Sentence by which the provedor das Capelas orders Luís de Brito do Rio to give an account of the properties which he inherited as successor to the entail and chapel established by Lopo Mendes do Rio and Leonor Dias, to calculate the amount he should own, since, as a successor from a transversal line, he could only own half of the properties. Luís de Brito do Rio set embargos upon this sentence, claiming some of the properties had been taken without authorization, and as such he shouldn't be charged for them.
Followed by a royal sentence dated 1630-08-13, judging this sentence fair, sentences of liquidation, dated 1630-10-08, 1630-10-12, and 1630-11-16, and other procedural documentation.

Sentence issued by the mamposteiro-mor by which it is proven that the administrator of the entail established by Lopo Mendes do Rio and Leonor Dias can only administer half its properties, since he succeded through a transversal line. The other half must be divided in two parts: the first to use in pious obligations, especially the redemption of captives, and the second to be given to the priests of the convent of S. Domingos de Benfica, for maintenance of the chapel. The administrator is ordered to make an inventory of the properties entailed, so they can be divided.
Followed by acórdão em Relação dated 1626-08-3, confirming the sentence and declaring that the properties of the entail shall not be diminished. Instead, the administrator shall make these payments annually.

Sentence ordering that the appellee delivers to the appealer, who belongs to the institutor's lineage, the chapel's assets and the incomes obtained since the begining of the legal action.

Sentence against Bento Vaz about an embargo he set upon the revenues of quinta de Almoster, entailed to the chapel of Simão da Veiga Cabral, which couldn't be rented or pawned, because it belonged to an entail.

Sentence by which the embargos set upon the chapel of D. Catarina da Silveira by António Cabral da Cunha, its administrator, are annulled, since it is clear from the institution that D. Catarina da Silveira established a chapel of 33 masses in the convent of S. Francisco of Lisboa, making D. Maria da Silveira her heir, and that D. Maria da Silveira, added three masses to the chapel, thus making the administrators of these chapel the owners of both their properties.

Sentence by which the provedor das Capelas condemns Luís de Brito do Rio, administrator of the chapel established by Lopo Mendes do Rio and Leonor Dias, to pay what he owed to the priests of the convent of S. Domingos de Benfica, and to spend 20 cruzados of gold in ornamentation of the chapel, which he was obliged to do as successor from a transversal line. He also orders the priests of the convent to release the properties of the entail they had taken without authorization, so that the administrator can have them repaired.

Royal sentence finishing a court process between the priests of the convent of S. Domingos de Benfica, Lisboa, and Luís de Brito do Rio, fidalgo da Casa do Rei, husband of Joana de Lima Henriques and administrator of the entail and chapel established by Lopo Mendes do Rio and Leonor Dias. Luís de Brito do Rio had inherited the entail after the death, in 1619, of D. Guiomar da Silva, wife of Luís de Mendonça, who was the last successor of the institutors in direct line. As heir from a transversal line, Luís de Brito do Rio only had the right to administer half the possessions of the entail. The other half should, according to the will of the institutors, be divided in two parts: half to the convent of S. Domingos de Benfica and half for pious obligations, namely redemption of captives. There was a long process to establish which properties and what revenue was owed to each part.
Contains several documents regarding these proceedings, including royal sentences dated 1627-08-17, 1627-11-18, 1630-08-13, 1631-07-24, 1631-07-28 and 1631-07-30; sentences issued by the provedor das Capelas dated 1627-02-18, 1630-05-24, 1631-03-06 and 1631-07-24, and sentences of liquidation dated 1630-10-08, 1630-10-12 and 1630-11-16. Mentions dispatches and several embargos set upon the revenue by both parts.

Royal sentence, on behalf of João IV, judging the sharing made between the procurador do Fisco and Manuel Lopes Conqueiro, tutor of António, minor, son of Brás Casco de Farelões, which took place in Fisco of Évora.
The sentence orders that the previous sentence, issued by the Fisco of Évora, be carried out, giving to António, orphan of Brás Casco de Farelões, the part that belonged to him in his father's assets and in the entail established by his grandparents.

Royal sentence executing a citation order issued on behalf of the abbot and monks of the monastery of São Bento da Baía condemning Manuel Lopes, administrator of the chapel of São Pedro, founded by António Cordeiro, to restitute a land near Vila Velha's district that was unlawfully entailed by the institutor. The judicial dispute over this land lasted from 1656 to 1684, opposing the monastery, as plaintiff, against the institutor and the administrators of the entail.

Royal sentence, on behalf of Filipe, judging a civil process between Manuel do Vale, plaintiff, against Francisco Barreto, defendant, regarding the administration of the chapel established by Catarina Cabreira.

Royal sentence confirming a court sentence that finished a court process started by the licenciado Francisco de Barros, deceased, against the priests of the convent of Santíssima Trindade of Lisboa, and continued by his grandson, Francisco Pereira de Azevedo. Francisco de Barros had bequeathed 600 000 réis to the priests of the convent of Santíssima Trindade, who should acquire with it a public debt instrument to entail to his chapel. The priests hadn't fulfilled this obligation. After obtaining a royal sentence in his favour, Francisco de Barros had agreed that the priests could consignate the 600 000 réis in a lease in S. Jordão, Lisboa, which they possessed. The king confirmed this decision and ordered the consignation of the money on the leases.
Contains other copies of the royal sentence VINC007846 FBCC EA/002a and of the consent deed VINC007846 FBCC EA/002b; testemonies regarding the possession of the leases by the convent and documentation related to the habilitation of Francisco Pereira de Azevedo as heir and administrator of the chapel, after the death of his grandfather.

Royal sentence of D. João II, judging a civil process between Leonor Afonso, plaintiff, administrator of the entail instituted by Rui Soares, against João Dias and Catarina Gonçalves, his wife, defendants, on the possession of some mills belonging to the entail.

Royal sentence, passed by the queen's authority, judging a civil process between Vasco Eanes, plaintiff, against Pedro Mendes, defendant, administrator of the chapel established by priest Simão Gonçalves, vigário of the parish of São Pedro de Sintra. The sentence proves that Cubelo's place, on the outskirts of Sintra, was not included in the assets linked to the chapel, so he condemns the defendant to leave it to the plaintiff and to pay the costs of the process.

Royal sentence ordering the priests of the convent of Santíssima Trindade of Lisboa to return to the licenciado Francisco de Barros the 600 000 réis they had received from him.

Royal sentence judging a civil suit of appeal between Violante Gomes Formigo da Cunha, as plaintiff - administrator of the chapel founded by Iria Caeira -, against Luísa Lopes de Beça, defendant, about the possession of several assets its administration.
A previous sentence had declared the plaintiff as legitimate administrator of the chapel, which the defendant had appealed. The new sentence declares the defendant to be the legitimate administrator of the chapel, as she is the closest descendant of the founder, and nullifies the appointment of the plaintiff, ordering her to hand over the administration.

Exemplification of extract of the Torre do Tombo's Book, showing that the chapels were divided between Sancho de Melo da Silva, José Francisco de Melo e Castro, Cristóvão Francisco de Magalhães and D. Guiomar de Lemos and Silva, his wife.

Court sentence condemning Manuel do Canto de Castro, defendant and administrator of the entail of Pedro Eanes do Castro and other entails, incluging the entail of Vale and those which became vacant after the death of D. Juliana de Melo, to pay a maintenance of 150.000 réis or 30 moios of wheat to Inácio do Canto de Vasconcelos, plaintiff, becuase he is married to D. Inês de Castro, sister of Manuel do Canto de Castro, and very poor. It is mentioned that the rich brother is forced to feed the poor brother.

Court sentence (extract) judging the litigated properties, such as the farmstead (quinta) of Azambujeira, as belonging to the chapel of Fernando Rodrigues Patarinho and Lopo Rodrigues, plaintiff and the chapel's administrator, as their owner.

Court sentence handed down by Dr. Nicolau de Brito Cardoso, judge of the Casa da Suplicação and judge of Tombos da Coroa, about the sequestration and embargo of the property of the entail and hospital of D. Gaião, in Santarém, between the procurador da Coroa, author, and D. Marcos de Noronha, conde dos Arcos, defendant. The sentence absolves the defendant, lifting the sequestration and embargo of property.

Court sentence issued by Fernando de Sousa, Provedor dos Órfãos e Juiz dos Resíduos em Beja e Moura, declaring that the administration of the chapel founded by Martinho Eanes and Francisco Eanes belongs to João Luís Rasquinho and the defendants must deliver to the author the entailed properties that they have. The defendants didn't opposed to the libel of acusation presented by the author.

Court sentence regarding motions set by Francisco Correia de Lacerda and José da Costa Dias about the properties entailed to the chapel founded by padre João da Costa. It was claimed that the farmstead da Talha Grande in S. João da Talha, entailed to this chapel, had been subrogated by Pedro Vaz de Sá, its former administrator, for a public debt instrument and houses in Lisboa. However, José da Costa Dias claimed there was no subrogation deed or any public debt instrument proving this subrogation, and that the houses had been leased by Pedro Vaz de Sá, and thus couldn't have been entailed. José da Costa Dias was considered right, against Francisco Correia de Lacerda's claims, and it was judged that the farmstead was still entailed to the chapel and thus it was seized and its possessor was ordered to pay the obligations of the chapel until he presented the subrogation deed and proof that the subrogated properties were free of other charges.

Court sentence, ordering that among the assets left by Brás Casco de Farelões, the estate of the entail should be separated, and with the rest, proceed in the same way as with those of Manuel Casco, dividing them between the son and Ana Mestra de Brito, wife of Brás Casco.

Court sentence issued by the Ouvidor do Cível da Relação da Baía, João de Góis de Araújo, denying the appeal made by the defendant, Manuel Lopes da Costa, in which he tried to revert the sentence given against him. The Ouvidor do Cível confirmed his condemnation, sentencing Manuel Lopes da Costa to restitute the disputed land and pay for the costs of the process, otherwise, the 7.303 réis would be seized on the chapel's assets.

Court sentence condemning Bernardo Peres, husband of Isabel de Espinosa, to pay the obligation of the chapel established by Ângela Rodrigues de Brito and Belchior de Espinosa, since he and his wife possessed the houses entailed to it and had received them with that obligation.
Preceded by answer of the promotores about this subject.

Court sentence validating the proofs of possession of the leases of S. Jordão by the priests of the convent of Santíssima Trindade and ordering the consignation of the 600 000 réis given by Francisco de Barros to these leases.

Court sentence by doutor António Mergulhão Borges, do Desembargo do Rei, provedor e contador da sua fazenda e dos Resíduos in Coimbra, ordering the lifting of the sequestration on the properties of the entail founded by Pedro Homem de Resende, in favour of his sister, D. Jerónima Corte Real, who became its administrator after the death of her brother, João de Resende, first administrator, who died in Castille.
Contains a precatory letter, a list of the properties of the entail and a court sentence.

Court sentence approving the execution accounts of the wills of Francisco Rodrigues da Silva and Francisca Falcoa da Rosa and absolving Manuel Fernandes and João Monteiro, defendants, executors of the deceased, from it execution. Orders that a certificate of the wills and assets entailed to the Juízo da Provedoria das Capelas be issued, as well as the execution of the tombo of the assets.

Court sentence issued by Doutor Miguel Estaço de Negreiros, provedor da Comarca of Elvas, approving the tombo of the chapel instituted by Gonçalo de Pina, administered by Pedro Vaz de Pina, and ordering its registration.

Court sentence given by bacharel Diogo Gastão, provedor and ouvidor, judging a civil process between the procurador dos resíduos of Lagos, plaintiff, against Iñigo Rodrigues, defendant, due to Ermígio Fernandes' entail.
The sentence proved that the assets belonged to the entail and not to the chapel and that the administrator had fulfilled the charges, condemning him only at the expense of the process.
It is inserted in a certificate of of court record (dated 1545-04-18).

Court sentence issued by the Ouvidor do Cível da Relação da Baía, regarding a judicial demand that opposed Salvador Vieira, plaintiff, and António Cordeiro, defendant over a land in Vila Velha's district. The land was originally possessed by Salvador Vieira, who abandoned it during the Dutch invasion of the capitania da Baía, between 1624 and 1625, and was given to António Cordeiro as a sesmaria in 1630. Once António Cordeiro remained in possession of the land for more than 25 years, without any complaints of the original owner, the Ouvidor do Cível absolved the defendant from the charges and condemned the plaintiff to recognize the possession of the land and pay for the costs of the process.

Court sentence, issued by Doutor André da Silva Mascarenhas, provedor dos resíduos, capelas, confrarias, hospitais, albergarias, gafarias e órfãos da comarca of Santarém, confirming the subrogation of some houses, located in Lisboa, in Rua das Arcas, belonging to the chapel instituted by Guiomar Soares, for the Bolachas' farmhouse (casal) and the Jardim's olive grove, located in Santarém.
The petition was presented by Luís de Barros de Anaia and D. Maria de Andrada, his wife, as well as on behalf of Helena de Anaia, daughter of both, administrators of the chapels instituted by Guiomar Soares and Jerónimo de Barros.

Court sentence, judging a civil process between Manuel Nunes de Farelões, attorney of Barnabé de Farelões, his brother, plaintiff, against the procurador do Fisco of Évora, defendant, over Manuel Casco de Farelões' assets, relaxado.
The sentence acquits the defendant, recognizing that the Fisco of Évora were entitled to the assets confiscated from Manuel Casco de Farelões, for having committed the crimes of heresy and apostasy. However, it recognizes that the plaintiff retains the right to administer the entail, instituted with other assets, because in the institution it was declared that, in the event of a crime of lese-majest, the administration should pass to the next.

Court sentence issued by the licenciado António Antunes Leite, provedor da comarca de Viana, approving the land measurement deed of the assets of the chapel of Manuel Gonçalves Moreira and ordering that they be registered in the tombo.

Court sentence issued by Doutor Manuel Álvares da Silva, Provedor dos órfãos, terças, obras, hospitais, capelas, confrarias, albergarias e resíduos and contador da Fazenda Real, approving the tombo of the chapel instituted by Luísa Serrão, Eustáquia Serrão and Joana Serrão, administered by Catarina Leitão de Abreu.
Contains: a certificate of an account of the will chart of Luísa Serrão, Eustáquia Serrão and Joana Serrão; some land measurement deeds (dated 1679-10-30 – 1679-11-08).
It includes other legal documents necessary to carry out the tombo.

Court sentence ordering the sequestration of the assets of the chapel of Diogo de Palma and Elvira de Salazar. If it were proved that the Viscondessa de Asseca was not its administrator, it should be declared vacant for the Crown.
Two other procedural documents dated 1688-02-03 and 1688-03-13 follow.

Court sentence issued by Doutor Miguel Estaço de Negreiros, provedor da Comarca of Elvas, ordering the completion of the inventory of the assets of the chapel instituted by Gonçalo de Pina, administered by Pedro Vaz de Pina.

Court sentence issued by the Ouvidor do Cível da Relação da Baía, João de Góis de Araújo, judging that the sesmaria that was given to António Cordeiro by the Governador-Geral in 1630 was unlawfully given, and therefore null. He condemned the defendant, Manuel Lopes da Costa, to restitute the disputed land to the monastery of São Bento and to pay for the costs of the process.

Court sentence issued by the conservador of the University of Évora, judging the motions filed by Francisco Barreto against Manuel do Vale. The motions are given as not proven, and the will made by Catarina Cabreira is judged as valid and well done.

Court sentence accepting a motion by an unidentified plaintiff, and declaring that the houses which had been previously entailed by João Cardoso do Amaral to the masses established by Guiomar de Alvoredo were freed, since they had been subrogated by lands in Patameira.

Court sentence ordering the lifting of the sequestration on the properties of Pedro Homem de Resende's entail, which had belonged to João de Resende, its first administrator, in favour of their sister, D. Jerónima Corte Real.

Court sentence handed down by Doutor Miguel Estaço de Negreiros, provedor of the Comarca of Elvas, judging the assets listed by João de Sousa Machado, as entaild, and as such, obliged to the charges of the chapel of Nuno Machado, which he administered.

Court sentence issued by Simão Gonçalves, corregedor do cível, declaring D. Pedro de Eça, executor of D. Filipa da Silva, his sister-in-law, legitimate administrator of the assets of Filipa da Silva's entail during the minority D. Diogo de Eça Corte Real, his son, first administrator.

Court sentence issued by Doutor Francisco Nunes de Aguiar, juiz de fora in Portalegre, approving the sale of some houses, located in Cerro de São Francisco, in Portalegre, made by Nuno Vaz de Sousa and his wife D. Mécia to Jorge Centeno de Chaves and his wife Leonor Gomes.

Court sentence refusing new motions by Bernardo Peres and ordering him to pay the obligations of the chapel established by Ângela Rodrigues de Brito and Belchior de Espinosa. The obligations had been previously fulfilled by Manuel de Espinosa, son of the deceased.
Followed by petitions and motions by Bernardo Peres, still refusing to pay.

Certificate of payment of the sisa in which Jorge Centeno de Chaves declares that he bought some houses, located in Cerro de São Francisco, in Portalegre, from Nuno Vaz de Sousa and his wife D. Mécia.

Acórdão do Desembargo that revokes a previous sentence from Provedor of Évora, judging the partition of the income of the chapel of António de Oliveira between the administrator, the pious obligations and a poor and close relative. It orders the payment of one moio of wheat or 30 cruzados to the administrator, the fulfilment of the pious obligations and the payment of the remaining income to Catarina de Oliveira, appellee, who is poor and a close relative. The institutor imposed this condition to the administrators who are collateral relatives, including D. Ana Maria de Oliveira, appellant and current administrator.

Acórdão do Desembargo ordering the fulfilment of the previous sentence from Corregedor do Cível da Corte and declaring that the defendant will pay the 150.000 réis with no alternative.

Acórdão em Relação judging the embargoes as proven, the chapel established by Afonso Munhós as absolute and ordering the lifting of the sequestration of his assets.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion filed by Agostinho da Silva Manuel, plaintiff, against Manuel de Figueira and Nicolau Veloso, defendants.
The sentence judges the motions as proven. It was proved that the chapel ordered by Manuel de Oliveira Serrão had been instituted by D. Maria de Oliveira, his sister, and António Nunes do Prado, his brother-in-law. The sentence judges the chapel vacant for the Crown, condemning Nicolau Veloso for the illegitimate possession of entailed assets, but acquitting Manuel de Figueira, for not proving that the mills he had were entailed. It orders that the administration be handed over to the plaintiff and the chapel registered in the “título das condenadas”. The plaintiff should, with the sentence, request the respective administration letter and register it with the Juízo da Provedoria das Capelas.

Acórdão em Relação refusing the motion presented by doutor Crispim Luís.

Acórdão em relação acquiting D. Diogo de Meneses, conde da Ericeira, of the accusation presented by the Procurador da Coroa. The Horta do Tanque do Conselho as well as the Horta do Rei were registered in the books of the Almoxarifado as "reguengos" and it were given to the conde da Ericeira for lifetime. There was imposed a sequestration on the Horta do Tanque do Conselho because it belongs to the chapel founded by Pedro Esteves and Maria Eanes. The chapel belongs to the crown and for conde da Ericeira for lifetime; he must make the tombo and put an inscription in the church.

Acórdão em relação ordering a sequestration to the entailed assets of the chapel founded by Vasco Lourenço since the administrator doesn't fullfils the pious obligations. Manuel Ribeiro will administrate this chapel to fullfil everything that is concerned with this chapel, including the new tombo.

Acórdão em relação ordering to make the tombo and put an inscription on the church. The chapel belongs to the Crown since 1450. The future administrators will have the tombo in a book and will fulfill the pious obligations.

Acórdão em relação which opposed the Procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against António de Abreu, defendant and chapel's administrator appointed by the provedor. The chapel belongs to the crown and it will be accepted the appointments of the provedor for its administration while the king doens't choose another administrator. The income will be shared in equal parts for the Fazenda, the rescue of the captives and the pious obligations. The chaplain will be choosed by the administrator and he must put an inscription in the chapel.

Acórdão em relação judging the plaintiff Bento Fernandes, legitimate son of André Fernandes Bochardo who died in Brazil, as the administrator os the properties that belong to the chapel founded by Afonso Domingues Bochardo. The defendant Rodrigo Eanes didn't opposed to the plaintiff's libel of accusation.

Acórdão em relação judging the defendant Bento Fernandes Bochardo, the only and legitimate son of André Fernandes Bochardo, as the legitimate administrator of the chapel founded by Afonso Domingues Bochardo. He proved that he is descendant of the institutor and that fulfills the pious obligations. He must have a ledger and must put an inscription in the church. A copy of this sentence must be delivered to the Provedoria, to the Torre do Tombo and to the Church.

Acórdão em relação ordering that the chapel belongs to the crown. The ancestors of the defendant Diogo Lopes de Carvalho belong to the institutor's family, but he only have appointed Maria Afonso to the chapel's administration and no other person and Maria isn't related to the institutor nor to the defendant. Therefore, the defendant and his successors can administrate the chapel if they fulfill the pious obligations and take care of the entail assets. This sentence must be registered in the book of Capelas da Coroa in the Torre do Tombo and in the books of Provedoria. The sequestration can't be lifted until the tombo is finished.

Acórdão em relação which opposed the Procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Manuel Pimentel Cabral, defendant. The defendant administrates the chapel for 17 years without having requested the administration letter. As he didn't shown the chapel foundation deed, the papal bull nor the court sentence, it was ordered the sequestration of the assets and the income of the chapel in may of 1627. After that he requested the administration letter and he was acquitted; but he has two months to bring the other documents into the presence of the judge.

Acórdão em relação ordering the end of the sequestration of the chapel founded by Afonso Vaz e Teresa Fernandes. The defendant Manuel Pimentel Cabral is the legal administrator and must continue to fulfill the pious obligations. He didn't showned the chapel foundation deed, the papal bull nor the court sentence, but the administration letter issued the king refered to them.

Acórdão em relação condemning the defendant Vicente Temudo Caldeira, grandson of Cristóvão Mendes, to deliver the chapel administration to the Crown. He haven't showed a valid record to administrated it as it was requested by the author the Procurador da Coroa. The future administrator must have a ledger; and put an inscripition in the church.

Acórdão em relação acquiting António de Melo, defendant, from the accusation presented by the Procurador da Coroa, and ending the sequestration. He has the will of the institutors as well as the tombo and fulfills the pious obligations. Therefore he is the administrator of the chapel and he must rebuild the houses of the village in the next four years, write the pious obligations in the inscription in the grave of the institutors, and make three copies of the tombo, one for him, one for the Provedoria and another for the Torre do Tombo.

Acórdão em relação accepting the accusation presented by the Procurador da Coroa. Since the defendant didn't received an administration letter within the time limit fixed by the previous acórdão em relação, the chapel is now vacant and belongs do the crown. It should be collected the income and made the tombo.

Acórdão em relação acquiting the defendant Luís Gonçalves Ferreira because he has the chapel's tombo and has fulfilled the pious obligations. However the chapel must be registered on the list of Capelas da Coroa. The administrator shall have a book with this acórdão and will report annually to the Provedor and put an inscription in the church. There must be made three copies of the tombo: one for the administrator, one for the Provedor and another one for the Torre do Tombo.

Acórdão em Relação judging the civil process between Francisco de Lemos e Nápoles, author, against Teobaldo de Lemos de Campos, defendant, about the chapel instituted by António Rodrigues de Figueiredo and Maria Rodrigues de Figueiredo, his sister. The sentence reaffirms that the chapel was vacant for the Crown and its legitimate administration belonged to the defendant. He orders that the Crown take possession of the chapel and that it be registered in the books of Torre do Tombo and in the Capelas da Coroa, as well as that the provedor da comarca make the assets' tombo, making them hand over to the administrator.

Acórdão em Relação declaring that the chapel founded by Inês Fernandes becomes vacant to the crown and that its administration belongs for lifetime to padre Crispim Luís Soeiro who has judicially denounced its vacancy. The defendant padre Semião Dias Ribeiro must drop the houses, because they belong to the chapel, and is condemned to pay back the incomes since the begining of the legal action.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the condes of Sarzedas, plaintiffs, against João Rodrigues Carreiro and his wife, and the procurador da Coroa, defendants, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Branca Eanes and Martinho do Sem, in the convent of São Domingos of Santarém.
The sentence judges the entail as vacant for the Crown, as the plaintiffs failed to prove that they were descendants of the institutors. It also judges the documents presented by the defendants as invalid, not legitimizing the possession of the entail, but only the usufruct of 40 000 réis which, with those of the chapel of Martinho Pires Vieira and Catarina Álvares, in Nossa Senhora de Marvila, were given to them by an ordinance of the Conselho da Fazenda. Orders the Crown to be sworn in.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Agostinho da Silva Manuel, plaintiff, against Manuel de Figueira and Nicolau Veloso, defendants, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Manuel de Oliveira Serrão, in the convent of São Domingos of Lisboa.
The sentence acquits the defendants, for not proving that the assets they owned were entailed, ordering that the chapel be registered as absolute. In the absence of any will or institution, the denunciation warrant of administration, which the author had presented, is considered invalid.

Acórdão em Relação ordering the lifting of the sequestration of the assets of the chapel instituted by Maria Reimonda for being absolute and not belonging to the Crown list. This situation had demonstrated another sentence, related to half of the chapel administered by Anastácio, son of Silvestre Correia do Amaral.

Acórdão em Relação granting the appeal of Leonor Nunes as tutor of her son António, ordering the immediate end of the sequestration of the chapel founded by Maria Reimonda. This chapel is "absoluta".

Acórdão em Relação condemning the defendants doutor Crispim Luís and his son doutor Manuel Álvares Vidigal to drop the entailed assets, composed of a "Quinta da Biscaia" and lands in Pêra Manca, in Évora. The chapel is vacant and belongs to the crown and it will be issued orders to take possession of the assets. This chapel must be registered in the book of the chapels that are vacant and also in the book of the Torre do Tombo.

Acórdão em relação which opposed the plaintiff Procurador da Coroa against the defendant Diogo de Sampaio de Melo ordering the sequestration of the entailed assets of the chapel since that defendant didn't made the tombo as it was ordered in the administration letter of 1611. The new tombo and this acórdão must be registered in the book of the Capelas da Coroa of the Torre do Tombo and in the book of the Provedoria, and to put an inscription in the grave of the institutor. The the tombo of the chapel founded by Gonçalo Esteves, that is attached to this one, must be registered as well.

Acórdão em Relação accepting the petition of the author Manuel Gomes de Sequeira and condemning the defendant João Nunes Monteiro to payback the incomes obtained since the begining of the legal action.

Acórdão em Relação recognizing the right of Salvador Vieira to appeal to the Casa da Suplicação against the acórdão issued by the Relação da Baía and the sentence that was issued by the Ouvidor-Geral do Cível da Relação da Baía by which he was convicted to recognize the legitimate possession of António Cordeiro over the disputed land.

Acórdão em Relação declaring that the embargo presented by Agostinho Coelho was proved because he belongs to the institutor's lineage. Therefore this chapel is "absoluta", the seizure must be ended and this deliberation must be writen in the margin of the record in the Capelas da Coroa book.

Acórdão em relação considering that the pious obligations aren't fulfilled and that the assets of the chapel are splitted, orders the issue of a commission to the Provedor of Guimarães or in his absence to the Juiz de Fora to get access to the foundation deed of the chapel and its tombo. They have to remake the tombo according to the institution to determine if the administrator fullfills the pious obligations, and they must issued a declaration deed about the results of this inquiry. If they conclude that there are differences in the payment of the pious obligations they must impose a sequestration to the entailed assets.

Acórdão em relação acquiting the defendant Manuel Homem Pereira from the accusation presented by the Procurador da Coroa, because he has the tombo and has fulfilled the pious obligations. However the chapel must be registered on the list of Capelas da Coroa. The administrator shall have a book with this acórdão and will report annually to the Provedor and put an inscription in the church.

Acórdão em Relação ordering the end of the sequestration in the chapel founded by Martinho Miguéis in the church of São João in Pedrogão Grande, as it was required by padre Manuel Mimoso. This chapel never belonged to the Crown.

Acórdão em Relação declaring that the embargo presented by Manuel Veloso was proved. The houses in the rua da Fé were entailed by Maria de Oliveira but were sold to pay her debts. Fort that reason the previous acórdão is revoked. The chapel doesn't belong to the Crown.

Acórdão em Relação accepting the petition of the authors Gaspar de Caldas Lobo and his wife D. Francisca Josefa Pinto Maciel considering that the chapel is "absoluta" and that isn't vacant, according to the acórdão of 1672-08-13. The above D. Francisca Josefa belongs to the lineage of the institutor. Order to end the sequestration.

Acórdão em relação orderign the end of the sequestration of the entailed properties of the chapel. The defendant Pedro de Mesquita didn't made the tombo yet as it was ordered by the letter of administration, but he is acquitted because he acomplishes the pious obligations. This sentence must be delivered to the Provedoria and also to the defendant to have it with a ledger. He must put an inscription in the church.

Acórdão em relação condemning the defendant Francisco Ribeiro due to the accusation presented by the Procurador da Coroa, plaintiff. Since the defendant doesn't have the entail foundation deed nor the tombo, and considering that Catarina Ribeiro was unable to administrate this chapel for being daughter of a clergyman, the chapel is vacant in favour of the Crown. Therefore, the defendant must drop the chapel as well as the income obtained since the begining of the legal action. It must be imposed a sequestration to all the assets that belong to the chapel.

Acórdão em relação ordering the fulfillment of the previous acórdão em relação because the motion is not accepted.

Acórdão em relação which opposed the plaintiff Procurador da Coroa against the defendant Martinho Afonso de Beja, administrator of the entail, about several entailed assets that were lost and motivated the sequestration of the entail's income. Orders the defendant to make a new tombo, to fulfill the pious obligations and to put and inscription on the church.

Acórdão em relação accepting the motion presented by Vicente Temudo Caldeira and ordering that he will continue to be the chapel's administration according to the rules of the administration letter issued by the king D. Afonso V in 1458-02-27. The Procurador da Coroa didn't opposed to the motion.

Acórdão em relação accepting that the motion presented by the appellant e revoking the embargoed sentence, because the previous administrator João Camelo lost his right in the chapel's administration when his first wife died. Therefore, they declare null the warrant issued to the appellees, mother and son, and condemns them to deliver the incomes since the begining of the legal action.

Acórdão em relação which opposed the plaintiff Procurador da Coroa against the defendant Diogo de Melo de Sampaio ordering that the chapel's administration belongs to the defendant. He must fulfill the pious obligations, register this acórdão and tombo in the book of the Capelas da Coroa of the Torre do Tombo, must have a ledger and since the institutor his buried in the church of Madalena in Lisbon the defendant must put an inscription of this chapel near the inscription of the chapel of Maria Eanes, which is attached to this one.

Acórdão em Relação ordering that the chapel belongs to the Crown and to the plaintiff Manuel Gomes de Sequeira for his lifetime. This acórdão must be registered in the books of Capelas da Coroa and in the books of Torre do Tombo. The plaintiff must require the administration letter to the Desembargo do Paço and make the tombo.

Acórdão em relação ordering to make the tombo as soon as possible, comparing it with the inquiry deeds of 1570 and 1572. It must be put an inscription in the church nearby the grave of the institutor, and collect the incomes since 1621.

Acórdão em relação acquiting the defendant Diogo Salema from the accusation presented by the Procurador da Coroa, considering him as the entail's administrator according to the administration letter that he received. He made the tombo and has fulfilled the pious obligations. The tombo will be sended to the Provedoria, one copy swill stay with the administrator; and this acórdão will be registered in the Torre do Tombo.

Acórdão em relação judging the farm of Ressaio as an entalied property of the chapel founded by Maria Luís and therefore Manuel de Quadros, who possesses it as a free property, must deliver it to the crown. The ageement deed between António Gonçalves and Pedro Álvares Cabral dind't took place. And since there afren't any descendants of the administrators Rui Godinho, Ana Godinho and Rodrigo minor son of Antão Gonçalves, the chapel belongs to the crown, who will take possession of it and will make the tombo.

Acórdão of Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the petition presented by the conde dos Arcos, supplicant, due to the sequestration ordered by the procurador da Coroa about the assets of the chapel of D. Gaião. The sentence confirms the sentence of 1670-04-19, ordering the sequestration be lifted and the chapel registered as absoluta.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion, filed by Luís da Silva de Sousa, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Maria Martins Bousão, in Estremoz.
View the certificate from the Torre do Tombo, ordering the survey of the sequestration of the assets of the chapel of Maria Martins Bousão.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion filed by Sancho de Melo da Silva, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, about the Torrosa's farm (herdade), on the outskirts of Avis.
The sentence considers the motions as unproven, since the Torrosa's farm, which had been sequestered, did not belong to the chapel of Clara Vicente and Maria Eanes Louseira, but to that of Afonso Pires Rodrigues, which belonged to the Crown. Orders the sequestration to continue until the Crown appoints an administrator for the chapel.

Acórdão of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the civil process between João de Saldanha da Gama, author, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Fernando Jaques da Silva and D. Sebastiana de Noronha, his wife, defendants, on the denunciation of the entail instituted by Luís da Maia. The sentence proves that the entail was vacant for the Crown, being illegitimately administered by the defendants. Orders the Crown to take possession of the entail and be registered in the books of the Crown and Torre do Tombo. The plaintiff, who had already received a denunciation warrant of administration, should, with the sentence, ask for an administration letter at the Desembargo do Paço and make the assets' tombo.

Acórdão judging the possession of the chapel established by Bárbara Teixeira de Valadares, in favor of Francisco de Oliveira.
The sentence recognizes that the administrator, who had received a previous favorable sentence, had complied the order, carrying out a tombo and declaring the income of the chapel's assets.
It orders the placement of a headstone in the chapel, noticing its institution, and also the registration of the tombo in the church, at Provedoria and at Torre do Tombo.

Acórdão do Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and D. António de Meneses, defendant, about the sequestration of the assets of the hospital and chapel established by Maior Dias, in Ponte de Ceira. The sentence acquits the defendant, orders that the administration be returned to him and the sequestration of assets lifted.
Sentence handed down by Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, Juíz das Capelas da Coroa e tombos da Coroa, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.

Acórdão of Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the petition presented by priest Mateus Ferreira, supplicant, due to the sequestration ordered by the procurador da Coroa about the assets of the chapel instituted by Vicente Pires and Sancha Fernandes. The sentence determines that - unlike a previous sentence -, the chapel did not belong to the Crown, but to the supplicant, since his predecessor had already been acquitted in a previous case filed by the procurador da Coroa. It is determined that the chapel should be removed from the list of chapels belonging to the Crown.

Acórdão of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the civil suit between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and the priest Manuel Rebelo, defendant, about the administration of the chapel and shelter instituted by Martinho Eanes and Maria Pires Gaiteira, his wife, in the hermitage of Santa Maria de Roriz, on the outskirts of Penalva.
The sentence absolves the defendant, orders that a note be added to the provision of Torre do Tombo, the removal of the chapel from the list of the Capelas da Coroa and the use of the sentence as a title until the institution is found.
Sentence handed down by Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, juiz das Capelas da Coroa e tombos da Coroa, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.

Acórdão of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Isabel Barbas, defendant, about Santa Catarina's albergaria and hospital, in Vila Franca de Xira, instituted by Lourenço Vasques and Margarida Pires. The sentence absolves the defendant, for being a descendant of the founders, recognizing her as the legitimate administrator. It orders the removal of the chapel from the list of Capelas da Coroa and the registration of this sentence and the tombo of the assets in the Provedoria. It reiterates the administrator must fulfill the charges and take advantage of the assets and must place a headstone on the door of the albergaria publicizing it was a hospital for the poor. It also orders the lifting of the sequestration of the albergaria's assets.
Sentence handed down by Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, Juíz das Capelas da Coroa e tombos da Coroa, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion, filed by Luís da Silva de Sousa, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Maria Martins Bousão, in Estremoz.
The sentence judges the motions as proven, ordering the lifting of the sequestration of the assets of Maria Martins Bousão's chapel. It orders, however, that it be maintained until, by a certificate from the Torre do Tombo, they can be distinguished from those in the chapel of Vasco Esteves Bousão.