Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Henrique Pestana, defendant, administrator of the chapel founded by Aldonça Afonso.
The sentence judges the chapel as a vacancy for the Crown, reiterates the need to fulfill the charges, orders the tombo and the placement of a tombstone that says: “Aldonça Afonso, mulher de Inigo Fernandes, deixou encargo de trinta missas nesta igreja sobre seus bens. Vagou para a Coroa. Feita esta lembrança mil seiscentos e vinte e cinco”.

Acórdão em relação acquiting the appellee Martinho Lopes de Azevedo from the motion presented by the appellant Pedro Álvares. The appellant descends from the institutor but doesn't have the power to present a motion against the grace warrant of administration that was issued on behalf of the appellee.

Acórdão em Relação ordering that the chapel founded by Rodrigo Álvares dos Santos and Leonor Ribeiro belongs to the second opponent João Ribeiro de Vasconcelos who is descendant of the institutors; he is great-grandson of Gomes Ribeiro, brother of Leonor Ribeiro. Therefore, the chapel is "absoluta". The defendant is condemned to return the incomes obtained since the begining of the legal action.

Acórdão em Relação declaring that the chapel founded by Gil Martins becomes vacant in favour of the Crown and that its administration belongs for lifetime to D. Maria Berarda de Lima who has judicially denounced its vacancy. This acórdão should by transcript in the Capelas da Coroa book and in the Torre do Tombo books; and D. Maria Berarda Lima should have to require the administration letter to the Desembargo do Paço and make the tombo.

Acórdão em Relação accepting the petition of Paula de Andrade ordering that his chapel and entail must be registered as "absoluta" and therefore the seizure must end. In the previous acórdão they took the same decision but they didn't write a note in the margin of the record in the Capelas da Coroa book and the seizure was not lifted.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between Luís de Saldanha da Gama, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Fernando Jaques da Silva and D. Sebastiana de Noronha, his wife, defendants, on the administration of the chapel instituted by João Baquar, on the altar of São João, in the church of Santo António do Tojal.
The sentence judges the chapel as a vacancy for the Crown, condemning the defendants for not being a descendant of either the institutor or the first administrator. It orders that the administration be handed over to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, and the chapel be registered in the Torre do Tombo and in the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa. The plaintiff, with the sentence, should also ask for the respective administration letter.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Valentim de Carvalho Henriques, plaintiff, against D. Luísa de Miranda, defendant, his mother-in-law, later treated by D. Isabel de Sande, his daughter, about the administration of the chapel of Agostinho Afonso and Marta Filipe, his wife. Opponents in the process were António de Aguiar de Gouveia, priest Frei António de Jesus Maria, António de Melo Lobo, Gomes de Figueiredo Barbosa, Miguel de Melo, António de Barros and Filipe de Moura de Melo.
The sentence gives as unproven the claims of any of the opponents. It judges the entail as vacant for the Crown, condemning the defendant to leave him and hand over the administration to the plaintiff, who would have him during his life. The entail had to be registered at the Juizo das Capelas da Coroa and at the Torre do Tombo. The sentence had to be passed to the plaintiff, who, with it, had to ask for the administration letter at the Desembargo do Paço and then make an tombo of the assets.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between Diogo Salter de Macedo, plaintiff, against Lopo de Vabo e Alistão, defendant, on the administration of the chapels established by Isabel Garcês, in the convent of São Francisco, by Margarida Afonso Gaudelina, in the church of Santa Maria do Bispo, and by Maria Garcês, in the church of Santiago, all in Montemor-o-Novo.
The sentence judges the three chapels as vacancies for the Crown, ordering them to register at the Torre do Tombo. He acquits the defendant of Isabel Garcês' chapel, for which he had previously obtained an administration letter. It condemns him, however, in relation to the other two, for not being able to prove that he is a descendant of the founders.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between padre João Nunes Velho, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Estêvão Penedo and Maria Rodrigues, his wife, defendants, on the administration of the chapel instituted by priest João Gonçalves Arvelos, in the mother church of Alcácer do Sal.
The sentence judges the chapel as a vacant for the Crown, as the defendants are not descendants of the institutor. Orders the chapel to be registered in the books of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa and Torre do Tombo. It orders that the administration be delivered to the plaintiff, in the form of the denunciation warrant of administration that he had, and, with the sentence, must request the administration letter and register it with the Provedoria.

Acórdão em relação of Juizo das Capelas da Coroa, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Álvaro de Mancelos, defendant, on the administration of the chapel established by Catarina Eanes in the monastery of São Vicente de Fora.
The sentence confirms the previous one, ordering its fulfillment.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process of motion filed by D. Clemência de Mendonça, appellant, about the administration of the chapel of Rui Gonçalves Franco.
The sentence confirms the previous one, judging the motions as unproven.

Acórdão em Relação declaring that the embargo presented by Luís Barreto Zagalo was proved, he is descendant of the institutor. Therefore the seizure must be ended. This chapel must be registered as "absoluta" and must be writen a note in the margin of the record in the Capelas da Coroa book.

Acórdão em relação giving the chapel's administration to Martinho Afonso, besteiro, who lives in Vidigueira. He has to appoint an attorney-in-fact to go to Lisbon to take possession of the chapel.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion between António de Sequeira Pestana, appellant, against Bento Solteiro Alvarinho, appellee, on the administration of the chapel established by Pedro Gomes and Rui Pais, in Moura.
The sentence recognizes the appellee's right to pursue the demand for the administration of the chapel that he had denounced.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion filed by Félix Manuel de Sousa, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, on the administration of the chapel instituted by João Lourenço.
The sentence judges the motions as proven. It is shown that the chapel belonged to the Crown, which, however, made it at the grace of the descendants of Fernando Boto, who had been its administrator, and from which the appellant descended. It declares that the appellant is the legitimate administrator of the chapel and orders the lifting of the sequestration of assets. The appellant had to request, with the sentence, the respective administration letter, and then register the tombo of the chapel in Torre do Tombo.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Domingos Nogueira Cardoso, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Jorge Dias da Cunha, defendant, about the chapel or morgado by Isabel Antunes.
The sentence judges the entail to be vacant for the Crown, as there are no descendants of the institutor. It condemns the defendant and delivers the administration to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, according to the denunciation warrant of administration he had. Orders the chapel to be registered at the Torre do Tombo and at the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa.

Acórdão em Relação condemning the defendants doutor Crispim Luís and his son doutor Manuel Álvares Vidigal to drop the entailed assets, composed of a "Quinta da Biscaia" and lands in Pêra Manca, in Évora. The chapel is vacant and belongs to the crown and it will be issued orders to take possession of the assets. This chapel must be registered in the book of the chapels that are vacant and also in the book of the Torre do Tombo.

Acórdão em Relação accepting the motion presented by João Viegas, grandson of Manuel Abelho. The previous sentence is revoked, the chapel is "absoluta" and belongs to the above João Viegas.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between João Marques da Fonseca, plaintiff, against Ana de Abreu da Silveira, defendant, about the administration of the entail instituted by Pedro Afonso Leitão, known as Morgado dos Leitões.
The sentence declares the entail vacant for the Crown, condemning the defendant, who was neither a descendant of the institutor nor a family member of the last administrator. It orders that the administration be delivered to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, in the form of the denunciation warrant of administration he had. Orders the entail to be registered in the “Tombo das Capelas” and in the Torre do Tombo. The plaintiff had to request the respective administration letter at the Desembargo do Paço and make a tombo of the assets.

Acórdão em Relação considering the motion presented by Francisco Gonçalves Calvo as proven. Many witnesses said that his grandparents were descendants of the institutor and administrated the chapel. The administration belongs to the above Francisco Gonçalves Calvo and not to the appellee Diogo Lopes.

Acórdão em relação, judging the chapels established by João Pires Cegagatos and Estêvão Redondo, located in the mother church of Viana de Alvito, following the acórdão of 1622-10-06.
The sentence shows that both chapels were vacant for the Crown, ordering their possession, to later be appointed an administrator. It orders the realization of the tombo, separate for each one of the chapels, and the placement of a tombstone where the grave of João Pires Cegagatos would be.

Acórdão em Relação acquitting Maria Ferreira of the accusation presented by the Procurador da Coroa, because she belongs to the lineage of the chapel's institutor. She must fulfill the pious obligations using the papal bull that reduced the masses. The acórdão must be registered in the books of the Provedoria and of the Torre do Tombo.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Francisco Henriques, defendant, on the administration of the chapel and hospital established by Lourenço Eanes Mostardeiro.
The sentence states that the chapel was vacant for the Crown, since the administrator had not presented the documents justifying its possession.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process of motion filed by João de Paiva da Costa, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee.
The sentence judges the motions as proven, proving that the appellant was a legitimate descendant of Maria da Paz, who, previously, had been judged as the legitimate administrator of the chapel. The appellant had to maintain the administration and the sequestration of the chapel's assets should be lifted.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Beatriz Nunes Sanches and Bartolomeu da Costa dos Mosquitos, her son, defendants, due to the administration of the chapel established by Margarida Eanes Silvestre, in the monastery of São Domingos de Benfica.
The sentence shows that the defendants were not descendants of institutor and that Diogo da Costa dos Mosquitos, previous administrator, husband and father of the defendants, had sold properties of the chapel, going against the institution.
The sentence condemns the defendants to leave the administration of the chapel, declares the chapel vacant for the Crown and authorizes it to appoint the administrator.

Acórdão em Relação declaring that the chapel founded by Fernando Ribeiro and his wife Catarina Jorge is vacant to the crown and that its administration belongs for lifetime to Manuel Martins de Figueiredo who has judicially denounced its vacancy. He must require the administration letter to Desembargo do Paço and make the tombo. The defendant Manuel de Araújo Barreto, widower of Antónia Josefa, last descendant of the institutors, is condemned to drop the chapel and to pay the incomes obtained since the starting of the legal action.

Acórdão em relação accepting the motion presented by the defendant against the Procurador da Coroa. The previous acórdão em relação is revoked and they acquit the defendant, Catarina Barros. She must have a book with the will and the tombo and put an inscription in the chapel about the masses to Gil Lourenço, abade de Sabadim. This sentence shall be registered in the books of the Provedoria and in books of Torre do Tombo.

Acórdão em Relação declaring that the embargo presented by Agostinho Coelho was proved because he belongs to the institutor's lineage. Therefore this chapel is "absoluta", the seizure must be ended and this deliberation must be writen in the margin of the record in the Capelas da Coroa book.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between António Ferreira da Cunha, plaintiff, against António Coelho de Barros, defendant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by António de Paiva, in the church of São Bartolomeu of Castanheira do Ribatejo.
The defendant has no objection to the libel of accusation, acknowledging that he was an illegitimate administrator of the chapel. The sentence judges the chapel as a vacancy for the Crown, ordering the defendant to leave the administration. It orders them to be registered “no título das capelas vagas” and in the Torre do Tombo. It orders that the administration be delivered to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, in the form of the warrant he had, and must request the administration letter.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Manuel Guterres, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against padre Carlos Pereira Moniz, Urbana Moniz de São Pedro, Josefa Maria, António Vieira, her husband, Isidora da Paixão, Olímpia do Sacramento and Manuel Leite Pereira, defendants, on the administration of the Joana Lausteve's chapel.
The defendants did not present any opposition to the libel of accusation, acknowledging that they were illegitimate administrators in the chapel. The sentence judges the chapel as a vacancy for the Crown, condemning the defendants to leave it to the plaintiff. It orders that the chapel be registered in the books of the condemned chapels, in Torre do Tombo and in the Provedoria da Comarca.

Acórdão em relação declaring that the chapel's administration doesn't belong to the plaintiff nor to the defendant, but to Martinho Afonso, besteiro, from Vidigueira, who is descendant from the institutor. The defendant must drop the chapel's administration with all its assets.

Acórdão em relação acquiting the defendant Vicente da Serra and his wife Maria Bocarra from the accusation presented by the plaintiff the Procurador da Coroa, because he is descendant from the institutor. Orders to put a note in the chancery charters; and the defendant must put an inscription in the institutor's grave.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Nicolau Monteiro Barreto, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Manuel Martins, defendant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Diogo Rodrigues Trombeta and Margarida Fernandes, his wife, in the mother church of Sousel. His opponent was Lourença, minor, represented by Manuel Martins, her uncle and tutor.
The sentence condemns the defendant and the plaintiff to leave the administration of the chapel, recognizing that Lourença was its legitimate administrator, as she was the daughter of Pedro Dias, the last administrator, descendant of the institutors, who had only lost her due to maladministration. Orders the chapel to be registered under the title of absolute chapels.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion as unproven, confirming the previous sentence.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Fernando Rodrigues de Brito Pereira, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Leonardo Mendes de Almeida, his wife and the abbess and nuns of the convent of Nossa Senhora da Esperança of Vila Viçosa, defendants, on the chapel instituted by D. Isabel de Ataíde, in the mother church of Serpa.
The sentence judges the chapel as a vacancy for the Crown, as there are no descendants of the institutor. It condemns the defendants and delivers the administration to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, in the form of the denunciation warrant of administration he had. Orders the chapel to be registered at the Torre do Tombo and at the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação ordering the issuing the administration letter on behalf of JOsé Gomes de Freitas. This entail that is vacant due to the arrestement of Valentim de Barros by the Santo Ofício of the sequestration of his belongings, must be integrated in the Capelas da Coroa and registered in their book, as in the books of the Provedoria and of the Torre do Tombo. Valentim de Barros had a son named Geraldo who has died without descendants.

Acórdão em Relação accepting the petition of the authors Gaspar de Caldas Lobo and his wife D. Francisca Josefa Pinto Maciel considering that the chapel is "absoluta" and that isn't vacant, according to the acórdão of 1672-08-13. The above D. Francisca Josefa belongs to the lineage of the institutor. Order to end the sequestration.

Acórdão em Relação declaring that the chapel is "absoluta" and the plaintiff Cristóvão Rangel da Fonseca is its legitimate administrator. The seizure is ended.

Acórdão em Relação declaring that the embargo presented by Francisco Borges Marim was proved, he is he is grandson of Francisco Borges and therefore descendant of the institutor. This chapel is considered "absoluta" and the seizure must be ended. This court sentence must be registered in the book of Torre do Tombo.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between João de Noronha, appellant, against Domingos da Câmara, appellee, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Fernando Vaz da Granja, in Constantim.
The sentence gives the motion presented as unproven, noting that the appellant had no right to the administration of the chapel because he was the natural son of the previous administrator. Consequently, it recognized as legitimate the administration of the appellee.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil deed between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against D. Diogo da Silveira, defendant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Catarina Fernandes.
The sentence acquits the defendant as legitimate administrator of the chapel, by his son Francisca Mexia, previous administrator. It orders the end of the sequestration of the chapel's assets and their registration in the Provedoria and in the Books of Capelas da Coroa.

Acórdão em Relação acquiting the defendant Francisco de Freitas of all charges and considering that the this chapel and entail is "absoluta" and therefore must be registered in the their book.

Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Gomes Ravasco, defendant, administrator of the chapels instituted by João Fernandes and Catarina Rodrigues Pimenta.
The sentence absolves the defendant, as the legitimate administrator of the chapels. He orders the chapel to be removed from the list of the Capelas da Coroa, that the administrator make a tombo and register it in the Provedoria and in the church. He should also place a tombstone in the chapels saying "João Fernandes e Catarina Rodrigues Pimenta ordenaram esta capela com missa quotidiana e fábrica na forma da instituição de que é administrador de sua geração Gomes Ravasco”.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Gabriel Luís Rasquinho, defendant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Martinho Eanes and Francisco Eanes, in the church of Santiago of Beja.
The sentence acquits the defendant, as the legitimate administrator of the chapel, for being a descendant of the institutors. Orders the chapel to be crossed off from the list of Capelas da Coroa. It orders that the tombo of the chapel be registered in the Torre do Tombo and in the Provedoria, in accordance with the regulations of the chapels, and that a tombstone be placed that reads "Francisco Eanes e Martinho Eanes deixaram seus bens com encargo de se dizerem as duas partes em missas e com salário da constituição de que há tombo e se faz esta memória. Ano de mil seiscentos e vinte e quatro sendo administrador Gabriel Luís Rasquinho que é da geração e por sentença é satisfeito".

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the condes of Sarzedas, plaintiffs, against João Rodrigues Carreiro and his wife, and the procurador da Coroa, defendants, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Branca Eanes and Martinho do Sem, in the convent of São Domingos of Santarém.
The sentence judges the entail as vacant for the Crown, as the plaintiffs failed to prove that they were descendants of the institutors. It also judges the documents presented by the defendants as invalid, not legitimizing the possession of the entail, but only the usufruct of 40.000 réis which, with those of the chapel of Martinho Pires Vieira and Catarina Álvares, in Nossa Senhora de Marvila, were given to them by an ordinance of the Conselho da Fazenda. Orders the Crown to be sworn in.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process against Manuel Jorge, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against João de Alpoim de Brito and his wife D. Antónia Ribeiro de Lima, defendants, about the administration of the chapel of Sancha Eanes, in the church of Santa Justa of Lisbon.
The sentence declares the vacancy of the chapel for the Crown, condemning the defendants to prove that they were the descendants of the institutor. Orders the chapel to be registered in the “Livros do Tombo das Capelas” and in the “Livro do Tombo". The plaintiff had to request the respective administration letter at the Desembargo do Paço and make an tombo of assets.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Guilherme da Costa, plaintiff, against António Cordovil de Sousa, defendant, represented by Manuel de Sousa Viegas, his brother and curador, about the administration of the chapel instituted by Pedro Martins Alfar.
The sentence judges the chapel as a vacancy for the Crown, since the defendant cannot demonstrate that he is a descendant of the institutor. It orders that the administration be delivered to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, in the form of the denunciation warrant of administration he had. Orders the chapel to be registered at the Torre do Tombo and at the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between D. Salter de Macedo, plaintiff, against Lopo de Vabo e Alistão, defendant, on the administration of the chapels established by Isabel Garcês, in the convent of São Francisco, by Margarida Afonso Gaudelina, in the church of Santa Maria do Bispo, and by Maria Garcês, in the church of Santiago, all in Montemor-o-Novo.
The sentence judges the three chapels as vacancies for the Crown, ordering them to register at the Torre do Tombo. He acquits the defendant of Isabel Garcês' chapel, for which he had previously obtained an administration letter. It condemns him, however, in relation to the other two, for not being able to prove that he is a descendant of the founders.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process of motion between Teresa Maria de Sousa and her children, appellants, and Pedro Semedo Estaço, appellee, about the administration of the chapel of Catarina Fernandes, in the convent of Nossa Senhora da Graça in Lisbon.
The sentence confirms the previous one, judging the motion as unproven.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between José Barreto Valdevinos de Vasconcelos, plaintiff, against the provedor and brothers of the Santa Casa da Misericórdia of Évora, defendants, on the administration of the chapels instituted by Belchior Barreto, Fernando Barreto, Diogo Pires and Gaspar Barreto Cabral.
The sentence judges the four chapels as vacant for the Crown, and the plaintiff cannot prove to be a descendant of any of the institutors. It acquits the defendants and orders the chapels to be registered at the Torre do Tombo and the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Manuel Correia and Matias Leão, his father, defendants, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Filipa Rodrigues, in the convent of São Francisco of Évora.
The sentence acquits the defendants, as they are descendants of the institutor and legitimate administrators of the chapel. Orders the chapel to be removed of the list of Capelas da Coroa. It orders the chapel to be registered in the church and the Provedoria records and that a tombstone be placed that reads: “Sepultura de Filipa Rodrigues, que deixou dez missas para sempre por sua alma sobre bens de que há tombo, faleceu ano de mil quinhentos e vinte e um". Only then could the sequestration of assets be lifted.

Acórdão judging a civil deed between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Miguel de Cabedo de Vasconcelos, defendant, administrator of the chapel of Esteva Lourenço.
The sentence acquits the defendant, as he is a legitimate descendant of the institutor. It is ordered that the chapel be crossed out from the list of the Capelas da Coroa and that the administrator make a tombo of the assets, including the institution and the sentence. It is also ordered to be registered at Torre do Tombo, at the Provedoria and at the church.
Judgment given by desembargador Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, juiz dos tombos, averiguação e manifestações das Capelas da Coroa, in the name of Filipe III, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.

Acórdão of Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the petition presented by Francisco Freire de Andrade, supplicant, due to the sequestration ordered by Belchior de Valadares, procurador da Coroa, about the assets of the chapel of doutor Pedro Nunes. Although, in a previous process, if it was proved the chapel was vacant for the Crown, now the sentence issued recognizes that, according to the institution, the chapel could never revert to the Crown, since, lacking institutor's descendants, the administration would fall to the Lisboa' municipality. The supplicant failed the prove that he belongs to the lineage of the originator, but the sentence determines the registration of the chapel as absolute.

Acórdão judging João de Azevedo da Silveira as the legitimate successor in the administration of the chapel of Helena da Silveira, his aunt.
Several petitions and acórdãos follow, following the previous one, concerning the handing over of the chapel's assets and their subrogation.

Acórdão of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the civil process between José de Campos e Pontes, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Maria Aires and Manuel da Costa Zuzarte, defendants. The sentence proves there were no descendants of Luís Fernandes and that, due to the death of Maria Pereira, last administrator, Maria Aires, defendant, mother of Maria Pereira, had illegally taken possession of the entailed assets and sold part of them to Manuel da Costa Zuzarte, defendant. The sentence condemns the defendants to hand over the assets to the plaintiff, who had received a denunciation warrant of administration. It also determines the chapel be inscribed in Torre do Tombo and its assets, with the institution, in the Tombo do Juízo das Capelas. The author should, with the sentence, request the respective administration letter.

Acórdão of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the civil process between Manuel da Costa Zuzarte, plaintiff, against José de Campos e Pontes, defendant, because of the administration of Luís Fernandes' chapel. The sentence confirms that of 1694-07-06, reaffirming that, under no circumstances, Maria Aires, previous administrator, could enjoy the assets and donate them, absolving the defendant.

Acórdão do Desembargo judging D. Juliana Catarina de Meneses, opponent, as the legitimate successor of the entail founded by D. Fernando Coutinho, because she is the daughter of Rui da Silva, grandson of the first administrator and son of his second son, Jorge da Silva. It condemns condes de S. Lourenço, defendants, to relinquish to D. Juliana the entail's assets with their income generated since the undue occupation until their return. This acórdão also excludes from the entail's succession António Correia da Silva, plaintiff, Pedro da Silva, opponent, and the late D. André de Almada, opponent.

Acórdão, judging a civil process of motion brought by Luís de Góis de Mendonça, D. Margarida de Castro, his wife, and D. António da Costa, father and tutor of D. Francisco da Costa, appellants, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, on the administration of the Minguelhos' chapel, instituted by Lourenço Martins Minguelhos and Vasco Martins Minguelhos, in the church of Santa Maria da Lagoa de Monsaraz.
The sentence gives the motions as proven, revoking the previous one. It recognizes that the chapel was, since time immemorial, legitimately administered by the grandparents and parents of the appellant, descendants of the institutors, recognizing him as a legitimate administrator. It orders that this sentence be put on the tombo and serve as an institution. Orders that the chapel be removed from the list of Capelas da Coroa and a declaration added in the Torre do Tombo and in the Provedoria.

Acórdão em relação, judging the motion presented by the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff.
The sentence annuls the previous one, issued on 1597-05-07, declaring that the chapel belongs to the Crown. It orders a tombo and the placement of a tombstone.

Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Isabel de Paz, defendant, administrator of the chapel established by João Boução, in the church of Santa Maria de Celorico da Beira.
The sentence absolves the defendant, proving that the chapel is "absoluta", ordering it to be crossed out from the list of Capelas da Coroa.
Judgment given by desembargador Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, juiz dos tombos, averiguação e manifestações das Capelas da Coroa, in the name of Filipe III, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between José Barreto Valdevinos de Vasconcelos, plaintiff, against the provedor and brothers of the Santa Casa da Misericórdia of Évora, defendants, on the administration of the chapels instituted by Belchior Barreto, Fernando Barreto, Diogo Pires and Gaspar Barreto Cabral.
The sentence judges the four chapels as vacant for the Crown, and the plaintiff cannot prove to be a descendant of any of the institutors. It acquits the defendants and orders the chapels to be registered at the Torre do Tombo and the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Fernando Pereira de Castro, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Lopo de Alpoim, defendant, on the denunciation of the administration of the chapel established by Diogo da Fonseca.
The sentence declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, as the defendant's legitimacy cannot be proved, and must be administered by the plaintiff during his lifetime.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Álvaro de Sousa, defendant, on the administration of the chapel of São João, instituted by Constança Esteves, in the church of Santa Maria de Estremoz.
The sentence acquits the defendant, as the legitimate administrator of the chapel. The administrator was to fulfill the charges and enjoy the chapel's assets. He had to register the sentence at the tombo, at the church and at the Provedoria, and only then would the sequestration of his assets be lifted.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process of motion.
The sentence confirms the previous one, judging the motions as unproven.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Francisco Coutinho do Sem, defendant, on the administration of the chapel established by Branca Eanes, Gil do Sem and Martinho do Sem, in Santarém.
The sentence declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, ordering its registration in the Livro das Capelas da Coroa. However, having received an royal provision to administer it during his lifetime, it requires the defendant to request an administration letter and make a tombo of the chapel's assets.

Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against João Lopes de Pina, defendant, about the administration of the chapels established by Vasco Esteves Bousão and Maria Martins Bousão, his wife.
The sentence proves that Vasco Esteves Bousão's chapel belonged to the Crown and that Maria Martins Bousão's was absoluta.
Consequently, it determines that the defendant should leave the administration of the first, as ordered in the previous sentence, but can legitimately administer the second.
It mandates Barnabé Maldonado, escrivão, by order of the provedor or the juiz de fora, to take possession of the chapel of Vasco Esteves Bousão, and that António Barbosa acts as provisional administrator.

Acórdão, judging a civil deed between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Gonçalo Fernandes Picheiro, defendant, who was administrator of the chapel of Diogo Rodrigues Trombeta and Margarida Fernandes, Manuel Mendes Batalhos being opponent.
The sentence judged the possession of the chapel in favor of the opponent, because he proves the defendant had inherited the administration of the chapel because it was sold by Gaspar Mealheiro to Álvaro Rodrigues, so he was not a descendant of the institutors, and therefore could not administer the chapel.
It also proves that, on the contrary, the opponent was a descendant of the first administrator of the chapel.
Condemns the defendant to leave the administration of the chapel, giving possession to Manuel Mendes Batalhos. It orders the fulfillment of the charges, the realization of the tombo of the chapel's assets, which should be registered in the Provedoria and in the Torre do Tombo, as well as the placing of a headstone in the grave of the institutors.
Sentence given by desembargador Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, juiz dos tombos, averiguação e manifestações das Capelas da Coroa, in the name of Filipe III, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.

Acórdão acquiting the defendant Domingos da Fonseca against the legal action presented by the plaintiff Procurador da Coroa. This chapel is "absoluta" and this acórdão must be registered in the chapel's tombo, in the books of the Provedoria, of the church and of Torre do Tombo. The seizure is ended.
Signed by Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, Juíz do Tombo da Capela da Coroa, and undersigned by Pedro Almirante, Escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Isabel de Novais, wife of Diogo de Faria de Araújo, defendant, administrator of the chapel established by Martinho Dias de Ceira, in the church of São Bartolomeu of Coimbra.
The sentence absolves the defendant, for being a descendant of the institutor and, as such, legitimate administrator of the chapel. Even so, the sentence could not be registed, nor the sequestration of the assets lifted, until the defendant presented the tombo of the chapel's assets and the proof of fulfillment of the charges.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between António de Azevedo de Mendonça, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against José Pereira Sodré, Duarte Sodré Pereira, his son, Francisco Nobre de Almeida and his wife, defendants, about the administration of the chapel of the priest Frei Fernando Marques.
The defendants did not present any opposition to the libel of accusation. The sentence judges the chapel vacant for the Crown, condemning the defendants to leave the administration to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, who should ask for the respective administration letter. It orders that the chapel be registered in the Torre do Tombo, in the books of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa and in Provedoria of Tomar.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between António Borges de Azevedo, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Brás de Oliveira Pais, defendant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Pedro Lobo and Leonor Cardosa, his wife, in the convent of São Francisco of Alenquer.
The sentence judges the chapel vacant for the Crown, as there are no descendants of the founders. It orders that the administration be given to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, and with the sentence, he must request the respective administration letter at the Desembargo do Paço. It also had to make the tombo of the assets, within two months. Orders the chapel to be registered at the Torre do Tombo and at the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação, judging the motions presented by José Barreto Valdevinos de Vasconcelos as unproven, ordering the fulfillment of the previous sentence.

Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Domingos de Morais, defendant, administrators of the chapel of Santo Estêvão, instituted by Estêvão Vaz and Florença Eanes, his wife, in the church of Nossa Senhora da Oliveira of Guimarães.
The sentence absolves the defendant, as he is a legitimate descendant of the founders, ordering the chapel to be crossed out from the list of Capelas da Coroa. It is also proved that, due to the reduction in the chapel's income, the charges had previously been reduced, so the defendant did not meet the institution's, but only had to meet those of the reduction. In this sense, it is ordered that the provedor verify the chapel's income, as well as if the lease of the properties (carried out with reduced incomes) were made in accordance with the Ordenações. Taking into account the high number of properties, it is also ordered to verify their number, with those existing in the institution and in the tombo.
Judgment given by desembargador Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, juiz dos tombos, averiguação e manifestações das Capelas da Coroa, in the name of Filipe III, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.

Acórdão of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the civil suit about the chapel instituted by Lourenço Martins and Constança Rodrigues, in Bornes and Bragança, between the procurador da Coroa, author, and D. Mariana de Morais, defendant, represented by Lázaro de Figueiredo Jorge de Madureira, her tutor. The sentence absolves the defendant, giving as proven she is of the lineage of the institutors. The end of the sequestration of the chapel's assets is ordered and registered as absoluta.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Filipe Ribeiro de Carvalho, defendant, on the administration of the chapel established by Gonçalo Eanes de Carvalho, in the church of Santa Maria dos Açogues de Montemor-o-Novo.
The sentence determines that Nuno de Carvalho, who had received a letter of administration of the king, would only belong to half of the chapel, as the institution stated that there must be two administrators, he tends to omit this information. In this sense, it acquits the defendant of half of the chapel and declares the other as vacant for the Crown. It orders it registration and that the Crown provide it as an administrator.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Luís Lopes Lobo, defendant, on the administration of the chapels instituted by Domingos Esteves Bem-lhe-Quero and Maior Domingues, in Estremoz.
The sentence acquits the defendant, as the legitimate administrator of the chapels, for being a descendant of D. Iria, previous administrator. Orders the chapels to be removed from the list of Capelas da Coroa. Orders that the tombo of the chapels be registered in the Torre do Tombo and in the Provedoria.

Acórdão ordering the lifting of the sequestration of the assets of the chapels instituted by Domingos Esteves Bem-lhe-Quero and Maior Domingues, as they do not belong to the Crown. On the contrary, it orders the confiscation of the assets of the chapel instituted by Teresa Martins to be maintained, since it has not been proven that it is not belonging to the Crown.

Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Domingos da Fonseca, defendant, administrator of the chapel established by Pedro Afonso, in the church of São Miguel of Freixo, on the outskirts of Fonte Arcada.
The sentence orders the tombo, registered at Torre do Tombo and at the Provedoria, and that the administrators comply with the charges.
Judgment given by desembargador Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, juiz dos tombos, averiguação e manifestações das Capelas da Coroa, in the name of Filipe III, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.

Acórdão declaring that this chapel is administrated by the defendants' family for the last 120 years, which is the family of the institutor, and therefore doesn't belong to the Crown. This court sentence must be registered in the books of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa and in books of the Torre do Tombo.
Signed by Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, Juiz do Tombo da Capela da Coroa, and undersigned by Pedro Almirante, Escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.

Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against João Lopes de Pina, defendant, about the administration of the chapels established by Vasco Esteves Bousão and Maria Martins Bousão, his wife.
The sentence proves that Vasco Esteves Bousão's chapel belonged to the Crown and that Maria Martins Bousão's was absoluta.
Consequently, it determines that the defendant should leave the administration of the first, as ordered in the previous sentence, but can legitimately administer the second.
It mandates Barnabé Maldonado, escrivão, by order of the provedor or the juiz de fora, to take possession of the chapel of Vasco Esteves Bousão, and that António Barbosa acts as provisional administrator.

Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Gomes Ravasco, defendant, administrator of the chapels instituted by João Fernandes and Catarina Rodrigues Pimenta.
The sentence absolves the defendant, as the legitimate administrator of the chapels. He orders the chapel to be removed from the list of the Capelas da Coroa, the administrator to make a tombo and register it in the Provedoria and in the church. He should also place a tombstone in the chapels saying "João Fernandes e Catarina Rodrigues Pimenta ordenaram esta capela com missa quotidiana e fábrica na forma da instituição de que é administrador de sua geração Gomes Ravasco”.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion filed by the Conde de Sarzedas, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, on the administration of the chapel and entail instituted by Branca Eanes and Martinho do Sem, in the convent of São Domingos of Santarém.
The judgment judges the motions as proven, demonstrating that the appellant was a descendant of the institutors and that the succession in the entail had been regulated by the institutors' dispositions, there being no reason for it to belong to the Crown. It orders the appellee to leave the administration, which he hands over to the appellant.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between António Antunes, plaintiff, tutor of João Rodrigues, against the procurador da Coroa and António de Aguiar da Silva, defendants, on the administration of the chapel of Fernando Daires, in Lisbon.
The sentence declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, since the death of João Vieira, last administrator, left none of the founder's relatives. It orders that the chapel be registered in the “Livros das Capelas da Coroa” and in the Torre do Tombo and hands over the administration to the defendant [António de Aguiar da Silva], only during his lifetime, who should request the respective administration letter.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between José Barreto Valdevinos de Vasconcelos, plaintiff, against the provedor and brothers of the Santa Casa da Misericórdia of Évora, defendants, on the administration of the chapels instituted by Belchior Barreto, Fernando Barreto, Diogo Pires and Gaspar Barreto Cabral.
The sentence judges the four chapels as vacant for the Crown, and the plaintiff cannot prove to be a descendant of any of the institutors. It acquits the defendants and orders the chapels to be registered at the Torre do Tombo and the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion filed by Luís Correia, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Filipa Rodrigues, in Évora.
The sentence judges the motions as proven, recognizing the appellant as a legitimate administrator of the chapel, since he was the son of Manuel Correia, previously judged as a legitimate administrator of the chapel. It orders that the sequestration of the chapel's assets be lifted and that it be recorded, where necessary, that the chapel did not belong to the Crown.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion filed by José Correia de Andrade, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, about the chapel instituted by Pedro Cabaços.
The sentence judges the motions as proven, as the chapel is not of the Crown and the appellant is a descendant of Beatriz Calva, previously judged as the legitimate administrator of the chapel. It orders the sequestration of the chapel's assets to be lifted.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between João de Sampaio Lobo, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against D. Antónia de Amorim and her husband, defendants, about the administration of the chapel of São João, instituted by Constança Esteves, in the church of Santa Maria de Estremoz.
The sentence acquits the defendants, as legitimate administrators of the chapel, which, in this way, was not found vacant for the Crown.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion, filed by Francisco de Macedo de Siqueira, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Moninho Pais and D. Clara, his wife, in the church of Santa Maria da Orada, in Avis.
The sentence judges the motions as proven, ordering the lifting of the sequestration of the chapel's assets, which, previously, had already been judged as not belonging to the Crown. It also orders the necessary records to be made in the books of the Capelas da Coroa.

Acórdão ordering the lifting of the sequestration of the assets of the chapels instituted by Domingos Esteves Bem-lhe-Quero and Maior Domingues, as they do not belong to the Crown. On the contrary, it orders the confiscation of the assets of the chapel instituted by Teresa Martins to be maintained, since it has not been proven that it is not belonging to the Crown.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between Francisco do Vale Soutomaior, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador, against the licenciado Brás de Oliveira Pais, appointed curador for the chapel, about the administration of the chapel of Gregório Lourenço and Maria Borges, his wife, located on the island of Santiago, Cabo Verde.
The sentence declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, ordering it to be registered in the “Livro das Capelas da Coroa” and in the Torre do Tombo, and delivered to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, in the form of the denunciation warrant of administration to him presented.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process of motion between André de Castro de Cal, appellant, and Francisco do Vale Soutomaior, appellee, about the administration of the chapel of Gregório Lourenço and Maria Borges, his wife.
The sentence confirms the previous one, judging the motions as unproven.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between D. António Henriques de Almeida, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Gonçalo Fernandes, defendant, on the administration of the chapel of Guiomar Romacha.
The sentence judges the chapel as a vacancy for the Crown, since the administrator was not a descendant of the institutor. Condemns the defendant to leave the chapel to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, in accordance with the denunciation warrant of administration he had. It orders the chapel to be registered in the “Livro das Capelas vagas” and in the Torre do Tombo.

Acórdão em relação, ordering the end of the sequestration of the assets of the chapel instituted by João Domingues, abbot of Sabadim, since Francisco de Sousa Lobato, supplicant, was its legitimate administrator, having received a warrant of administration, and made the tombo of the chapel's assets.

Acórdão, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Luís de Góis de Mendonça, defendant, on the administration of the Minguelhos' chapel, instituted by Lourenço Martins Minguelhos and Vasco Martins Minguelhos, in the church of Santa Maria da Lagoa de Monsaraz .
The sentence declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, and it must be registered in the book of Capelas da Coroa and the properties of the demand in the respective tombo. A tombstone should be placed that said: “Nesta igreja se dizem sessenta missas pela capela que deixaram Lourenço Martins e Vasco Martins Minguelhos que vagou para a Coroa pelos bens declarados no tombo e esta memória se fez no ano de mil seiscentos e vinte e dois”. It orders the Provedor to take possession of the chapel and that the future administrator make tombo of the assets and fulfill the charges.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between José Barreto Valdevinos de Vasconcelos, plaintiff, against the provedor and brothers of the Santa Casa da Misericórdia of Évora, defendants, on the administration of the chapels instituted by Belchior Barreto, Fernando Barreto, Diogo Pires and Gaspar Barreto Cabral.
The sentence judges the four chapels as vacant for the Crown, and the plaintiff cannot prove to be a descendant of any of the institutors. It acquits the defendants and orders the chapels to be registered at the Torre do Tombo and the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação, judging the motions presented by José Barreto Valdevinos de Vasconcelos as unproven, ordering the fulfillment of the previous sentence.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between [Manuel Vaz da Corda], plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against the administrator of the chapel instituted by Leonor Cacela, unidentified.
The sentence declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, since the defendant could not prove to be a descendant of the institutor. It orders that the chapel be registered in the “Livro das Capelas da Coroa” and in the Torre do Tombo and delivers its administration to the plaintiff, only during his lifetime, and for that, he must request the respective administration letter at the Desembargo do Paço.

Acórdão ordering the survey of the sequestration of the chapel's assets established by Martinho Eanes and Francisco Eanes, since Domingos Luís Rasquinho, defendant, had proved to be the grandson of Gabriel Luís Rasquinho and legitimate administrator of the chapel.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Roque de Macedo Pereira, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against António de Macedo Pereira, defendant, about the chapel instituted by Francisca de Sampaio Borges, in Estremoz.
The sentence judges the chapel as a vacancy for the Crown, condemning the defendant and ordering the delivery of administration to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, in the form of the denunciation warrant of administration he had. It orders the chapel to register at the Torre do Tombo and at the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, and the plaintiff must request the respective administration letter.

Acórdão of the Desembargo do Paço, issued by doutores Francisco Nogueira, juiz dos Feitos da Coroa e Fazenda, and Luís Lopes de Carvalho, judging a civil process between doutor Gaspar Barbosa and D. Leonor Soares, his wife, plaintiffs, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against João Lopes de Pina and Mécia Antónia, his mother and tutor, defendants, on the administration of the chapels established by Vasco Esteves Bousão and Maria Martins Bousão, his wife.
It comes from an exemplification (dated 1623-02-18).
The sentence condemns the defendants to leave the plaintiffs to the administration of the chapel established by Vasco Esteves Bousão, since they had not presented any document that would legalize this administration. On the contrary, it has not been proved that the assets of Maria Martins Bousão's chapel were attached to those of the chapel established by her husband, recognizing the administration of the defendants as legitimate.