Court sentence judging Miguel Soares de Vasconcelos, opponent, as the rightful successor of the entail of Diogo Soares, because he is son of the institutor and brother of António Soares de Melo, last administrator. It condemns the defendant, not named, grandson of the institutor, to relinquish the to the opponent, but absolves him from the payment of its income until the sentence publication, since he owned it with good faith and ambiguous title.

Court sentence judging Maria de Figueiredo, plaintiff with her husband, Simão Temudo Freire, as the rightful successor of the chapel founded in 1559 by padre Francisco Leitão, who lived in Sertã, because she is the daughter of Pedro Vaz de Cunha, the closest relative of the institutor and of the last administrator, Isabel Leitão. It condemns António Galvão and his wife, Petronilha de Mendonça, defendants, to relinquish the entailed assets, with the income generated since the contested lawsuit.

Court sentence judging the plaintiff as the rightful successor of the entail and chapel of Mécia Gomes, because he is the great-grandson of António Gomes, brother of the institutor, and condemning the defendant to relinquish him the entailed assets, with their income generated since the contested lawsuit.

Court sentence judging Sebastião de Abreu, plaintiff, as the rightful successor of the entail of Maria Toscano because he is the legitimate grandson of António da Costa Moreira, who was appointed in third place by the institutor and died before Sebastião de Abreu da Costa, to whom he should have succeeded. It condemns Belchior Moreira de Barbuda, defendant, to relinquish to the plaintiff the entailed assets, with their income generated since the undue occupation until their return. The defendant was appointed in fourth place by the intitutor, to succeed to António da Costa Moreira if he did not have children, and took possession of the entail after the death of Sebastião de Abreu.

Court sentence judging D. Luís Francisco de Albuquerque, opponent, as the rightful successor of the entail of Afonso de Albuquerque and D. Maria de Noronha, his wife, because he is a descendant of Gonçalo de Albuquerque, first administrator, by straight line and is his closest relative.

Court sentence absolving Sebastião Lopes, defendant, from the requested by Luís Alfar, plaintiff, and declaring him as the rightful successor and owner of the properties of the two chapels founded by Manuel Alfar, because he is the closest relative of Sebastião Lopes, the last administrator.

Court sentence judging Manuel de Saldanha, defendant, as the rightful successor of the entail of D. João de Castro, by the bloodline of his great-grandfather, Gaspar Gonçalves de Albuquerque, male and first born child of D. Luísa de Albuquerque, the institutor's granddaughter, excluding Manuel de Sampaio, plaintiff, successor of D. Luísa de Albuquerque by female line.

Court sentence judging that the revenues of the Sofala's fortress belong to Luísa Maria de Mendonça e Eça, defendant, wife of marquês de Montebelo, since she is her mother's, D. Joana de Mendonça, successor in the entail founded by Diogo de Mendonça Furtado, her grandfather, with those revenues as a dowry to marry his daughter with Manuel de Sousa da Silva. It also absolves the defendants from paying 15.000 cruzados requested by the plaintiffs as a dowry, since there is no free assets from Diogo de Mendonça Furtado.

Royal sentence judging a legal action which opposed Catarina Fernandes, wife of Mateus Domingues, plaintiff, against Pedro Eanes, Escrivão do Tesouro do Infante, and Isabel Martins, wife of João Esteves, concerning the administration of the chapel instituted by Sancha Eanes Palhavã in the church of Santa Justa of Lisboa. Its former administrator, Lourenço, son of Catarina Fernandes and brother of Isabel Martins, had been missing for 20 years.
A previous sentence recognized the degree of kinship of Isabel Martins with the institutor and the last administrator, declaring that she was the legitimate administrator of the chapel, since the institution did not prohibited women of administering it. The defendants made an appeal against that decision, but the royal sentence confirmed it.
Contains detailed informations regarding the institution of the entail and its first administrators.

Royal sentence, on behalf of Afonso VI, judging a civil process between Domingos do Amaral Valente, replaced by Manuel Lampreia de Vargas, plaintiff, against the prior and beneficiados of the church of Santa Maria de Serpa, defendants, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Ana de Oliveira.
The sentence confirms a judgment by the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa declaring the chapel vacant for the Crown, condemning the defendants as illegitimate administrators, and handing the administration over to the plaintiff.

Royal sentence, passed in the name of D. Pedro, as Prince Regent, judging a petition filed by Francisco de Sousa Lobato, against the procurador da Coroa, on the administration of the chapel established by João Domingues, abbot of Sabadim.
The sentence orders compliance with previous judgments.

Royal sentence, on behalf of Filipe III, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Luís de Góis de Mendonça, defendant, on the administration of the Minguelhos' chapel, instituted by Lourenço Martins Minguelhos and Vasco Martins Minguelhos, in church of Santa Maria da Lagoa de Monsaraz.
The sentence reiterates the last judgment, recognizing that the chapel was, since time immemorial, legitimately administered by the defendant's grandparents and parents, descendants of the institutors, recognizing him as a legitimate administrator. It orders that this sentence be put on the tombo and serve as an institution. Orders that the chapel be removed of the list of Capelas da Coroa and a declaration added in the Torre do Tombo and in the Provedoria.

Royal sentence issued by D. Pedro II, judging a civil process between Manuel Martins Pereira and his wife, plaintiffs, against António Lopes Moutoso and Maria Álvares Veladas, his wife, defendants, over the administration of the chapel established by Diogo Barradas de Bem.
The sentence judges the plaintiffs as the legitimate administrators of the chapel and condemns the defendants to leave the administration and the possession of the entailed properties.
Contains inserted parts of the libel of accusation and of the contrariedade.

Royal sentence judging a civil suit of appeal between Violante Gomes Formigo da Cunha, as plaintiff - administrator of the chapel founded by Iria Caeira -, against Luísa Lopes de Beça, defendant, about the possession of several assets its administration.
A previous sentence had declared the plaintiff as legitimate administrator of the chapel, which the defendant had appealed. The new sentence declares the defendant to be the legitimate administrator of the chapel, as she is the closest descendant of the founder, and nullifies the appointment of the plaintiff, ordering her to hand over the administration.

Sentence ordering that the appellee delivers to the appealer, who belongs to the institutor's lineage, the chapel's assets and the incomes obtained since the begining of the legal action.

Sentence issued by D. Diogo, arcebishop of Lisbon, giving the administration of the chapel founded by Maria Eanes to Lourenço Martins Mourato, Leonor Vasques and Inês Vasques, during their lifetime, and reduces the pious obligations. It mentions another sentence issued by D. João, arcebishop of Lisbon, in 1408-12-12, by which is known the pious obligations and that Vasco Lourenço and Lourenço Martins Mourato were appointed to the chapel's administration.

Sentence of D. Sebastião, judging a civil process between Francisco Ribeiro, plaintiff, against the procurador da Coroa, defendant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Vasco Lourenço Torneiro.
The sentence recognizes that the administration of the chapel legitimately belonged to the plaintiff, as he was a descendant of the institutor and the last administrator. It also recognizes that, despite a previous provision by D. João III, the chapel was absolute and not of Crown.