Sentence ordering that the appellee delivers to the appealer, who belongs to the institutor's lineage, the chapel's assets and the incomes obtained since the begining of the legal action.

Sentence issued by D. Diogo, arcebishop of Lisbon, giving the administration of the chapel founded by Maria Eanes to Lourenço Martins Mourato, Leonor Vasques and Inês Vasques, during their lifetime, and reduces the pious obligations. It mentions another sentence issued by D. João, arcebishop of Lisbon, in 1408-12-12, by which is known the pious obligations and that Vasco Lourenço and Lourenço Martins Mourato were appointed to the chapel's administration.

Sentence of D. Sebastião, judging a civil process between Francisco Ribeiro, plaintiff, against the procurador da Coroa, defendant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Vasco Lourenço Torneiro.
The sentence recognizes that the administration of the chapel legitimately belonged to the plaintiff, as he was a descendant of the institutor and the last administrator. It also recognizes that, despite a previous provision by D. João III, the chapel was absolute and not of Crown.

Royal sentence judging a legal action which opposed Catarina Fernandes, wife of Mateus Domingues, plaintiff, against Pedro Eanes, Escrivão do Tesouro do Infante, and Isabel Martins, wife of João Esteves, concerning the administration of the chapel instituted by Sancha Eanes Palhavã in the church of Santa Justa of Lisboa. Its former administrator, Lourenço, son of Catarina Fernandes and brother of Isabel Martins, had been missing for 20 years.
A previous sentence recognized the degree of kinship of Isabel Martins with the institutor and the last administrator, declaring that she was the legitimate administrator of the chapel, since the institution did not prohibited women of administering it. The defendants made an appeal against that decision, but the royal sentence confirmed it.
Contains detailed informations regarding the institution of the entail and its first administrators.

Royal sentence, on behalf of Afonso VI, judging a civil process between Domingos do Amaral Valente, replaced by Manuel Lampreia de Vargas, plaintiff, against the prior and beneficiados of the church of Santa Maria de Serpa, defendants, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Ana de Oliveira.
The sentence confirms a judgment by the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa declaring the chapel vacant for the Crown, condemning the defendants as illegitimate administrators, and handing the administration over to the plaintiff.

Royal sentence, passed in the name of D. Pedro, as Prince Regent, judging a petition filed by Francisco de Sousa Lobato, against the procurador da Coroa, on the administration of the chapel established by João Domingues, abbot of Sabadim.
The sentence orders compliance with previous judgments.

Royal sentence, on behalf of Filipe III, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Luís de Góis de Mendonça, defendant, on the administration of the Minguelhos' chapel, instituted by Lourenço Martins Minguelhos and Vasco Martins Minguelhos, in church of Santa Maria da Lagoa de Monsaraz.
The sentence reiterates the last judgment, recognizing that the chapel was, since time immemorial, legitimately administered by the defendant's grandparents and parents, descendants of the institutors, recognizing him as a legitimate administrator. It orders that this sentence be put on the tombo and serve as an institution. Orders that the chapel be removed of the list of Capelas da Coroa and a declaration added in the Torre do Tombo and in the Provedoria.

Royal sentence issued by D. Pedro II, judging a civil process between Manuel Martins Pereira and his wife, plaintiffs, against António Lopes Moutoso and Maria Álvares Veladas, his wife, defendants, over the administration of the chapel established by Diogo Barradas de Bem.
The sentence judges the plaintiffs as the legitimate administrators of the chapel and condemns the defendants to leave the administration and the possession of the entailed properties.
Contains inserted parts of the libel of accusation and of the contrariedade.

Royal sentence judging a civil suit of appeal between Violante Gomes Formigo da Cunha, as plaintiff - administrator of the chapel founded by Iria Caeira -, against Luísa Lopes de Beça, defendant, about the possession of several assets its administration.
A previous sentence had declared the plaintiff as legitimate administrator of the chapel, which the defendant had appealed. The new sentence declares the defendant to be the legitimate administrator of the chapel, as she is the closest descendant of the founder, and nullifies the appointment of the plaintiff, ordering her to hand over the administration.

Court sentence judging Maria de Sottomayor Perdigão, plaintiff with her husband, Baltasar Homem da Costa, as the rightful successor of the chapel of Vasco Martins Gavião, because she is the eldest daughter of the last administrator, Pascoal Perdigão, who did not have any son, and from the institutor's bloodline. Contrary to what the defendant, Padre Frei Francisco Soares, prior da igreja de Benavente, who had a right to inherit the chapel if the institutor's line was extinguished, claimed, the intitutor did not exclude women from the chapel's administration and did not establish an exclusive male succession (agnation), allowing for female succession. It condemns the defendant to relinquish the chapel's administration, with its income, since the undue occupation until its return to the plaintiffs.

Court sentence absolving D. António Jorge Ximenes de Melo, defendant, from the requested by Tomás Ximenes de Aragão, plaintiff, and Otávio Ximenes de Aragão, opponent, and declaring him as the rightful successor of the entail founded in 1610, in Lisboa, by André Ximenes and Maria Ximenes de Aragão, his wife, because he is the grandson of the last administrator, Jerónimo Ximenes, son of his daughter. The arguments of the plaintiff and opponent are not valid, since it is not an agnation entail and the women and their descendants are not excluded.

Court sentence judging João Mendes Lobo, plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the entail of Espadeiro, founded by Isabel Martins, because he is the closest relative of Joana Pereira Loba, the last administrator and daughter of Isabel Mendes, so he is from the bloodline of the first administrator, João Mendes Lobo, o Velho. Aires Vasques Lobo, defendant, argued that he is the closest relative of Joana Pereira Lobo, but by his grandfather line, who is not from the first administrator's bloodline.

Court sentence judging the plaintiff, not named, as the rightful successor of the entail founded by Padre Jordão Afonso to Graça Jordoa, one of the three entails founded by him, because she is the closest relative from the institutor's bloodline. The other entails he had founded were given to Margarida Jordoa and Inês Jordoa.

Court sentence judging Francisco Carneiro de Mariz, plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the entail of abbot Gomes Carneiro because he descends from the first administrator, Francisco Carneiro da Costa, by male bloodline, while Diogo Figueira, defendant, argued that he should succeed to the last administrator, doutor António Mariz Carneiro, who took possession of the entail claiming that the institutor appointed only scholars. It condemns the defendant to relinquish to the plaintiff the entailed assets, with their income generated since the contested lawsuit.

Court sentence judging D. Tomás, minor, and D. Paula Maria Josefa de Mendonça, his mother and tutor, plaintiffs, as administrators of the Hospital of S. Brás, founded by Fernando Vaz de Agonide, in Aveiro, succeeding to D. Tomás de Nápoles, father of D. Tomás, according to the succession clauses changed in a papal brief dated from 1582, which stated that the hospital should have a regular succession as an entail. Until then, the successors are appointed by the current administrators. Both opponent, D. Joana de Sousa e Alcáçova, and defendants, João de Nápoles and D. Catarina, his wife, invoked this argument. It condemns the defendant to relinquish the hospital's properties, with the income generated since the undue occupation until their return.

Court sentence judging António Correia da Silva, plaintiff, represented and administrated by his father, António Correia da Silva, as the rightful successor of the chapel of António Simões and Luísa Mendes, his wife, and the chapel of D. Catarina de Pina, their daughter, both located in the hermitage of Ascensão , next to their houses in Calçada do Congo (Combro?). It is proven that he is the closest relative of D. Catarina de Pina and that Bartolomeu Gonçalves, father of Tristão Guedes de Queirós, defendant, forged the will of D. Catarina de Pina so its descendants could succeed. The oponent, José Pereira de Veras, is also excluded, because he is not relative to D. Catarina de Pina. It condemns the defendant to relinquish the chapels to the plaintiff, with the income since the contested lawsuit until their return.

Court sentence judging the original plaintiff, deceased, and her son, the qualified plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the entail of Maria de Jesus and its entailed houses, located in Lisbon, because she was niece of the institutor, who determined that the chapel should belong to her relatives while there is their descendants. It condemns the defendants, the religious of the monastery of São Domingos of Azeitão (?), to relinquish to the plaintiffs the entailed houses, with their income generated since the contested lawsuit. The defendants only succeed in the chapel's administration if there is not descendants from the institutor or if the descendants are religious.

Court sentence judging Constança Fernandes, plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the chapel of Lourenço Vaz Carrasco, who lived in the village of Santo Aleixo, because she is niece of António Fernandes, the last administrator, who died in Castille. João Rodrigues Borralho and his wife, defendants, are condemned to relinquish the entailed assets to the plaintiffs, with their income generated since the undue occupation until their return.

Court sentence absolving Sebastião Lopes, defendant, from the requested by Luís Alfar, plaintiff, and declaring him as the rightful successor and owner of the properties of the two chapels founded by Manuel Alfar, because he is the closest relative of Sebastião Lopes, the last administrator.

Court sentence judging D. Doroteia de Meneses, defendant, as the legitimate daughter of D. Cecília de Meneses and her husband, Francisco Zuzarte da Fonseca, and, therefore, the rightful successor of her mother in the administration of the entail founded by Diogo de Castro do Rio as a dowry of 50.000 cruzados to her daughter Maria de Castro do Rio to marry to D. Francisco de Moura. It also judges that the request of the plaintiff, not named, is not valid. The plaintiff accused D. Doroteia de Meneses of not being daughter of D. Cecília de Meneses, claiming that he should succeed in the entail's administration, because he is the closest relative of the administrator and from the institutor's bloodline.

Court sentence judging the properties mentioned in the lawsuit, both those from the foundation deed and those from the dowry deed, as entailed and Padre Frei Bento Lamberto, professed religious in the monastery of Maceira Dão, as the rightful successor of the entail of Licenciado António Marques, abbot of S. Miguel of Fiães, because he is the closest relative of António Vaz Perestrelo, last administrator, and belongs to the institutor's bloodline. It condemns the defendant to relinquish the entailed assets, withe their income generated since the contested lawsuit until their return, to the monastery of Maceira Dão, plaintiff, their rightful owner during Padre Frei Bento Lamberto lifetime.

Court sentence judging Catarina Nunes, defendant, as the rightful successor of the chapel founded by Beatriz Lourenço in some houses, in Rua Pública, in Moura, later subrogated by 4 geiras of olive grove, and a vineyard in Fogo. Domingos Nunes, plaintiff, argues that he is the rightful successor, because he is the closest relative of Pedro Eanes and Beatriz Rodrigues, the first couple of administratos of the chapel. Altought, the sentence states that he did not prove his blood relationship with them and that the fact that he is the administrator of one of the chapels of Beatriz Lourenço does not mean that he is also the administrator of the other.

Court sentence judging António Correia da Silva, plaintiff, represented and administrated by his father, António Correia da Silva, as the rightful successor of the chapel of António Simões and Luísa Mendes, his wife, and the chapel of D. Catarina de Pina, their daughter, both located in the hermitage of Ascensão , next to their houses in Calçada do Congo (Combro?). It is proven that he is the closest relative of D. Catarina de Pina and that Bartolomeu Gonçalves, father of Tristão Guedes de Queirós, defendant, forged the will of D. Catarina de Pina so its descendants could succeed. The oponent, José Pereira de Veras, is also excluded, because he is not relative to D. Catarina de Pina. It condemns the defendant to relinquish the chapels to the plaintiff, with the income since the contested lawsuit until their return.

Court sentence absolving and judging António Correia da Silva, defendant, as the rightful successor of the entail of António Simões de Pina and Luísa Mendes, his wife, because he is the closest relative of D. Catarina de Pina, the first administrator, and he was already judged as the rightul successor in a previous sentence. João de Paiva da Gama, plaintiff, did not prove that he is the closest relative of D. Catarina de Pina and was condemned to pay the proceedings expenses.

Court sentence ordering the complete fulfilment by D. Beatriz de Oliveira Franco of her uncle's, André Franco, last will, which did not change the dowry contract. By this contract, dated from 1652-02-08, André Franco endowed his niece with 150.000 réis and the chapel's administration to marry Doutor João Leite de Aguilar. This sentence concerns the chapel's succession after the death of D. Beatriz de Oliveira Franco if she hasn't descendants.

Court sentence judging António Henriques Sacoto, defendant, as the rightful successor of the entail of Jerónimo Henrique, against Aires Penteado Osório, plaintiff, and Agostinho de Barros Henrique and Gonçalo Ribeiro Pinto, opponent, because he is the closest relative of the institutor and last administrator by male bloodline.

Court sentence judging João da Costa Ferreira, plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the chapel of Maria da Silveira, widow of Álvaro Penteado, founded in 1595, because he is the grandson of Maria de Alquevim and João Rodrigues, endowed by the institutor and first administrators. It condemns licenciado Nuno Rodrigues de Azevedo and his wife, Maria de Alquevim, defendants, to relinquish to the plaintiff the chapel's assets, improperly owned by them, with their income generated since the contested lawsuit.

Court sentence that revokes a previous sentence delivered from an unspecified judge, condemning the qualified defendants, not named, to relinquish to the qualified plaintiffs, not named, the assets of the chapel of Maria Lourenço, with their income generated since the contested lawsuit until their return, because the plaintiff are the children of the original plaintiffs, who were from the institutor's bloodline and her closest relatives.

Court sentence judging Miguel Soares de Vasconcelos, opponent, as the rightful successor of the entail of Diogo Soares, because he is son of the institutor and brother of António Soares de Melo, last administrator. It condemns the defendant, not named, grandson of the institutor, to relinquish the to the opponent, but absolves him from the payment of its income until the sentence publication, since he owned it with good faith and ambiguous title.

Court sentence judging Maria de Figueiredo, plaintiff with her husband, Simão Temudo Freire, as the rightful successor of the chapel founded in 1559 by padre Francisco Leitão, who lived in Sertã, because she is the daughter of Pedro Vaz de Cunha, the closest relative of the institutor and of the last administrator, Isabel Leitão. It condemns António Galvão and his wife, Petronilha de Mendonça, defendants, to relinquish the entailed assets, with the income generated since the contested lawsuit.

Court sentence judging the plaintiff as the rightful successor of the entail and chapel of Mécia Gomes, because he is the great-grandson of António Gomes, brother of the institutor, and condemning the defendant to relinquish him the entailed assets, with their income generated since the contested lawsuit.

Court sentence judging Sebastião de Abreu, plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the entail of Maria Toscano because he is the legitimate grandson of António da Costa Moreira, who was appointed in third place by the institutor and died before Sebastião de Abreu da Costa, to whom he should have succeeded. It condemns Belchior Moreira de Barbuda, defendant, to relinquish to the plaintiff the entailed assets, with their income generated since the undue occupation until their return. The defendant was appointed in fourth place by the intitutor, to succeed to António da Costa Moreira if he did not have children, and took possession of the entail after the death of Sebastião de Abreu.

Court sentence judging D. Luís Francisco de Albuquerque, opponent, as the rightful successor of the entail of Afonso de Albuquerque and D. Maria de Noronha, his wife, because he is a descendant of Gonçalo de Albuquerque, first administrator, by straight line and is his closest relative.

Court sentence absolving Sebastião Lopes, defendant, from the requested by Luís Alfar, plaintiff, and declaring him as the rightful successor and owner of the properties of the two chapels founded by Manuel Alfar, because he is the closest relative of Sebastião Lopes, the last administrator.

Court sentence judging Manuel de Saldanha, defendant, as the rightful successor of the entail of D. João de Castro, by the bloodline of his great-grandfather, Gaspar Gonçalves de Albuquerque, male and first born child of D. Luísa de Albuquerque, the institutor's granddaughter, excluding Manuel de Sampaio, plaintiff, successor of D. Luísa de Albuquerque by female line.

Court sentence judging that the revenues of the Sofala's fortress belong to Luísa Maria de Mendonça e Eça, defendant, wife of marquês de Montebelo, since she is her mother's, D. Joana de Mendonça, successor in the entail founded by Diogo de Mendonça Furtado, her grandfather, with those revenues as a dowry to marry his daughter with Manuel de Sousa da Silva. It also absolves the defendants from paying 15.000 cruzados requested by the plaintiffs as a dowry, since there is no free assets from Diogo de Mendonça Furtado.

Court sentence (extract) judging the administration of the chapel instituted by Filipa Sacota. The sentence judges Clariana Maria as legitimate administrator of the chapel.
There follows a set of acórdãos dated 1674-06-28, 1675-01-07 and 1676-01-17, confirming the previous sentence.
This is followed by a certificate of account of the administration (dated 1761-04-24), which includes various other documentation such as a response issued by the promotor do Juízo (dated 1662-06-26); a certificate of compliance with the charges (dated 1668-10-18); a certificate of notification (dated 1680-12-19); a motion (extract), a petition; an oath of D. Clariana Maria de Vasconcelos; other motion (extract) and various records, giving an account of the fulfillment of the chapel's charges.

Court sentence acquiting the defendant Bernardo Rodrigues Moreira of the accusation presented by the plaintiffs Gaspar Nunes Velho and his wife Isabel Luís. The plaintiff received an administration letter that was based on false information that he presented.

Court sentence against D. Isabel Henriques and her children, authors of a libel against Jorge Nogueira de Novais, represented by his son and guardian, Rodrigo de Resende Nogueira. Jorge Nogueira de Novais is judged the rightful heir of D. Guiomar de Novais, as he was her closest relative, being her cousin, son of her mother's brother. The claimants are ordered to return him his inheritance.

Court sentence issued by Doutor Álvaro Fernandes, in a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against João Afonso Soudo, defendant.
The sentence condemns the defendant to leave the administration vacant to the Crown, as he does not have an institution, nor does he belong to the lineage of the institutor.

Court sentence of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa by which king D. Manuel I judges a civil process between João Luís, plaintiff, against Gregório de Reboredo, defendant, administrator of the chapel established by Pedro Afonso and Senhorinha Afonso , his wife, in the church of São Miguel of Freixo, on the outskirts of Fonte Arcada.
The sentence absolves the defendant and condemns the plaintiff to pay the costs.

Court sentence issued by Aires Gomes da Silva, regedor na Comarca and Correição de Entre Douro e Minho, judging a civil suit between João Gonçalves, plaintiff, against Lopo de Basto, his wife Maria Domingues and Gonçalo Eanes, defendants, concerning the limits and confrontations of the Quinta de Guilhamelo. The sentence states that the chapel had been instituted by Nuno Ribeiro, in 1435. The sentence condemns the defendants to deliver the property to the plaintiff, who is recognised as the closest descendant of the institutor and legitimate administrator of the chapel.

Court sentence issued by the licenciado Afonso Mendes de Vasconcelos, juiz do cível in Lisboa, judging a petition filed by Veríssimo de Moura, petitioner, asking that he be recognized as legitimate administrator of the chapel instituted by António de Moura, his father.
The sentence gives the content of the petition as proven, recognizing that the petitioner was the eldest son of António de Moura and, as such, the legitimate administrator of the chapel he had instituted.

Court sentence acknowledging that Catarina Fernandes, wife of Luís Marques, supplicant, was the administrator of the chapel instituted by Sancha Eanes de Palhavã, for being the sister of Isabel Martins, previous administrator, ordering that she be given possession of it.

Court sentence judging a civil case of appeal between João Freire de Almeida, appellant, against Miguel Soares de Vasconcelos, appellee, on the administration of the chapel established by Martinho Vaz de Almeida.
The sentence acquits the defendant.

Court sentence confirming the administration of the chapel instituted by Geraldo Vicente, to Gil Afonso and Leonor Eanes, his wife, defendants. A previous sentence had already confirmed that the administration belonged to Leonor Eanes to be the closest relative of the institutor. The sentence reiterates the need to fulfill the charges and orders the placement of a tombstone.

Court sentence handed down by doutor Manuel de Almeida, provedor of the comarca of Elvas, judging a civil process between Jácome de Pina, plaintiff, against Pedro do Couto and Álvaro Marques, defendants.
The sentence proves that the author was a legitimate administrator of the chapel of Maria Eanes, for being the son of Nuno de Pina and grandson of Diogo de Pina, condemning the defendants to leave the administration.

Court sentence issued by the corregedor cível da corte adjudicating a civil process between Manuel Martins Pereira and his wife, plaintiffs, against António Lopes Moutoso and Maria Álvares Veladas, his wife, defendants, on the administration of the chapel established by Diogo Barradas de Bem.
The sentence judges the plaintiffs as the legitimate administrator of the chapel, condemns the defendants to leave the administration and possession of the entailed properties.

Acórdão do Desembargo ordering the fulfilment of the previous sentence from Juiz do Cível of Lisbon and declaring that the single storey houses mentioned in the institutor's (?) will do not belong to the chapel of Mécia Gomes.

Acórdão confirming the sentence of Provedor dos Resíduos, in the part where he declares the clause of the institutor's will as lawful, because it supports the dowry donated to D. Beatriz de Oliveira Franco, who is condemned to pay the proceedings expenses.

Acórdão from Desembargo absolving the defendant, Miguel Soares de Vasconcelos, from the legal action took by the plaintiff, Pedro Soares, and declaring him the rightful successor of the entail of deão D. Luís de Melo. The judges quoted the family name and coat of arms clauses to justify the exclusion of the plaintiff, because there are still relatives of the institutor and the outsiders only can succeed after those relatives extinction.

Acórdão do Desembargo that revokes a previous sentence from Corregedor do Cível, absolving Diogo Gomes de Lemos, defendant, from the requested by Maria Correia Ferreira, plaintiff, and Joana Ferreira de Vilhena, religious in the monastery of Santa Ana of Viana, opponent, and judging him as the rightful successor of the entails of João Martins Ferreira and Pantaleão Ferreira, his son, because he descends from Inês Correia, daughter of João Martins Ferreira and sister of Pantaleão Ferreira. The plaintiff is excluded from the succession because it is not proven that Violante Correia, her ancestor, is daughter of João Martins Ferreira and sister of Pantaleão Ferreira. The opponent is excluded because she is a religious.

Acórdão that revokes a previous sentence from Corregedor, judging Jerónimo Teles Barreto de Albuquerque, appellant, as the rightful successor of the entail of Afonso de Albuquerque and D. Maria de Noronha, his wife, because he is the grandson of Pedro Barreto, great-grandson of Gonçalo de Albuquerque, first administrator, and his descendant by straight line, so he is closer to him than D. Francisco Luís de Albuquerque.

Acórdão from Desembargo revoking a previous sentence from Juiz and Ouvidor, because it rejected the motion of the appellant.

Acórdão from Desembargo ordering the fulfilment of a previous motioned sentence, given the evidences presented by the appellee on how he is from the institutor's bloodline.

Acórdão do Desembargo that partially revokes the previous sentence from Corregedor do Cível da Corte, condemning the defendant to relinquish to the opponent the income generated since the contested lawsuit until its return, because he owned it with ill will after the contested lawsuit.

Acórdão judging Álvaro de Sousa, appellant, as the rightful successor of the entail founded by Álvaro de Sousa and Francisca de Távora and later ratified, added and amended by Gaspar de Sousa, D. Maria de Meneses, his wife, and Álvaro de Sousa, their son, because he is male, grandson and descendant by straight line of Álvaro de Sousa, unlike Diogo de Sousa and the appellee, D. Antónia de Meneses, siblings of Álvaro de Sousa and his collateral relatives.

Acórdão produced by the Casa da Suplicação confirming the sentence of Provedor dos Resíduos, in the part where he orders the execution of the institutor's will with regard to pious bequests, and states that it was not so well judged in his interference on deciding about the hindrances to the future succession of the chapel, because he is not a competent judge. The appealer and the appellee are condemned in the proceedings expenses.

Acórdão from Desembargo revoking a previous sentence from Juiz and Ouvidor, because it rejected the motion of the appellant.

Acórdão do Desembargo that revokes a previous sentence delivered from an unspecified judge, determing João Caeiro, plaintiff, represented by João Pais, his tutor, as the rightful successor of the chapels of Fernando Eanes Caeiro and João Fernandes Caeiro, his son, because he is son of Francisco Fernandes Janeiro, the closest relative of the last administrator, João de Cabo Caeiro, and belongs to the bloodline of the institutors.

Acórdão do Desembargo that revokes a previous sentence delivered from an unspecified judge, determing João Caeiro, plaintiff, represented by João Pais, his tutor, as the rightful successor of the chapels of Fernando Eanes Caeiro and João Fernandes Caeiro, his son, because he is son of Francisco Fernandes Janeiro, the closest relative of the last administrator, João de Cabo Caeiro, and belongs to the bloodline of the institutors.

Acórdão from Desembargo ordering the fulfilment of a previous motioned sentence, given the evidences presented by the appellee on how he is from the institutor's bloodline.

Acórdão em Relação judging António de Miranda, opponent, as the rightful successor of the entail of Manuel de Miranda, because he is descendant from Guiomar de Miranda, the institutor's sister, and from Maria de Miranda, her daughter, and condemning Francisco de Sousa Cid and his wife, D. Maria de Sousa, defendants, to relinquish the entail to him, with the income generated since the contested lawsuit. It excludes Pedro de Melo, plaintiff, who received the entail's administration, allegedly vacant to the Crown, from the king, and D. Maria de Sousa, defendant, because her consanguinity was forged and she is the daughter of her mother's second husband, Licenciado Manuel da Costa, and not of Simão de Miranda, the first administrator.

Acórdão em Relação revoking a previous sentence from a judge determining D. Ana de Sequeira, plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the entail of Margarida Lobo, because she is the only daughter of Diogo Pires Reimão, nephew of the institutor. Since Marcos Raposo Figueira and his wife, defendants, are not related to the institutor, they are condemned to relinquish the entailed assets to the plaintiff, with their income since the contested lawsuit.

Acórdão em Relação declaring that the succession of the chapel of doutor Lourenço Coelho Leitão and D. Ana Cardosa, his wife, belongs to the plaintiff, not named, because he his descendant of doutor Jerónimo Gomes Leitão, nephew of doutor Lourenço Coelho Leitão and the first successor appointed by him. It condemns the plaintiff, not named, to relinquish to the plaintiff the chapel's assets, with their income generated since the undue occupation, when the defendant's father took possession of them, until their return. The plaintiff or her child will live in Viseu or in its outskirts, as imposed by the institutor.

Acórdão em Relação judging the chapel of S. Brás, founded by Fernando Vaz, in Aveiro, next to the church of S. Miguel, as absoluta, because it is not vacant, whether it is of regular succession or appointment. The chapel was denounced as vacant to the Crown by Tomás da Costa Corte-Real, plaintiff, since the institutor's lineage is extincted. It orders that D. Tomás Jordão de Noronha, qualified part in the proceedings, must remain in the chapel's administration and if D. Catarina da Veiga, his sister and defendant, wants to demand him she must do it in the competent court. While D. Catarina da Veiga and her husband, João de Nápoles, defendants, argue that the chapel is of appointment, D. Tomás Jordão de Noronha, qualified part, argues that it is of regular succession.

Acórdão em Relação ordering that only D. Beatriz de Oliveira Franco will be compelled to fulfil the pious obligations, judging her hindrances as proven and condemning André Correia to pay the proceedings expenses. Once D. Beatriz de Oliveira Franco has not descendants, the institutor's first will takes precedence in the chapel's succession. However, the first will disappeared, so André Correia, only mentioned in the second, can't succeed after the death of D. Beatriz de Oliveira Franco.

Acórdão em Relação ordering that the embargoed sentence should go through the chancery and must be delivered separately, with a statement that the sentence does not harm the institutor's relatives if D. Beatriz de Oliveira Franco appoints a stranger as successor, before her death.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion filed by Francisco da Serra, appellant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Miguel da Serra, in Moura.
The sentence judges the motions as proven, since, by previous rulings of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, it is proved that the chapel was absolute and, as such, legitimately administered by the descendants of the institutor. Orders the sequestration of the chapel's assets to be lifted.

Acórdão em Relação refusing the motion presented by doutor Crispim Luís.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between António Gomes, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Francisca Dinis and Domingos Gonçalves, her husband, defendants, concerning the denunciation of the administration of the chapel established by Pedro Gonçalves, in the church of Santa Maria de Oeiras.
The sentence condemns the defendants to hand over the administration of the chapel to the plaintiff who had denounced it as vacant to the Crown, due to the extinction of the lineage of administrators.

Acórdão em relação ordering that the chapel's administration belongs to the defendant Gabriel Luís Rasquinho who is descendant of the institutor. He as already succeded to his father and grandfather. The court sentence of 1535-09-06 is valid as a foundation deed. He must make the tombo and put an inscription in the church.

Acórdão em relação judging João Martins da Costa, plaintiff, who as denounced the chapel's vacancy, as as the rightful successor of the chapel founded by Melícia Rodrigues, and condemning the defendant Maria Prestes, who doens't belongs to the family of the institutor, to relinquish the assets of the chapel to the author. The crown must take possession of the chapel, and the plaintiff must do the tombo and request the administration letter. If any descendant of António Álvares Paredes claim the chapel, it must be given to him.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion between António de Aguiar de Gouveia and D. Isabel de Sande, appellants, against Valentim de Carvalho Henriques, appellee, about the administration of the entail of Agostinho Afonso and Marta Filipe, his wife.
The sentence confirms the previous one, judging the motions as unproven.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Gaspar de Gouveia, appellant, due to the administration of the chapel established by Urraca da Serra and António de Gouveia, her husband.
The sentence determines that, although a relative of the institutors, the appellant was not entitled to the administration of the chapel, since none of the instituters had determined that the chapel should be administered by a relative, before it was up to the provedor to lease the entailed assets.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between André de Carvalho Moutinho, tutor of D. Clemência de Mendonça, his sister-in-law, plaintiff, against Manuel Teles de Meneses e Faro, defendant, about the administration of the chapel of Rui Gonçalves Franco, located in the monastery of Santa Clara of Lisbon.
The sentence acquits the defendant, ordering that the chapel should remain incorporated in the Crown, where it was for about 80 years, since the plaintiff had not been able to prove that it was from the institutor's blood. The defendant had 15 days to present the document that legitimized his administration, under penalty of possession being given to the Crown.

Acordão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Gregório de Morais and his wife, defendants, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Catarina Eanes in the monastery of São Vicente de Fora.
The sentence condemns the defendants to leave the administration, as they are not descendants of the institutor. It declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, which should appoint an administrator.

Acórdão em Relação considering the motion as not proven, and therefore orders to comply with previous acórdão and condemns the appellee.

Acórdão em Relação judging the administration of the chapel instituted by Sancha Eanes as legitimately belonging to D. Beatriz de Olmedo, defendant, the complaint filed by Inácio Carvalho de Azevedo, author, cannot being executed. He orders that this sentence be placed on the list of absolutes.

Acórdão em Relação declaring that the chapel and the entail founded by doutor Duarte Mendes becomes vacant in favour of the crown and that its administration belongs for lifetime to João Freire de Andrade who has judicially denounced its vacancy.

Acórdão em relação declaring that the denunciation warrant of administration of 1621-07-26 was issued on behalf of Manuel Fernandes Conde having false informations. Therefore, the crown must take possession of the chapel. Manuel Fernandes Conde has six month to appeal to the king for a new warrant according to the two acordão em relação, the first warrant thart he has received and also the informations about the incomes of the chapel.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between priest Manuel Luís, vigário of the church of Nossa Senhora da Devesa of Castelo de Vide, appellant, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Tomé da Silveira do Crato, defendant, due to the administration of the chapel instituted by Lourenço Pires and Domingas Eanes, his wife, in the chapel in the church of Nossa Senhora da Devesa of Castelo de Vide.
The sentence absolves the defendant, considered legitimately appointed as administrator of the chapel, because it was declared vacant for the Crown.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion between António de Sequeira Pestana, appellant, against Bento Solteiro Alvarinho, appellee, on the administration of the chapel established by Pedro Gomes and Rui Pais, in Moura.
The sentence recognizes the appellee's right to pursue the demand for the administration of the chapel that he had denounced.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion, filed by Jorge Vidal de Mendonça, appellant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by priest Diogo Vidal in Setúbal. The sentence judges the motions as proven, recognizing the appellant as the legitimate administrator of the chapel and ordering that the sequestration of assets be lifted, as it does not belong to the Crown.

Acórdão em Relação ordering the fulfillment of a previous sentence from Desembargadores dos Agravos and condemning the suitor (suplicante), not named, to pay the proceedings expenses.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Francisco de Galvão, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against António de Azevedo and his wife, defendants, on the administration of the entail instituted by João de Landrobe, in the church of São Julião of Setúbal.
The sentence judges the entail as vacant for the Crown, condemning the defendant for not being able to prove that he is a descendant of the institutor. It orders that administration be given to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, in the form of the denunciation warrant of administration he had. Orders the registration of the sentence in Torre do Tombo, in the books of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa and in the books of the Provedoria of Setúbal.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion filed by Diogo Velho, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, about the chapel instituted by Diogo Rodrigues Trombeta and Margarida Fernandes, his wife.
The sentence judges the motios as proven, as the chapel does not belong to the Crown and the appellant is a descendant of the institutors. It orders the sequestration of the chapel's assets to be lifted.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Manuel Soares, defendant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Rui Soares.
The sentence acquits the defendant, recognizing him as the legitimate administrator of the chapel. It orders that this chapel should be removed from the list of Capelas da Coroa as mentioned in Torre do Tombo's Book. It also orders that the sentence be registered with the church and the Provedoria.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between André Lopes de Oliveira, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Jorge de Sousa Mascarenhas, defendant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Paulo Nunes.
Due to the defendant's death, the civil process continued against Jerónimo da Silva de Azevedo and his wife.
The sentence judges the chapel vacant for the Crown, condemning the defendant to leave the administration to the plaintiff, in the form of the denunciation warrant of administration he had. It also orders that the chapel be registered in the Torre do Tombo and in the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Francisco Ribeiro, defendant.
The judgment reveals that Francisco Ribeiro, in the libel he presented and which resulted in the royal sentence issued in 1576-01-30, purposely misrepresented the information presented. Thus, taking into account previous administration letters, issued by D. Manuel I, the chapel is declared as belonging to the Crown. The process was ordered to continue so that the chapel could be provided with an administrator. The defendant had to prove how he was a descendant of the institutor.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Francisco Ribeiro, defendant.
The sentence, reaffirming the assumptions of the previous one, condemns the defendant to leave the administration of the chapel to the Crown. It orders the chapel to be registered in the Books of Capelas da Coroa, make a tombo and place a tombstone in the church that says: “Vasco Lourenço Torneiro clérigo instituiu capela nesta igreja e o capelão perpétuo de que se fez tombo. Vagou para a Coroa. Feita esta lembrança em março de 1627”.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process of motion between D. Clemência de Mendonça, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, about the administration of the chapel of Rui Gonçalves Franco.
The sentence proves that the appellant was a legitimate descendant of the institutor, ordering the Crown to leave the administration of the chapel and hand it over to the appellant.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Valentim de Carvalho Henriques, replaced by João de Sousa Pereira, tutor of Caetano, his son, plaintiff, against D. Isabel de Sande, defendant, about the administration of the chapel instituted by Margarida Gonçalves Figueira, in Alverca. The sentence judges the chapel as vacant for the Crown, condemning the defendant and ordering the delivery of the administration to the plaintiff. The plaintiff, with the sentence, should request the respective administration letter, in the Desembargo do Paço, and make the tombo of the chapel's assets.

Acórdão em Relação accepting the petition of padre Afonso Caldeira de Castelo Branco ordering the end of the seizure. This chapel must be registered as "absoluta" and must be writen a note in the margin of the record in the Capelas da Coroa book.

Acórdão em Relação accepting the denunciation of doutor Francisco Pereira da Silva and considering that the defendant, D. Antónia da Câmara, doesn’t belong to the family of the institutor. Therefore, the chapel and entail should be listed in the Capelas da Coroa and its administration should belong to the plaintiff for his lifetime. He will ask to Desembargo do Paço the administration letter and also order an inventory to the entailed properties.

Acórdão em Relação accepting the appeal submitted by the plaintiff, doutor Francisco Pereira da Silva, and condemning the defendant, D. Antónia da Câmara, to return the profits obtained since the beginning of the legal action.

Acórdão em Relação ordering that the chapel is "absoluta" and its administration belongs to Manuel Peixoto, grandson of Maria Ferreira.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between António Serrão, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Beatriz de Sousa, defendant, on the denunciation of the chapel instituted by Maria Lobo.
The sentence condemns the defendant for not being a descendant of either the first administrator or the institutor, and cannot justify the right to administration. It declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, and the administration must be handed over to the author, during his lifetime, who had denounced it. He reiterates the need to fulfill the charges and orders the tombo and the placement of a tombstone that says: “Maria Loba deixou encargo de trinta missas nesta igreja sobre bens que são da Coroa. Feita esta lembrança mil seiscentos e vinte e sete”.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between Diogo Mendes, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against D. Maria da Costa, defendant, due to the administration of the chapel instituted by Diogo Garcia and Guiomar Feio, in São Vicente de Fora.
The sentence condemns the defendant to leave the administration of the chapel because he is not a descendant of the founders. It declares the chapel vacant for the Crown and orders it to be handed over to the author, who had a denunciation warrant of administration.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process of motion. The sentence confirms the previous one, judging the motions as unproven.