E - USUFRUCT

Taxonomy

Code

Scope note(s)

Source note(s)

Display note(s)

Hierarchical terms

E - USUFRUCT

Equivalent terms

E - USUFRUCT

Associated terms

E - USUFRUCT

122 Archival description results for E - USUFRUCT

122 results directly related Exclude narrower terms

Court sentence

Court sentence handed down by Doutor Miguel Estaço de Negreiros, provedor of the Comarca of Elvas, judging the assets listed by João de Sousa Machado, as entaild, and as such, obliged to the charges of the chapel of Nuno Machado, which he administered.

Machado, João de Sousa (flor.1627)

Court sentence

Court sentence issued by Simão Gonçalves, corregedor do cível, declaring D. Pedro de Eça, executor of D. Filipa da Silva, his sister-in-law, legitimate administrator of the assets of Filipa da Silva's entail during the minority D. Diogo de Eça Corte Real, his son, first administrator.

Eça, Pedro de (flor.1548-1549)

Court sentence

Court sentence issued by Doutor Francisco Nunes de Aguiar, juiz de fora in Portalegre, approving the sale of some houses, located in Cerro de São Francisco, in Portalegre, made by Nuno Vaz de Sousa and his wife D. Mécia to Jorge Centeno de Chaves and his wife Leonor Gomes.

Sousa, Nuno Vaz de (flor.1684-1688)

Court sentence

Court sentence refusing new motions by Bernardo Peres and ordering him to pay the obligations of the chapel established by Ângela Rodrigues de Brito and Belchior de Espinosa. The obligations had been previously fulfilled by Manuel de Espinosa, son of the deceased.
Followed by petitions and motions by Bernardo Peres, still refusing to pay.

Peres, Bernardo (flor.1622-1626)

Court sentence (extract)

Court sentence (extract) judging the litigated properties, such as the farmstead (quinta) of Azambujeira, as belonging to the chapel of Fernando Rodrigues Patarinho and Lopo Rodrigues, plaintiff and the chapel's administrator, as their owner.

Patarinho, Lopo Rodrigues (flor.[13--]-[14--])

Court sentence (transcription)

Court sentence condemning Manuel do Canto de Castro, defendant and administrator of the entail of Pedro Eanes do Castro and other entails, incluging the entail of Vale and those which became vacant after the death of D. Juliana de Melo, to pay a maintenance of 150.000 réis or 30 moios of wheat to Inácio do Canto de Vasconcelos, plaintiff, becuase he is married to D. Inês de Castro, sister of Manuel do Canto de Castro, and very poor. It is mentioned that the rich brother is forced to feed the poor brother.

Castro, Manuel do Canto de (flor.1685-1687)

Exemplification

Exemplification of extract of the Torre do Tombo's Book, showing that the chapels were divided between Sancho de Melo da Silva, José Francisco de Melo e Castro, Cristóvão Francisco de Magalhães and D. Guiomar de Lemos and Silva, his wife.

Silva, Sancho de Melo da (flor.1694)

Royal sentence

Royal sentence finishing a court process between the priests of the convent of S. Domingos de Benfica, Lisboa, and Luís de Brito do Rio, fidalgo da Casa do Rei, husband of Joana de Lima Henriques and administrator of the entail and chapel established by Lopo Mendes do Rio and Leonor Dias. Luís de Brito do Rio had inherited the entail after the death, in 1619, of D. Guiomar da Silva, wife of Luís de Mendonça, who was the last successor of the institutors in direct line. As heir from a transversal line, Luís de Brito do Rio only had the right to administer half the possessions of the entail. The other half should, according to the will of the institutors, be divided in two parts: half to the convent of S. Domingos de Benfica and half for pious obligations, namely redemption of captives. There was a long process to establish which properties and what revenue was owed to each part.
Contains several documents regarding these proceedings, including royal sentences dated 1627-08-17, 1627-11-18, 1630-08-13, 1631-07-24, 1631-07-28 and 1631-07-30; sentences issued by the provedor das Capelas dated 1627-02-18, 1630-05-24, 1631-03-06 and 1631-07-24, and sentences of liquidation dated 1630-10-08, 1630-10-12 and 1630-11-16. Mentions dispatches and several embargos set upon the revenue by both parts.

Rio, Luís de Brito do (flor.1620-1636)

Royal sentence

Royal sentence, on behalf of João IV, judging the sharing made between the procurador do Fisco and Manuel Lopes Conqueiro, tutor of António, minor, son of Brás Casco de Farelões, which took place in Fisco of Évora.
The sentence orders that the previous sentence, issued by the Fisco of Évora, be carried out, giving to António, orphan of Brás Casco de Farelões, the part that belonged to him in his father's assets and in the entail established by his grandparents.

António (flor.1645-1646)

Royal sentence

Royal sentence executing a citation order issued on behalf of the abbot and monks of the monastery of São Bento da Baía condemning Manuel Lopes, administrator of the chapel of São Pedro, founded by António Cordeiro, to restitute a land near Vila Velha's district that was unlawfully entailed by the institutor. The judicial dispute over this land lasted from 1656 to 1684, opposing the monastery, as plaintiff, against the institutor and the administrators of the entail.

Costa, Manuel Lopes da (flor.1664-1684)

Royal sentence

Royal sentence, on behalf of Filipe, judging a civil process between Manuel do Vale, plaintiff, against Francisco Barreto, defendant, regarding the administration of the chapel established by Catarina Cabreira.

Vale, Manuel do (flor.1630-1633)

Royal sentence

Royal sentence confirming a court sentence that finished a court process started by the licenciado Francisco de Barros, deceased, against the priests of the convent of Santíssima Trindade of Lisboa, and continued by his grandson, Francisco Pereira de Azevedo. Francisco de Barros had bequeathed 600 000 réis to the priests of the convent of Santíssima Trindade, who should acquire with it a public debt instrument to entail to his chapel. The priests hadn't fulfilled this obligation. After obtaining a royal sentence in his favour, Francisco de Barros had agreed that the priests could consignate the 600 000 réis in a lease in S. Jordão, Lisboa, which they possessed. The king confirmed this decision and ordered the consignation of the money on the leases.
Contains other copies of the royal sentence VINC007846 FBCC EA/002a and of the consent deed VINC007846 FBCC EA/002b; testemonies regarding the possession of the leases by the convent and documentation related to the habilitation of Francisco Pereira de Azevedo as heir and administrator of the chapel, after the death of his grandfather.

Azevedo, Francisco Pereira de (flor.1663)

Royal sentence

Royal sentence of D. João II, judging a civil process between Leonor Afonso, plaintiff, administrator of the entail instituted by Rui Soares, against João Dias and Catarina Gonçalves, his wife, defendants, on the possession of some mills belonging to the entail.

Afonso, Leonor (flor.1480)

Royal sentence

Royal sentence, passed by the queen's authority, judging a civil process between Vasco Eanes, plaintiff, against Pedro Mendes, defendant, administrator of the chapel established by priest Simão Gonçalves, vigário of the parish of São Pedro de Sintra. The sentence proves that Cubelo's place, on the outskirts of Sintra, was not included in the assets linked to the chapel, so he condemns the defendant to leave it to the plaintiff and to pay the costs of the process.

Mendes, Pedro (flor.1513)

Royal sentence

Royal sentence ordering the priests of the convent of Santíssima Trindade of Lisboa to return to the licenciado Francisco de Barros the 600 000 réis they had received from him.

Barros, Francisco de (flor.1651-1662)

Royal sentence

Royal sentence judging a civil suit of appeal between Violante Gomes Formigo da Cunha, as plaintiff - administrator of the chapel founded by Iria Caeira -, against Luísa Lopes de Beça, defendant, about the possession of several assets its administration.
A previous sentence had declared the plaintiff as legitimate administrator of the chapel, which the defendant had appealed. The new sentence declares the defendant to be the legitimate administrator of the chapel, as she is the closest descendant of the founder, and nullifies the appointment of the plaintiff, ordering her to hand over the administration.

Formiga, Violante Gomes (flor.1499-1504)

Sentence

Sentence by which the provedor das Capelas orders Luís de Brito do Rio to give an account of the properties which he inherited as successor to the entail and chapel established by Lopo Mendes do Rio and Leonor Dias, to calculate the amount he should own, since, as a successor from a transversal line, he could only own half of the properties. Luís de Brito do Rio set embargos upon this sentence, claiming some of the properties had been taken without authorization, and as such he shouldn't be charged for them.
Followed by a royal sentence dated 1630-08-13, judging this sentence fair, sentences of liquidation, dated 1630-10-08, 1630-10-12, and 1630-11-16, and other procedural documentation.

Rio, Luís de Brito do (flor.1620-1636)

Sentence

Sentence issued by the mamposteiro-mor by which it is proven that the administrator of the entail established by Lopo Mendes do Rio and Leonor Dias can only administer half its properties, since he succeded through a transversal line. The other half must be divided in two parts: the first to use in pious obligations, especially the redemption of captives, and the second to be given to the priests of the convent of S. Domingos de Benfica, for maintenance of the chapel. The administrator is ordered to make an inventory of the properties entailed, so they can be divided.
Followed by acórdão em Relação dated 1626-08-3, confirming the sentence and declaring that the properties of the entail shall not be diminished. Instead, the administrator shall make these payments annually.

Rio, Luís de Brito do (flor.1620-1636)

Sentence

Sentence ordering that the appellee delivers to the appealer, who belongs to the institutor's lineage, the chapel's assets and the incomes obtained since the begining of the legal action.

Sentence

Sentence against Bento Vaz about an embargo he set upon the revenues of quinta de Almoster, entailed to the chapel of Simão da Veiga Cabral, which couldn't be rented or pawned, because it belonged to an entail.

Vaz, Bento (flor.1645)

Sentence

Sentence by which the embargos set upon the chapel of D. Catarina da Silveira by António Cabral da Cunha, its administrator, are annulled, since it is clear from the institution that D. Catarina da Silveira established a chapel of 33 masses in the convent of S. Francisco of Lisboa, making D. Maria da Silveira her heir, and that D. Maria da Silveira, added three masses to the chapel, thus making the administrators of these chapel the owners of both their properties.

Cunha, António Cabral da (flor.1679-1683)

Sentence

Sentence by which the provedor das Capelas condemns Luís de Brito do Rio, administrator of the chapel established by Lopo Mendes do Rio and Leonor Dias, to pay what he owed to the priests of the convent of S. Domingos de Benfica, and to spend 20 cruzados of gold in ornamentation of the chapel, which he was obliged to do as successor from a transversal line. He also orders the priests of the convent to release the properties of the entail they had taken without authorization, so that the administrator can have them repaired.

Rio, Luís de Brito do (flor.1620-1636)

Results 101 to 122 of 122