Acórdão em Relação accepting the petition of padre Afonso Caldeira de Castelo Branco ordering the end of the seizure. This chapel must be registered as "absoluta" and must be writen a note in the margin of the record in the Capelas da Coroa book.

Acórdão em Relação accepting the denunciation of doutor Francisco Pereira da Silva and considering that the defendant, D. Antónia da Câmara, doesn’t belong to the family of the institutor. Therefore, the chapel and entail should be listed in the Capelas da Coroa and its administration should belong to the plaintiff for his lifetime. He will ask to Desembargo do Paço the administration letter and also order an inventory to the entailed properties.

Acórdão em Relação accepting the appeal submitted by the plaintiff, doutor Francisco Pereira da Silva, and condemning the defendant, D. Antónia da Câmara, to return the profits obtained since the beginning of the legal action.

Acórdão em Relação ordering that the chapel is "absoluta" and its administration belongs to Manuel Peixoto, grandson of Maria Ferreira.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between António Serrão, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Beatriz de Sousa, defendant, on the denunciation of the chapel instituted by Maria Lobo.
The sentence condemns the defendant for not being a descendant of either the first administrator or the institutor, and cannot justify the right to administration. It declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, and the administration must be handed over to the author, during his lifetime, who had denounced it. He reiterates the need to fulfill the charges and orders the tombo and the placement of a tombstone that says: “Maria Loba deixou encargo de trinta missas nesta igreja sobre bens que são da Coroa. Feita esta lembrança mil seiscentos e vinte e sete”.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between Diogo Mendes, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against D. Maria da Costa, defendant, due to the administration of the chapel instituted by Diogo Garcia and Guiomar Feio, in São Vicente de Fora.
The sentence condemns the defendant to leave the administration of the chapel because he is not a descendant of the founders. It declares the chapel vacant for the Crown and orders it to be handed over to the author, who had a denunciation warrant of administration.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process of motion. The sentence confirms the previous one, judging the motions as unproven.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Henrique Pestana, defendant, administrator of the chapel founded by Aldonça Afonso.
The sentence judges the chapel as a vacancy for the Crown, reiterates the need to fulfill the charges, orders the tombo and the placement of a tombstone that says: “Aldonça Afonso, mulher de Inigo Fernandes, deixou encargo de trinta missas nesta igreja sobre seus bens. Vagou para a Coroa. Feita esta lembrança mil seiscentos e vinte e cinco”.

Acórdão em relação acquiting the appellee Martinho Lopes de Azevedo from the motion presented by the appellant Pedro Álvares. The appellant descends from the institutor but doesn't have the power to present a motion against the grace warrant of administration that was issued on behalf of the appellee.

Acórdão em Relação ordering that the chapel founded by Rodrigo Álvares dos Santos and Leonor Ribeiro belongs to the second opponent João Ribeiro de Vasconcelos who is descendant of the institutors; he is great-grandson of Gomes Ribeiro, brother of Leonor Ribeiro. Therefore, the chapel is "absoluta". The defendant is condemned to return the incomes obtained since the begining of the legal action.

Acórdão em Relação declaring that the chapel founded by Gil Martins becomes vacant in favour of the Crown and that its administration belongs for lifetime to D. Maria Berarda de Lima who has judicially denounced its vacancy. This acórdão should by transcript in the Capelas da Coroa book and in the Torre do Tombo books; and D. Maria Berarda Lima should have to require the administration letter to the Desembargo do Paço and make the tombo.

Acórdão em Relação accepting the petition of Paula de Andrade ordering that his chapel and entail must be registered as "absoluta" and therefore the seizure must end. In the previous acórdão they took the same decision but they didn't write a note in the margin of the record in the Capelas da Coroa book and the seizure was not lifted.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between Luís de Saldanha da Gama, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Fernando Jaques da Silva and D. Sebastiana de Noronha, his wife, defendants, on the administration of the chapel instituted by João Baquar, on the altar of São João, in the church of Santo António do Tojal.
The sentence judges the chapel as a vacancy for the Crown, condemning the defendants for not being a descendant of either the institutor or the first administrator. It orders that the administration be handed over to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, and the chapel be registered in the Torre do Tombo and in the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa. The plaintiff, with the sentence, should also ask for the respective administration letter.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Valentim de Carvalho Henriques, plaintiff, against D. Luísa de Miranda, defendant, his mother-in-law, later treated by D. Isabel de Sande, his daughter, about the administration of the chapel of Agostinho Afonso and Marta Filipe, his wife. Opponents in the process were António de Aguiar de Gouveia, priest Frei António de Jesus Maria, António de Melo Lobo, Gomes de Figueiredo Barbosa, Miguel de Melo, António de Barros and Filipe de Moura de Melo.
The sentence gives as unproven the claims of any of the opponents. It judges the entail as vacant for the Crown, condemning the defendant to leave him and hand over the administration to the plaintiff, who would have him during his life. The entail had to be registered at the Juizo das Capelas da Coroa and at the Torre do Tombo. The sentence had to be passed to the plaintiff, who, with it, had to ask for the administration letter at the Desembargo do Paço and then make an tombo of the assets.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between Diogo Salter de Macedo, plaintiff, against Lopo de Vabo e Alistão, defendant, on the administration of the chapels established by Isabel Garcês, in the convent of São Francisco, by Margarida Afonso Gaudelina, in the church of Santa Maria do Bispo, and by Maria Garcês, in the church of Santiago, all in Montemor-o-Novo.
The sentence judges the three chapels as vacancies for the Crown, ordering them to register at the Torre do Tombo. He acquits the defendant of Isabel Garcês' chapel, for which he had previously obtained an administration letter. It condemns him, however, in relation to the other two, for not being able to prove that he is a descendant of the founders.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between padre João Nunes Velho, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Estêvão Penedo and Maria Rodrigues, his wife, defendants, on the administration of the chapel instituted by priest João Gonçalves Arvelos, in the mother church of Alcácer do Sal.
The sentence judges the chapel as a vacant for the Crown, as the defendants are not descendants of the institutor. Orders the chapel to be registered in the books of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa and Torre do Tombo. It orders that the administration be delivered to the plaintiff, in the form of the denunciation warrant of administration that he had, and, with the sentence, must request the administration letter and register it with the Provedoria.

Acórdão em relação of Juizo das Capelas da Coroa, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Álvaro de Mancelos, defendant, on the administration of the chapel established by Catarina Eanes in the monastery of São Vicente de Fora.
The sentence confirms the previous one, ordering its fulfillment.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process of motion filed by D. Clemência de Mendonça, appellant, about the administration of the chapel of Rui Gonçalves Franco.
The sentence confirms the previous one, judging the motions as unproven.

Acórdão em Relação declaring that the embargo presented by Luís Barreto Zagalo was proved, he is descendant of the institutor. Therefore the seizure must be ended. This chapel must be registered as "absoluta" and must be writen a note in the margin of the record in the Capelas da Coroa book.

Acórdão em relação giving the chapel's administration to Martinho Afonso, besteiro, who lives in Vidigueira. He has to appoint an attorney-in-fact to go to Lisbon to take possession of the chapel.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion between António de Sequeira Pestana, appellant, against Bento Solteiro Alvarinho, appellee, on the administration of the chapel established by Pedro Gomes and Rui Pais, in Moura.
The sentence recognizes the appellee's right to pursue the demand for the administration of the chapel that he had denounced.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion filed by Félix Manuel de Sousa, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, on the administration of the chapel instituted by João Lourenço.
The sentence judges the motions as proven. It is shown that the chapel belonged to the Crown, which, however, made it at the grace of the descendants of Fernando Boto, who had been its administrator, and from which the appellant descended. It declares that the appellant is the legitimate administrator of the chapel and orders the lifting of the sequestration of assets. The appellant had to request, with the sentence, the respective administration letter, and then register the tombo of the chapel in Torre do Tombo.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Domingos Nogueira Cardoso, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Jorge Dias da Cunha, defendant, about the chapel or morgado by Isabel Antunes.
The sentence judges the entail to be vacant for the Crown, as there are no descendants of the institutor. It condemns the defendant and delivers the administration to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, according to the denunciation warrant of administration he had. Orders the chapel to be registered at the Torre do Tombo and at the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa.

Acórdão em Relação condemning the defendants doutor Crispim Luís and his son doutor Manuel Álvares Vidigal to drop the entailed assets, composed of a "Quinta da Biscaia" and lands in Pêra Manca, in Évora. The chapel is vacant and belongs to the crown and it will be issued orders to take possession of the assets. This chapel must be registered in the book of the chapels that are vacant and also in the book of the Torre do Tombo.

Acórdão em Relação accepting the motion presented by João Viegas, grandson of Manuel Abelho. The previous sentence is revoked, the chapel is "absoluta" and belongs to the above João Viegas.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between João Marques da Fonseca, plaintiff, against Ana de Abreu da Silveira, defendant, about the administration of the entail instituted by Pedro Afonso Leitão, known as Morgado dos Leitões.
The sentence declares the entail vacant for the Crown, condemning the defendant, who was neither a descendant of the institutor nor a family member of the last administrator. It orders that the administration be delivered to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, in the form of the denunciation warrant of administration he had. Orders the entail to be registered in the “Tombo das Capelas” and in the Torre do Tombo. The plaintiff had to request the respective administration letter at the Desembargo do Paço and make a tombo of the assets.

Acórdão em Relação considering the motion presented by Francisco Gonçalves Calvo as proven. Many witnesses said that his grandparents were descendants of the institutor and administrated the chapel. The administration belongs to the above Francisco Gonçalves Calvo and not to the appellee Diogo Lopes.

Acórdão em relação, judging the chapels established by João Pires Cegagatos and Estêvão Redondo, located in the mother church of Viana de Alvito, following the acórdão of 1622-10-06.
The sentence shows that both chapels were vacant for the Crown, ordering their possession, to later be appointed an administrator. It orders the realization of the tombo, separate for each one of the chapels, and the placement of a tombstone where the grave of João Pires Cegagatos would be.

Acórdão em Relação acquitting Maria Ferreira of the accusation presented by the Procurador da Coroa, because she belongs to the lineage of the chapel's institutor. She must fulfill the pious obligations using the papal bull that reduced the masses. The acórdão must be registered in the books of the Provedoria and of the Torre do Tombo.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Francisco Henriques, defendant, on the administration of the chapel and hospital established by Lourenço Eanes Mostardeiro.
The sentence states that the chapel was vacant for the Crown, since the administrator had not presented the documents justifying its possession.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process of motion filed by João de Paiva da Costa, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee.
The sentence judges the motions as proven, proving that the appellant was a legitimate descendant of Maria da Paz, who, previously, had been judged as the legitimate administrator of the chapel. The appellant had to maintain the administration and the sequestration of the chapel's assets should be lifted.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Beatriz Nunes Sanches and Bartolomeu da Costa dos Mosquitos, her son, defendants, due to the administration of the chapel established by Margarida Eanes Silvestre, in the monastery of São Domingos de Benfica.
The sentence shows that the defendants were not descendants of institutor and that Diogo da Costa dos Mosquitos, previous administrator, husband and father of the defendants, had sold properties of the chapel, going against the institution.
The sentence condemns the defendants to leave the administration of the chapel, declares the chapel vacant for the Crown and authorizes it to appoint the administrator.

Acórdão em Relação declaring that the chapel founded by Fernando Ribeiro and his wife Catarina Jorge is vacant to the crown and that its administration belongs for lifetime to Manuel Martins de Figueiredo who has judicially denounced its vacancy. He must require the administration letter to Desembargo do Paço and make the tombo. The defendant Manuel de Araújo Barreto, widower of Antónia Josefa, last descendant of the institutors, is condemned to drop the chapel and to pay the incomes obtained since the starting of the legal action.

Acórdão em relação accepting the motion presented by the defendant against the Procurador da Coroa. The previous acórdão em relação is revoked and they acquit the defendant, Catarina Barros. She must have a book with the will and the tombo and put an inscription in the chapel about the masses to Gil Lourenço, abade de Sabadim. This sentence shall be registered in the books of the Provedoria and in books of Torre do Tombo.

Acórdão em Relação declaring that the embargo presented by Agostinho Coelho was proved because he belongs to the institutor's lineage. Therefore this chapel is "absoluta", the seizure must be ended and this deliberation must be writen in the margin of the record in the Capelas da Coroa book.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between António Ferreira da Cunha, plaintiff, against António Coelho de Barros, defendant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by António de Paiva, in the church of São Bartolomeu of Castanheira do Ribatejo.
The defendant has no objection to the libel of accusation, acknowledging that he was an illegitimate administrator of the chapel. The sentence judges the chapel as a vacancy for the Crown, ordering the defendant to leave the administration. It orders them to be registered “no título das capelas vagas” and in the Torre do Tombo. It orders that the administration be delivered to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, in the form of the warrant he had, and must request the administration letter.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Manuel Guterres, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against padre Carlos Pereira Moniz, Urbana Moniz de São Pedro, Josefa Maria, António Vieira, her husband, Isidora da Paixão, Olímpia do Sacramento and Manuel Leite Pereira, defendants, on the administration of the Joana Lausteve's chapel.
The defendants did not present any opposition to the libel of accusation, acknowledging that they were illegitimate administrators in the chapel. The sentence judges the chapel as a vacancy for the Crown, condemning the defendants to leave it to the plaintiff. It orders that the chapel be registered in the books of the condemned chapels, in Torre do Tombo and in the Provedoria da Comarca.

Acórdão em relação declaring that the chapel's administration doesn't belong to the plaintiff nor to the defendant, but to Martinho Afonso, besteiro, from Vidigueira, who is descendant from the institutor. The defendant must drop the chapel's administration with all its assets.

Acórdão em relação acquiting the defendant Vicente da Serra and his wife Maria Bocarra from the accusation presented by the plaintiff the Procurador da Coroa, because he is descendant from the institutor. Orders to put a note in the chancery charters; and the defendant must put an inscription in the institutor's grave.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Nicolau Monteiro Barreto, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Manuel Martins, defendant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Diogo Rodrigues Trombeta and Margarida Fernandes, his wife, in the mother church of Sousel. His opponent was Lourença, minor, represented by Manuel Martins, her uncle and tutor.
The sentence condemns the defendant and the plaintiff to leave the administration of the chapel, recognizing that Lourença was its legitimate administrator, as she was the daughter of Pedro Dias, the last administrator, descendant of the institutors, who had only lost her due to maladministration. Orders the chapel to be registered under the title of absolute chapels.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion as unproven, confirming the previous sentence.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Fernando Rodrigues de Brito Pereira, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Leonardo Mendes de Almeida, his wife and the abbess and nuns of the convent of Nossa Senhora da Esperança of Vila Viçosa, defendants, on the chapel instituted by D. Isabel de Ataíde, in the mother church of Serpa.
The sentence judges the chapel as a vacancy for the Crown, as there are no descendants of the institutor. It condemns the defendants and delivers the administration to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, in the form of the denunciation warrant of administration he had. Orders the chapel to be registered at the Torre do Tombo and at the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação ordering the issuing the administration letter on behalf of JOsé Gomes de Freitas. This entail that is vacant due to the arrestement of Valentim de Barros by the Santo Ofício of the sequestration of his belongings, must be integrated in the Capelas da Coroa and registered in their book, as in the books of the Provedoria and of the Torre do Tombo. Valentim de Barros had a son named Geraldo who has died without descendants.

Acórdão em Relação accepting the petition of the authors Gaspar de Caldas Lobo and his wife D. Francisca Josefa Pinto Maciel considering that the chapel is "absoluta" and that isn't vacant, according to the acórdão of 1672-08-13. The above D. Francisca Josefa belongs to the lineage of the institutor. Order to end the sequestration.

Acórdão em Relação declaring that the chapel is "absoluta" and the plaintiff Cristóvão Rangel da Fonseca is its legitimate administrator. The seizure is ended.

Acórdão em Relação declaring that the embargo presented by Francisco Borges Marim was proved, he is he is grandson of Francisco Borges and therefore descendant of the institutor. This chapel is considered "absoluta" and the seizure must be ended. This court sentence must be registered in the book of Torre do Tombo.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between João de Noronha, appellant, against Domingos da Câmara, appellee, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Fernando Vaz da Granja, in Constantim.
The sentence gives the motion presented as unproven, noting that the appellant had no right to the administration of the chapel because he was the natural son of the previous administrator. Consequently, it recognized as legitimate the administration of the appellee.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil deed between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against D. Diogo da Silveira, defendant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Catarina Fernandes.
The sentence acquits the defendant as legitimate administrator of the chapel, by his son Francisca Mexia, previous administrator. It orders the end of the sequestration of the chapel's assets and their registration in the Provedoria and in the Books of Capelas da Coroa.

Acórdão em Relação acquiting the defendant Francisco de Freitas of all charges and considering that the this chapel and entail is "absoluta" and therefore must be registered in the their book.

Acórdão em Relação judging António de Miranda, opponent, as the rightful successor of the entail of Manuel de Miranda, because he is descendant from Guiomar de Miranda, the institutor's sister, and from Maria de Miranda, her daughter, and condemning Francisco de Sousa Cid and his wife, D. Maria de Sousa, defendants, to relinquish the entail to him, with the income generated since the contested lawsuit. It excludes Pedro de Melo, plaintiff, who received the entail's administration, allegedly vacant to the Crown, from the king, and D. Maria de Sousa, defendant, because her consanguinity was forged and she is the daughter of her mother's second husband, Licenciado Manuel da Costa, and not of Simão de Miranda, the first administrator.

Acórdão em Relação revoking a previous sentence from a judge determining D. Ana de Sequeira, plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the entail of Margarida Lobo, because she is the only daughter of Diogo Pires Reimão, nephew of the institutor. Since Marcos Raposo Figueira and his wife, defendants, are not related to the institutor, they are condemned to relinquish the entailed assets to the plaintiff, with their income since the contested lawsuit.

Acórdão em Relação declaring that the succession of the chapel of doutor Lourenço Coelho Leitão and D. Ana Cardosa, his wife, belongs to the plaintiff, not named, because he his descendant of doutor Jerónimo Gomes Leitão, nephew of doutor Lourenço Coelho Leitão and the first successor appointed by him. It condemns the plaintiff, not named, to relinquish to the plaintiff the chapel's assets, with their income generated since the undue occupation, when the defendant's father took possession of them, until their return. The plaintiff or her child will live in Viseu or in its outskirts, as imposed by the institutor.

Acórdão em Relação judging the chapel of S. Brás, founded by Fernando Vaz, in Aveiro, next to the church of S. Miguel, as absoluta, because it is not vacant, whether it is of regular succession or appointment. The chapel was denounced as vacant to the Crown by Tomás da Costa Corte-Real, plaintiff, since the institutor's lineage is extincted. It orders that D. Tomás Jordão de Noronha, qualified part in the proceedings, must remain in the chapel's administration and if D. Catarina da Veiga, his sister and defendant, wants to demand him she must do it in the competent court. While D. Catarina da Veiga and her husband, João de Nápoles, defendants, argue that the chapel is of appointment, D. Tomás Jordão de Noronha, qualified part, argues that it is of regular succession.

Acórdão em Relação ordering that only D. Beatriz de Oliveira Franco will be compelled to fulfil the pious obligations, judging her hindrances as proven and condemning André Correia to pay the proceedings expenses. Once D. Beatriz de Oliveira Franco has not descendants, the institutor's first will takes precedence in the chapel's succession. However, the first will disappeared, so André Correia, only mentioned in the second, can't succeed after the death of D. Beatriz de Oliveira Franco.

Acórdão em Relação ordering that the embargoed sentence should go through the chancery and must be delivered separately, with a statement that the sentence does not harm the institutor's relatives if D. Beatriz de Oliveira Franco appoints a stranger as successor, before her death.

Acórdão do Desembargo ordering the fulfilment of the previous sentence from Juiz do Cível of Lisbon and declaring that the single storey houses mentioned in the institutor's (?) will do not belong to the chapel of Mécia Gomes.

Acórdão confirming the sentence of Provedor dos Resíduos, in the part where he declares the clause of the institutor's will as lawful, because it supports the dowry donated to D. Beatriz de Oliveira Franco, who is condemned to pay the proceedings expenses.

Acórdão from Desembargo absolving the defendant, Miguel Soares de Vasconcelos, from the legal action took by the plaintiff, Pedro Soares, and declaring him the rightful successor of the entail of deão D. Luís de Melo. The judges quoted the family name and coat of arms clauses to justify the exclusion of the plaintiff, because there are still relatives of the institutor and the outsiders only can succeed after those relatives extinction.

Acórdão do Desembargo that revokes a previous sentence from Corregedor do Cível, absolving Diogo Gomes de Lemos, defendant, from the requested by Maria Correia Ferreira, plaintiff, and Joana Ferreira de Vilhena, religious in the monastery of Santa Ana of Viana, opponent, and judging him as the rightful successor of the entails of João Martins Ferreira and Pantaleão Ferreira, his son, because he descends from Inês Correia, daughter of João Martins Ferreira and sister of Pantaleão Ferreira. The plaintiff is excluded from the succession because it is not proven that Violante Correia, her ancestor, is daughter of João Martins Ferreira and sister of Pantaleão Ferreira. The opponent is excluded because she is a religious.

Acórdão that revokes a previous sentence from Corregedor, judging Jerónimo Teles Barreto de Albuquerque, appellant, as the rightful successor of the entail of Afonso de Albuquerque and D. Maria de Noronha, his wife, because he is the grandson of Pedro Barreto, great-grandson of Gonçalo de Albuquerque, first administrator, and his descendant by straight line, so he is closer to him than D. Francisco Luís de Albuquerque.

Acórdão from Desembargo revoking a previous sentence from Juiz and Ouvidor, because it rejected the motion of the appellant.

Acórdão from Desembargo ordering the fulfilment of a previous motioned sentence, given the evidences presented by the appellee on how he is from the institutor's bloodline.

Acórdão do Desembargo that partially revokes the previous sentence from Corregedor do Cível da Corte, condemning the defendant to relinquish to the opponent the income generated since the contested lawsuit until its return, because he owned it with ill will after the contested lawsuit.

Acórdão judging Álvaro de Sousa, appellant, as the rightful successor of the entail founded by Álvaro de Sousa and Francisca de Távora and later ratified, added and amended by Gaspar de Sousa, D. Maria de Meneses, his wife, and Álvaro de Sousa, their son, because he is male, grandson and descendant by straight line of Álvaro de Sousa, unlike Diogo de Sousa and the appellee, D. Antónia de Meneses, siblings of Álvaro de Sousa and his collateral relatives.

Acórdão produced by the Casa da Suplicação confirming the sentence of Provedor dos Resíduos, in the part where he orders the execution of the institutor's will with regard to pious bequests, and states that it was not so well judged in his interference on deciding about the hindrances to the future succession of the chapel, because he is not a competent judge. The appealer and the appellee are condemned in the proceedings expenses.

Acórdão from Desembargo revoking a previous sentence from Juiz and Ouvidor, because it rejected the motion of the appellant.

Acórdão do Desembargo that revokes a previous sentence delivered from an unspecified judge, determing João Caeiro, plaintiff, represented by João Pais, his tutor, as the rightful successor of the chapels of Fernando Eanes Caeiro and João Fernandes Caeiro, his son, because he is son of Francisco Fernandes Janeiro, the closest relative of the last administrator, João de Cabo Caeiro, and belongs to the bloodline of the institutors.

Acórdão do Desembargo that revokes a previous sentence delivered from an unspecified judge, determing João Caeiro, plaintiff, represented by João Pais, his tutor, as the rightful successor of the chapels of Fernando Eanes Caeiro and João Fernandes Caeiro, his son, because he is son of Francisco Fernandes Janeiro, the closest relative of the last administrator, João de Cabo Caeiro, and belongs to the bloodline of the institutors.

Acórdão from Desembargo ordering the fulfilment of a previous motioned sentence, given the evidences presented by the appellee on how he is from the institutor's bloodline.

Court sentence acquiting the defendant Bernardo Rodrigues Moreira of the accusation presented by the plaintiffs Gaspar Nunes Velho and his wife Isabel Luís. The plaintiff received an administration letter that was based on false information that he presented.

Court sentence against D. Isabel Henriques and her children, authors of a libel against Jorge Nogueira de Novais, represented by his son and guardian, Rodrigo de Resende Nogueira. Jorge Nogueira de Novais is judged the rightful heir of D. Guiomar de Novais, as he was her closest relative, being her cousin, son of her mother's brother. The claimants are ordered to return him his inheritance.

Court sentence issued by Doutor Álvaro Fernandes, in a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against João Afonso Soudo, defendant.
The sentence condemns the defendant to leave the administration vacant to the Crown, as he does not have an institution, nor does he belong to the lineage of the institutor.

Court sentence of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa by which king D. Manuel I judges a civil process between João Luís, plaintiff, against Gregório de Reboredo, defendant, administrator of the chapel established by Pedro Afonso and Senhorinha Afonso , his wife, in the church of São Miguel of Freixo, on the outskirts of Fonte Arcada.
The sentence absolves the defendant and condemns the plaintiff to pay the costs.

Court sentence issued by Aires Gomes da Silva, regedor na Comarca and Correição de Entre Douro e Minho, judging a civil suit between João Gonçalves, plaintiff, against Lopo de Basto, his wife Maria Domingues and Gonçalo Eanes, defendants, concerning the limits and confrontations of the Quinta de Guilhamelo. The sentence states that the chapel had been instituted by Nuno Ribeiro, in 1435. The sentence condemns the defendants to deliver the property to the plaintiff, who is recognised as the closest descendant of the institutor and legitimate administrator of the chapel.

Court sentence issued by the licenciado Afonso Mendes de Vasconcelos, juiz do cível in Lisboa, judging a petition filed by Veríssimo de Moura, petitioner, asking that he be recognized as legitimate administrator of the chapel instituted by António de Moura, his father.
The sentence gives the content of the petition as proven, recognizing that the petitioner was the eldest son of António de Moura and, as such, the legitimate administrator of the chapel he had instituted.

Court sentence acknowledging that Catarina Fernandes, wife of Luís Marques, supplicant, was the administrator of the chapel instituted by Sancha Eanes de Palhavã, for being the sister of Isabel Martins, previous administrator, ordering that she be given possession of it.

Court sentence judging a civil case of appeal between João Freire de Almeida, appellant, against Miguel Soares de Vasconcelos, appellee, on the administration of the chapel established by Martinho Vaz de Almeida.
The sentence acquits the defendant.

Court sentence confirming the administration of the chapel instituted by Geraldo Vicente, to Gil Afonso and Leonor Eanes, his wife, defendants. A previous sentence had already confirmed that the administration belonged to Leonor Eanes to be the closest relative of the institutor. The sentence reiterates the need to fulfill the charges and orders the placement of a tombstone.

Court sentence handed down by doutor Manuel de Almeida, provedor of the comarca of Elvas, judging a civil process between Jácome de Pina, plaintiff, against Pedro do Couto and Álvaro Marques, defendants.
The sentence proves that the author was a legitimate administrator of the chapel of Maria Eanes, for being the son of Nuno de Pina and grandson of Diogo de Pina, condemning the defendants to leave the administration.

Court sentence issued by the corregedor cível da corte adjudicating a civil process between Manuel Martins Pereira and his wife, plaintiffs, against António Lopes Moutoso and Maria Álvares Veladas, his wife, defendants, on the administration of the chapel established by Diogo Barradas de Bem.
The sentence judges the plaintiffs as the legitimate administrator of the chapel, condemns the defendants to leave the administration and possession of the entailed properties.

Court sentence (extract) judging the administration of the chapel instituted by Filipa Sacota. The sentence judges Clariana Maria as legitimate administrator of the chapel.
There follows a set of acórdãos dated 1674-06-28, 1675-01-07 and 1676-01-17, confirming the previous sentence.
This is followed by a certificate of account of the administration (dated 1761-04-24), which includes various other documentation such as a response issued by the promotor do Juízo (dated 1662-06-26); a certificate of compliance with the charges (dated 1668-10-18); a certificate of notification (dated 1680-12-19); a motion (extract), a petition; an oath of D. Clariana Maria de Vasconcelos; other motion (extract) and various records, giving an account of the fulfillment of the chapel's charges.

Court sentence judging Maria de Sottomayor Perdigão, plaintiff with her husband, Baltasar Homem da Costa, as the rightful successor of the chapel of Vasco Martins Gavião, because she is the eldest daughter of the last administrator, Pascoal Perdigão, who did not have any son, and from the institutor's bloodline. Contrary to what the defendant, Padre Frei Francisco Soares, prior da igreja de Benavente, who had a right to inherit the chapel if the institutor's line was extinguished, claimed, the intitutor did not exclude women from the chapel's administration and did not establish an exclusive male succession (agnation), allowing for female succession. It condemns the defendant to relinquish the chapel's administration, with its income, since the undue occupation until its return to the plaintiffs.

Court sentence absolving D. António Jorge Ximenes de Melo, defendant, from the requested by Tomás Ximenes de Aragão, plaintiff, and Otávio Ximenes de Aragão, opponent, and declaring him as the rightful successor of the entail founded in 1610, in Lisboa, by André Ximenes and Maria Ximenes de Aragão, his wife, because he is the grandson of the last administrator, Jerónimo Ximenes, son of his daughter. The arguments of the plaintiff and opponent are not valid, since it is not an agnation entail and the women and their descendants are not excluded.

Court sentence judging João Mendes Lobo, plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the entail of Espadeiro, founded by Isabel Martins, because he is the closest relative of Joana Pereira Loba, the last administrator and daughter of Isabel Mendes, so he is from the bloodline of the first administrator, João Mendes Lobo, o Velho. Aires Vasques Lobo, defendant, argued that he is the closest relative of Joana Pereira Lobo, but by his grandfather line, who is not from the first administrator's bloodline.

Court sentence judging the plaintiff, not named, as the rightful successor of the entail founded by Padre Jordão Afonso to Graça Jordoa, one of the three entails founded by him, because she is the closest relative from the institutor's bloodline. The other entails he had founded were given to Margarida Jordoa and Inês Jordoa.

Court sentence judging Francisco Carneiro de Mariz, plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the entail of abbot Gomes Carneiro because he descends from the first administrator, Francisco Carneiro da Costa, by male bloodline, while Diogo Figueira, defendant, argued that he should succeed to the last administrator, doutor António Mariz Carneiro, who took possession of the entail claiming that the institutor appointed only scholars. It condemns the defendant to relinquish to the plaintiff the entailed assets, with their income generated since the contested lawsuit.

Court sentence judging D. Tomás, minor, and D. Paula Maria Josefa de Mendonça, his mother and tutor, plaintiffs, as administrators of the Hospital of S. Brás, founded by Fernando Vaz de Agonide, in Aveiro, succeeding to D. Tomás de Nápoles, father of D. Tomás, according to the succession clauses changed in a papal brief dated from 1582, which stated that the hospital should have a regular succession as an entail. Until then, the successors are appointed by the current administrators. Both opponent, D. Joana de Sousa e Alcáçova, and defendants, João de Nápoles and D. Catarina, his wife, invoked this argument. It condemns the defendant to relinquish the hospital's properties, with the income generated since the undue occupation until their return.

Court sentence judging António Correia da Silva, plaintiff, represented and administrated by his father, António Correia da Silva, as the rightful successor of the chapel of António Simões and Luísa Mendes, his wife, and the chapel of D. Catarina de Pina, their daughter, both located in the hermitage of Ascensão , next to their houses in Calçada do Congo (Combro?). It is proven that he is the closest relative of D. Catarina de Pina and that Bartolomeu Gonçalves, father of Tristão Guedes de Queirós, defendant, forged the will of D. Catarina de Pina so its descendants could succeed. The oponent, José Pereira de Veras, is also excluded, because he is not relative to D. Catarina de Pina. It condemns the defendant to relinquish the chapels to the plaintiff, with the income since the contested lawsuit until their return.

Court sentence judging the original plaintiff, deceased, and her son, the qualified plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the entail of Maria de Jesus and its entailed houses, located in Lisbon, because she was niece of the institutor, who determined that the chapel should belong to her relatives while there is their descendants. It condemns the defendants, the religious of the monastery of São Domingos of Azeitão (?), to relinquish to the plaintiffs the entailed houses, with their income generated since the contested lawsuit. The defendants only succeed in the chapel's administration if there is not descendants from the institutor or if the descendants are religious.

Court sentence judging Constança Fernandes, plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the chapel of Lourenço Vaz Carrasco, who lived in the village of Santo Aleixo, because she is niece of António Fernandes, the last administrator, who died in Castille. João Rodrigues Borralho and his wife, defendants, are condemned to relinquish the entailed assets to the plaintiffs, with their income generated since the undue occupation until their return.

Court sentence absolving Sebastião Lopes, defendant, from the requested by Luís Alfar, plaintiff, and declaring him as the rightful successor and owner of the properties of the two chapels founded by Manuel Alfar, because he is the closest relative of Sebastião Lopes, the last administrator.

Court sentence judging D. Doroteia de Meneses, defendant, as the legitimate daughter of D. Cecília de Meneses and her husband, Francisco Zuzarte da Fonseca, and, therefore, the rightful successor of her mother in the administration of the entail founded by Diogo de Castro do Rio as a dowry of 50.000 cruzados to her daughter Maria de Castro do Rio to marry to D. Francisco de Moura. It also judges that the request of the plaintiff, not named, is not valid. The plaintiff accused D. Doroteia de Meneses of not being daughter of D. Cecília de Meneses, claiming that he should succeed in the entail's administration, because he is the closest relative of the administrator and from the institutor's bloodline.

Court sentence judging the properties mentioned in the lawsuit, both those from the foundation deed and those from the dowry deed, as entailed and Padre Frei Bento Lamberto, professed religious in the monastery of Maceira Dão, as the rightful successor of the entail of Licenciado António Marques, abbot of S. Miguel of Fiães, because he is the closest relative of António Vaz Perestrelo, last administrator, and belongs to the institutor's bloodline. It condemns the defendant to relinquish the entailed assets, withe their income generated since the contested lawsuit until their return, to the monastery of Maceira Dão, plaintiff, their rightful owner during Padre Frei Bento Lamberto lifetime.

Court sentence judging Catarina Nunes, defendant, as the rightful successor of the chapel founded by Beatriz Lourenço in some houses, in Rua Pública, in Moura, later subrogated by 4 geiras of olive grove, and a vineyard in Fogo. Domingos Nunes, plaintiff, argues that he is the rightful successor, because he is the closest relative of Pedro Eanes and Beatriz Rodrigues, the first couple of administratos of the chapel. Altought, the sentence states that he did not prove his blood relationship with them and that the fact that he is the administrator of one of the chapels of Beatriz Lourenço does not mean that he is also the administrator of the other.

Court sentence judging António Correia da Silva, plaintiff, represented and administrated by his father, António Correia da Silva, as the rightful successor of the chapel of António Simões and Luísa Mendes, his wife, and the chapel of D. Catarina de Pina, their daughter, both located in the hermitage of Ascensão , next to their houses in Calçada do Congo (Combro?). It is proven that he is the closest relative of D. Catarina de Pina and that Bartolomeu Gonçalves, father of Tristão Guedes de Queirós, defendant, forged the will of D. Catarina de Pina so its descendants could succeed. The oponent, José Pereira de Veras, is also excluded, because he is not relative to D. Catarina de Pina. It condemns the defendant to relinquish the chapels to the plaintiff, with the income since the contested lawsuit until their return.

Court sentence absolving and judging António Correia da Silva, defendant, as the rightful successor of the entail of António Simões de Pina and Luísa Mendes, his wife, because he is the closest relative of D. Catarina de Pina, the first administrator, and he was already judged as the rightul successor in a previous sentence. João de Paiva da Gama, plaintiff, did not prove that he is the closest relative of D. Catarina de Pina and was condemned to pay the proceedings expenses.

Court sentence ordering the complete fulfilment by D. Beatriz de Oliveira Franco of her uncle's, André Franco, last will, which did not change the dowry contract. By this contract, dated from 1652-02-08, André Franco endowed his niece with 150.000 réis and the chapel's administration to marry Doutor João Leite de Aguilar. This sentence concerns the chapel's succession after the death of D. Beatriz de Oliveira Franco if she hasn't descendants.

Court sentence judging António Henriques Sacoto, defendant, as the rightful successor of the entail of Jerónimo Henrique, against Aires Penteado Osório, plaintiff, and Agostinho de Barros Henrique and Gonçalo Ribeiro Pinto, opponent, because he is the closest relative of the institutor and last administrator by male bloodline.

Court sentence judging João da Costa Ferreira, plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the chapel of Maria da Silveira, widow of Álvaro Penteado, founded in 1595, because he is the grandson of Maria de Alquevim and João Rodrigues, endowed by the institutor and first administrators. It condemns licenciado Nuno Rodrigues de Azevedo and his wife, Maria de Alquevim, defendants, to relinquish to the plaintiff the chapel's assets, improperly owned by them, with their income generated since the contested lawsuit.

Court sentence that revokes a previous sentence delivered from an unspecified judge, condemning the qualified defendants, not named, to relinquish to the qualified plaintiffs, not named, the assets of the chapel of Maria Lourenço, with their income generated since the contested lawsuit until their return, because the plaintiff are the children of the original plaintiffs, who were from the institutor's bloodline and her closest relatives.