Acórdão em Relação that opposed the Procurador da Coroa, as plaintiff, against the defendant Manuel Botelho da Silveira concerning the tombo and inquiry about the chapel founded by Martinho Eanes in Salvaterra de Magos which is adminstrated by the above Manuel Botelho da Silveira. The defendant is acquitted, because he was minor and didn't have any guilty in the bad administration of his father; but he must rebuild the houses of the hospital and put an inscription on the front door; it's also necessary to buy some properties to entail again. This acórdão must by registered in the books of Torre do Tombo and also in the books of Provedoria.

Acórdão em Relação considering that the appellant Estácio de Botelho Sequeira is the legitimate administrator of the hospital and chapel founded by Martinho Eanes. The hospital and the chapel is "absoluta" and therefore the sequestration must end.

Acórdão em relação acquiting the defendant Luís Borralho, administrator of the chapel and the shelter, from the accusation presented by the Procurador da Coroa. The chapel must be registered in the book of the Capelas da Coroa. He will make the tombo in three copies, one for the chapel's administrator, one for the provedoria and another one for the Torre do Tombo. He will put an inscription in the shelter of Vimieiro.

Acórdão em Relação adressed to the Oficiais da Câmara de Salvaterra de Magos ordering them to supervise the rebuilding work of the Hospital and chapel founded by Martinho Eanes. The appelant Manuel Botelho Silveira cannot possess the administration until the rebuilding work is finished.

Acórdão of Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the petition presented by Duarte de Melo Pereira, supplicant, administrator of half the chapel instituted by João Miguéis, due to the sequestration ordered by the procurador da Coroa about the assets of the chapel. In addition to the petition presented by the supplicant, the embargoes presented by António de Morais, also a administrator, regarding the increase in charges are also considered. The sentence recognizes the legitimacy of the administration of both and that the previous sentences had reduced the institution's charges.

Acórdão of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the civil process between procurador da Coroa, author, against Manuel Barbosa and D. Margarida Godinha, his wife, defendants, due to the sequestration ordered by the procurador da Coroa about the assets of the chapel of Santa Clara, instituted by João Miguéis in the church of Santa Maria de Sintra. The sentence shows the chapel was not of the Crown and that the administrators were appointed by their predecessors. The defendants are acquitted of non-compliance with the charges, as the chapel was reduced in income, ordering that, in the future, they seek to comply with them, as well as recover the lost assets and carry out a new tombo. They were also required to make a statement on the institutor's grave, stating that, due to the reduction in income, it was necessary to reduce charges. Only after this declaration should the sequestration of assets be lifted.
Sentence handed down by Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, Juiz das Capelas da Coroa e tombos da Coroa, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.

Acórdão of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the civil process between procurador da Coroa, author, against Manuel Barbosa and D. Margarida Godinha, his wife, defendants. As a result of the acórdão of 1628-02-18, whose compliance is ordered, the charges are reduced.
Sentence handed down by Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, Juiz das Capelas da Coroa e tombos da Coroa, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.