by António Moniz da Fonseca. Pedro Calado de Araújo, provedor das capelas, judges that the quinta da Bouça had been wrongfully entailed by António Moniz da Fonseca, because it was foreira, and thus it should be freed from the obligations imposed on it and sold in public auction. The revenue made in the auction should be used to buy interest to entail to the chapel.

Lease deed by which Henrique da Cunha de Ataíde and his wife Mariana Sottomayor requested to lease some the proprieties entailed to Maria de Sottomayor's chapel in order to continue to fulfil its obligations.

Lease deed by which the friars of the Convent of Nossa Senhora da Graça contracted with Vicente Vaz to take possession of the properties entailed to Rui Grego and Valentina de Almeida's chapel.

Lease deed by which the administrator Henrique da Silva leased some lands and olive groves near to Póvoa de Santo Adrião belonging to João Domingues' chapel.

Deed of sale by which Sebastião Lau sold to Duarte Fernandes, the executor of Lourenço de Aguiar Fafes' will, 21 000 réis of rents from some vineyards, houses and orchards located in the same place. The executor Duarte Fernandes also purchased 35 000 réis of rents (foro) from a farm located in Alhos Vedros. Lourenço Aguiar Fafes had founded a chapel and had appointed his sister Constança Fafes to be its first administrator. The institutor ordered that all the assets that he brought from Índia should be sold in order to be used for the celebration of masses in the Church of Nossa Senhora da Luz, in Lisboa.

Court sentence absolving Dionísio Ravasco, defendant, from the requested by the plaintiffs, the religious of Santíssima Trindade of Lisbon and Frei Sebastião da Ordem da Santíssima Trindade, administrator, and judging some tributary houses as free and not entailed to the entail of Sancha Pires, because it is forbidden to entail tributary houses without the landlord's permission. It mentions that Desembargador Manuel Álvares de Carvalho, father of Frei Sebastião, ordered to sale de houses to pay his debts and the defendant bought them with the landlord's permission.

Court sentence judging that Diogo Soares da Veiga do Avelar e Taveira, plaintiff and administrator of entail of Isabel de Avelar, does not have action to claim the ownership of the lease of a non-identified farmstead (quinta), belonging to the monastery of Santa Clara of Santarém, to the Provedor and Irmãos of Misericórdia of Lisbon, defendants, who legally own the lease and are absolved. The successors of the entail only owned the lease for three lifes.

Court sentence regarding motions set by Francisco Correia de Lacerda and José da Costa Dias about the properties entailed to the chapel founded by padre João da Costa. It was claimed that the farmstead da Talha Grande in S. João da Talha, entailed to this chapel, had been subrogated by Pedro Vaz de Sá, its former administrator, for a public debt instrument and houses in Lisboa. However, José da Costa Dias claimed there was no subrogation deed or any public debt instrument proving this subrogation, and that the houses had been leased by Pedro Vaz de Sá, and thus couldn't have been entailed. José da Costa Dias was considered right, against Francisco Correia de Lacerda's claims, and it was judged that the farmstead was still entailed to the chapel and thus it was seized and its possessor was ordered to pay the obligations of the chapel until he presented the subrogation deed and proof that the subrogated properties were free of other charges.

Court sentence issued by Juíz do Cível which opposed the plaintiff Ana Teixeira, administrator of the chapel founded by Aldonça Afonso, represented by her attorney-in-fact, and the defendant D. Maria de Bermudes, lessee of the chapel. The author demands the payments of the lease of the entire chapel.

Court sentence delivered by juiz de fora absolving the defendant from the requested by the plaintiff, administrator of the entail or chapel of João Afonso das Grotas Fundas, because it is allowed to lease properties which belonged to João Afonso das Grotas Fundas.

Court sentence delivered by Francisco de Sande Machado, juiz dos órfãos, judging a lawsuit between D. Fernando da Silva and D. Beatriz, his wife, plaintiffs, and João Farinha, tutor of Gaspar Lopes' offspring, minors and orphans, defendant, about a farmstead (herdade) belonging to the entail of Maria Aires, administrated by the plaintiff, and leased to the defendants' ancestors. The plaintiffs claim that the lease exceeded its term and request to the defendants to relinquish them the farmstead. Since the defendants withdrew the lawsuit, the judge orders to give the farmstead possession to the plaintiffs, as belonging to their entail.

Court sentence delivered by Francisco de Sande Machado, juiz dos órfãos, judging D. Fernando da Silva and D. Beatriz, his wife, plaintiffs, as owners of the farmstead called of Gaspar Lopes because it belongs to the entail of Maria Aires.

Court sentence validating the composition deed celebrated between Manuel Lampreia de Vargas and priest Frei Pedro Pessanha de Valadares.

Court sentence regarding a conflict between the monastery of São Francisco and Jorge Lourenço, administrator of the chapel instituted by Filipa Coutinho, concerning one of the estates of the entail.

Certificate by which it was declared that the administrator Henrique da Silva leased some lands and olive groves located near to Póvoa de Santo Adrião and that belonged to João Domingues' chapel.

Acórdão do Desembargo that revokes a previous sentence from Corregedor do Cível da Corte, condemning the defendant to relinquish to the Diogo Soares da Veiga do Avelar e Taveira, plaintiff and administrator of the entail of Isabel de Avelar, the lease of a farmstead (quinta), with its income generated since the contested lawsuit. The lease was included in the entail by the institutor, who appointed the administrators to succeed in the lease.

Acórdão em relação not accepting the request that João Martins da Costa adressed to the reitor of Colégio de Santo Antão da Companhia de Jesus to subrogate a house with another one. He must register the houses in the tombo of the chapel. Further requests will be attended by the Procurador da Coroa.

Acórdão em Relação declaring that the embargo presented by Maria Soares was proved, so the chapel never belonged to the Crown. According to the acórdão of 1622-05-09 the chapel's administrator can lease the properties. Therefore the seizure must be ended. This chapel must be registered as "absoluta" and must be writen a note in the margin of the record in the Capelas da Coroa book.

Acórdão em relação ordering that the crown must take possession of the chapel and make its tombo. The defendant is enforced to pay the rents to fulfill the pious obligations.

Acórdão em relação acquiting the defendant Francisco de Sousa, administrator of the chapel, against the accusation presented by the Procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, because he fulfills the pious obligations. They order him to remake the tombo and to bring to the chapel the leases that are lost; if the income increase he must order more masses according to the instititors' will, and put an inscription in the chapel. He must make three copies of the tombo with the will: one for the administrator, one for the Provedoria and another one to the Torre do Tombo.

Acórdão em relação accepting the libel of accusation presented by the Procurador da Coroa and ordering that the chapel belongs to the crown, because the defendant Luziana da Veiga doesn't descend from the institutor. The defendant will have the usufruct of another part of the houses located in Arco do Rossio, that se has rented.

Acórdão em relação ordering that the defendant must deliver the money to the deposit and that the crown must take possession of the chapel.