Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Gomes Ravasco, defendant, administrator of the chapels instituted by João Fernandes and Catarina Rodrigues Pimenta.
The sentence absolves the defendant, as the legitimate administrator of the chapels. He orders the chapel to be removed from the list of the Capelas da Coroa, that the administrator make a tombo and register it in the Provedoria and in the church. He should also place a tombstone in the chapels saying "João Fernandes e Catarina Rodrigues Pimenta ordenaram esta capela com missa quotidiana e fábrica na forma da instituição de que é administrador de sua geração Gomes Ravasco”.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Gabriel Luís Rasquinho, defendant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Martinho Eanes and Francisco Eanes, in the church of Santiago of Beja.
The sentence acquits the defendant, as the legitimate administrator of the chapel, for being a descendant of the institutors. Orders the chapel to be crossed off from the list of Capelas da Coroa. It orders that the tombo of the chapel be registered in the Torre do Tombo and in the Provedoria, in accordance with the regulations of the chapels, and that a tombstone be placed that reads "Francisco Eanes e Martinho Eanes deixaram seus bens com encargo de se dizerem as duas partes em missas e com salário da constituição de que há tombo e se faz esta memória. Ano de mil seiscentos e vinte e quatro sendo administrador Gabriel Luís Rasquinho que é da geração e por sentença é satisfeito".

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the condes of Sarzedas, plaintiffs, against João Rodrigues Carreiro and his wife, and the procurador da Coroa, defendants, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Branca Eanes and Martinho do Sem, in the convent of São Domingos of Santarém.
The sentence judges the entail as vacant for the Crown, as the plaintiffs failed to prove that they were descendants of the institutors. It also judges the documents presented by the defendants as invalid, not legitimizing the possession of the entail, but only the usufruct of 40.000 réis which, with those of the chapel of Martinho Pires Vieira and Catarina Álvares, in Nossa Senhora de Marvila, were given to them by an ordinance of the Conselho da Fazenda. Orders the Crown to be sworn in.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process against Manuel Jorge, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against João de Alpoim de Brito and his wife D. Antónia Ribeiro de Lima, defendants, about the administration of the chapel of Sancha Eanes, in the church of Santa Justa of Lisbon.
The sentence declares the vacancy of the chapel for the Crown, condemning the defendants to prove that they were the descendants of the institutor. Orders the chapel to be registered in the “Livros do Tombo das Capelas” and in the “Livro do Tombo". The plaintiff had to request the respective administration letter at the Desembargo do Paço and make an tombo of assets.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Guilherme da Costa, plaintiff, against António Cordovil de Sousa, defendant, represented by Manuel de Sousa Viegas, his brother and curador, about the administration of the chapel instituted by Pedro Martins Alfar.
The sentence judges the chapel as a vacancy for the Crown, since the defendant cannot demonstrate that he is a descendant of the institutor. It orders that the administration be delivered to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, in the form of the denunciation warrant of administration he had. Orders the chapel to be registered at the Torre do Tombo and at the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between D. Salter de Macedo, plaintiff, against Lopo de Vabo e Alistão, defendant, on the administration of the chapels established by Isabel Garcês, in the convent of São Francisco, by Margarida Afonso Gaudelina, in the church of Santa Maria do Bispo, and by Maria Garcês, in the church of Santiago, all in Montemor-o-Novo.
The sentence judges the three chapels as vacancies for the Crown, ordering them to register at the Torre do Tombo. He acquits the defendant of Isabel Garcês' chapel, for which he had previously obtained an administration letter. It condemns him, however, in relation to the other two, for not being able to prove that he is a descendant of the founders.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process of motion between Teresa Maria de Sousa and her children, appellants, and Pedro Semedo Estaço, appellee, about the administration of the chapel of Catarina Fernandes, in the convent of Nossa Senhora da Graça in Lisbon.
The sentence confirms the previous one, judging the motion as unproven.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between José Barreto Valdevinos de Vasconcelos, plaintiff, against the provedor and brothers of the Santa Casa da Misericórdia of Évora, defendants, on the administration of the chapels instituted by Belchior Barreto, Fernando Barreto, Diogo Pires and Gaspar Barreto Cabral.
The sentence judges the four chapels as vacant for the Crown, and the plaintiff cannot prove to be a descendant of any of the institutors. It acquits the defendants and orders the chapels to be registered at the Torre do Tombo and the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Manuel Correia and Matias Leão, his father, defendants, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Filipa Rodrigues, in the convent of São Francisco of Évora.
The sentence acquits the defendants, as they are descendants of the institutor and legitimate administrators of the chapel. Orders the chapel to be removed of the list of Capelas da Coroa. It orders the chapel to be registered in the church and the Provedoria records and that a tombstone be placed that reads: “Sepultura de Filipa Rodrigues, que deixou dez missas para sempre por sua alma sobre bens de que há tombo, faleceu ano de mil quinhentos e vinte e um". Only then could the sequestration of assets be lifted.

Acórdão judging a civil deed between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Miguel de Cabedo de Vasconcelos, defendant, administrator of the chapel of Esteva Lourenço.
The sentence acquits the defendant, as he is a legitimate descendant of the institutor. It is ordered that the chapel be crossed out from the list of the Capelas da Coroa and that the administrator make a tombo of the assets, including the institution and the sentence. It is also ordered to be registered at Torre do Tombo, at the Provedoria and at the church.
Judgment given by desembargador Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, juiz dos tombos, averiguação e manifestações das Capelas da Coroa, in the name of Filipe III, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.

Acórdão of Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the petition presented by Francisco Freire de Andrade, supplicant, due to the sequestration ordered by Belchior de Valadares, procurador da Coroa, about the assets of the chapel of doutor Pedro Nunes. Although, in a previous process, if it was proved the chapel was vacant for the Crown, now the sentence issued recognizes that, according to the institution, the chapel could never revert to the Crown, since, lacking institutor's descendants, the administration would fall to the Lisboa' municipality. The supplicant failed the prove that he belongs to the lineage of the originator, but the sentence determines the registration of the chapel as absolute.

Acórdão judging João de Azevedo da Silveira as the legitimate successor in the administration of the chapel of Helena da Silveira, his aunt.
Several petitions and acórdãos follow, following the previous one, concerning the handing over of the chapel's assets and their subrogation.

Acórdão of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the civil process between José de Campos e Pontes, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Maria Aires and Manuel da Costa Zuzarte, defendants. The sentence proves there were no descendants of Luís Fernandes and that, due to the death of Maria Pereira, last administrator, Maria Aires, defendant, mother of Maria Pereira, had illegally taken possession of the entailed assets and sold part of them to Manuel da Costa Zuzarte, defendant. The sentence condemns the defendants to hand over the assets to the plaintiff, who had received a denunciation warrant of administration. It also determines the chapel be inscribed in Torre do Tombo and its assets, with the institution, in the Tombo do Juízo das Capelas. The author should, with the sentence, request the respective administration letter.

Acórdão of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the civil process between Manuel da Costa Zuzarte, plaintiff, against José de Campos e Pontes, defendant, because of the administration of Luís Fernandes' chapel. The sentence confirms that of 1694-07-06, reaffirming that, under no circumstances, Maria Aires, previous administrator, could enjoy the assets and donate them, absolving the defendant.

Acórdão do Desembargo judging D. Juliana Catarina de Meneses, opponent, as the legitimate successor of the entail founded by D. Fernando Coutinho, because she is the daughter of Rui da Silva, grandson of the first administrator and son of his second son, Jorge da Silva. It condemns condes de S. Lourenço, defendants, to relinquish to D. Juliana the entail's assets with their income generated since the undue occupation until their return. This acórdão also excludes from the entail's succession António Correia da Silva, plaintiff, Pedro da Silva, opponent, and the late D. André de Almada, opponent.

Acórdão, judging a civil process of motion brought by Luís de Góis de Mendonça, D. Margarida de Castro, his wife, and D. António da Costa, father and tutor of D. Francisco da Costa, appellants, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, on the administration of the Minguelhos' chapel, instituted by Lourenço Martins Minguelhos and Vasco Martins Minguelhos, in the church of Santa Maria da Lagoa de Monsaraz.
The sentence gives the motions as proven, revoking the previous one. It recognizes that the chapel was, since time immemorial, legitimately administered by the grandparents and parents of the appellant, descendants of the institutors, recognizing him as a legitimate administrator. It orders that this sentence be put on the tombo and serve as an institution. Orders that the chapel be removed from the list of Capelas da Coroa and a declaration added in the Torre do Tombo and in the Provedoria.

Acórdão em relação, judging the motion presented by the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff.
The sentence annuls the previous one, issued on 1597-05-07, declaring that the chapel belongs to the Crown. It orders a tombo and the placement of a tombstone.

Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Isabel de Paz, defendant, administrator of the chapel established by João Boução, in the church of Santa Maria de Celorico da Beira.
The sentence absolves the defendant, proving that the chapel is "absoluta", ordering it to be crossed out from the list of Capelas da Coroa.
Judgment given by desembargador Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, juiz dos tombos, averiguação e manifestações das Capelas da Coroa, in the name of Filipe III, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between José Barreto Valdevinos de Vasconcelos, plaintiff, against the provedor and brothers of the Santa Casa da Misericórdia of Évora, defendants, on the administration of the chapels instituted by Belchior Barreto, Fernando Barreto, Diogo Pires and Gaspar Barreto Cabral.
The sentence judges the four chapels as vacant for the Crown, and the plaintiff cannot prove to be a descendant of any of the institutors. It acquits the defendants and orders the chapels to be registered at the Torre do Tombo and the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Fernando Pereira de Castro, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Lopo de Alpoim, defendant, on the denunciation of the administration of the chapel established by Diogo da Fonseca.
The sentence declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, as the defendant's legitimacy cannot be proved, and must be administered by the plaintiff during his lifetime.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Álvaro de Sousa, defendant, on the administration of the chapel of São João, instituted by Constança Esteves, in the church of Santa Maria de Estremoz.
The sentence acquits the defendant, as the legitimate administrator of the chapel. The administrator was to fulfill the charges and enjoy the chapel's assets. He had to register the sentence at the tombo, at the church and at the Provedoria, and only then would the sequestration of his assets be lifted.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process of motion.
The sentence confirms the previous one, judging the motions as unproven.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Francisco Coutinho do Sem, defendant, on the administration of the chapel established by Branca Eanes, Gil do Sem and Martinho do Sem, in Santarém.
The sentence declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, ordering its registration in the Livro das Capelas da Coroa. However, having received an royal provision to administer it during his lifetime, it requires the defendant to request an administration letter and make a tombo of the chapel's assets.

Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against João Lopes de Pina, defendant, about the administration of the chapels established by Vasco Esteves Bousão and Maria Martins Bousão, his wife.
The sentence proves that Vasco Esteves Bousão's chapel belonged to the Crown and that Maria Martins Bousão's was absoluta.
Consequently, it determines that the defendant should leave the administration of the first, as ordered in the previous sentence, but can legitimately administer the second.
It mandates Barnabé Maldonado, escrivão, by order of the provedor or the juiz de fora, to take possession of the chapel of Vasco Esteves Bousão, and that António Barbosa acts as provisional administrator.

Acórdão, judging a civil deed between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Gonçalo Fernandes Picheiro, defendant, who was administrator of the chapel of Diogo Rodrigues Trombeta and Margarida Fernandes, Manuel Mendes Batalhos being opponent.
The sentence judged the possession of the chapel in favor of the opponent, because he proves the defendant had inherited the administration of the chapel because it was sold by Gaspar Mealheiro to Álvaro Rodrigues, so he was not a descendant of the institutors, and therefore could not administer the chapel.
It also proves that, on the contrary, the opponent was a descendant of the first administrator of the chapel.
Condemns the defendant to leave the administration of the chapel, giving possession to Manuel Mendes Batalhos. It orders the fulfillment of the charges, the realization of the tombo of the chapel's assets, which should be registered in the Provedoria and in the Torre do Tombo, as well as the placing of a headstone in the grave of the institutors.
Sentence given by desembargador Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, juiz dos tombos, averiguação e manifestações das Capelas da Coroa, in the name of Filipe III, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.

Acórdão acquiting the defendant Domingos da Fonseca against the legal action presented by the plaintiff Procurador da Coroa. This chapel is "absoluta" and this acórdão must be registered in the chapel's tombo, in the books of the Provedoria, of the church and of Torre do Tombo. The seizure is ended.
Signed by Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, Juíz do Tombo da Capela da Coroa, and undersigned by Pedro Almirante, Escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Isabel de Novais, wife of Diogo de Faria de Araújo, defendant, administrator of the chapel established by Martinho Dias de Ceira, in the church of São Bartolomeu of Coimbra.
The sentence absolves the defendant, for being a descendant of the institutor and, as such, legitimate administrator of the chapel. Even so, the sentence could not be registed, nor the sequestration of the assets lifted, until the defendant presented the tombo of the chapel's assets and the proof of fulfillment of the charges.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between António de Azevedo de Mendonça, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against José Pereira Sodré, Duarte Sodré Pereira, his son, Francisco Nobre de Almeida and his wife, defendants, about the administration of the chapel of the priest Frei Fernando Marques.
The defendants did not present any opposition to the libel of accusation. The sentence judges the chapel vacant for the Crown, condemning the defendants to leave the administration to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, who should ask for the respective administration letter. It orders that the chapel be registered in the Torre do Tombo, in the books of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa and in Provedoria of Tomar.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between António Borges de Azevedo, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Brás de Oliveira Pais, defendant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Pedro Lobo and Leonor Cardosa, his wife, in the convent of São Francisco of Alenquer.
The sentence judges the chapel vacant for the Crown, as there are no descendants of the founders. It orders that the administration be given to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, and with the sentence, he must request the respective administration letter at the Desembargo do Paço. It also had to make the tombo of the assets, within two months. Orders the chapel to be registered at the Torre do Tombo and at the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação, judging the motions presented by José Barreto Valdevinos de Vasconcelos as unproven, ordering the fulfillment of the previous sentence.

Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Domingos de Morais, defendant, administrators of the chapel of Santo Estêvão, instituted by Estêvão Vaz and Florença Eanes, his wife, in the church of Nossa Senhora da Oliveira of Guimarães.
The sentence absolves the defendant, as he is a legitimate descendant of the founders, ordering the chapel to be crossed out from the list of Capelas da Coroa. It is also proved that, due to the reduction in the chapel's income, the charges had previously been reduced, so the defendant did not meet the institution's, but only had to meet those of the reduction. In this sense, it is ordered that the provedor verify the chapel's income, as well as if the lease of the properties (carried out with reduced incomes) were made in accordance with the Ordenações. Taking into account the high number of properties, it is also ordered to verify their number, with those existing in the institution and in the tombo.
Judgment given by desembargador Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, juiz dos tombos, averiguação e manifestações das Capelas da Coroa, in the name of Filipe III, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.

Acórdão of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the civil suit about the chapel instituted by Lourenço Martins and Constança Rodrigues, in Bornes and Bragança, between the procurador da Coroa, author, and D. Mariana de Morais, defendant, represented by Lázaro de Figueiredo Jorge de Madureira, her tutor. The sentence absolves the defendant, giving as proven she is of the lineage of the institutors. The end of the sequestration of the chapel's assets is ordered and registered as absoluta.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Filipe Ribeiro de Carvalho, defendant, on the administration of the chapel established by Gonçalo Eanes de Carvalho, in the church of Santa Maria dos Açogues de Montemor-o-Novo.
The sentence determines that Nuno de Carvalho, who had received a letter of administration of the king, would only belong to half of the chapel, as the institution stated that there must be two administrators, he tends to omit this information. In this sense, it acquits the defendant of half of the chapel and declares the other as vacant for the Crown. It orders it registration and that the Crown provide it as an administrator.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Luís Lopes Lobo, defendant, on the administration of the chapels instituted by Domingos Esteves Bem-lhe-Quero and Maior Domingues, in Estremoz.
The sentence acquits the defendant, as the legitimate administrator of the chapels, for being a descendant of D. Iria, previous administrator. Orders the chapels to be removed from the list of Capelas da Coroa. Orders that the tombo of the chapels be registered in the Torre do Tombo and in the Provedoria.

Acórdão ordering the lifting of the sequestration of the assets of the chapels instituted by Domingos Esteves Bem-lhe-Quero and Maior Domingues, as they do not belong to the Crown. On the contrary, it orders the confiscation of the assets of the chapel instituted by Teresa Martins to be maintained, since it has not been proven that it is not belonging to the Crown.

Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Domingos da Fonseca, defendant, administrator of the chapel established by Pedro Afonso, in the church of São Miguel of Freixo, on the outskirts of Fonte Arcada.
The sentence orders the tombo, registered at Torre do Tombo and at the Provedoria, and that the administrators comply with the charges.
Judgment given by desembargador Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, juiz dos tombos, averiguação e manifestações das Capelas da Coroa, in the name of Filipe III, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.

Acórdão declaring that this chapel is administrated by the defendants' family for the last 120 years, which is the family of the institutor, and therefore doesn't belong to the Crown. This court sentence must be registered in the books of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa and in books of the Torre do Tombo.
Signed by Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, Juiz do Tombo da Capela da Coroa, and undersigned by Pedro Almirante, Escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.

Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against João Lopes de Pina, defendant, about the administration of the chapels established by Vasco Esteves Bousão and Maria Martins Bousão, his wife.
The sentence proves that Vasco Esteves Bousão's chapel belonged to the Crown and that Maria Martins Bousão's was absoluta.
Consequently, it determines that the defendant should leave the administration of the first, as ordered in the previous sentence, but can legitimately administer the second.
It mandates Barnabé Maldonado, escrivão, by order of the provedor or the juiz de fora, to take possession of the chapel of Vasco Esteves Bousão, and that António Barbosa acts as provisional administrator.

Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Gomes Ravasco, defendant, administrator of the chapels instituted by João Fernandes and Catarina Rodrigues Pimenta.
The sentence absolves the defendant, as the legitimate administrator of the chapels. He orders the chapel to be removed from the list of the Capelas da Coroa, the administrator to make a tombo and register it in the Provedoria and in the church. He should also place a tombstone in the chapels saying "João Fernandes e Catarina Rodrigues Pimenta ordenaram esta capela com missa quotidiana e fábrica na forma da instituição de que é administrador de sua geração Gomes Ravasco”.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion filed by the Conde de Sarzedas, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, on the administration of the chapel and entail instituted by Branca Eanes and Martinho do Sem, in the convent of São Domingos of Santarém.
The judgment judges the motions as proven, demonstrating that the appellant was a descendant of the institutors and that the succession in the entail had been regulated by the institutors' dispositions, there being no reason for it to belong to the Crown. It orders the appellee to leave the administration, which he hands over to the appellant.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between António Antunes, plaintiff, tutor of João Rodrigues, against the procurador da Coroa and António de Aguiar da Silva, defendants, on the administration of the chapel of Fernando Daires, in Lisbon.
The sentence declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, since the death of João Vieira, last administrator, left none of the founder's relatives. It orders that the chapel be registered in the “Livros das Capelas da Coroa” and in the Torre do Tombo and hands over the administration to the defendant [António de Aguiar da Silva], only during his lifetime, who should request the respective administration letter.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between José Barreto Valdevinos de Vasconcelos, plaintiff, against the provedor and brothers of the Santa Casa da Misericórdia of Évora, defendants, on the administration of the chapels instituted by Belchior Barreto, Fernando Barreto, Diogo Pires and Gaspar Barreto Cabral.
The sentence judges the four chapels as vacant for the Crown, and the plaintiff cannot prove to be a descendant of any of the institutors. It acquits the defendants and orders the chapels to be registered at the Torre do Tombo and the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion filed by Luís Correia, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Filipa Rodrigues, in Évora.
The sentence judges the motions as proven, recognizing the appellant as a legitimate administrator of the chapel, since he was the son of Manuel Correia, previously judged as a legitimate administrator of the chapel. It orders that the sequestration of the chapel's assets be lifted and that it be recorded, where necessary, that the chapel did not belong to the Crown.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion filed by José Correia de Andrade, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, about the chapel instituted by Pedro Cabaços.
The sentence judges the motions as proven, as the chapel is not of the Crown and the appellant is a descendant of Beatriz Calva, previously judged as the legitimate administrator of the chapel. It orders the sequestration of the chapel's assets to be lifted.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between João de Sampaio Lobo, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against D. Antónia de Amorim and her husband, defendants, about the administration of the chapel of São João, instituted by Constança Esteves, in the church of Santa Maria de Estremoz.
The sentence acquits the defendants, as legitimate administrators of the chapel, which, in this way, was not found vacant for the Crown.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion, filed by Francisco de Macedo de Siqueira, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Moninho Pais and D. Clara, his wife, in the church of Santa Maria da Orada, in Avis.
The sentence judges the motions as proven, ordering the lifting of the sequestration of the chapel's assets, which, previously, had already been judged as not belonging to the Crown. It also orders the necessary records to be made in the books of the Capelas da Coroa.

Acórdão ordering the lifting of the sequestration of the assets of the chapels instituted by Domingos Esteves Bem-lhe-Quero and Maior Domingues, as they do not belong to the Crown. On the contrary, it orders the confiscation of the assets of the chapel instituted by Teresa Martins to be maintained, since it has not been proven that it is not belonging to the Crown.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between Francisco do Vale Soutomaior, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador, against the licenciado Brás de Oliveira Pais, appointed curador for the chapel, about the administration of the chapel of Gregório Lourenço and Maria Borges, his wife, located on the island of Santiago, Cabo Verde.
The sentence declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, ordering it to be registered in the “Livro das Capelas da Coroa” and in the Torre do Tombo, and delivered to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, in the form of the denunciation warrant of administration to him presented.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process of motion between André de Castro de Cal, appellant, and Francisco do Vale Soutomaior, appellee, about the administration of the chapel of Gregório Lourenço and Maria Borges, his wife.
The sentence confirms the previous one, judging the motions as unproven.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between D. António Henriques de Almeida, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Gonçalo Fernandes, defendant, on the administration of the chapel of Guiomar Romacha.
The sentence judges the chapel as a vacancy for the Crown, since the administrator was not a descendant of the institutor. Condemns the defendant to leave the chapel to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, in accordance with the denunciation warrant of administration he had. It orders the chapel to be registered in the “Livro das Capelas vagas” and in the Torre do Tombo.

Acórdão em relação, ordering the end of the sequestration of the assets of the chapel instituted by João Domingues, abbot of Sabadim, since Francisco de Sousa Lobato, supplicant, was its legitimate administrator, having received a warrant of administration, and made the tombo of the chapel's assets.

Acórdão, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Luís de Góis de Mendonça, defendant, on the administration of the Minguelhos' chapel, instituted by Lourenço Martins Minguelhos and Vasco Martins Minguelhos, in the church of Santa Maria da Lagoa de Monsaraz .
The sentence declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, and it must be registered in the book of Capelas da Coroa and the properties of the demand in the respective tombo. A tombstone should be placed that said: “Nesta igreja se dizem sessenta missas pela capela que deixaram Lourenço Martins e Vasco Martins Minguelhos que vagou para a Coroa pelos bens declarados no tombo e esta memória se fez no ano de mil seiscentos e vinte e dois”. It orders the Provedor to take possession of the chapel and that the future administrator make tombo of the assets and fulfill the charges.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between José Barreto Valdevinos de Vasconcelos, plaintiff, against the provedor and brothers of the Santa Casa da Misericórdia of Évora, defendants, on the administration of the chapels instituted by Belchior Barreto, Fernando Barreto, Diogo Pires and Gaspar Barreto Cabral.
The sentence judges the four chapels as vacant for the Crown, and the plaintiff cannot prove to be a descendant of any of the institutors. It acquits the defendants and orders the chapels to be registered at the Torre do Tombo and the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação, judging the motions presented by José Barreto Valdevinos de Vasconcelos as unproven, ordering the fulfillment of the previous sentence.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between [Manuel Vaz da Corda], plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against the administrator of the chapel instituted by Leonor Cacela, unidentified.
The sentence declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, since the defendant could not prove to be a descendant of the institutor. It orders that the chapel be registered in the “Livro das Capelas da Coroa” and in the Torre do Tombo and delivers its administration to the plaintiff, only during his lifetime, and for that, he must request the respective administration letter at the Desembargo do Paço.

Acórdão ordering the survey of the sequestration of the chapel's assets established by Martinho Eanes and Francisco Eanes, since Domingos Luís Rasquinho, defendant, had proved to be the grandson of Gabriel Luís Rasquinho and legitimate administrator of the chapel.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Roque de Macedo Pereira, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against António de Macedo Pereira, defendant, about the chapel instituted by Francisca de Sampaio Borges, in Estremoz.
The sentence judges the chapel as a vacancy for the Crown, condemning the defendant and ordering the delivery of administration to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, in the form of the denunciation warrant of administration he had. It orders the chapel to register at the Torre do Tombo and at the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, and the plaintiff must request the respective administration letter.

Acórdão of the Desembargo do Paço, issued by doutores Francisco Nogueira, juiz dos Feitos da Coroa e Fazenda, and Luís Lopes de Carvalho, judging a civil process between doutor Gaspar Barbosa and D. Leonor Soares, his wife, plaintiffs, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against João Lopes de Pina and Mécia Antónia, his mother and tutor, defendants, on the administration of the chapels established by Vasco Esteves Bousão and Maria Martins Bousão, his wife.
It comes from an exemplification (dated 1623-02-18).
The sentence condemns the defendants to leave the plaintiffs to the administration of the chapel established by Vasco Esteves Bousão, since they had not presented any document that would legalize this administration. On the contrary, it has not been proved that the assets of Maria Martins Bousão's chapel were attached to those of the chapel established by her husband, recognizing the administration of the defendants as legitimate.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion, filed by Gaspar Limpo Homem, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, on the administration of the chapel instituted by João Fernandes and Catarina Rodrigues Pimenta, in Moura.
The sentence judges the motions as proven, recognizing the appellant as a legitimate administrator and ordering the lifting of the sequestration of the chapel's assets. It should also be registered, where necessary, that the chapel did not belong to the Crown.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between José Coelho Varela, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against José Teixeira da Fonseca and his wife, defendants, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Paulo Arrais de Mendonça, in the church of Misericórdia of Almada. The opponents were Estêvão Cordeiro Soares and D. Francisca Machone, his wife.
The defendants did not present any opposition to the libel of accusation, acknowledging that they were illegitimate administrators of the chapel. The sentence gives the opponents' allegations as unproven, as it was not possible to prove that D. Francisca Machone was a family member of the last administrator of the chapel. It judges the chapel as a vacant for the Crown, and must be registered in the Coroa and Torre do Tombo books. It orders that the administration be delivered to the plaintiff, in the form of the warrant he had, and, with the sentence, within two months, he must request the administration letter at the Desembargo do Paço.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between Pedro Semedo Estaço, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Luís de Oliveira Pantoja and Teresa Maria de Sousa, his wife, defendants, about the administration of Catarina Fernandes' chapel, in the convent of Nossa Senhora da Graça of Lisbon.
The judgment declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, ordering the defendants to leave its administration. It also orders that the chapel be registered in the “Livros das Capelas da Coroa” and in the Torre do Tombo and delivers the administration to the plaintiff, who, with the present judgment, should request the respective administration letter at the Desembargo do Paço.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Luís Lopes Lobo, defendant, on the administration of the chapels instituted by Domingos Esteves Bem-lhe-Quero and Maior Domingues, in Estremoz.
The sentence acquits the defendant, as the legitimate administrator of the chapels, for being a descendant of D. Iria, previous administrator. Orders the chapels to be removed from the list of Capelas da Coroa. Orders that the tombo of the chapels be registered in the Torre do Tombo and in the Provedoria.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Bartolomeu de Sousa Mexia, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Maria da Silva, defendant, about the chapel instituted by Isabel Correia.
The sentence judges the chapel as a vacancy for the Crown, as there are no descendants of the institutor. It condemns the defendant and delivers the administration to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, in the form of the denunciation warrant of administration he had. Orders the chapel to be registered at the Torre do Tombo and at the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa. The plaintiff, with the sentence, had to request the respective administration letter at the Desembargo do Paço.

Acórdão em relação, judging the motions presented by José Barreto Valdevinos de Vasconcelos as unproven, ordering the fulfillment of the previous sentence.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Domingos Tomás, defendant, on the administration of the chapel established by Lourenço Dias, in Castanheira, on the outskirts of Pedrogão Grande.
The sentence acquits the defendant, recognizing him as the legitimate administrator of the chapel. Orders the lifting of the sequestration of assets, the fulfillment of the charges and the execution of the tombo. It orders the chapel to be deleted of the list of Capelas da Coroa and to be recorded in the register of Torre do Tombo.

Acórdão of Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the petition presented by D. Margarida Maria Marconi de Brito, supplicant, due to the sequestration ordered by the procurador da Coroa about the assets of the chapel instituted by João Miguéis. The sentence reiterates that the chapel was not of the Crown, the administrator being appointed by the predecessor. It determines that the chapel is registered as absolute and that the sequestration of assets be lifted.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between D. Diogo Salter de Macedo, plaintiff, against Lopo de Vabo e Alistão, defendant, on the administration of the chapels established by Isabel Garcês, in the convent of São Francisco, by Margarida Afonso Gaudelina, in the church of Santa Maria do Bispo, and by Maria Garcês, in the church of Santiago, all in Montemor-o-Novo. The sentence judges the three chapels as vacancies for the Crown, ordering them to register at the Torre do Tombo. He acquits the defendant of Isabel Garcês' chapel, for which he had previously obtained an administration letter. It condemns him, however, in relation to the other two, for not being able to prove that he is a descendant of the founders.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between João de Quintanilha, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against D. Maria de Meneses, defendant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Beatriz Borges.
Opponents were D. Ângela de Sá Pereira and D. Isabel de Vasconcelos. D. Úrsula de Vasconcelos, in addition to being an opponent, was the second plaintiff.
The sentence judges the chapel vacant for the Crown, as the institutor's lineage is extinguished. Orders the administration to be handed over to the plaintiff, during his lifetime. Orders the registration of the chapel in Torre do Tombo and in the books of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa. The plaintiff should, with the sentence, ask for the respective administration letter and register it with the Provedoria.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Manuel do Canto Velho, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Cristóvão Landim da Gama, defendant, about the administration of the chapel instituted by Paula de Ataíde. António de Lemos de Figueiredo was opponent.
The sentence judges the chapel as a vacancy for the Crown, condemning the defendant to leave the administration to the plaintiff. Orders the chapel to be registered at the Torre do Tombo and at the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa. The plaintiff, with the sentence, should apply for the respective administration letter.

Acórdão em relação, judging the motions presented by José Barreto Valdevinos de Vasconcelos as unproven, ordering the fulfillment of the previous sentence.

Acórdão em relação, ordering the defendant and his wife to make a declaration acknowledging that the chapel belonged to the Crown, so that they could receive the grace of its administration in their lives.

Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Gonçalo Salvado, defendant, administrator of the chapel of Santa Ana, established by Estêvão Domingues, in the church of Santa Maria de Almacave, in Lamego.
The sentence orders the tombo, registered at Torre do Tombo and at the Provedoria, and that the administrators comply with the charges.
Judgment given by desembargador Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, juiz dos tombos, averiguação e manifestações das Capelas da Coroa, in the name of Filipe III, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Domingos do Amaral Valente, replaced by Manuel Lampreia de Vargas, plaintiff, against the prior and beneficiados of the church of Santa Maria de Serpa, defendants, about the administration of the chapel instituted by Ana de Oliveira.
The sentence declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, for lack of descendants of the institutor condemning the defendants as illegitimate administrators, since they are ecclesiastical and cannot administer lay assets. Orders the delivery of the administration to the plaintiff, only during his life, in the form of the denunciation warrant of administration that he had. The plaintiff had to apply for the administration letter and make the property's tombo.

Acórdão of Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, judging the petition presented by Diogo Caldeira Mimoso, supplicant, due to the sequestration ordered by the procurador da Coroa about the assets of the chapel of Gonçalo Domingues. The sentence shows the chapel was not of the Crown and that the supplicant was its legitimate administrator, as he was a descendant of the institutor. It determines the removal of the chapel from the Capelas da Coroa and its registration as absolute, and the lift of the sequestration of the assets.

Acórdão judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Isabel de Paz, defendant, administrator of the chapel established by João Boução, in the church of Santa Maria de Celorico da Beira.
The sentence absolves the defendant, proving that the chapel is "absoluta", ordering it to be crossed out from the list of Capelas da Coroa.
Judgment given by desembargador Tomé Pinheiro da Veiga, juiz dos tombos, averiguação e manifestações das Capelas da Coroa, in the name of Filipe III, and signed by Pedro Lamirante, escrivão dos Feitos da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion filed by Francisco da Serra, appellant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Miguel da Serra, in Moura.
The sentence judges the motions as proven, since, by previous rulings of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa, it is proved that the chapel was absolute and, as such, legitimately administered by the descendants of the institutor. Orders the sequestration of the chapel's assets to be lifted.

Acórdão em Relação refusing the motion presented by doutor Crispim Luís.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between António Gomes, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Francisca Dinis and Domingos Gonçalves, her husband, defendants, concerning the denunciation of the administration of the chapel established by Pedro Gonçalves, in the church of Santa Maria de Oeiras.
The sentence condemns the defendants to hand over the administration of the chapel to the plaintiff who had denounced it as vacant to the Crown, due to the extinction of the lineage of administrators.

Acórdão em relação ordering that the chapel's administration belongs to the defendant Gabriel Luís Rasquinho who is descendant of the institutor. He as already succeded to his father and grandfather. The court sentence of 1535-09-06 is valid as a foundation deed. He must make the tombo and put an inscription in the church.

Acórdão em relação judging João Martins da Costa, plaintiff, who as denounced the chapel's vacancy, as as the rightful successor of the chapel founded by Melícia Rodrigues, and condemning the defendant Maria Prestes, who doens't belongs to the family of the institutor, to relinquish the assets of the chapel to the author. The crown must take possession of the chapel, and the plaintiff must do the tombo and request the administration letter. If any descendant of António Álvares Paredes claim the chapel, it must be given to him.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion between António de Aguiar de Gouveia and D. Isabel de Sande, appellants, against Valentim de Carvalho Henriques, appellee, about the administration of the entail of Agostinho Afonso and Marta Filipe, his wife.
The sentence confirms the previous one, judging the motions as unproven.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, and Gaspar de Gouveia, appellant, due to the administration of the chapel established by Urraca da Serra and António de Gouveia, her husband.
The sentence determines that, although a relative of the institutors, the appellant was not entitled to the administration of the chapel, since none of the instituters had determined that the chapel should be administered by a relative, before it was up to the provedor to lease the entailed assets.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between André de Carvalho Moutinho, tutor of D. Clemência de Mendonça, his sister-in-law, plaintiff, against Manuel Teles de Meneses e Faro, defendant, about the administration of the chapel of Rui Gonçalves Franco, located in the monastery of Santa Clara of Lisbon.
The sentence acquits the defendant, ordering that the chapel should remain incorporated in the Crown, where it was for about 80 years, since the plaintiff had not been able to prove that it was from the institutor's blood. The defendant had 15 days to present the document that legitimized his administration, under penalty of possession being given to the Crown.

Acordão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Gregório de Morais and his wife, defendants, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Catarina Eanes in the monastery of São Vicente de Fora.
The sentence condemns the defendants to leave the administration, as they are not descendants of the institutor. It declares the chapel vacant for the Crown, which should appoint an administrator.

Acórdão em Relação considering the motion as not proven, and therefore orders to comply with previous acórdão and condemns the appellee.

Acórdão em Relação judging the administration of the chapel instituted by Sancha Eanes as legitimately belonging to D. Beatriz de Olmedo, defendant, the complaint filed by Inácio Carvalho de Azevedo, author, cannot being executed. He orders that this sentence be placed on the list of absolutes.

Acórdão em Relação declaring that the chapel and the entail founded by doutor Duarte Mendes becomes vacant in favour of the crown and that its administration belongs for lifetime to João Freire de Andrade who has judicially denounced its vacancy.

Acórdão em relação declaring that the denunciation warrant of administration of 1621-07-26 was issued on behalf of Manuel Fernandes Conde having false informations. Therefore, the crown must take possession of the chapel. Manuel Fernandes Conde has six month to appeal to the king for a new warrant according to the two acordão em relação, the first warrant thart he has received and also the informations about the incomes of the chapel.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process between priest Manuel Luís, vigário of the church of Nossa Senhora da Devesa of Castelo de Vide, appellant, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Tomé da Silveira do Crato, defendant, due to the administration of the chapel instituted by Lourenço Pires and Domingas Eanes, his wife, in the chapel in the church of Nossa Senhora da Devesa of Castelo de Vide.
The sentence absolves the defendant, considered legitimately appointed as administrator of the chapel, because it was declared vacant for the Crown.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion between António de Sequeira Pestana, appellant, against Bento Solteiro Alvarinho, appellee, on the administration of the chapel established by Pedro Gomes and Rui Pais, in Moura.
The sentence recognizes the appellee's right to pursue the demand for the administration of the chapel that he had denounced.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion, filed by Jorge Vidal de Mendonça, appellant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by priest Diogo Vidal in Setúbal. The sentence judges the motions as proven, recognizing the appellant as the legitimate administrator of the chapel and ordering that the sequestration of assets be lifted, as it does not belong to the Crown.

Acórdão em Relação ordering the fulfillment of a previous sentence from Desembargadores dos Agravos and condemning the suitor (suplicante), not named, to pay the proceedings expenses.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Francisco de Galvão, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against António de Azevedo and his wife, defendants, on the administration of the entail instituted by João de Landrobe, in the church of São Julião of Setúbal.
The sentence judges the entail as vacant for the Crown, condemning the defendant for not being able to prove that he is a descendant of the institutor. It orders that administration be given to the plaintiff, during his lifetime, in the form of the denunciation warrant of administration he had. Orders the registration of the sentence in Torre do Tombo, in the books of the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa and in the books of the Provedoria of Setúbal.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process of motion filed by Diogo Velho, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, about the chapel instituted by Diogo Rodrigues Trombeta and Margarida Fernandes, his wife.
The sentence judges the motios as proven, as the chapel does not belong to the Crown and the appellant is a descendant of the institutors. It orders the sequestration of the chapel's assets to be lifted.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Manuel Soares, defendant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Rui Soares.
The sentence acquits the defendant, recognizing him as the legitimate administrator of the chapel. It orders that this chapel should be removed from the list of Capelas da Coroa as mentioned in Torre do Tombo's Book. It also orders that the sentence be registered with the church and the Provedoria.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between André Lopes de Oliveira, plaintiff, assisted by the procurador da Coroa, against Jorge de Sousa Mascarenhas, defendant, on the administration of the chapel instituted by Paulo Nunes.
Due to the defendant's death, the civil process continued against Jerónimo da Silva de Azevedo and his wife.
The sentence judges the chapel vacant for the Crown, condemning the defendant to leave the administration to the plaintiff, in the form of the denunciation warrant of administration he had. It also orders that the chapel be registered in the Torre do Tombo and in the Juízo das Capelas da Coroa.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Francisco Ribeiro, defendant.
The judgment reveals that Francisco Ribeiro, in the libel he presented and which resulted in the royal sentence issued in 1576-01-30, purposely misrepresented the information presented. Thus, taking into account previous administration letters, issued by D. Manuel I, the chapel is declared as belonging to the Crown. The process was ordered to continue so that the chapel could be provided with an administrator. The defendant had to prove how he was a descendant of the institutor.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between the procurador da Coroa, plaintiff, against Francisco Ribeiro, defendant.
The sentence, reaffirming the assumptions of the previous one, condemns the defendant to leave the administration of the chapel to the Crown. It orders the chapel to be registered in the Books of Capelas da Coroa, make a tombo and place a tombstone in the church that says: “Vasco Lourenço Torneiro clérigo instituiu capela nesta igreja e o capelão perpétuo de que se fez tombo. Vagou para a Coroa. Feita esta lembrança em março de 1627”.

Acórdão em relação judging a civil process of motion between D. Clemência de Mendonça, appellant, against the procurador da Coroa, appellee, about the administration of the chapel of Rui Gonçalves Franco.
The sentence proves that the appellant was a legitimate descendant of the institutor, ordering the Crown to leave the administration of the chapel and hand it over to the appellant.

Acórdão em relação, judging a civil process between Valentim de Carvalho Henriques, replaced by João de Sousa Pereira, tutor of Caetano, his son, plaintiff, against D. Isabel de Sande, defendant, about the administration of the chapel instituted by Margarida Gonçalves Figueira, in Alverca. The sentence judges the chapel as vacant for the Crown, condemning the defendant and ordering the delivery of the administration to the plaintiff. The plaintiff, with the sentence, should request the respective administration letter, in the Desembargo do Paço, and make the tombo of the chapel's assets.